I have WAY more proof than you do
I have yet to see it.
Moderrn Hebrew is not actually Ancient Hebrew. I've covered this ad nauseam. Even modern Hebrew has multiple dialects; and it continues to evolve.
Compare English/Ebonics VS Hebrew/Modern Hebrew.
For your reference:
The Ancient ote Alef, evolved into the Latin A.
In English when we see the letter A in English; we know that it represents the sound of A.
Go figure! Coincidence?
According to the rules of Modern Hebrew, Aleph is silent.
This is ridiculous. The sound that it makes begins its' name. It's the same sound that it makes when it begins the word abba.
Unlike English, where these letters simply indicate a phonetic sound; in Ancient Hebrew, each of the otiot has its' own stand alone meaning, These otiot are building blocks for more complex expressions.
You think you know better than those who used it for 1000s of years
Another ridiculous statement. I gone over this too, ad nauseam. Modern Hebrew has not been spoken for thousands of years; and the Masoretes didn't speak Ancient Hebrew.
Nikkud are there for a reason,
They're there to preserve the Masoretic perversion of Ancient Hebrew.
What does King James have anything to do with it?!?
In case you didn't realize it, Strong simply compiled the various inept translations of the King James crew, and assigned numbers to them.
YOU provided those reference #s as proof,
You are incorrect again. I've told you their purpose. I know why I provided them. Strawman arguments don't prove your case.
Yeshua rebukked them and their understanding, not the language.
Yahushua rebuked them for corrupting Yah's word; and OH how they did it in so many ways.