Why Evolutionary Dating Methods Are Wrong

[AV1611VET]

Check out this video:

From the info section:

Calvin Smith exposes what secular scientists don’t tell people about radiometric dating methods, and highlights their huge biases.

Can someone answer why 45,000 year old wood be found inside of 45 million year old rock?

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Can someone answer why 45,000 year old wood be found inside of 45 million year old rock?

Because they used the wrong dating method. I'd say what's been explained ad nauseum time and again to you, but I and all others know that you don't care for the answer in the slightest.

 

[SelfSim]

Check out this video:

From the info section:

Calvin Smith exposes what secular scientists don’t tell people about radiometric dating methods, and highlights their huge biases.

Can someone answer why 45,000 year old wood be found inside of 45 million year old rock?

Why not be honest and include the explanation given in the Science Forum thread?

As follows:

 

[AV1611VET]

Because they used the wrong dating method. I'd say what's been explained ad nauseum time and again to you, but I and all others know that you don't care for the answer in the slightest.

Perhaps I care enough to share this information with my YEC brothers and sisters in Christ?

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Perhaps I care enough to share this information with my YEC brothers and sisters in Christ?

Fair point. Even though it is wrong and misleading information, some would even say an outright lie...

 

[AV1611VET]

Fair point. Even though it is wrong and misleading information, some would even say an outright lie...

Personally, I wouldn't know.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Personally, I wouldn't know.

Even though you've been told repeatedly...

 

[SelfSim]

Personally, I wouldn't know.

.. by your own will ...

 

[RamiC]

What is an "evolutionary dating method"? Is it a dating method that changes through time?

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

What is an "evolutionary dating method"? Is it a dating method that changes through time?

Since AV believes in the 6000 year embedded age claim of the age of the Earth, and since the theory of evolution does require 'deep time' as he calls it to work, he calls any length of time older than 6000 years 'evolutionary'.

 

[SelfSim]

What is an "evolutionary dating method"? Is it a dating method that changes through time?

No.

 

[RamiC]

Since AV believes in the 6000 year embedded age claim of the age of the Earth, and since the theory of evolution does require 'deep time' as he calls it to work, he calls any length of time older than 6000 years 'evolutionary'.

Oh.

So it is correct that evolution does require much more time than 6000 years, but there is actually no such thing as an evolutionary dating method?

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Oh.

So it is correct that evolution does require much more time than 6000 years, but there is actually no such thing as an evolutionary dating method?

That is correct because you don't use evolution to date the earth, you use geology and radioactive decay.

 

[AV1611VET]

What is an "evolutionary dating method"? Is it a dating method that changes through time?

-- That's about right!

 

[AV1611VET]

... he calls any length of time older than 6000 years 'evolutionary'.

longer

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

longer

Good catch. Saying 'older' in that sentence was grammatically wrong.

 

[River Jordan]

Since AV believes in the 6000 year embedded age claim of the age of the Earth, and since the theory of evolution does require 'deep time' as he calls it to work, he calls any length of time older than 6000 years 'evolutionary'.

Then that's yet another bit of history he has wrong. Scientists had figured out that the earth is ancient well before the development of the theory of evolution.

 

[AV1611VET]

Then that's yet another bit of history he has wrong. Scientists had figured out that the earth is ancient well before the development of the theory of evolution.

Okay.

The earth is old.

What of it?

 

[sjastro]

Fair point. Even though it is wrong and misleading information, some would even say an outright lie...

There is no ambiguity about it YEC sites engage in straight out lies about science which is their stock in trade.

 

[River Jordan]

Okay.

The earth is old.

What of it?

1) the earth is old, and

2) that it is old cannot be attributed to "evolutionary dating methods", since the conclusion that the earth is old predates the theory of evolution.