Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Here is another peer reviewed paper against AGW.
http://landshape.org/stats/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/article.pdf
Here is another peer reviewed paper against AGW.
Here are 900 peer reviewed papers against AGW
Popular Technology.net: 900+ Peer-Reviewed Papers Supporting Skepticism of "Man-Made" Global Warming (AGW) Alarm
I do have a strong opinion on global warming and don't believe in man caused global warming. I do believe in pollution in big cities caused by cars and coal burning plants.
You realize that people manufactured and drive these cars, built and operate those coal burning plants...so how do you not think that it was man that caused this?
Al Gore would have done something about it. He already has made a big difference. It is amazing to think how close he came to being elected and how different things would have been without Bush.Nothing that's effective will be done about it.
I believe in man caused pollution but not in man caused global warming.
CO2
This is incorrect. Any peer-reviewed criticism of the papers was refuted by the authors and the rebuttal is included on the list following the paper.which refuted by a huge number of science bodies, far more than 900+
This is incorrect. Any peer-reviewed criticism of the papers was refuted by the authors and the rebuttal is included on the list following the paper.
As for your "scientific bodies", a handful of an organization's council members who release a position statement or an organization's president who signs a statement does not equal endorsement of this position by the hundreds of thousands of these organization's members.
Please provide a complete survey of any of these organization's members position on AGW. Failure to do so means you cannot use them to support your argument.
All the scientists "linked" to the IPCC never signed the report so you have no idea what their position is in regards to AGW.I guess you will have to write off all the scientists linked with the IPCC.
All the scientists "linked" to the IPCC never signed the report so you have no idea what their position is in regards to AGW.
The number of scientists that supports AGW Alarm is in the minority.
All the scientists "linked" to the IPCC never signed the report so you have no idea what their position is in regards to AGW.
The number of scientists that supports AGW Alarm is in the minority.
All of this is widely disputed but since I cannot post links, I cannot provide the counter arguments. To pick one,More info for you:
BBC News - The arguments made by climate change sceptics
This is incorrect. Any peer-reviewed criticism of the papers was refuted by the authors and the rebuttal is included on the list following the paper.
As for your "scientific bodies", a handful of an organization's council members who release a position statement or an organization's president who signs a statement does not equal endorsement of this position by the hundreds of thousands of these organization's members.
Please provide a complete survey of any of these organization's members position on AGW. Failure to do so means you cannot use them to support your argument.
Yeah, this is one of the many ways that conservative think tanks lie.All of this is widely disputed but since I cannot post links, I cannot provide the counter arguments. To pick one,
The MWP was global according to data published by 983 individual scientists from 566 research institutions in 43 different countries ... and counting.
Google - "Medieval Warm Period Project"
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?