• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Why the Apocryphal Books Rejected as Scripture.

The Liturgist

Traditional Liturgical Christian
Site Supporter
Nov 26, 2019
15,442
8,130
50
The Wild West
✟751,663.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Generic Orthodox Christian
Marital Status
Celibate
I don't see why that's an issue with Catholicism since it values tradition over the Bible and objects to putting emphasis on the Bible.

As @Valletta said, that is simply untrue.

I wish people would criticize the Roman Catholic church for its actual problems, like the Novus Ordo Missae, the Papacy of Francis, the Pachamamba incident, Traditiones Custodes and the cruel way Pope Francis continues to treat the Traditional Latin Mass communities, the German bishops and their pro-lgbtq advocacy, and Fiducia Supplicans, and actual historical failings such as the Council of Florence, rather than various untruths about the Roman Catholic Church that for the most part emerge out of urban legends, gross misunderstandings and Jack Chick tracts.
 
Upvote 0

ozso

Site Supporter
Oct 2, 2020
27,287
14,923
PNW
✟954,933.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
As @Valletta said, that is simply untrue.

I wish people would criticize the Roman Catholic church for its actual problems, like the Novus Ordo Missae, the Papacy of Francis, the Pachamamba incident, Traditiones Custodes and the cruel way Pope Francis continues to treat the Traditional Latin Mass communities, the German bishops and their pro-lgbtq advocacy, and Fiducia Supplicans, and actual historical failings such as the Council of Florence, rather than various untruths about the Roman Catholic Church that for the most part emerge out of urban legends, gross misunderstandings and Jack Chick tracts.
My comment was based on remarks I've seen posted by Catholics. Poo-pooing appealing to scripture when it's pointed out that a particular tradition or practice is unscriptural. When it comes to that it seems one shouldn't trust the bible, much less interpret it, and just go with what the ruling class commands.
 
Upvote 0

The Liturgist

Traditional Liturgical Christian
Site Supporter
Nov 26, 2019
15,442
8,130
50
The Wild West
✟751,663.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Generic Orthodox Christian
Marital Status
Celibate
My comment was based on remarks I've seen posted by Catholics. Poo-pooing appealing to scripture when it's pointed out that a particular tradition or practice is unscriptural. When it comes to that it seems one shouldn't trust the bible, much less interpret it, and just go with what the ruling class commands.

I haven’t seen that. I have seen Catholics, Orthodox, Lutherans, Anglicans and other liturgical Christians disagree with what some people claim the Bible says, because their interpretation is at odds with the traditional interpretations inherited from the Early Church, the consensus patrum, to use a term interestingly coined by Calvinist theologians. All my Catholic friends on the forum including but not limited to @Lost4words @Valletta @Michie @chevyontheriver @concretecamper and seceral others certainly believe they are following the Bible according to its correct interpretation, and also regard, as per the Catechism of the Catholic Church, the Bible to be the center of the Magisterium, just as we Orthodox regard it as the heart of Holy Tradition.

Indeed, prior to the rise of Fundamentalism, and the Neo-Orthodoxy of Karl Barth, all Calvinist theologians were very interested in Patristics and Church Tradition, as John Calvin saw himself as reforming the church so as to more properly express what he believed was the Patristic interpretation of Scripture. He was mistaken - in fact, Calvinism was largely unprecedented, and perhaps the realization of this fact explains the popularity of Neo-Orthodoxy and Fundamentalist Calvinism, which deprecate or in the case of Fundamentalism outright reject the importance of Tradition and the Consensus Patrum.

Note that I myself have done a great deal of ministry as a Congregationalist, and Congretionalism was influenced by Calvinism, being descended from, but not identical with, Puritanism (Congregationalism was a more mature movement which rejected the darker aspects of Puritanism), although specifically as a Comgregationalist I have always regarded myself as a Reformed Catholic in the tradition of Mercersburg Theology and the Scoto-Catholic movement in the Presbyterian churches, and more specifically, a high church movement in various Congregational churches, such as the celebrated King’s Weigh House in the City of London, whose minister at the turn of the 20th century, Rev. John Hunter, wrote Devotional Services for Public Worship, one of the most beautiful liturgical service books ever composed, vaguely similiar to the Book of Common Prayer, but stylistically more elegant in its prayer and petitions, while still every bit as scriptural and rational, retaining the qualities that John Wesley praised the BCP for, while eliminating some of its more problematic aspects.

