Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Evolution has no answer to the origins of life, has no transistional evidence, has no way to account for any species change, as nature itself cannot add the additional Dna required for that to happen, and most of all, the Bible declares God was the Creator!I thought that the topic was evolution. What you are doing now is moving the goal posts. I will gladly discuss abiogenesis with you once you admit that evolution is a fact.
And no, I have never observed a man resurrected from the dead and there are no reliable accounts of that ever happening. Why did you even bring that up? Are you trying to disprove your own faith?
The reason that evolution is included in high school curricula is because it is based upon reliable repeatable evidence. Until creationists come up with the same it cannot be taught in schools.
Where did the Universe come out from, if there was nothing before the Big Bang per that theory?I wasn’t promoting the Big Bang theory, just saying it addresses the origins of the universe. I don’t think it matters because you are referring to the Bible in a discussion on science, and saying you have a PHD in creation... which is pretty silly.
Interesting that essentially all cultures have the concept of a worldwide flood that came about die to the "gods" being mad with mankind, and only a small family unit survived that event!A story which agrees in every way with every discovery of mankind, like the one written in Genesis, changes from faith to fact in the last days of this earth. Daniel 12:4
Adam was the first human being to have the "made in image of God" applied towards Him!The ToE, is not a scientific fact and it's false assumptions cannot be repeated. It's most obvious failure is in teaching the lie that Humans evolved from the common ancestor of Apes. Adam was made billions of years before LUCA appeared in the water of planet Earth, from where Apes evolved billions of years LATER.
That means that it is IMPOSSIBLE that Humans (descendants of Adam) could have descended from creatures made some 10 Billion years later or 3.8 Billion years ago. Science has mistakenly classified the sons of God (prehistoric people) as Humans (descendants of Adam). The first Humans suddenly appeared only 11k years ago, in the mountains of Ararat exactly as God told us and the empirical evidence is still there. Map: Fertile Cresent, 9000 to 4500 BCE That's God's Truth which no man can refute.
I would agree that the reson apes and men are alike quite a bit is not due to us sharing a common ancestor, but that God blueprint for primates was pretty close and standard!do you agree that a robot that is identical to a penguin is evidence for design?
i asked a simple question and its seems that you refuse to answer. i think that its because the answer is clear...Your replicating cars analogy has been thoroughly discredited by numerous forum members. It is a silly idea.
1. Self replicating cars do not exist.
2. Self replicating cars have not been adequately described by you.
3. Self replicating cars, as described by you, are irrelevant to discussions of evolution and design.
4. Self replicating cars are evidence that you are confused beyond my ability to help you. They are not evidence for anything else.
Now answer my question.
That is because the origin of life is a different but related subject. It is not supposed to have an explanation.Evolution has no answer to the origins of life, has no transistional evidence, has no way to account for any species change, as nature itself cannot add the additional Dna required for that to happen, and most of all, the Bible declares God was the Creator!
Your statement is like saying "I would agree that dogs and German Shepherds are alike quite a bit". Humans are apes. Just as German Shepherds are dogs.I would agree that the reson apes and men are alike quite a bit is not due to us sharing a common ancestor, but that God blueprint for primates was pretty close and standard!
Only on paper.German Shepherds are dogs.
In every sense. It appears that reality frightens you. Otherwise why the post that is rather trolling?Only on paper.
I have no idea! I am an agnostic when it comes to the topic of origins. We don’t know how things “began.” I certainly don’t think the god of the Torah magically created the universe out of nothing, any more than Zeus did.Where did the Universe come out from, if there was nothing before the Big Bang per that theory?
No, they don't. There are many cultures that do not have the belief of a catastrophic flood. In fact it is absent in Egypt, right next to Israel. Also the flood stories disagree with each other. They in effect refute each other in that sense.Interesting that essentially all cultures have the concept of a worldwide flood that came about die to the "gods" being mad with mankind, and only a small family unit survived that event!
One more time, do you care for a discussion on the basics of science?
Humnans are made in the very Image of God, and NO other creature can claim that truth!Your statement is like saying "I would agree that dogs and German Shepherds are alike quite a bit". Humans are apes. Just as German Shepherds are dogs.
The entire fossil record shows that it happened!No, they don't. There are many cultures that do not have the belief of a catastrophic flood. In fact it is absent in Egypt, right next to Israel. Also the flood stories disagree with each other. They in effect refute each other in that sense.
When it comes to the flood the evidence against it tells us that it never happened. And there is no evidence for it.
What features and behaviours did these 'Humans' exhibit that would distinguish them from Homo Sapiens Sapiens of the preceeding ~40,000 years?
It doesn't. Not even by a long shot.
Yet somehow, the entire scientific community seems to have missed that.
It's them you would need to convince. Which shouldn't be a problem if you actually can. But you can't, can you?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?