• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Why people reject the reality of Hell

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,148
EST
✟1,123,613.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I know from past experience, anything I post along those lines will be dismissed by you. You
Ah when I see "Letter to the Ephesians" I'm thinking of Paul's Letter to the Ephesians
.
Why would you think Paul's writing when I was quoting ECF who mentioned hell?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,148
EST
✟1,123,613.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I don't get what you're talking about here. Maybe you meant it for someone else.
I quoted ECF who mentioned hell and I asked you to call or raise with at least 3 ECF who rejected hell.. Some evidence for the "75%" who allegedly did not believe in hell. This is now at least twice I have asked for evidence.
I finally found the info I was referring to in my post #80 above.
Schaff, Herzogg Encycopedia of Religious Knowledge, Universalism, Vol. 12 p. 96
In the West this doctrine had fewer adherents and was never accepted by the Church at large. In the first five or six centuries of Christianity there were five or six known theological schools, of which four (Alexandria, Antioch, Caesarea, and Edessa or Nisibis) were Universalist, one (Ephesus) accepted conditional immortality; one (Carthage or Rome) taught endless punishment of the wicked. Other theological schools are mentioned as founded by Universalist but their actual doctrine on this subject is unknown.
Link: Philip Schaff: Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia Vol. : 0120=96 - Christian Classics Ethereal Library
My objection to this blurb is Schaff, et alia, in the entire article do not provide any evidence for the claim made in this lead paragraph. As it stands it is only the unsupported opinion of the author(s).
 
Upvote 0

ozso

Site Supporter
Oct 2, 2020
28,035
15,207
PNW
✟977,097.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I quoted ECF who mentioned hell and I asked you to call or raise with at least 3 ECF who rejected hell.. Some evidence for the "75%" who allegedly did not believe in hell. This is now at least twice I have asked for evidence.
I finally found the info I was referring to in my post #80 above.
Schaff, Herzogg Encycopedia of Religious Knowledge, Universalism, Vol. 12 p. 96
In the West this doctrine had fewer adherents and was never accepted by the Church at large. In the first five or six centuries of Christianity there were five or six known theological schools, of which four (Alexandria, Antioch, Caesarea, and Edessa or Nisibis) were Universalist, one (Ephesus) accepted conditional immortality; one (Carthage or Rome) taught endless punishment of the wicked. Other theological schools are mentioned as founded by Universalist but their actual doctrine on this subject is unknown.
Link: Philip Schaff: Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia Vol. : 0120=96 - Christian Classics Ethereal Library
My objection to this blurb is Schaff, et alia, in the entire article do not provide any evidence for the claim made in this lead paragraph. As it stands it is only the unsupported opinion of the author(s).
I've come across other sources. But you will just reject them. I posted a bunch of quotes from ECFs to you once and got the same kind condescending rejections. I'd like to have a civil respectful discourse with you, but I've found that's not possible.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: wendykvw
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,148
EST
✟1,123,613.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I've come across other sources. But you will just reject them. I posted a bunch of quotes from ECFs to you once and got the same kind condescending rejections. I'd like to have a civil respectful discourse with you, but I've found that's not possible.
Please show me one time when I rejected something out-of-hand without giving a considered reason? I can't recall any. What about my post #82, which you quoted, is disrespectful?
 
Upvote 0

Saint Steven

You can call me Steve
Site Supporter
Jul 2, 2018
18,580
11,393
Minneapolis, MN
✟930,356.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
So you think that when Jesus told his friends in Luke 12:4-5 that they should fear what might come after death worse than they feared being brutally murdered, he was just pulling their leg?
No.
But there may be exaggeration to make a point.
Did Jesus really want them to literally remove a hand, or pull out an eye? Or was that an exaggeration to make a point?
 
Upvote 0

Saint Steven

You can call me Steve
Site Supporter
Jul 2, 2018
18,580
11,393
Minneapolis, MN
✟930,356.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
So you think that when Jesus told his friends in Luke 12:4-5 that they should fear what might come after death worse than they feared being brutally murdered, he was just pulling their leg?
No.
But there may be exaggeration to make a point.

Did Jesus really want them to literally remove a hand, or pull out an eye? Or was that an exaggeration to make a point?
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,148
EST
✟1,123,613.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Saint Steve said:
No.
But there may be exaggeration to make a point.
Did Jesus really want them to literally remove a hand, or pull out an eye? Or was that an exaggeration to make a point?
There is an old adage about interpreting the Bible, "If the plain sense makes good sense, it is nonsense to seek any other sense." It is dishonest to invent figurative language just to make scripture appear to support one's denominational assumptions/presuppositions.
Just because it is evident that cutting off a hand or putting out an eye is figurative hyperbole that does not mean that everything Jesus said at that time was figurative.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Gregorikos
Upvote 0

Gregorikos

Ordinary Mystic
Dec 31, 2019
1,103
893
Louisville, Kentucky
Visit site
✟123,327.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
No.
But there may be exaggeration to make a point.