His successor, whose name escapes me, also published a beautiful service book, Devotional Liturgies, and attempted to use the King’s Weigh House as a place where Roman Catholicism and Protestantism could be reconciled, but unfortunately, he was ahead of his time; if he had tried that after Vatican II, it could have had a very positive impact. However, it was not meant to be, so he gave up and retired to a Roman Catholic monastery. Then World War II happened, and after the war the residential population of the 1 square mile area of the actual City of London plummeted, dropping to just 9,000 or so today, as most of its inhabitants moved to adjacent boroughs, the wealthy to the adjacent City of Westminster or the Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, the middle class to Islington, Greenwich, Blackheath and Wandsworth, and the poor to Hackney, Tower Hamlets, Southwark, Lambeth, Vauxhall, Brixton and places further afield such as Croydon. Most of the Anglican and other parishes in the City no longer offer Sunday services, and the ones that do attract specific congregations based on ethnicity (various Orthodox churches, a Church of Scotland and a Welsh language parish, and a Dutch church) or particularly high quality liturgics (St. Magnus the Martyr and St. Bartholomew the Great are particularly popular high church Anglican parishes), or affiliation with specific professions (the Temple Church, for instance, an Anglican church with beautiful liturgies that serves half of the Anglican barristers who live and work at the Inns of Court, specifically those of Inner Temple and Middle Temple; Gray’s Inn and Lincoln’s Inn have their own chapels), and the rest either provide services on weekdays, like St. Stephen Walbrook, whose Thursday services are quite beautiful, or are their own attraction, for instance, the chapels at the Tower of London, and St. Paul’s Cathedral (Westminster Abbey, as the name implies, is in the adjacent City of Westminster, part of Greater London, and also home to most of London’s tourist attractions aside from St. Paul’s and the Tower of London). The King’s Weigh House could not survive, and the church is now a Ukrainian Catholic cathedral, which seems fitting.

An American equivalent, Old South Church in Boston, where I once aspired to preach, for it embodied the liturgical Congregationalism I love so much, with its neo-Byzantine Venetian-style architecture, its glorious choir and splendid services, and its central role in the history of the cultural center of Colonial New England and the early United States, tragically was taken over by theologians advocating various new heterodoxies such as liberation theology, queer theology, womanist theology, neo-Gnosticism, and so on, for unlike the conservative Congregationalist bastion of equal antiquity, Park Street Church, which I have also always loved, Old South Church became part of the ultra-liberal United Church of Christ.

As I see it, Old South Church typifies the denomination you ought to be opposed to, rather than the Roman Catholic Church. You might compare these two services, and tell me which one is more Biblical:


This “Drag Queen Story Hour” in the month of June (in which sexual perverts commit the sin of pride while celebrating their sexual perversion) is now extremely common in the United Church of Christ, which I resigned from because contrary to their ad campaign, I believe we should not put a comma where God intended a period (my friend @actionsub is familiar with that).

Now, compare that literal travesty in which no Bible is opened and if a Gospel is preached, it is not the one handed down by St. Paul, and should be considered anathema (Galatians 1:9) with this beautiful Roman Catholic liturgy the very next day:


At this liturgy, there are are three Scripture lessons in addition to an appointed Psalm, and the theme of the liturgy is the teaching and celebration of the essential Christian doctrine of the Holy Trinity. The scripture lessons and most of the liturgy are in English, conducted in a beautiful and reverent manner using the revised Pauline missal (as modified at the behest of Pope St. John Paul II and the future Pope Benedict XVI to correct certain severe errors in the initial 1969 release) - people who attended the traditional Latin mass using the ancient Tridentine missal (that Pope Francis is trying to abolish despite its beauty and antiquity) also heard the Scripture lessons in English.

