• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Woke is Marxism Evolved to Take on the West

ralliann

christian
Jun 27, 2007
8,439
2,652
✟280,980.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Widowed
I agree with what the Bible says. :)
It is what the bible says. Along with this

Le 20:10 And the man that committeth adultery with another man’s wife, even he that committeth adultery with his neighbour’s wife, the adulterer and the adulteress shall surely be put to death.

Good thing for all of us we have a new covenant, whereby these are forgiven in repentance.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Aldebaran
Upvote 0

Bradskii

Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Aug 19, 2018
23,984
16,466
72
Bondi
✟389,177.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
It is what the bible says. Along with this

Le 20:10 And the man that committeth adultery with another man’s wife, even he that committeth adultery with his neighbour’s wife, the adulterer and the adulteress shall surely be put to death.

Good thing for all of us we have a new covenant, whereby these are forgiven in repentance.
One cannot repent if one doesn't believe one has done wrong. So if a gay person says that she will not repent because there is nothing to repent, then it looks like you're saying the punishment stands.

Maybe what you should be saying is 'Repent. Or you deserve to die'. Does that sound more loving to you? More caring?
 
Upvote 0

Aldebaran

NCC-1701-A
Christian Forums Staff
Purple Team - Moderator
Site Supporter
Oct 17, 2009
43,462
13,753
Wisconsin, United States of America
✟899,379.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Don't play games. It was quoted in a discussion about gays and it was specifically directed at gays. You've already agreed as to what you meant by it and you have said that you agree with it. Now suggesting that it was done for some other reason is farcical.
Hard to tell if you can't even point it out.
 
Upvote 0

Aldebaran

NCC-1701-A
Christian Forums Staff
Purple Team - Moderator
Site Supporter
Oct 17, 2009
43,462
13,753
Wisconsin, United States of America
✟899,379.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
One cannot repent if one doesn't believe one has done wrong. So if a gay person says that she will not repent because there is nothing to repent, then it looks like you're saying the punishment stands.

Maybe what you should be saying is 'Repent. Or you deserve to die'. Does that sound more loving to you? More caring?
What sounds loving is when the One who does the judging (God) actually pays the price for the wrong that the person deserved to die for, with the only condition being that the offender admits his wrong and repents of it. However, if the person who did the wrong doesn't believe he did anything wrong, and therefore continues doing the wrong, and is in fact proud of what he is doing, then what choice does the One doing the judging (God) have other than to give him the price of his wrong?
 
Upvote 0

ralliann

christian
Jun 27, 2007
8,439
2,652
✟280,980.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Widowed
One cannot repent if one doesn't believe one has done wrong. So if a gay person says that she will not repent because there is nothing to repent, then it looks like you're saying the punishment stands.

Maybe what you should be saying is 'Repent. Or you deserve to die'. Does that sound more loving to you? More caring?
Nope you cannot repent if you do not believe it. And yes, God will carry out the penalty and judgement in the resurrection from the dead. Those of us who are of faith will have eternal life and never die, not so for the rest. We say repent, so you also may have eternal life, in the resurrection, and dwell in the eternal kingdom. So you see, we teach no such carrying out of death in this world and this life. So, what you are doing is calling us killers, or God, for not giving them eternal life in the next world in the resurrection from the dead. Silly really, because you believe none of it anyway. How rediculous to hate God for not including them in the promise of heaven. You don't even believe in heaven.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aldebaran
Upvote 0

Bradskii

Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Aug 19, 2018
23,984
16,466
72
Bondi
✟389,177.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
However, if the person who did the wrong doesn't believe he did anything wrong, and therefore continues doing the wrong, and is in fact proud of what he is doing, then what choice does the One doing the judging (God) have other than to give him the price of his wrong?
Which you agree, in the specific case of gay people, is death. Why are you asking me? This has already been decided.
 
Upvote 0

Bradskii

Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Aug 19, 2018
23,984
16,466
72
Bondi
✟389,177.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Hard to tell if you can't even point it out.
You do know that people are following this discussion? And do know what you have posted? Which were very specific answers to specific questions.
 
Upvote 0

Bradskii

Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Aug 19, 2018
23,984
16,466
72
Bondi
✟389,177.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Silly really, because you believe none of it anyway. How rediculous to hate God for not including them in the promise of heaven. You don't even believe in heaven.
Yes, it would be nonsensical in extremis for me to hate God. How right you are are. I cannot argue against what He says because I don't think He has said anything. I hope that's clear to you. But I can argue against what people say they believe He wants.

I would like to think that that's equally as clear to you. But it seems not.
 