Did Jesus really want them to literally remove a hand, or pull out an eye? Or was that an exaggeration to make a point?

Fascinating. So what point would you say he was making with his exaggeration?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Saint Steven
Upvote 0

ozso

Site Supporter
Oct 2, 2020
28,035
15,207
PNW
✟977,097.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
So you think that when Jesus told his friends in Luke 12:4-5 that they should fear what might come after death worse than they feared being brutally murdered, he was just pulling their leg?

Getting back to this. I think Jesus meant what he said outright. But I think the emphasis was more on the power of God compared to the power of earthly enemies, rather the emphasis being on hell. However, as far as hell goes, it depends on what Jews thought hell was at the time.

There's someone here who frequently posts a long article with entries from Jewish Encyclopedia, Encyclopedia Judaica and the Talmud regarding what the Jews believed about hell. But in going over all of it, the only two sources really indicating a hell of eternal torment are found in the Book of Enoch and the Book of Judith. The official view of hell in Judaism that I've heard from reliable sources including rabbis such as Rabbi Moshe Zeldman, is that it lasts one year.
 
Upvote 0

Kylism

Forever humbled by God's presence
Jan 22, 2011
40
13
✟26,198.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Nope .... the wicked get totally destroyed by fire by God Himself .... described as the 2nd death.

The immortal "soul" belief really confuses a lot of scripture and scripture does not teach that we are immortal .... immortality was forfeited when access to the tree of life in Eden was put in place.

eleos1954 asked "what is the second death". You were looking for a definition.

Here is mine. I haven't fully explored it completely but to some level I have.

Second Death is references to a future time which is similar to moment of first death of Adam and Eve in where taking fruit of knowing good and evil brought death (Eph 2:1 as for you, you were dead in your transgressions and sins). We (Adam and Eve and descendants) were cut off from God spiritually and unable to be with God in connection we were separated. The second death in where these will be cut off from God in lake of fire. So those in lake of fire are in second death by being cut off or separated.

In a place where God is not present. That alone to be in a place opposite of the fruit of Spirit (Gal 5:22-23) is torment.
 
Upvote 0

RileyG

Veteran
Christian Forums Staff
Moderator Trainee
Hands-on Trainee
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Feb 10, 2013
35,838
20,625
29
Nebraska
✟758,184.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
People reject the idea of Hell because it is scary and because they can't understand a God that would send people to Hell. (Actually, people choose Hell.)

Barna does a lot of polling. A recent poll shows that upwards of 50% of the people in America that claim they are Christian.... Do not believe in Hell.


........
Yikes!
 
Upvote 0

RileyG

Veteran
Christian Forums Staff
Moderator Trainee
Hands-on Trainee
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Feb 10, 2013
35,838
20,625
29
Nebraska
✟758,184.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
People reject hell because they don't believe in the Gospel and/or do not want to be accountable for their un-repented sins.
 
Upvote 0

ozso

Site Supporter
Oct 2, 2020
28,035
15,207
PNW
✟977,097.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
People reject hell because they don't believe in the Gospel and/or do not want to be accountable for their un-repented sins.

I know of Catholic priests who don't believe in hell. At least not the eternal torment version.
 
Upvote 0

eleos1954

God is Love
Site Supporter
Nov 14, 2017
11,018
6,441
Utah
✟853,083.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
eleos1954 asked "what is the second death". You were looking for a definition.

Here is mine. I haven't fully explored it completely but to some level I have.

Second Death is references to a future time which is similar to moment of first death of Adam and Eve in where taking fruit of knowing good and evil brought death (Eph 2:1 as for you, you were dead in your transgressions and sins). We (Adam and Eve and descendants) were cut off from God spiritually and unable to be with God in connection we were separated. The second death in where these will be cut off from God in lake of fire. So those in lake of fire are in second death by being cut off or separated.

In a place where God is not present. That alone to be in a place opposite of the fruit of Spirit (Gal 5:22-23) is torment.

well .... death is death .... not to exist (we understand fully earthly death - 1st death)

what the issue is .... if there's any conciseness in the 2nd death then that is claiming a conscience for eternity of some kind .... whether mental, physical or both.