So my view is this: rather than constantly criticizing the Roman Catholic Church, usually on the basis of invalid reasoning, urban legends, and misconceptions perpetuated by polemicists like Jack Chick, conservative Protestant members of Christian Forums should recognize traditional Catholics as their allies, and join with them in opposing liberal mainline churches like the United Church of Christ, as well as liberal theologians who have seized control of the United Methodist Church in violation of its own Book of Discipline and the resolutions adopted at the last General Conference in 2018 and who prevented a conference from being held in the summer of 2022, ostensibly due to covid (but as we all know, by the summer of 2022, Covid was no longer a valid reason for avoiding anything, and teleconferencing and other approaches could have been used to minimize the risk for attendees who were elderly or immunocompromised). And these same liberal theologians are trying to seize control of the Roman Catholic Church and every other denomination, and recently have made inroads in several Evangelical churches.

So, I say,, rather than oppose the pious, traditional churches that happen to be Roman Catholic, who sincerely believe they are following Scripture, and who read it aloud, in English, at every Sunday (and who are required to attend every Sunday or on Saturday evening, and on major holy days, unlike most Protestants; failure to do so is regarded as sinful in the Catholic Church, specifically a failure to honor the Sabbath and keep it holy) we should oppose the churches that chose to openly defy scripture and fly the rainbow flag and campaign for “reproductive justice” (abortion, that is to say, infanticide) and which seek to influence our naive and suggestible children with “Drag Queen Story Hours.” Travesty was an object of mockery to children raised just a decade ago, (this is why British children historically found Pantomime so amusing) but now the media has many youngsters look up to drag queens as celebrities, and the thought of “drag time story hour” happening in a church that has set aside the month of June not to celebrate the lives of the Apostles, which is what Eastern and Oriental Orthodox churches do, or the Trinity and Holy Communion, which is the Roman Catholic practice, but to celebrate homosexual perversion as condemned by the Torah, the New Testament and the Early Church Fathers, such as St. Basil the Great and St. Gregory of Nyssa (who some liberal Christians foolishly admire because they mistakenly believe he was a Universalist, when in fact he is one of the Church Fathers who was most critical of homosexual perversion and who wrote a special disciplinary canon that applied in the diocese of Nyssa of which he was bishop to reprimand Christians who dared violate the clear Scriptural teaching on sexual morality, and defile themselves in the manner of Sodom and Gomorrah.

In closing, who cares if the Roman Catholics read Maccabees or Sirach, when literally all of the mainline Protestant churches are now flying rainbow flags?
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: actionsub
Upvote 0

The Liturgist

Traditional Liturgical Christian
Site Supporter
Nov 26, 2019
15,442
8,130
50
The Wild West
✟751,663.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Generic Orthodox Christian
Marital Status
Celibate
Once I have rested, I shall quote from some of the “deuterocanonical” books, such as Wisdom, Sirach, Baruch, Tobit, and excerpts of the correct versions of Daniel and Esther, such as the beautiful canticle Benedicite Omni Opera, which I am proud to say are considered protocanon in the Eastern and Oriental Orthodox churches, and compare them with actual apocrypha, which some liberal theologians like the late Robert Funk, Elaine Pagels, Karen King of Harvard Divinity School (who spent a fortune on a manuscript of an apocryphal gospel that would have appealed to proponents of queer theology, to put it mildly, only for it to turn out to be fake, a complete forgery, and more recently, Hal Taussig ,are trying to get included in the canon of the mainline Protestant churches, such as the interesting, but corrupt Gospel of Thomas, the worthless Gospel of Truth, (which might be more aptly called the Gospel of Falsehood) or the deranged Thunder: Perfect Mind, (see Taussig’s recent publication, A New New Testament), or the Gospel of Judas or the Infancy Gospel of Thomas, (actually on second thought, those last two are too offensive to quote on ChristianForums) unless someone wishes to write such a post first.
 
Upvote 0

ozso

Site Supporter
Oct 2, 2020
27,287
14,923
PNW
✟954,933.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I haven’t seen that. I have seen Catholics, Orthodox, Lutherans, Anglicans and other liturgical Christians disagree with what some people claim the Bible says, because their interpretation is at odds with the traditional interpretations inherited from the Early Church, the consensus patrum, to use a term interestingly coined by Calvinist theologians. All my Catholic friends on the forum including but not limited to @Lost4words @Valletta @Michie @chevyontheriver @concretecamper and seceral others certainly believe they are following the Bible according to its correct interpretation, and also regard, as per the Catechism of the Catholic Church, the Bible to be the center of the Magisterium, just as we Orthodox regard it as the heart of Holy Tradition.