Upvote 0

Aldebaran

NCC-1701-A
Christian Forums Staff
Purple Team - Moderator
Site Supporter
Oct 17, 2009
43,462
13,753
Wisconsin, United States of America
✟899,379.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Which you agree, in the specific case of gay people, is death. Why are you asking me? This has already been decided.
Since you keep writing about it, and won't let it go (see post #272), I thought you'd want to offer your input.
 
Upvote 0

ralliann

christian
Jun 27, 2007
8,439
2,652
✟280,980.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Widowed
Yes, it would be nonsensical in extremis for me to hate God. How right you are are. I cannot argue against what He says because I don't think He has said anything. I hope that's clear to you. But I can argue against what people say they believe He wants.

I would like to think that that's equally as clear to you. But it seems not.
No, you cannot because you are judging what you do not understand. What he want's and I want, and every Christian wants is for people, all people to have something more than this life. In order for you judge us JUSTLY, you have to have Fuller knowledge than just the piecemeal your judgements are based upon. This life is one thing, nobody wants to take that from them. In fact to quote scripture, "EAT, DRINK, AND BE MERRY!"
Since this life, and this world is all you have to enjoy, so make the best of it.
There was only one nation on this earth, given the authority to carry out God's judgement UPON IT'S OWN CITIZENS. That was Israel. Yep, they also Judged "CERTAIN OTHER NATIONS".

*****It was not for their righteousness that they Judged the nations.....
It was the wickedness of those nations.

De 9:4 Speak not thou in thine heart, after that the LORD thy God hath cast them out from before thee, saying, For my righteousness the LORD hath brought me in to possess this land: but for the wickedness of these nations the LORD doth drive them out from before thee.

De 9:5 Not for thy righteousness, or for the uprightness of thine heart, dost thou go to possess their land: but for the wickedness of these nations the LORD thy God doth drive them out from before thee, and that he may perform the word which the LORD sware unto thy fathers, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.

2. things there

God did not destroy nations for not killing SINNERS, or simply for being sinners.
It was for their wickedness.
Do you know what their wickedness was?

Le 18:21 And thou shalt not let any of thy seed pass through the fire to Molech, neither shalt thou profane the name of thy God: I am the LORD.

What was this about?
They had hollow images of their God, which the hollow was filled with wood and lit on fire, until it glowed red hot. It's arms stuck out before it, glowing red hot. They placed their children in its arms, until it burnt to death. Their priests would beat their drums as loud as possible to drown out their children's cries as they died, through basically frying in the arms of "moloch".
Yes, God killed these nations and Israel took their land.

Got a problem with that?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Robban

-----------
Site Supporter
Dec 27, 2009
11,667
3,190
✟833,031.00
Country
Sweden
Gender
Male
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Divorced

No, you cannot because you are judging what you do not understand. What he want's and I want, and every Christian wants is for people, all people to have something more than this life. In order for you judge us JUSTLY, you have to have Fuller knowledge than just the piecemeal your judgements are based upon. This life is one thing, nobody wants to take that from them. In fact to quote scripture, "EAT, DRINK, AND BE MERRY!"
Since this life, and this world is all you have to enjoy, so make the best of it.
There was only one nation on this earth, given the authority to carry out God's judgement UPON IT'S OWN CITIZENS. That was Israel. Yep, they also Judged "CERTAIN OTHER NATIONS".

*****It was not for their righteousness that they Judged the nations.....
It was the wickedness of those nations.

De 9:4 Speak not thou in thine heart, after that the LORD thy God hath cast them out from before thee, saying, For my righteousness the LORD hath brought me in to possess this land: but for the wickedness of these nations the LORD doth drive them out from before thee.

De 9:5 Not for thy righteousness, or for the uprightness of thine heart, dost thou go to possess their land: but for the wickedness of these nations the LORD thy God doth drive them out from before thee, and that he may perform the word which the LORD sware unto thy fathers, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.

2. things there

God did not destroy nations for not killing SINNERS, or simply for being sinners.
It was for their wickedness.
Do you know what their wickedness was?

Le 18:21 And thou shalt not let any of thy seed pass through the fire to Molech, neither shalt thou profane the name of thy God: I am the LORD.

What was this about?
They had hollow images of their God, which the hollow was filled with wood and lit on fire, until it glowed red hot. It's arms stuck out before it, glowing red hot. They placed their children in its arms, until it burnt to death. Their priests would beat their drums as loud as possible to drown out their children's cries as they died, through basically frying in the arms of "moloch".
Yes, God killed these nations and Israel took their land.

Got a problem with that?
From what twisted source did you find that?