Revelation 20:7

Satan Is Destroyed Forever

7 When the 1,000 years are finished, Satan will be free to leave his prison. 8 He will go out and fool the nations who are over all the world. They are Gog and Magog. He will gather them all together for war. There will be as many as the sand along the sea-shore. 9 They will spread out over the earth and all around the place where God’s people are and around the city that is loved. Fire will come down from God out of heaven and destroy them.

Is God going to destroy satan or not? Yes He is ... AMEN!
 
Upvote 0

Gregorikos

Ordinary Mystic
Dec 31, 2019
1,103
893
Louisville, Kentucky
Visit site
✟123,327.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
Getting back to this. I think Jesus meant what he said outright. But I think the emphasis was more on the power of God compared to the power of earthly enemies, rather the emphasis being on hell. However, as far as hell goes, it depends on what Jews thought hell was at the time.

There's someone here who frequently posts a long article with entries from Jewish Encyclopedia, Encyclopedia Judaica and the Talmud regarding what the Jews believed about hell. But in going over all of it, the only two sources really indicating a hell of eternal torment are found in the Book of Enoch and the Book of Judith. The official view of hell in Judaism that I've heard from reliable sources including rabbis such as Rabbi Moshe Zeldman, is that it lasts one year.

I think what Jews thought at the time is irrelevant. They thought many things that Jesus disagreed with. What really matters is what Jesus said, and he clearly warned that something could come after death, even a murderous death, which was to be feared. He wasn't teaching about the power of God there. He was teaching about hell.
 
Upvote 0

FineLinen

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Jan 15, 2003
12,119
6,397
83
The Kingdom of His dear Son
✟573,542.00
Faith
Non-Denom
I think what Jews thought at the time is irrelevant. They thought many things that Jesus disagreed with. What really matters is what Jesus said, and he clearly warned that something could come after death, even a murderous death, which was to be feared. He wasn't teaching about the power of God there. He was teaching about hell.

The Lord Jesus Christ, the full expression of our Father, spoke once of "everlasting punishment ", and what were the qualifying factors.

