Because bad as she is, the alternative is worse.
Why would anyone Vote for Hillary?
Just wondering
Upvote
0
Because bad as she is, the alternative is worse.
Why would anyone Vote for Hillary?
Just wondering
The alternative supports abortion and the LGBT agenda of placing men in women's bathrooms and changing rooms. If you can feel at ease with that being a Christian you really need to rethink either your choice (perfect word for this) or your candidate.Because bad as she is, the alternative is worse.
I think either of those wedge issues are a really poor basis for choosing a national leader.The alternative supports abortion and the LGBT agenda of placing men in women's bathrooms and changing rooms. If you can feel at ease with that being a Christian you really need to rethink either your choice (perfect word for this) or your candidate.
Or: She supports a womans right to have control of her own medical/body decisions without getting the government involved and keeping the government from forming some type of "potty police patrol" to enforce nonsensical laws that will be struck down the instant they're brought before the Supreme Court?The alternative supports abortion and the LGBT agenda of placing men in women's bathrooms and changing rooms.
I have no problem with the above because neither of them have an actual existence outside of the "REPUBLICAN/CONSERVATIVE-ECHO-CHAMBER-OF TERROR!!!" (tm).If you can feel at ease with that being a Christian you really need to rethink either your choice (perfect word for this) or your candidate.
So...all those "symptoms" people are using to "diagnose" her are as obvious as a bone protruding from someones leg? Or is this just one more example of people allowing their wishful thinking color their views? Because I have to be honest here this sounds more wishful then accurate.
tulc(here's one of several bands named "slam dunk")
You should understand I only care so much to learn things about Clinton, I hope you understand.
She is going to go to prison, did you neglect that I said that? It's prophetic, but still, not like it doesn't have merit.
I'm saying if there's a bone sticking out it's never a good thing. If you can point at any bones sticking out of Sec. Clinton I will grant you that there's something wrong, if however you're only "evidence" are things that can also be attributed to something else then I'd say "No, without testing and examining you can't "diagnose" anyone from a group of carefully selected videos and photos."So you're admitting you can diagnose from a picture.
I'm saying if there's a bone sticking out it's never a good thing. If you can point at any bones sticking out of Sec. Clinton I will grant you that there's something wrong, if however you're only "evidence" are things that can also be attributed to something else then I'd say "No, without testing and examining you can't "diagnose" anyone from a group of carefully selected videos and photos."
tulc(still waiting for an accurate "diagnosis" for his posting style)
Except all of it taken together is still just someone picking and choosing from carefully selected videos and photos to reach a conclusion that (let's face it) is very much in line with what they want hear. Add to that a great deal of ignoring/dismissing anything that doesn't agree with the conclusion people want to reach. what it all adds up to is: people should stop pretending to be doctors on line.In general you are right. But there is a culmination of evidence that speaks to Hillary's health issues. This is how the nature of evidence works. One piece may point toward health issues. That is not enough. But when you have many pieces that do the same thing, the likelyhood of one's position becomes stronger.
Except all of it taken together is still just someone picking and choosing from carefully selected videos and photos to reach a conclusion that (let's face it) is very much in line with what they want hear. Add to that a great deal of ignoring/dismissing anything that doesn't agree with the conclusion people want to reach. what it all adds up to is: people should stop pretending to be doctors on line.
tulc(is a driver in Chicago and is happy to continue to do so)
Except all of it taken together is still just someone picking and choosing from carefully selected videos and photos to reach a conclusion that (let's face it) is very much in line with what they want hear. Add to that a great deal of ignoring/dismissing anything that doesn't agree with the conclusion people want to reach. what it all adds up to is: people should stop pretending to be doctors on line.
tulc(is a driver in Chicago and is happy to continue to do so)
...and still not her actual doctor or someone who's personally examined her, correct?From the link I posted: "
“This is a very unusual story with Hillary,” said Lahita, making reference to her suffering two blood clots, a stroke and post-concussive syndrome, which caused Hillary to have to wear special prism glasses to counter her double vision.
“The very fact that she’s having these clots and she’s had two bouts of thrombosis is disconcerting to say the least,” said Lahita."
http://www.christianforums.com/thre...vote-for-hillary.7961126/page-6#post-70038672
...and still not her actual doctor or someone who's personally examined her, correct?
tulc(just thought that should be pointed out)
got another link? This one just takes me to twitter and about a zillion tweets that aren't about this.View attachment 181121
The Associated Press
✔@AP
View attachment 181122 BREAKING: AP analysis: More than half those who met Clinton as Cabinet secretary gave money to Clinton Foundation.