That's funny. We both know why you're picking a study too old to be relevant to cite.
I put up another, nationwide study. It still works the same way. Why would you imagine it wouldn't?
www.econ.iastate.edu
In reasonable journalism, the author will often cite a dissenting opinion, as the author of that article did. Maybe that's not allowed where you come from...
It's reelection pandering without any data.
Strayhorn documented all of her findings. And she didn't run for re-election. It was, after all, something the ruling party didn't want to hear.
How to get on the terrorist watch list:
The Justice Department's Office of Inspector General has criticized the list for frequent errors and slow response to complaints. An audit by the Office of Inspector General found that 38% of a 105 record sample contained inaccuracies.[13] The Federal Bureau of Investigation has said it is redressing errors
en.wikipedia.org
Do you understand how you get on those lists?
A little over 1/3 of the time, someone just messed up. That doesn't seem very hard to me.
That was true under Trump. He had a much better handle on the problem. Biden has open borders....
You just said that he apprehended over a hundred people on the terrorist watch list. And he's caught tens of thousands more. Try to keep your claims consistent. Makes you seem like like you're serious about the stuff you post.
Less than the number of terrorists in the Jan 6 insurrection, all of them homegrown. And you should probably know that the vast majority of people on the terrorist watch list are not terrorists.
In English, you should put a verb after "this." Some other languages don't. Perhaps you're familiar with one of them.
(mentions that terrorist watch list dates from 2007)
Oh wow....more ancient data.
Are you even reading the links?
This is why Trump's own FBI director admitted that the major terrorist threat to America was far-right Americans.
That was true under Trump.
It wasn't all Trump's fault. He merely incited them. They were there before he was president.
He had a much better handle on the problem.
For which he now has multiple felony indictments and will shortly be tried for his role in the insurrection and the attempt to overturn the election.
and actual terrorists are crossing them. Boston bomber types, Orlando massacre types..
Those guys were legal residents. You seem to have made my argument for me. BTW, most massacres in the United States in recent years have been by extreme right racists.
Undocumented workers come here for the same reason they have always come. To get jobs and take part in the American Dream.
Again, I don't care about moral reasons.
It's not moral; it's practical. They come here because they believe that they can become successful if they work hard. No morality involved.
I understand you think it makes you a good person to take this position, but it doesn't.
It merely makes me a realist. Why do you think they come here?