The Lake of Theos/ Fire is the end of all 4 hells & death!
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,148
EST
✟1,123,613.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I think what Jews thought at the time is irrelevant. They thought many things that Jesus disagreed with. What really matters is what Jesus said, and he clearly warned that something could come after death, even a murderous death, which was to be feared. He wasn't teaching about the power of God there. He was teaching about hell.
You said "I think what Jews thought at the time is irrelevant." That may be true in some instances but what the Jews believed about "hell." Remember the founder, Jesus, and the first 12 Christians were Jews.
My ¢¢Below are quotes from three Jewish sources; the 1917 Jewish Encyclopedia, 1972 Encyclopedia Judaica and the Talmud. Which to date have not been, and I am convinced cannot be, refuted.
= = = = =
…..It is very enticing to claim that the Christian concept of "Hell" was somehow derived from Dante's 14th century writing “Inferno,” or some later writing. But according to these three sources, at least 16 centuries before Dante even scribbled one line, among the יהודים/Yehudim/ιουδαιων/Youdaion/Jews in Israel, before and during the time of Jesus, there was a significant belief in a place of everlasting torment of the wicked and they called it both sheol and gehinnom. Sheol and gehinnom are written Hades and Gehenna, respectively, in both the 225 BC LXX and the NT. As can be seen by the citations in this post The Jews later called both Sheol/Hades, and Ge Hinnom/Gehenna, “Hell.
…..There were different factions within Judaism; Sadducees, Pharisees, Essenes etc. and different beliefs about resurrection, hell etc. These differing beliefs do not disprove anything in this post.
[1]1925 Jewish Encyclopedia, Gehenna
The place where children were sacrificed to the god Moloch … in the "valley of the sons of Hinnom," to the south of Jerusalem (Josh. xv. 8, passim; II Kings xxiii. 10; Jer. ii. 23; vii. 31-32; xix. 6, 13-14). … the valley was deemed to be accursed, and "Gehenna" therefore soon became a figurative equivalent for "hell." Hell, like paradise, was created by God (Sotah 22a);[“Soon” in this paragraph would be about 700 BC +/-, DA]​
Note: This is according to the ancient Jews, long before the Christian era, NOT any assumed/alleged bias of “modern” Christian translators. DA
…..This refutes the false narrative that the eleven [11] times Jesus mentioned “Gehenna” He was referring to the valley of GeHinnom/Gehenna outside Jerusalem where trash and bodies were supposedly always burning.
”(I)n general …sinners go to hell immediately after their death. The famous teacher Johanan b. Zakkai [30 BC-90 AD] wept before his death because he did not know whether he would go to paradise or to hell (Ber. 28b). The pious go to paradise, and sinners to hell(B.M. 83b).
“But as regards the heretics, etc., and Jeroboam, Nebat's son, hell shall pass away, but they shall not pass away" (R. H. 17a; comp. Shab [Talmud]. 33b). All that descend into Gehenna shall come up again, with the exception of three classes of men: those who have committed adultery, or shamed their neighbors, or vilified them (B. M. 58b).[/i]
“… heretics and the Roman oppressors go to Gehenna, and the same fate awaits the Persians, the oppressors of the Babylonian Jews (Ber. 8b).[Talmud] “When Nebuchadnezzar descended into hell, [שאול/Sheol] all its inhabitants were afraid that he was coming to rule over them (Shab. 149a; [Talmud] comp. Isa. xiv. 9-10). The Book of Enoch [x. 6, xci. 9, etal] also says that it is chiefly the heathen who are to be cast into the fiery pool on the Day of Judgment (x. 6, xci. 9, et al). "The Lord, the Almighty, will punish them on the Day of Judgment by putting fire and worms into their flesh, so that they cry out with pain unto all eternity" (Judith xvi. 17). The sinners in Gehenna will be filled with pain when God puts back the souls into the dead bodies on the Day of Judgment, according toIsa. xxxiii. 11 (Sanh. 108b)[Talmud].
Link: Jewish Encyclopedia Online
Note, scripture references are highlighted in blue.
= = = = = = = = = =
[2]1972 Encyclopedia Judaica:
Gehinnom (Heb. גֵּי בֶן־הִנֹּם, גֵּי בְנֵי הִנֹּם, גֵּיא בֶן־הִנֹּם, גֵּיא הִנֹּם Gr. Γέεννα; "Valley of Ben-Hinnom, Valley of [the Son (s) of] Hinnom," Gehenna), a valley south of Jerusalem on one of the borders between the territories of Judah and Benjamin, between the Valley of *Rephaim and *En-Rogel (Josh. 15:8; 18:16). It is identified with Wadi er-Rababi.
…..During the time of the Monarchy, Gehinnom, at a place called Topheth, was the site of a cult which involved the burning of children (II Kings 23:10; Jer. 7:31; 32:35 et al.; ). Jeremiah repeatedly condemned this cult and predicted that on its account Topheth and the Valley of the Son of Hinnom would be called the Valley of the "Slaughter" (Jer. 19:5–6).
In Judaism the name Gehinnom is generally used as an appellation of the place of torment reserved for the wicked after death. The New Testament used the Greek form Gehenna in the same sense.
Link:
Gehinnom
http://www.jevzajcg.me/enciklopedia/Encyclopaedia Judaica, v. 07 (Fey-Gor).pdf
= = = = = = = = = =
[3]Talmud -Tractate Rosh Hashanah Chapter 1.
The school of Hillel says: . . . but as for Minim, [i.e. followers of Jesus] informers and disbelievers, who deny the Torah, or Resurrection, or separate themselves from the congregation, or who inspire their fellowmen with dread of them, or who sin and cause others to sin, as did Jeroboam the son of Nebat and his followers, they all descend to Gehenna, and are judged there from generation to generation, as it is said [Isa. lxvi. 24]:
"And they shall go forth and look upon the carcases of the men who have transgressed against Me; for their worm shall not die, neither shall their fire be quenched." Even when Gehenna will be destroyed, they will not be consumed, as it is written[Psalms, xlix. 15]: "And their forms wasteth away in the nether world," which the sages comment upon to mean that their forms shall endure even when the grave is no more.
Concerning them Hannah says [I Sam. ii. 10]: "The adversaries of the Lord shall be broken to pieces."
Link: Tract Rosh Hashana: Chapter I.
When Jesus taught e.g.,
• “Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels:” Matthew 25:41
• "these shall go away into eternal punishment, Matthew 25:46"
• "the fire of hell [Γέεννα/gehenna] where the fire is not quenched and the worm does not die, 3 times Mark 9:43-48"
• "cast into a fiery furnace where there will be wailing and gnashing of teeth,” Matthew 13:42, Matthew 13:50
• “But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea.” Matthew 18:6 [A fate worse than death. DA]
• “Not everyone who says to me Lord, Lord will enter the kingdom of heaven. …And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.” Matthew 7:23
• “woe unto that man by whom the Son of man is betrayed! it had been good for that man if he had not been born. ” Matthew 26:24 [A fate worse than death]
• “But I say unto you, that it shall be more tolerable in that day for Sodom, than for that city.” Luke 10:12​
[A fate worse than death. DA]
…..These teachings tacitly reaffirmed and sanctioned a then existing significant Jewish view of eternal hell, c.f. Jewish Encyclopedia, Encyclopedia Judaica and Talmud, supra.
In Matt. 18:6, 26:24 and Luk 10:12, see above, Jesus teaches that there is a punishment worse than death or nonexistence.
…..A punishment worse than death, without mercy, is also mentioned in Hebrews 10:28-31.
Heb 10:28 He that despised Moses' law died without mercy under two or three witnesses:
29 Of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace?
30 For we know him that hath said, Vengeance belongeth unto me, I will recompense, saith the Lord. And again, The Lord shall judge his people.
31 It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God. [A fate worse than death. DA]​
…..how much sorer punishment,””Vengeance belongeth unto me, I will recompense, saith the Lord,””It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God” these deprecations certainly do not sound like everyone will be saved, no matter what.
…..Jesus is quoted as using the word death 17 times in the gospels, if He intended to say “eternal death,” in Matt 25:46, that is what He would have said but He didn’t, He said “eternal punishment/aionios kolasis.
….The Sadducees did not believe in the resurrection, see Acts of the Apostles 23:8. They knew that everybody died; rich, poor; young, old; good, bad; men, women; children, infants; sick, healthy, and knew that it was permanent and often it did not involve punishment.
When Jesus taught, e.g., “eternal punishment” the Sadducees would not have understood it as simply death, it very likely would have meant something worse to them.
…..Re: Matt 25:46 concerning “punishment” one early church father wrote,
“Then these reap no advantage from their punishment, as it seems: moreover, I would say that they are not punished unless they are conscious of the punishment.” Justin Martyr [A.D. 110-165.] Dialogue with Trypho Chapter 4​
It is not punishment if it is not experienced,
…..Jesus attended Temple and synagogues for about 25 years +/-. He undoubtedly knew what the Jews believed about the fate of the unrighteous. He opposed the Jewish leaders many times, If the Jewish teaching on hell was wrong, why wouldn’t Jesus tell them there was no hell, no eternal punishment etc? Why would Jesus teach “eternal punishment,” etc. to Jews who believed, e.g.
"The Lord, the Almighty, will punish them on the Day of Judgment by putting fire and worms into their flesh, so that they cry out with pain unto all eternity"[/i] ([Judith xvi:17]Judith xvi. 17).
Link: Judith, CHAPTER 16
 