Molech: A form of idolatry, named Molech,

And this was the manner of it's worship, that one would hand over one's child to the pagan priests,
who would make two huge fires,

the child was then passed through on foot between these two fires.
(Sanh 64b) see Rashi.
 
Upvote 0

Robban

-----------
Site Supporter
Dec 27, 2009
11,667
3,190
✟833,031.00
Country
Sweden
Gender
Male
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Divorced
FWIW:

Most of the Jewish interpreters, Jarchi (on Le 17:16), Kimchi, and Maimonides (Mor. Neb. 3:38) among the number, say that in the worship of Molech the children were not burned, but made to pass between two burning pyres, as a purificatory rite. But the allusions to the actual slaughter are too plain to be mistaken, and Aben Ezra, in his note on Le 18:21, says that "to cause to pass through" is the same as "to burn." "They sacrificed their sons and their daughters unto devils, and shed innocent blood, the blood of their sons and of their daughters, whom they sacrificed unto the idols of Canaan" (Ps 106:37-38). In Jer 7:31, the reference to the worship of Molech by human sacrifice is still more distinct: "They have built the high places of Tophet... to burn their sons and their daughters in the fire," as "burnt-offerings unto Baal," the sun-god of Tyre, with whom, or in whose character, Molech was worshipped (Jer 19:5). Compare the statements in De 12:31; Eze 16:20-21; Eze 23:37; the last two of which may also be adduced to show that the victims were slaughtered before they were burned. But the most remarkable passage is that in 2Ch 28:3, in which the wickedness of Ahaz is described: "Moreover, he burned incense in the valley of the son of Hinnom, and burned (וִיִּבעֵר) his children in the fire, after the abominations of the nations whom Jehovah had driven out before the children of Israel." Now, in the parallel narrative of 2Ki 16:3, instead of וִיִּבעֵר, "and he burned," the reading is הֶעֵַביר, "he made to pass through," and Dr. Geiger suggests that the former may be the true reading, of which the latter is an easy modification, serving as a euphemistic expression to disguise the horrible nature of the sacrificial rites. But it is more natural to suppose that it is an exceptional instance, and that the true reading is וִיִּעֲבֵר than to assume that the other passages have been intentionally altered. We may infer from the expression, "after the abominations of the nations whom Jehovah had driven out before the children of Israel," that the character of the Molech-worship of the time of Ahaz was essentially the same. as that of the old Canaanites, although Movers maintains the contrary.​
Handing over one's child to pagan priests was the big no-no.

Rashi does not comment on every verse, only where there can be missunderstanding.
 
Upvote 0

ralliann

christian
Jun 27, 2007
8,439
2,652
✟280,980.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Widowed
FWIW:

Most of the Jewish interpreters, Jarchi (on Le 17:16), Kimchi, and Maimonides (Mor. Neb. 3:38) among the number, say that in the worship of Molech the children were not burned, but made to pass between two burning pyres, as a purificatory rite. But the allusions to the actual slaughter are too plain to be mistaken, and Aben Ezra, in his note on Le 18:21, says that "to cause to pass through" is the same as "to burn." "They sacrificed their sons and their daughters unto devils, and shed innocent blood, the blood of their sons and of their daughters, whom they sacrificed unto the idols of Canaan" (Ps 106:37-38). In Jer 7:31, the reference to the worship of Molech by human sacrifice is still more distinct: "They have built the high places of Tophet... to burn their sons and their daughters in the fire," as "burnt-offerings unto Baal," the sun-god of Tyre, with whom, or in whose character, Molech was worshipped (Jer 19:5). Compare the statements in De 12:31; Eze 16:20-21; Eze 23:37; the last two of which may also be adduced to show that the victims were slaughtered before they were burned. But the most remarkable passage is that in 2Ch 28:3, in which the wickedness of Ahaz is described: "Moreover, he burned incense in the valley of the son of Hinnom, and burned (וִיִּבעֵר) his children in the fire, after the abominations of the nations whom Jehovah had driven out before the children of Israel." Now, in the parallel narrative of 2Ki 16:3, instead of וִיִּבעֵר, "and he burned," the reading is הֶעֵַביר, "he made to pass through," and Dr. Geiger suggests that the former may be the true reading, of which the latter is an easy modification, serving as a euphemistic expression to disguise the horrible nature of the sacrificial rites. But it is more natural to suppose that it is an exceptional instance, and that the true reading is וִיִּעֲבֵר than to assume that the other passages have been intentionally altered. We may infer from the expression, "after the abominations of the nations whom Jehovah had driven out before the children of Israel," that the character of the Molech-worship of the time of Ahaz was essentially the same. as that of the old Canaanites, although Movers maintains the contrary.​
Any alterations? The Hebrews engaged in Whatever it was as well,,so???????
Either way, it was pretty brutal no matter how you slice it. It was wickedness. But I got that from my bible software.
 
