I don't understand fully what your saying. The way i understand your posts is that it didn't matter what happened in the OT, Christ would come no matter what.
Originally I was just responding to the comment that Samson died to
make sure that Christ would come. That is not the case.
Christ was always going to come to die and reconcile mankind to God - it was the only way, and was prophesied by the prophets. Whether Samson had obeyed God and lived a long life, or died as he did, made no difference.
The Lord told Adam in the Garden of Eden that one of his descendants would crush the serpent - this is a prophecy about Christ defeating the devil (serpent).
When Abraham was told to offer Isaac as a sacrifice, said to him "the Lord himself will provide the lamb for the burnt offering", that was foreshadowing what would happen on the cross - the Lord provided a sacrifice to take away our sin; his Son, the Lamb of God.
Isaiah spoke of Jesus as the suffering servant.
After his resurrection, Jesus explained what the Scriptures said about him - starting with Moses and the prophets.
Peter called Jesus the Lamb chosen from the foundation of the world, 1 Peter 1:20
That sounds unreasonable and slightly disturbing to me
Jesus' birth, death, ministry, suffering, resurrection, ascension etc were prophesied in the OT long before he came - it's Scriptural.
as it could lead to the idea Satan is fully defeated: ie-(full-preterism).
I've no idea what Preterism is.
The devil IS defeated; he cannot, and will not, ultimately win. But he is still on earth (sadly) for the moment.
There are so many prophecies in the OT predicting Christ's life on Earth, his hardships, his crucifiction, his burial, his ascention and even his return (eschatology)
There are something like 92 prophecies in the book of Psalms alone which foretell of Christ.
That's what I've been saying all along - Samson did not have to "make sure" Christ would come; it was prophesied that he would, and he obeyed his Father.
Your post made it sound as though the Son of God was undecided whether to be born on earth or not, so Samson had to disobey God, be captured by his enemies and die, and that would somehow make up his mind.
I guess you're trying to say that because Samson was selfless and said that if God gave him the strength to push the pillars of the building down, then he would sacrifice his life to die with them, and that is somehow like Christ giving his life for the world.
But as I said, it's not really.
Samson wanted to kill his enemies; those who were fighting Israel and those who had humiliated him. He was a prisoner of those enemies - captured because he let Delilah cut his hair, after which, God left him.
Jesus loved his enemies and gave his life for us. He willingly offered his perfect life as a sacrifice, so that God's enemies could live. The only way we could be reconciled to God was if someone who was both man and God, and who lived a perfect life, gave his life as a ransom for sin, Mark 19:45.
So, Samson or no Samson; Jesus would have come to die for the sins of the world.