Hello,
Isn't the topic on Financial Riches quite a controversial subject in Christianity today?
I believe that the the controversy on Financial Riches/Material Wealth is part of a larger scheme in the grand deception of the devil. To realise what the perfect will for God is for us, I think it behoves us to go back to the beginning of everything, since our God is the same yesterday, today and forever. There, we see the Original desire of God for man.
Genesis 1:28-30 And God blessed them. And God said to them, “Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth and subdue it, and have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over every living thing that moves on the earth.” 29 And God said, “Behold, I have given you every plant yielding seed that is on the face of all the earth, and every tree with seed in its fruit. You shall have them for food. 30 And to every beast of the earth and to every bird of the heavens and to everything that creeps on the earth, everything that has the breath of life, I have given every green plant for food.” And it was so.
It is clear from the passage above that Poverty, Lack and Powerlessness were never in the original plan of God for mankind. Through Adam's sin, humanity forfeited God's blessing and the curse of sin gave birth to the poverty and powerlessness on humanity's side and empowered the devil with wealth, riches and power that should have been ours. Now, the bible tells us.
1 John 3:8 This is why the Son of God was revealed, to destroy the works of the devil.
So if the fall of man is part of the work of the devil then it stands to reason that Christ came to restore to mankind the blessing God originally gave to mankind which the devil appropriated to himself which included dominion and abundance. And that is why Christ says.
John 10:10 The thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy. I have come that they may have life, and have it in all its fullness.
The fullness of life is, without a doubt, a life which God originally intended for mankind which is outlined in Genesis 1:28. More so, If Abraham was super rich and he is the father of our faith and a friend of God forever then isn't it sorely unfair if God wants us, his Sons and Daughters, to be poor? Of course God can't ever be unfair or a respecter of persons! It is therefore, highly unscriptural to imagine that God wants his children to live in poverty, powerlessness and lack. So, since the Bible never contradicts itself, what do the verses you have quoted as warning people to be rich truly mean?
Let's begin with Mathew 19 , Mark 10 and Luke 18.
Mathew 19:23 "Truly I tell you, it is hard for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of heaven.
Now, no statement could be as clear as that. Jesus unequivocally stated that it was hard for someone rich to enter the kingdom of heaven. Yet why did he say this? When we unravel the reason why, then can we understand the heart of his message. There are two popular view for this. 1. He said it because riches/material wealth are an impediment to salvation. Conclusion, it is better to be poor. 2. He said it because people trusted their wealth for salvation since at that time popular view was that wealth = God's approval. Conclusion, salvation by human resources is impossible.
Option 1 is already debunked in my preface. Poverty has never been part of God's plan for mankind. And there is no place in the bible that praises poverty or equate it to piousness. Instead, God says of those who give to him.
Luke 6:38 Give, and it will be given to you. A good measure, pressed down, shaken together and running over, will be poured into your lap. For with the measure you use, it will be measured to you.
Malachi 3:10 Bring the whole tithe into the storehouse, that there may be food in my house. Test me in this," says the LORD Almighty, "and see if I will not throw open the floodgates of heaven and pour out so much blessing that there will not be room enough to store it.
Does any of the verses above say, 'give and be poor, then you will be much closer to me'? No, both verses say give and it shall be given back to you in abundance (wealth/riches). And since when the bible says give it refers to your tithe which is material then it stands to reason that what you get back is also material. And the next verse confirms it. Anyway, now we will try to see if option 2 holds water. Did People at that time used to think that Wealth brought people closer to salvation? I believe that both Jesus and his disciples' responses allude to this fact.
Luke 18:26 Those who heard this asked, "Who then can be saved?"
'Who then can be saved?' is the response recorded in all the three gospels featuring this scene in Jesus' ministry. Extrapolating the thought behind the statement, we can make out their whole question, 'if it's hard for a rich man, who then can be saved?'. From there we can see that it was the disciple's opinion, as well as the popular opinion, that the rich had the highest chances of being saved; such that if they couldn't be saved, then what chances did the poor have? No doubt the religious leaders of that day had something to do with this erroneous opinion that encouraged the rich, including the rich young man, to trust more in the security of their wealth than in God. It is this opinion that Jesus sought to correct. And rightfully so, Jesus comments.
Mark 10:27 Looking at them, Jesus said, "With people it is impossible, but not with God; for all things are possible with God."
'With people' clearly means by human resources which includes for the most part, material wealth. So, it is without a doubt that option 2 was the reason behind Jesus' comment in Mathew 19:23.
He said it because people trusted their wealth for salvation since at that time popular view was that wealth = God's approval. Conclusion, salvation by human resources is impossible.
Now, this conclusion brings us to the question, why did Jesus Christ as the rich man to give away all his wealth if God wants his children to be prosperous and without lack? The dialogue he had with him reveals our answer.
Mark 10:18-21 “Why do you call me good?” Jesus answered. “No one is good—except God alone. 19 You know the commandments: ‘You shall not murder, you shall not commit adultery, you shall not steal, you shall not give false testimony, you shall not defraud, honor your father and mother.’a]
20 “Teacher,” he declared, “all these I have kept since I was a boy.”
21 Jesus looked at him and loved him. “One thing you lack,” he said. “Go, sell everything you have and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me.”
What an interesting choice of commandments we see in the Lord's list. Now, there's one thing that's clear, there was not a single word of Jesus Christ that was random. So what's the connecting factor in the list of commandments Jesus mentioned? And why did Jesus tell the young rich man that there was ONE thing that he lacked? There was no way that just one more commandment could make the list into the complete set of 10 commandments, there was at least four more commandments missing. Unless there was a different deeper grouping that the Lord was looking at.
Matthew 22:37-40 Jesus replied: “‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.’a]" 38 This is the first and greatest commandment. 39 And the second is like it: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’" 40 All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments.”
The verse above, I believe, is the key. There, Jesus sums up the whole ten commandments into two commandments- 1. Love God and 2. Love your neighbour as you love yourself. Now if these two commandments encompass the whole Law then we should be able to group/ categorise the ten commandments into two bundles based on the two commandments Jesus highlighted. If one does that apart from any external interference, it should be very obvious to what category the commandments in Jesus' list in Mark 10:19 fall. Yeah, you are right 'love your neighbour as you love yourself'. What's more glaring is the fact that ALL the first four of the ten commandments that make up the first and most important category of 'Love God' were missing in Jesus' list! In consequence, it becomes clearer than daylight that the 'one thing' that the young rich man was missing and that was the other category of the 10 commandments, the commandments on loving God. This young man could not love the Lord with all his heart, with all his soul and with all his mind, he only loved his wealth that much. He had another god beside the Lord and that was his riches. And that is why Jesus, filled with love for him, sought to correct him by asking him to lay his wealth aside and let God take up first place in his life and then he would be in perfect obedience with the law.
This here, beloved, is the real issue. What takes up first place in our lives? It's not that money or wealth is evil, its that for many of us, both rich and poor, money is our god. We cannot trust God and hold him to his word. In fact, unlike many wrongly believe, had the young rich man obeyed Jesus, his great wealth would not have dwindled away by giving it all to the poor, the wealth would have actually become one hundred times multiplied by the blessing of the Lord ! How do I know this, well, Jesus says it so in the next verses.
Mark 10:29-30 So Jesus answered and said, “Assuredly, I say to you, there is no one who has left house or brothers or sisters or father or mother a]">[a]or wife or children or b]">[b]lands, for My sake and the gospel’s, 30 who shall not receive a hundredfold now in this time—houses and brothers and sisters and mothers and children and lands, with persecutions—and in the age to come, eternal life.