Upvote 0

Bradskii

Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Aug 19, 2018
23,984
16,466
72
Bondi
✟389,177.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Since you keep writing about it, and won't let it go (see post #272), I thought you'd want to offer your input.
I'll take your 272 and raise you my 282. If you follow the conversation then you would have seen that I've already given it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hans Blaster
Upvote 0

ralliann

christian
Jun 27, 2007
8,439
2,652
✟280,980.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Widowed
I wouldn't know. I've told you, I don't read arguments based on scripture.
Ah, so you can accuse others of things that are untrue. how one feels, rather than what is real.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Bradskii

Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Aug 19, 2018
23,984
16,466
72
Bondi
✟389,177.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
In the OT, homosexuals were to be put to death, I assume, because God did not want this abomination to exist among His chosen people.

In NT theology, all unrepentant sinners are "deserving of death" as Paul indicates. As I pointed out to you, the passage in Romans is far broader than just homosexuality, as are other passages where Paul refers to sexual immorality along with other sins.
But, yet again, it was specifically used in a conversation about gay people, specifically directed at gay people. That is not up for discussion. It is plainly there to be seen. And the person quoting it was asked if he really believed that the quote was applicable - that gay people deserved death. The answer was an unequivocal yes.

And now we have had a few excuses put forward to justify this abominable suggestion.

Firstly, that part of the verse that mentioned a lot of other sins was left out. As if not obeying your parents was a sin that deserved death as well? Really? If you stay out late on a Saturday night you deserve to die? You think that's justified as well? But no mention was made of any other sins because this was specifically directed at gay people.

And then we've had another excuse. That hey, repentant sinners do not deserve death. Which requires one to accept that being gay is a sin and that gay people need to repent that sin. I think we can envisage a conversation where that argument is applied:

'Hey, you are gay, aren't you?'
'Ah, actually yes. I am'.
'So do you share a bed with your partner?'
'Not that it has anything to do with you, but yes'.
'Then you need to repent'.
'No, I actually don't. We are doing nothing wrong'.
'Then you deserve to die'.

What's next? 'Hey, don't give me a hard time. People who disobey their parents deserve to die as well. I'm not just picking on you'.

Guess we're lucky the conversation didn't take place between two Israelites back in the day. The situation might have escalated.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: gaara4158
Upvote 0

Bradskii

Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Aug 19, 2018
23,984
16,466
72
Bondi
✟389,177.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Ah, so you can accuse others of things that are untrue. how one feels, rather than what is real.
No. I can't accuse people of things that are untrue. How is that even possible? What point can you possibly be trying to make?
 
Upvote 0

ralliann

christian
Jun 27, 2007
8,439
2,652
✟280,980.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Widowed
In the OT, homosexuals were to be put to death, I assume, because God did not want this abomination to exist among His chosen people.

In NT theology, all unrepentant sinners are "deserving of death" as Paul indicates. As I pointed out to you, the passage in Romans is far broader than just homosexuality, as are other passages where Paul refers to sexual immorality along with other sins.

Yes, if any sinner refuses to acknowledge his or her sin and repent, he or she will experience the wrath and condemnation of God. There is nothing unique about an unrepentant homosexual vis-a-vis an unrepentant adulterer or shoplifter.

Jesus' treatment of the woman taken in adultery - which could just as easily have been the homosexual taken in sodomy - makes clear that the harsh OT penalties no longer apply.

It's not clear to me why you keep beating the dead horse of the Levitical punishment.

Certainly, the Christian message is always "Repent of your sin and seek forgiveness in Christ or you will experience the wrath and condemnation of God." From the Christian perspective, this is indeed a loving and caring message.
I think if you read Philo, it is something progressive, escalating to other behaviors.. using violently so. The idea It brought to my mind when reading him, was a cancer that can spread, and metastasize. Which could would be the desires of the flesh run amuk. So sin, desires of the flesh left unchecked, ruin a society.
Israel Was a Nation that was to absolutely keep it in Check. Even in that it was strong enough that they themselves got caught up. They were to be a light to the other nations, round about. Thank God they were, ( I believe still are) even though they fell, and suffered the consequences by their law.
God did delay it seems the Judgement on the Ammorites until their sin was full.
Ge 15:16 But in the fourth generation they shall come hither again: for the iniquity of the Amorites is not yet full.

He even made eating with the nations an issue with food laws....
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0