Women Denied Equal Opportunity - Feminists Silent.

[ViaCrucis]

But I do not subscribe to a group called redpillers, and I am a non feminist.
All feminist, buzzfeed or not, belong to the group feminism, whether you like it or not.

Not all non feminist, however, belong to the group redpillers.

Not all feminists are represented by what you see on buzzfeed. That's the point here.

-CryptoLutheran

 

[Wolfe]

That's just it. you are basing what you call a Feminist on a caricature of the actual movement. Something like a Social Justice Warrior but a Female Justice Warrior or something like that.

And you're calling them non feminist, they're not true feminism! Because I say so!

Not true scotsman fallacy, as I said.

 

[Wolfe]

Not all feminists are represented by what you see on buzzfeed. That's the point here.

-CryptoLutheran

Buzzfeed is just one example
That's the point here.

 

[Wolfe]

And that wouldn't slow the combat team down sheshk

If you're going to insult me, at least do it in a way I can understand.

And if that was a compliment, same applies.

 

[ViaCrucis]

And you're calling them non feminist, they're not true feminism! Because I say so!

Not true scotsman fallacy, as I said.

Not a true scotsman fallacy; rturner didn't say the most extreme examples aren't themselves feminists, just that they are extreme and, the result, is basically a caricature which is being used to paint all feminists. The fallacy here isn't the no true scotsman, but rather the error here is in your use of the inductive fallacy aka guilt by association.

-CryptoLutheran

 

[ViaCrucis]

Buzzfeed is just one example
That's the point here.

And redpillers are just one example.

Using an extreme and ridiculous case to paint an entire group is a problem.

-CryptoLutheran

 

[Wolfe]

Buzzfeed is just one example
That's the point here.

Also, it would be a good thing to say that buzzfeed are feminist, and feminist are feminist.
A group by group basis.

I however, belong to no group, so your argument doesn't quite apply.
You can critique anyone you like, based on whatever evidence you like.

But if you wanna critique me, please critique me.
There aren't thousands of other mes around to critique about, such as the case with feminism.

As I told paidsike, if you advocate true equality, and not fake equality, that's a-okay, call yourself whatever the hell, I don't care.
But do not discount that people like buzzfeed, exist, quite a lot of them.

 

[Wolfe]

Not a true scotsman fallacy; rturner didn't say the most extreme examples aren't themselves feminists, just that they are extreme and, the result, is basically a caricature which is being used to paint all feminists. The fallacy here isn't the no true scotsman, but rather the error here is in your use of the inductive fallacy aka guilt by association.

-CryptoLutheran

it'snot true Feminism.

Just how will you wiggle out of this one?

 

[jimmyjimmy]

Source, please.

Google is a fantastic tool. Try it. There are multiple sources for this.

 

[Hank77]

I'm all for women joining the army, logging, police force, any other stereo-typically man thing.

Just do not lower any of the physical qualifications for the sake of women.

And I'm all for men doing stereo-typically woman things, as long as they don't lower the intelligence standards.

 

[jimmyjimmy]

Reality is always the best policy:

 

[Wolfe]

And I'm all for men doing stereo-typically woman things, as long as the don't lower the intelligence standards.

Yeah, takes a harvard degree to fold laundry, and boil spaghetti.

 

[Citizen of the Kingdom]

Yeah, takes a harvard degree to fold laundry, and boil spaghetti.

You'd learn a new understanding of humor by the looks of it

 

[jimmyjimmy]

 

[Hank77]

Yeah, takes a harvard degree to fold laundry, and boil spaghetti.

Well to boil spaghetti one needs to be able to tell time or count out 10 mins. That's more intelligence than it takes to dig a ditch, buck bales, and several other guy things.

 

[rturner76]

You are somehow the authority of modern feminism because you don't?

Seriously, how did you not see this hypocrisy?

I claim to actually know what Feminism is. Your claim is false. Buzzfeed does not set the Feminist agenda. That has been going since the 1800s and it's always been about equality and liberation

 

[Wolfe]

Well to boil spaghetti one needs to be able to tell time or count out 10 mins. That's more intelligence than it takes to dig a ditch, buck bales, and several other guy things.

Ummmmm.

No it isn't.

 

[Wolfe]

I claim to actually know what Feminism is. Your claim is false. Buzzfeed does not set the Feminist agenda. That has been going since the 1800s and it's always been about equality and liberation

Lol, I'm right you're wrong.

What are you, five?

 

[Hank77]

Ummmmm.

No it isn't.

My daddy is bigger than your daddy and meaner, too.

 

[Wolfe]

My daddy is bigger than your daddy and meaner, too.

My daddy is a good for nothing low life, who did nothing for his children, in fact, did everything against them.
His biggest contribution to my life was being the carrier of my sperm, that eventually spawned me.
And then he proceeded to screw that up, and leave me in an endless contradictory limbo of wanting to die, and wanting to be happy.
He's also only 5'2, so your statement is statistically probable.

You triggered me, reported.