Bugeyedcreepy
Well-Known Member
- Jun 7, 2016
- 1,660
- 1,431
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Private
Non-sequitur. How does that even follow in your head?Amen. Thanks for confirming the Godless nature of today's Science/scientists. It gives the living another reason to ignore atheistic views of the dead.
I think there's some massive misunderstanding going on here, Firstly, Galaxies won't be crashing into any ground anytime soon - that concept is purely imagination stretched from said massive misunderstanding. Second, such dark energy propelled expansion speedup won't be a problem for trillions upon trillions of years from now. If we are even around that long, we will be entirely unrecognisable as human by then.It won't until we approach the edge of our world, which we currently hurtling toward at faster and faster speeds, in violation of the known laws of gravitation. That's WHY they call it "dark" since they have No idea of what is supplying the force necessary to crash the Galaxies into the ground which surrounds us. The "dark" is within their Godless minds.
....okay, you really have missed the boat - You really need to work on your coherence Aman. Galaxies are themselves comprised of these "lakes of fire" - but us normal people call them Stars.It's not the fall from the top of the Empire State building that does the damage. It's that sudden stop when the Galaxies crash into the Lake of fire.
You mean God considers me "dead" to him?Those who are dead to God have freely chosen to actually believe that this world is all there is. When they wake up to Judgment, their knees won't be able to hold them. Every knee will bow. Phl 2:10
Done that so many times already - and not just me, Many of us have taken the time to point out your failings and misgivings, you're just dishonest and a liar, both to your self as well as all of us. YOU need to acknowledge YOUR failings before you can be taken seriously.Then refute me (prove me wrong) either Scientifically Scripturally or Historically. Then you will see that I support what I write with the agreement of every discovery of Science and History. Want to try?
except it's so well-founded in science as to be a foundation cornerstone for quite a few scientific disciplines on top of being its own Scientific Theory. Good Luck getting your Nobel Prize overturning it!BTW, The ToE is a false assumption and not true to Science.
Last edited:
Upvote
0