Why would anyone Vote for Hillary

[PapaZoom]

got another link? This one just takes me to twitter and about a zillion tweets that aren't about this.
tulc(just curious)

I'll see if I can find the AP story.

 

[tulc]

Wait! I found it!
tulc(sorry)

 

[PapaZoom]

got another link? This one just takes me to twitter and about a zillion tweets that aren't about this.
tulc(just curious)

http://bigstory.ap.org/82df550e1ec646098b434f7d5771f625
http://nation.foxnews.com/2016/08/2...binet-secretary-gave-money-clinton-foundation
http://therightscoop.com/ap-blockbu...-state-dept-gave-money-to-clinton-foundation/

 

[tulc]

here: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...clinton-foundation-met-with-her-at-state.html

Clinton campaign spokesman Brian Fallon said the AP story relied on "utterly flawed data," in a statment released Tuesday afternoon.

"It cherry-picked a limited subset of Secretary Clinton's schedule to give a distorted portrayal of how often she crossed paths with individuals connected to charitable donations to the Clinton Foundation.

"The data does not account for more than half of her tenure as Secretary. And it omits more than 1700 meetings she took with world leaders, let alone countless others she took with other U.S government officials, while serving as Secretary of State.

"Just taking the subset of meetings arbitrarily selected by the AP, it is outrageous to misrepresent Secretary Clinton's basis for meeting with these individuals. Melinda Gates is a world-renowned philanthropist whose foundation works to address global health crises and eradicate disease in the developing world. Meeting with someone like Melinda Gates is squarely in the purview of America's top diplomat, whose job involves confronting these same global challenges."

Ahhh! There's that "mountain out of the molehill" we've come to expect out of the Republicans this election cycle!
tulc(needs to do a blood draw soon)

 

[PapaZoom]

here: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...clinton-foundation-met-with-her-at-state.html

Ahhh! There's that "mountain out of the molehill" we've come to expect out of the Republicans this election cycle!
tulc(needs to do a blood draw soon)

It's national news and is all over the place. Underplaying it won't help. It's not going away.

 

[PapaZoom]

 

[Carrythecross]

I think either of those wedge issues are a really poor basis for choosing a national leader.

Tell that to an unborn child being ripped apart in the womb, or having its head pulled out, a hole bored into the back of the skull and the brains suctioned out.

Both of those issues are clearly spelled out in the bible, murder and homosexuality, but, you are the one who will face God with your words here so chose them wisely.

 

[Carrythecross]

Or: She supports a womans right to have control of her own medical/body decisions without getting the government involved and keeping the government from forming some type of "potty police patrol" to enforce nonsensical laws that will be struck down the instant they're brought before the Supreme Court?

I have no problem with the above because neither of them have an actual existence outside of the "REPUBLICAN/CONSERVATIVE-ECHO-CHAMBER-OF TERROR!!!" (tm).
tulc(is getting ready to drive soon)

A woman's right to control her own medical decisions does not include murder, see your bible.

Men do not belong in the ladies bathroom this is so idiotic is is beyond even discussing on a Christian forum.

But then again, you support Hillary so what can be expected of you?

 

[Carrythecross]

Nope, that's not it.
tulc(guesses this talent only seems to work sometimes?)

The "power" of observation is common sense, the woman is a physical train wreck but so power hungry she does not care about selling you down the river.

 

[Carrythecross]

I find the ignore option the solution.

 

[tulc]

A woman's right to control her own medical decisions does not include murder, see your bible.

Men do not belong in the ladies bathroom this is so idiotic is is beyond even discussing on a Christian forum.

Apparently you don't care to discuss it, on the other hand I have no problem discussing things. Seems a little odd participating in a discussion board and then informing people somethings are "beyond even discussing". I might also point out because you don't feel the need to discuss something you have no way of knowing what the people around you are actually thinking. And we know, because nature abhors a vacuum, you'll probably end up making something up that doesn't even sort of resemble what other Christians are thinking. Which seems a shame, again, on a discussion board you decided to participate in.

But then again, you support Hillary so what can be expected of you?

Is it ok to discuss that or is it also one of those "That which we may not discuss!!" subjects?
tulc(is just trying to keep track of those subjects)

 

[tulc]

Lucky me, I just found the "ignore", you can't fix stupid and you really shouldn't spend a lot of time trying.

Ahhh! when you can't refute, just ignore!
tulc(thinks this discussion was just starting to get interesting too)

 

[tulc]

The "power" of observation is common sense, the woman is a physical train wreck but so power hungry she does not care about selling you down the river.

...and yet no doctor who's actually attended her has said anything. Just people who have no actual contact with her. That doesn't set off even the slightest warning bell in peoples heads?
tulc(guesses it's hard to tell the difference between a warning bell and the clanging of cognitive dissonance)

 

[tulc]

It's national news and is all over the place. Underplaying it won't help. It's not going away.

Every mole hill, "latest scandal!!!" the Republicans push tends to be "big" for about 30 seconds, especially on Faux news, then some cat video takes it's place and the Republicans are left with trying to find some other way to try and distract the electorate from who's the "Face of the Republican Party".
tulc(hopes the next one is at least interesting)

 

[PapaZoom]

Every mole hill, "latest scandal!!!" the Republicans push tends to be "big" for about 30 seconds, especially on Faux news, then some cat video takes it's place and the Republicans are left with trying to find some other way to try and distract the electorate from who's the "Face of the Republican Party".
tulc(hopes the next one is at least interesting)

 

[tulc]

View attachment 181134​

man, that smilie seems a little TOO happy with hitting it self in the head!
tulc(maybe some doctor could explain why it would react like that?)

 

[PapaZoom]

man, that smilie seems a little TOO happy with hitting it self in the head!
tulc(maybe some doctor could explain why it would react like that?)

Writing: "He's a hopeless case I'm afraid."

 

[PapaZoom]

man, that smilie seems a little TOO happy with hitting it self in the head!
tulc(maybe some doctor could explain why it would react like that?)

Not to worry though. If one of my personalities goes wacky I have others to step in and take over.

 

[Carrythecross]

Also, wouldn't it be nice to get to ask the candidate a bunch of questions before she becomes president?

http://www.tickcounter.com/countup/...00/Days_Since_Hillary's_Last_Press_Conference

Also, wouldn't it be nice to get to ask the candidate a bunch of questions before she becomes president?

http://www.tickcounter.com/countup/...00/Days_Since_Hillary's_Last_Press_Conference

That would require an actual press conference, which she does not do. She has only done one in over 200 days and the press literally clapped for her. Hillary does not have to answer questions and when she does, she just lies so at this point, what difference does it make?

 

[PapaZoom]

That would require an actual press conference, which she does not do. She has only done one in over 200 days and the press literally clapped for her. Hillary does not have to answer questions and when she does, she just lies so at this point, what difference does it make?

good point! She'll be even more distant and secretive as President. God help us all!