Upvote 0

ozso

Site Supporter
Oct 2, 2020
28,035
15,207
PNW
✟977,097.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I think what Jews thought at the time is irrelevant. They thought many things that Jesus disagreed with. What really matters is what Jesus said, and he clearly warned that something could come after death, even a murderous death, which was to be feared. He wasn't teaching about the power of God there. He was teaching about hell.
How could what the Jews believed about hell be irrelevant?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Saint Steven
Upvote 0

Gregorikos

Ordinary Mystic
Dec 31, 2019
1,103
893
Louisville, Kentucky
Visit site
✟123,327.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
How could what the Jews believed about hell be irrelevant?

Because Jesus didn't rehash what the Jews believed.

"You have heard what it was said...... but I say to you...."

The people were astonished at His teaching, because He taught as one who had authority, and not as the scribes. (BSB) Mark 1:22

All the people were amazed and began to ask one another, “What is this? A new teaching with authority! (BSB) Mark 1:27

The Jews believed some things correctly, and some things incorrectly. So their views are not the standard by which we judge, especially when their views contradicts the teachings of Jesus.
 
Upvote 0

Gregorikos

Ordinary Mystic
Dec 31, 2019
1,103
893
Louisville, Kentucky
Visit site
✟123,327.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
You said "I think what Jews thought at the time is irrelevant." That may be true in some instances but what the Jews believed about "hell." Remember the founder, Jesus, and the first 12 Christians were Jews.
My ¢¢Below are quotes from three Jewish sources; the 1917 Jewish Encyclopedia, 1972 Encyclopedia Judaica and the Talmud. Which to date have not been, and I am convinced cannot be, refuted.
= = = = =

TLDR, it doesn't matter. What the Jews believed is irrelevant because Because Jesus didn't rehash what the Jews believed.

"You have heard what it was said...... but I say to you...."

The people were astonished at His teaching, because He taught as one who had authority, and not as the scribes. (BSB) Mark 1:22

All the people were amazed and began to ask one another, “What is this? A new teaching with authority! (BSB) Mark 1:27

The Jews believed some things correctly, and some things incorrectly. So their views are not the standard by which we judge, especially when their views contradicts the teachings of Jesus.
 
Upvote 0