• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

mindlight

See in the dark
Site Supporter
Dec 20, 2003
14,279
2,997
London, UK
✟1,009,878.00
Country
Germany
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

Are you a Praetorist? The NIV translation implies " until the full number" has come in. The NkJV says fullness of the gentiles but could also refer to the times of the gentiles in which they dominate the Jews in which case some say it came to an end in 1967.

You have a non standard interpretation.
 
Upvote 0

mindlight

See in the dark
Site Supporter
Dec 20, 2003
14,279
2,997
London, UK
✟1,009,878.00
Country
Germany
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

And no thread would be complete without a bit of neo Gnosticism. But let us not pretend thst was what the Apostles thought.
 
Upvote 0

parousia70

Livin' in yesterday's tomorrow
Site Supporter
Feb 24, 2002
15,559
4,834
59
Oregon
✟901,523.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I am pretty sure they did not know when so they did not deliberately mislead. They like us had been told to live in this expectation.
Ok... so the Holy Spirit mislead them? and they in turn unknowingly mislead their flocks?

If they didn't know when, why were they so adamant about the nearness?
There's over 100 NT passages where Jesus and the apostles exhort their 1st century flocks to "be ready" for is is near, soon coming, without delay, about to take place, etc....

Doesn't sound like a group of teachers that was as in the dark about the timing as you seem to imply....
 
Reactions: Kaon
Upvote 0

parousia70

Livin' in yesterday's tomorrow
Site Supporter
Feb 24, 2002
15,559
4,834
59
Oregon
✟901,523.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others

Rather, I'm letting scripture interpret scripture, but for the sake of the argument,
Let's replace Fulness with FULL NUMBER in all the passages where the word fulness is used (that I supplied for you) and see if your interpretation works:

John 1:16
And of his full number have all we received, and grace for grace.

Romans 11:12 Now if the fall of them be the riches of the world, and the diminishing of them the riches of the Gentiles; how much more their full number?

Romans 15:29 And I am sure that, when I come unto you, I shall come in the full number of the blessing of the gospel of Christ.

Ephesians 1:23 Which is his body, the full number of him that filleth all in all.

Really? You're going to stick with that?
Fullness means Full number when we find it in the NT?
 
Upvote 0

ewq1938

Well-Known Member
Christian Forums Staff
Administrator
Site Supporter
Nov 5, 2011
45,376
6,904
✟1,023,301.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
That kind of puts a downer on him coming back if things have to get desperate before it happens.


Well, the great tribulation is certainly going to be a "downer" with all the persecutions and murders of Christians but it must happen before Christ returns.
 
Upvote 0

mindlight

See in the dark
Site Supporter
Dec 20, 2003
14,279
2,997
London, UK
✟1,009,878.00
Country
Germany
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

Yes there are strengths and weaknesses to the new world but even the poorest have it better today. There have always been injustices, travel was not invented in the last century. Thomas preached in India. Not sure we can look at the signs today and read a crisis. That said if Corona virus kills 10% of the worlds population I may have to revise that view
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Kaon

Well-Known Member
Mar 12, 2018
5,676
2,350
Los Angeles
✟111,517.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Celibate
And no thread would be complete without a bit of neo Gnosticism. But let us not pretend thst was what the Apostles thought.


How would we know? More than half of the NT is from Paul...

What institution controlled the texts in canon? It wasn't the layperson, we just do what we are told by authorities. Who has the authority?

We were already told there are principalities, archons and powers that rule this plane of existence, but we never actually listen do we (that is why we have the audacity to be political when we were also told we are not of this world).

The Word of the Most High is LIVING ENTITY, John even said not nearly all of His words can be put in all of the books in the world: so why are we using canonical texts as if they are the Living Entity when the Living Entity called the Word of the Most High is ALIVE?
 
Upvote 0

Contenders Edge

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
May 13, 2019
2,615
370
45
Hayfork
✟167,447.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others



Peter tells us that God is not slow in keeping His promises in the way that we count slowness, and that the reason why He tarries is because He takes no pleasure in destroying anyone but because He desires that all would come to repentance. (2 Pet. 3:9)

God would rather show His love than His wrath and so He tarries, but a day is coming in which He will no longer tarry but will finally have to punish sin. If we were to witness God's wrath and judgment at work in any degree, only then would we understand why He tarries. If you have ever read the book of Revelation, the judgments foretold thereby are unlike anything that we have ever seen and will be incredibly destructive: Most of the world is going to be wiped out when the judgment is complete.
 
Reactions: mindlight
Upvote 0

parousia70

Livin' in yesterday's tomorrow
Site Supporter
Feb 24, 2002
15,559
4,834
59
Oregon
✟901,523.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
The phrase “at hand” is taken from the single Greek word eggizō, and simply means “approaches.” It is not time specific. It can mean immediate or distant future, like our English word.