Indeed, prior to the rise of Fundamentalism, and the Neo-Orthodoxy of Karl Barth, all Calvinist theologians were very interested in Patristics and Church Tradition, as John Calvin saw himself as reforming the church so as to more properly express what he believed was the Patristic interpretation of Scripture. He was mistaken - in fact, Calvinism was largely unprecedented, and perhaps the realization of this fact explains the popularity of Neo-Orthodoxy and Fundamentalist Calvinism, which deprecate or in the case of Fundamentalism outright reject the importance of Tradition and the Consensus Patrum.

Note that I myself have done a great deal of ministry as a Congregationalist, and Congretionalism was influenced by Calvinism, being descended from, but not identical with, Puritanism (Congregationalism was a more mature movement which rejected the darker aspects of Puritanism), although specifically as a Comgregationalist I have always regarded myself as a Reformed Catholic in the tradition of Mercersburg Theology and the Scoto-Catholic movement in the Presbyterian churches, and more specifically, a high church movement in various Congregational churches, such as the celebrated King’s Weigh House in the City of London, whose minister at the turn of the 20th century, Rev. John Hunter, wrote Devotional Services for Public Worship, one of the most beautiful liturgical service books ever composed, vaguely similiar to the Book of Common Prayer, but stylistically more elegant in its prayer and petitions, while still every bit as scriptural and rational, retaining the qualities that John Wesley praised the BCP for, while eliminating some of its more problematic aspects.

His successor, whose name escapes me, also published a beautiful service book, Devotional Liturgies, and attempted to use the King’s Weigh House as a place where Roman Catholicism and Protestantism could be reconciled, but unfortunately, he was ahead of his time; if he had tried that after Vatican II, it could have had a very positive impact. However, it was not meant to be, so he gave up and retired to a Roman Catholic monastery. Then World War II happened, and after the war the residential population of the 1 square mile area of the actual City of London plummeted, dropping to just 9,000 or so today, as most of its inhabitants moved to adjacent boroughs, the wealthy to the adjacent City of Westminster or the Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, the middle class to Islington, Greenwich, Blackheath and Wandsworth, and the poor to Hackney, Tower Hamlets, Southwark, Lambeth, Vauxhall, Brixton and places further afield such as Croydon. Most of the Anglican and other parishes in the City no longer offer Sunday services, and the ones that do attract specific congregations based on ethnicity (various Orthodox churches, a Church of Scotland and a Welsh language parish, and a Dutch church) or particularly high quality liturgics (St. Magnus the Martyr and St. Bartholomew the Great are particularly popular high church Anglican parishes), or affiliation with specific professions (the Temple Church, for instance, an Anglican church with beautiful liturgies that serves half of the Anglican barristers who live and work at the Inns of Court, specifically those of Inner Temple and Middle Temple; Gray’s Inn and Lincoln’s Inn have their own chapels), and the rest either provide services on weekdays, like St. Stephen Walbrook, whose Thursday services are quite beautiful, or are their own attraction, for instance, the chapels at the Tower of London, and St. Paul’s Cathedral (Westminster Abbey, as the name implies, is in the adjacent City of Westminster, part of Greater London, and also home to most of London’s tourist attractions aside from St. Paul’s and the Tower of London). The King’s Weigh House could not survive, and the church is now a Ukrainian Catholic cathedral, which seems fitting.

An American equivalent, Old South Church in Boston, where I once aspired to preach, for it embodied the liturgical Congregationalism I love so much, with its neo-Byzantine Venetian-style architecture, its glorious choir and splendid services, and its central role in the history of the cultural center of Colonial New England and the early United States, tragically was taken over by theologians advocating various new heterodoxies such as liberation theology, queer theology, womanist theology, neo-Gnosticism, and so on, for unlike the conservative Congregationalist bastion of equal antiquity, Park Street Church, which I have also always loved, Old South Church became part of the ultra-liberal United Church of Christ.

