Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Again, there have been no transistion species ever recorded down to us, nor sen as evidenced around us today.When you post like this it only tells us that you have no idea of what you are arguing about. There are countless transitional fossils. So many that almost all fossils are considered to be transitional today.
Learn the terminology, and then see if there is evidence for it or not. Also you probably need to learn what is and what is not evidence. The concept is very simple and is in my sig.
Prove it. An unsupported statement is worth nothing in a debate and an inability to support such a claim is a tacit admission that one is wrong.Again, there have been no transistion species ever recorded down to us, nor sen as evidenced around us today.
When did the any animal change from one species into another?
Humans did not elvove, as we are direct and special creations of God! And all of the various kinds of animals, such as all of the breeds of dogs, sprung from the common ancestor created by God!Prove it. An unsupported statement is worth nothing in a debate and an inability to support such a claim is a tacit admission that one is wrong.
Animals do not "change species" in the sense that you appear to be using the phrase. New species arise. But there is no "change of kind". One cannot grow out of one's heritage. You evolved from apes and still are an ape. You evolved from mammals and still are a mammal. You are still a vertebrate and evolved from vertebrates.
That claim is worthless without some support. I could put exclamation points in a post "refuting" your claim by saying that we are the results of evolution. That claim would be just as worthless without support.Humans did not elvove, as we are direct and special creations of God! And all of the various kinds of animals, such as all of the breeds of dogs, sprung from the common ancestor created by God!
I believe that the scriptures themselves are inspired by God, and as such, record to us that life was created by God, and all life after its own kind directly!That claim is worthless without some support. I could put exclamation points in a post "refuting" your claim by saying that we are the results of evolution. That claim would be just as worthless without support.
Do you have any support at all for your claims or can they be dismissed with a handwave?
We know what you believe, what one knows can be supported with evidence. What one believes sound like what yo are doing.
Except when there is evidence, it can no longer be called "faith,"
and without faith it is impossible to please God.
How do you "know" humans are not a separate act of creation?
Can you prove that with repeatability in a lab?
Right I agree with you but we didn't evolve from them. When I was in school I was taught that we evolved from them because at the time scientists thought we did.
But yet there are many scientists out there trying to prove the existence of God.
I'm not saying magic is real though. Magicicans deal worth illusion and don't actually have any magical powers.
And this is indicated in the bible where?Yes, as the volume within the ark was enormous, and the need would be for only a male and female kittens and puppies,
as the Dna for all of the kinds of cats and dogs would have been in their genes,
Well sure, if you go extra-biblical to come up with excuses and ignore food and water storage and excrement removal and all that...so not really that much space required.
Also, remember that God had all animals on plant food diet during that time,
so lions and lambs would lie down next to each other!
Interesting question coming from the fellow that recently wrote this:When did the any animal change from one species into another?
Unlike a number of my colleagues, I DO think that supernatural events can be investigated.A mindset that does not try to explain the supernatural events in scripture via natural forces.
Yes, we know what you believe, can you support your belief? I know that life is the product of evolution because I can support my belief with reliable verifiable evidence.I believe that the scriptures themselves are inspired by God, and as such, record to us that life was created by God, and all life after its own kind directly!
The animals would have just needed to be infants versions, not fully grown adults! And per the Bible, there were no meat eaters until after the Flood, so leo and porky got along really well!And this is indicated in the bible where?
I saw a treatise on taking just the elephant kind on the ark, and allowing for their food and water would have taken up ~1/3 of the internal volume of the ark - and that was ONLY for the elephantids. Now add in bison, giraffids, etc...
Your ark sunk.
Evidence for this please.
Well sure, if you go extra-biblical to come up with excuses and ignore food and water storage and excrement removal and all that...
How can I remember something for which there is ZERO evidence? More extra-biblical apologetics based on desperation?
Right before the starving lions ate the lambs...
When were you able to observe life originated out of no life situation then?Yes, we know what you believe, can you support your belief? I know that life is the product of evolution because I can support my belief with reliable verifiable evidence.
I thought that the topic was evolution. What you are doing now is moving the goal posts. I will gladly discuss abiogenesis with you once you admit that evolution is a fact.When were you able to observe life originated out of no life situation then?
For that matter, have you even seen someone resurrected from the dead, or to be God as a man among us?
But we know that is not true. Fossils that are millions of years old show signs of predation. And a flood that added five vertical miles of water to the Earth would leave a sign. Why is there no sign of a flood on the Earth? The flood was demonstrated not to have occurred long before evolution came along.The animals would have just needed to be infants versions, not fully grown adults! And per the Bible, there were no meat eaters until after the Flood, so leo and porky got along really well!
Yeah, I saw that post too. You either misunderstood the simple question that I asked you or deliberately obfuscated, either way you failed to answer it. Since this thread is about evolution taught in public schools, not colleges, I was asking you about your own K-12 education, not about your alleged PhD in "creation."
A story is not an explanation.
Why is there no sign of a flood on the Earth?
I wasn’t promoting the Big Bang theory, just saying it addresses the origins of the universe. I don’t think it matters because you are referring to the Bible in a discussion on science, and saying you have a PHD in creation... which is pretty silly.False, since the Big Bang happened on the 3rd Day. Genesis 2:4 The first Day/Age began some 9 Billion years BEFORE the BB.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?