So it has no discernible meaning at all?

what about when Jesus used it here:
And he said, Go into the city to such a man, and say unto him, The Master saith, My time is at hand; I will keep the passover at thy house with my disciples. Matt 26:18

or here:

And the Jews' passover was at hand, and Jesus went up to Jerusalem. John 2:13

Distant Future? Immediate? either?
How were the disciples to know what he meant if as you say it could mean anything?

Where do you find the term "at hand" used in scripture to describe anything not actually "at hand"?
 
Upvote 0

Rebecca4Christ

Servant
Site Supporter
Jan 29, 2019
256
235
Central U.S.
✟151,667.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Divorced
Well my point was it has BEGUN and maybe you don't see the signs we were given to watch for,but I do. If you can't see the apostasy in the American church and Great Britain, I don't know how.
I misunderstood the spirit of your O.P.
 
Upvote 0

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,074
3,469
USA
Visit site
✟224,037.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

It means the same as our English word approach[es]. Tomorrow is approaching, so, too, also, is the future physical return of Christ to judge the living and the dead. Most people understand the broadness of the word. The meaning is determined by subject and context.
 
Upvote 0

Kaon

Well-Known Member
Mar 12, 2018
5,676
2,350
Los Angeles
✟111,517.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Celibate

Indeed. The Kingdom is already within us; these vessels are a "mal-projection" of real life - not actual life. That is why the Kingdom is always "at hand" and close - once you die you face judgment.
 
Upvote 0

Tra Phull

Ecumenical Loose Canon
Oct 24, 2019
1,248
684
Waco
✟53,394.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
"Unto them that look for Him will He appear the second time, without sin, unto salvation"

And yet "the glory of the Lord shall be revealed, and all flesh shall see it together"

Some see it and wail...

For us, it is unto salvation that we will see Him.
 
Upvote 0

mindlight

See in the dark
Site Supporter
Dec 20, 2003
14,279
2,997
London, UK
✟1,009,878.00
Country
Germany
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Well my point was it has BEGUN and maybe you don't see the signs we were given to watch for,but I do. If you can't see the apostasy in the American church and Great Britain, I don't know how.
I misunderstood the spirit of your O.P.

I see the same signs you do the Steve Chalks that once inspired and now disappoint. But we are only a small part of a global church and it would be dishonest to say the church as a whole is not growing and is not healthy. So if there is no global apostacy on the scale required then maybe this is sufficient reason to think Christ is not coming back immediately
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

mindlight

See in the dark
Site Supporter
Dec 20, 2003
14,279
2,997
London, UK
✟1,009,878.00
Country
Germany
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

Yes and even the judgments of revelation are those of a God who measures his anger and who shakes the world to bring as many as possible to repentance and salvation. He could click his fingers and snuff out the whole of creation just as he once brought it into existence in a single moment
 
Upvote 0

mindlight

See in the dark
Site Supporter
Dec 20, 2003
14,279
2,997
London, UK
✟1,009,878.00
Country
Germany
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

The church of the second century established a rule of faith that respected the authority of the apostles , their accounts of the life of Christ and his teachings and established an order to the church. It took time to reach settled understandings of the incarnation and the Trinity. But that process involved rejecting Gnostics like Valentinius , and heretics like Marcion who rejected the OT and much of the gospels also and Montanists who went beyond what they could truly say.

Today that settled understanding affirmed by the Spirit over centuries is accepted by all the major branches of the church and solidified in the apostles creed for instance and the canon. There is no significant disagreement on the Second Coming.
 
Upvote 0

Kilk1

Well-Known Member
Jul 21, 2019
609
196
Washington State
✟111,796.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I don't know; some say the "end of all things" refers to the destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70, while others say it's about the Lord's return but that "at hand" can mean different things. What I do know is that 1 Peter 4:7 doesn't contradict 2 Peter 3:3-4; 8-9. Do we agree on this?
 
Upvote 0

parousia70

Livin' in yesterday's tomorrow
Site Supporter
Feb 24, 2002
15,559
4,834
59
Oregon
✟901,523.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others

Ok... so again, where are the other non 2nd coming scriptural examples of something being told was at hand, that wasn't literally at hand?
 
Upvote 0

parousia70

Livin' in yesterday's tomorrow
Site Supporter
Feb 24, 2002
15,559
4,834
59
Oregon
✟901,523.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others

Of course.
 
Reactions: Kilk1
Upvote 0

Kilk1

Well-Known Member
Jul 21, 2019
609
196
Washington State
✟111,796.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Thanks for the reply! I think we agree then that 2 Peter 3:8-9 answers the question as to why it's been 2,000 years, right? God doesn't want anyone to perish, so He's being longsuffering to sinners.
 
Upvote 0

parousia70

Livin' in yesterday's tomorrow
Site Supporter
Feb 24, 2002
15,559
4,834
59
Oregon
✟901,523.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others

Are all the "imminent" words we find in the NT just as broad?
"Soon, shortly, about to take place, in a very little while, without delay, near, Immediately, etc...
Do all of these have such an elastic, changeable meaning that render them effectively meaningless?
 
Upvote 0