As I see it, Old South Church typifies the denomination you ought to be opposed to, rather than the Roman Catholic Church. You might compare these two services, and tell me which one is more Biblical:


This “Drag Queen Story Hour” in the month of June (in which sexual perverts commit the sin of pride while celebrating their sexual perversion) is now extremely common in the United Church of Christ, which I resigned from because contrary to their ad campaign, I believe we should not put a comma where God intended a period (my friend @actionsub is familiar with that).

Now, compare that literal travesty in which no Bible is opened and if a Gospel is preached, it is not the one handed down by St. Paul, and should be considered anathema (Galatians 1:9) with this beautiful Roman Catholic liturgy the very next day:


At this liturgy, there are are three Scripture lessons in addition to an appointed Psalm, and the theme of the liturgy is the teaching and celebration of the essential Christian doctrine of the Holy Trinity. The scripture lessons and most of the liturgy are in English, conducted in a beautiful and reverent manner using the revised Pauline missal (as modified at the behest of Pope St. John Paul II and the future Pope Benedict XVI to correct certain severe errors in the initial 1969 release) - people who attended the traditional Latin mass using the ancient Tridentine missal (that Pope Francis is trying to abolish despite its beauty and antiquity) also heard the Scripture lessons in English.

So my view is this: rather than constantly criticizing the Roman Catholic Church, usually on the basis of invalid reasoning, urban legends, and misconceptions perpetuated by polemicists like Jack Chick, conservative Protestant members of Christian Forums should recognize traditional Catholics as their allies, and join with them in opposing liberal mainline churches like the United Church of Christ, as well as liberal theologians who have seized control of the United Methodist Church in violation of its own Book of Discipline and the resolutions adopted at the last General Conference in 2018 and who prevented a conference from being held in the summer of 2022, ostensibly due to covid (but as we all know, by the summer of 2022, Covid was no longer a valid reason for avoiding anything, and teleconferencing and other approaches could have been used to minimize the risk for attendees who were elderly or immunocompromised). And these same liberal theologians are trying to seize control of the Roman Catholic Church and every other denomination, and recently have made inroads in several Evangelical churches.

So, I say,, rather than oppose the pious, traditional churches that happen to be Roman Catholic, who sincerely believe they are following Scripture, and who read it aloud, in English, at every Sunday (and who are required to attend every Sunday or on Saturday evening, and on major holy days, unlike most Protestants; failure to do so is regarded as sinful in the Catholic Church, specifically a failure to honor the Sabbath and keep it holy) we should oppose the churches that chose to openly defy scripture and fly the rainbow flag and campaign for “reproductive justice” (abortion, that is to say, infanticide) and which seek to influence our naive and suggestible children with “Drag Queen Story Hours.” Travesty was an object of mockery to children raised just a decade ago, (this is why British children historically found Pantomime so amusing) but now the media has many youngsters look up to drag queens as celebrities, and the thought of “drag time story hour” happening in a church that has set aside the month of June not to celebrate the lives of the Apostles, which is what Eastern and Oriental Orthodox churches do, or the Trinity and Holy Communion, which is the Roman Catholic practice, but to celebrate homosexual perversion as condemned by the Torah, the New Testament and the Early Church Fathers, such as St. Basil the Great and St. Gregory of Nyssa (who some liberal Christians foolishly admire because they mistakenly believe he was a Universalist, when in fact he is one of the Church Fathers who was most critical of homosexual perversion and who wrote a special disciplinary canon that applied in the diocese of Nyssa of which he was bishop to reprimand Christians who dared violate the clear Scriptural teaching on sexual morality, and defile themselves in the manner of Sodom and Gomorrah.

In closing, who cares if the Roman Catholics read Maccabees or Sirach, when literally all of the mainline Protestant churches are now flying rainbow flags?
Why have you rejected being a member the Roman Catholic Church?
 
Upvote 0

The Liturgist

Traditional Liturgical Christian
Site Supporter
Nov 26, 2019
15,442
8,130
50
The Wild West
✟751,663.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Generic Orthodox Christian
Marital Status
Celibate
Why have you rejected being a member the Roman Catholic Church?

