Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
So you're saying the Roman Catholic Church is above God? If there is scripture you have, why don't you share it. There is nothing that says the Lords day is on the first day otherwise it would have been provided by now. Even the Catholic church admits Sunday worship is a catholic commandment and not a Biblical one.Once again with the claim that part of the Bible is God's word but other parts of it are not.
Once again with the claim that part of the Bible is God's word but other parts of it are not.
Jesus kept His Fathers commandments, which includes the 4th commandment. No Sabbath keeper believes anything different.It is interesting that the Lord was being condemned for not keeping His sabbath by the sabbath keepers.
That is an unsubstantiated posh poor rebuttal!NO YOU DON'T! That is a fallacy!
You might want to go back and read the post you quoted me, I was quoting another poster about them saying the Catholic church said Sunday was a more appropriate day to worship. Your response to me would make it seem like you agree with that statement.I never said anything of the sort.
That is an unsubstantiated posh poor rebuttal!
I'm not finding any post like that and I'm not interested in any deflections. Identify the post you are referring to and quote the line in question. Then we may be able to figure out where you went wrong.You might want to go back and read the post you quoted me, I was quoting another poster about them saying the Catholic church said Sunday was a more appropriate day to worship. Your response to me would make it seem like you agree with that statement.
That is an unsubstantiated poor rebuttal frosted with new false logic!No it isn't...it is the truth...and
if you knew anything about the Torah, you would agree with me
That is an unsubstantiated poor rebuttal frosted with new false logic!
No it isn't. YOU said "If you wish to keep the Law, then you must keep all 613 laws." That is a blatant fallacy! No one could or was ever required to keep ALL "613"...it is impossible for any one person to do...
Correct. That why we all require forgiveness for our sins.
That's the reason for the new covenant. Because the old one
is a failure. But mankind actually needed to be SHOWN what a failure
the first covenant was. And the Jews were used as a demonstration
of how the law cannot save.
No, I do not need to define sin. YOU brought up sin by asking me if we were "free to sin". In point of fact, YES, we are free to sin because if we do sin, we have an advocate in heaven who is faithful to forgive our sins [1 John 2:1-2]; we also know that there is no judgement for those that believe [John 3:18]. So the issue is not "MAY WE SIN" ... the question to be asked is "DO YOU WANT TO SIN?" If you are "born from above" [John 3:3-8], then the answer will be "NO" [Philippians 2:13] [Romans 8:28-30] [Romans 6:1-23].First you need to define what sin is. We are told sin is the transgression of the law 1 John 3:4. Previously you indicated there is no law as it was made only to Jews. Now you’re saying there is sin so that means there must be laws.
Does the fact that you cannot keep all 613 laws permit you to violate those two laws that you COULD keep but CHOOSE NOT TO KEEP?That remark has nothing to do with what I said...
No it isn't. YOU said "If you wish to keep the Law, then you must keep all 613 laws." That is a blatant fallacy! Only a person that knows nothing regarding Torah would say something so silly! No one could or was ever required to keep ALL "613"...it is impossible for any one person to do...
You are splitting hairs.That has NOTHING to do with what I said. You said "If you wish to keep the Law, then you must keep all 613 laws." That is a fallacy because no one person could or was ever required to keep ALL "613". You really know nothing about Torah...
Does the fact that you cannot keep all 613 laws permit you to violate those two laws that you COULD keep but CHOOSE NOT TO KEEP?
That is the point and it IS relevant to what you said.
so I repeat ...
I trust that you are not wearing blended fabrics or cutting your hair!
Yep...
I've read all the accounts of the crucifixion.
Isn't it interesting that the women, who intended to prepare Jesus' body for burial and went to his tomb on the first day for that purpose, are so prominently mentioned in the narrative, after this had already been done? Curious.
John 19:38-40 King James Version
38 And after this Joseph of Arimathaea, being a disciple of Jesus, but secretly for fear of the Jews, besought Pilate that he might take away the body of Jesus: and Pilate gave him leave. He came therefore, and took the body of Jesus.
39 And there came also Nicodemus, which at the first came to Jesus by night, and brought a mixture of myrrh and aloes, about an hundred pound weight.
40 Then took they the body of Jesus, and wound it in linen clothes with the spices, as the manner of the Jews is to bury.
He (@Yeshua HaDerekh) is talking about the Torah laws for woman if your a man. Or the Torah laws for men if your a women so he is correct.You are splitting hairs.
No person was ever allowed to VIOLATE any of the 613, even if it fell to a High Priest to KEEP some of them.
Why do you willfully violate so many that you could keep if you wanted to?
(I believe that they are not for Gentiles, and will answer to God for my actions if I am wrong. What reason will YOU give for refusing to obey the Law that you believe applies to you?)
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?