I was never a member of the Roman Catholic Church. Rather I was raised in Methodism but attended an LCMS parochial school, and my godfather was Lutheran, and later I fell in love with high church Congregationalism but made the mistake of joining the UCC, which I resigned in protest in the late 2000s. I spent a year in the Episcopal Church while a friend of mine served his last year in the ministry before retiring, and then I joined the Orthodox Church a decade ago, largely because of the persecution of Orthodox Christians in Syria. However before and during Covid I found myself involved with traditional Congregationalist parishes, although I remain Orthodox.

I do like the Roman Catholic Church, particularly the traditional Latin mass. And I am tired of people criticizing the RCC when they should be criticizing either of the two UCCs (the United Church of Christ with its transvestite story time for youths and large monetary donations to Planned Parenthood, or the United Church of Canada with its atheist ministers and liturgical homicide - they performed “euthanasia” in the nave of one of their churches in Manitoba!

Pope John Paul II, like most conservative Christians, was adamantly opposed to abortion, euthanasia and sodomy, which the American UCC formed from the union of the Congregationalists and the Evangelical Reformed church, and the Canadian UCC, formed from the merger of the Canadian Methodists, Congregationalists and most of the Canadian Presbyterians, enthusiastically support.

And these same left wing theologians are forcibly seizing control of the United Methodist Church in which I was raised, against its own Book of Discipline (the Methodist form of canon law) and are also making a play for the Roman Catholic Church.

I suppose the reason why I am Orthodox is that the Orthodox Churches are those least likely to capitulate on moral issues like abortion and sodomy.
 
Upvote 0

Xeno.of.athens

I will give you the keys of the Kingdom of heaven.
May 18, 2022
7,351
2,317
Perth
✟198,619.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
I suppose the reason why I am Orthodox is that the Orthodox Churches are those least likely to capitulate on moral issues like abortion and sodomy.
I look at the Orthodox and wonder why they capitulated on divorce and remarriage.
 
Upvote 0

Always in His Presence

Jesus is the only Way
Site Supporter
Nov 15, 2006
49,391
17,788
Broken Arrow, OK
✟1,031,985.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I look at the Orthodox and wonder why they capitulated on divorce and remarriage.
And others look and the Roman Catholic Church and wonder why they capitulated on homosexuality.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: The Liturgist
Upvote 0

ozso

Site Supporter
Oct 2, 2020
27,287
14,923
PNW
✟954,933.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I was never a member of the Roman Catholic Church. Rather I was raised in Methodism but attended an LCMS parochial school, and my godfather was Lutheran, and later I fell in love with high church Congregationalism but made the mistake of joining the UCC, which I resigned in protest in the late 2000s. I spent a year in the Episcopal Church while a friend of mine served his last year in the ministry before retiring, and then I joined the Orthodox Church a decade ago, largely because of the persecution of Orthodox Christians in Syria. However before and during Covid I found myself involved with traditional Congregationalist parishes, although I remain Orthodox.

I do like the Roman Catholic Church, particularly the traditional Latin mass. And I am tired of people criticizing the RCC when they should be criticizing either of the two UCCs (the United Church of Christ with its transvestite story time for youths and large monetary donations to Planned Parenthood, or the United Church of Canada with its atheist ministers and liturgical homicide - they performed “euthanasia” in the nave of one of their churches in Manitoba!

Pope John Paul II, like most conservative Christians, was adamantly opposed to abortion, euthanasia and sodomy, which the American UCC formed from the union of the Congregationalists and the Evangelical Reformed church, and the Canadian UCC, formed from the merger of the Canadian Methodists, Congregationalists and most of the Canadian Presbyterians, enthusiastically support.

And these same left wing theologians are forcibly seizing control of the United Methodist Church in which I was raised, against its own Book of Discipline (the Methodist form of canon law) and are also making a play for the Roman Catholic Church.

I suppose the reason why I am Orthodox is that the Orthodox Churches are those least likely to capitulate on moral issues like abortion and sodomy.
As far as I can see the giant can of worms you've posted to me has nothing to do with the topic of the deuterocanonical books.
 
Upvote 0

rturner76

Domine non-sum dignus
Site Supporter
May 10, 2011
11,529
4,030
Twin Cities
✟845,003.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Green
So the Pretestant Churches accept the Catholic Church's judgement when approving all of the books that would make up the New Testament but they don't trust the same Church's judgement on the Old. So basically they trust what they like and don't trust what they don't like. There have been hundreds of writings by the early Church Fathers. Why not just go back and make up your own old and new Testaments? I mean since we can't trust the Church founded by the Apostles, why not rewrite the New Testament instead of just rewriting the Old?
 
Upvote 0

rturner76

Domine non-sum dignus
Site Supporter
May 10, 2011
11,529
4,030
Twin Cities
✟845,003.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Green
And others look and the Roman Catholic Church and wonder why they capitulated on homosexuality.
The never did but Catholics hate sin, not sinners like the Southern Baptists for example. Do they have the real truth or does one of the other 100,000 new churches (more added every year) have the truth?
 
Upvote 0

Xeno.of.athens

I will give you the keys of the Kingdom of heaven.
May 18, 2022
7,351
2,317
Perth
✟198,619.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
And others look and the Roman Catholic Church and wonder why they capitulated on homosexuality.
They look and wonder because the media deceives rather than because the curia and especially pope Francis "capitulated" on homosexuality.

I posted the entire document in the "Three Apostolic sees" thread, it is long, it took 3 continuations to complete. There is no capitulation in it.
 
Upvote 0

ozso

Site Supporter
Oct 2, 2020
27,287
14,923
PNW
✟954,933.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
So the Pretestant Churches accept the Catholic Church's judgement when approving all of the books that would make up the New Testament but they don't trust the same Church's judgement on the Old. So basically they trust what they like and don't trust what they don't like. There have been hundreds of writings by the early Church Fathers. Why not just go back and make up your own old and new Testaments? I mean since we can't trust the Church founded by the Apostles, why not rewrite the New Testament instead of just rewriting the Old?
There's only disagreement regarding seven questionable OT books. Some of the reasons are laid out in the OP. And those reasons are more complicated than simple dislike. I'm not sure that any Catholic here has actually addressed those reasons in a scholarly fashion. This thread seems to have mainly consisted of Catholics criticizing Protestantism and vice versa.
 
Upvote 0

rturner76

Domine non-sum dignus
Site Supporter
May 10, 2011
11,529
4,030
Twin Cities
✟845,003.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Green
There's only disagreement regarding seven questionable OT books. Some of the reasons are laid out in the OP. And those reasons are more complicated than simple dislike. I'm not sure that any Catholic here has actually addressed those reasons in a scholarly fashion. This thread seems to have mainly consisted of Catholics criticizing Protestantism and vice versa.
We shouldn't need a valid excuse to keep them. The Protestants need a valid excuse to accept every other book that The one true Apostolic Church chose to make up the OT and NT. The bottom line is they didn't like them so they thought they knew more about the Bible than the Church who built it. How arrogant is that? "Don't like a book? Chuck it out and we'll make our own religion where we can do what we want."
 
  • Agree
Reactions: The Liturgist
Upvote 0

The Liturgist

Traditional Liturgical Christian
Site Supporter
Nov 26, 2019
15,442
8,130
50
The Wild West
✟751,663.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Generic Orthodox Christian
Marital Status
Celibate
As far as I can see the giant can of worms you've posted to me has nothing to do with the topic of the deuterocanonical books.

It has everything to do with it. You’re picking on the wrong church. Roman Catholics may incorrectly use as deuterocanon some of the books we Orthodox regard as protocanon, but none of these books offensive. However left wing Protestant theologians are trying to introduce into the mainline Protestant churches books like the Gospel of Thomas, the Gospel of Mary, the Pistis Sophia, the Apocryphon of John, Thunder: Perfect Mind, the Odes of Solomon, the Tripartite Tractate, the Infancy Gospel of Thomas, the Acts of Thomas, the Acts of Andrew, the Gospel of Judas, and many other highly offensive and doctrinally erroneous works in order to promote various erroneous left wing theological systems such as Queer Theology, Womanist Theology, Postmodernism, various forms of Liberation Theology and so on.
 
Upvote 0

ozso

Site Supporter
Oct 2, 2020
27,287
14,923
PNW
✟954,933.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
The never did but Catholics hate sin, not sinners like the Southern Baptists for example.
There's no statement by the SBC to hate sinners. I imagine their stance regarding homsexuality is the same as their stance regarding fornication and adultery etc.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: The Liturgist
Upvote 0

ozso

Site Supporter
Oct 2, 2020
27,287
14,923
PNW
✟954,933.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
We shouldn't need a valid excuse to keep them. The Protestants need a valid excuse to accept every other book that The one true Apostolic Church chose to make up the OT and NT. The bottom line is they didn't like them so they thought they knew more about the Bible than the Church who built it. How arrogant is that? "Don't like a book? Chuck it out and we'll make our own religion where we can do what we want."
The "one true apostolic church" is a claim that's only made by the RCC government. But they don't have a monopoly on or exclusive ownership of the Body of Christ. Furthermore the RCC has (and had but discontinued) doctrine and practices no apostle or apostolic father ever instituted. Christianity is Christianity. Christianity that's not RCC is not another religion. Christianity isn't founded on the deuterocanonical Old Testament books that any and every single Christian has full access to.
 
Upvote 0

rturner76

Domine non-sum dignus
Site Supporter
May 10, 2011
11,529
4,030
Twin Cities
✟845,003.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Green
There's no statement by the SBC to hate sinners. I imagine their stance regarding homsexuality is the same as their stance regarding fornication and adultery etc.
My mistake, it wasn't the SBC it was Westboro

The Westboro Baptist Church (WBC) is an American, unaffiliated Primitive Baptist church in Topeka, Kansas, that was founded in 1955 by pastor Fred Phelps. It is widely considered a hate group,[nb 1] and is known for its public protests against homosexual people and for its usage of the phrases "God hates [bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse]" and "Thank God for dead soldiers". It also engages in hate speech against atheists, Jews, Muslims, transgender people, and even other Christian denominations.[nb 2] WBC's theology and practices are widely condemned by other Christian churches, including the Baptist World Alliance and the Southern Baptist Convention, and by politicians and public figures, including former U.S. president Barack Obama.[2]


The point is anyone that feels they can throw out whatever books of the Bible they don't like come up with stuff like this or some other weird interpretation of scropture. If you don't like what you are being taught, just start your own church.
 
Upvote 0

rturner76

Domine non-sum dignus
Site Supporter
May 10, 2011
11,529
4,030
Twin Cities
✟845,003.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Green
The "one true apostolic church" is a claim that's only made by the RCC government. But they don't have a monopoly on or exclusive ownership of the Body of Christ. Furthermore the RCC has (and had but discontinued) doctrine and practices no apostle or apostolic father ever instituted. Christianity is Christianity. Christianity that's not RCC is not another religion. Christianity isn't founded on the deuterocanonical Old Testament books that any and every single Christian has full access to.
C'mon keep it real. The Apostle Peter founded the CHurch of Rome and was the first Bishop of Rome. The same Church that would spread Christianity to the Entire western world. That is THE Church that is Holy and Apostolic. Who founded your church? An Apostle or some guy who thought he knew how to interpret scripture better than the Apostles?

It's just some dude who was probably very charismatic but not quite on of the original Apostles.
 
Upvote 0

ozso

Site Supporter
Oct 2, 2020
27,287
14,923
PNW
✟954,933.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
It has everything to do with it. You’re picking on the wrong church. Roman Catholics may incorrectly use as deuterocanon some of the books we Orthodox regard as protocanon, but none of these books offensive. However left wing Protestant theologians are trying to introduce into the mainline Protestant churches books like the Gospel of Thomas, the Gospel of Mary, the Pistis Sophia, the Apocryphon of John, Thunder: Perfect Mind, the Odes of Solomon, the Tripartite Tractate, the Infancy Gospel of Thomas, the Acts of Thomas, the Acts of Andrew, the Gospel of Judas, and many other highly offensive and doctrinally erroneous works in order to promote various erroneous left wing theological systems such as Queer Theology, Womanist Theology, Postmodernism, various forms of Liberation Theology and so on.
So when I'm talking to Catholics regarding their comments about the RCC regarding the seven deuterocanonical OT books, I'm supposed to instead be commenting on the complicated can of worms you're opening up on me? I think not.
 
Upvote 0