Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
That does not include getting you to accept what are facts or not. The bible is correct. Science regarding the past is incorrect. Now if science had some proof for the past nature it uses religiously in all models of the past, then we should have seen it by now. I think the time has come to stop pretending it has anything but baseless beliefs.If you are going to claim ANYTHING as being factually correct, then you must provide evidence to support the claim that it is correct.
The above denial of evolution was written by a human with a vestigial tail . . . called a coccyx. He may even be one of us humans who has the muscle attached for lifting the tail, but many of us lack that muscle . . . so it is uncertain if he has it or not. But we do know some humans have it. And it cannot do anything. It is a vestige.The bible needs no more support far as I am concerned, your religious so called science has no support. Evolution is not knowledge, it is contrived blasphemy.
Some people's dad had a tail eh? Some people are also God's children and created by Him.The above denial of evolution was written by a human with a vestigial tail . . . called a coccyx. He may even be one of us humans who has the muscle attached for lifting the tail, but many of us lack that muscle . . . so it is uncertain if he has it or not. But we do know some humans have it. And it cannot do anything. It is a vestige.
The bible is correct.
Science regarding the past is incorrect.
Why do you people expect things in the past to be the same as they are now?
If things were the same, even under your own theory there would be no reason for life to evolve and adapt to the changing conditions, but as one of you stated would remain in stasis being adapted to the conditions......
So are you promoting stasis with no evolution, or change with evolution? I'm not sure anymore from your arguments against Dad.....
Seems the only one arguing for change is Dad.....
As long as you are are unable to accept or recognize any evidence or proof outside of your religion, no one can prove much to you. About all you can do is respect the beliefs of others.prove it.
Prove it.
And before you try your old attempts at misdirection, asking someone else to support their position is NOT you supporting your position.
As long as you are are unable to accept or recognize any evidence or proof outside of your religion, no one can prove much to you. About all you can do is respect the beliefs of others.
My position is that science needs to support it's anti bible models and beliefs, or it will remain exposed as a fraud. It is not a matter, in this thread of what beliefs are better, it is only a question of what is belief and what is known.
Actually, my osition is that science has little clue what the actual universe is like right NOW! Time for example, they do not know what it is like out there. As for earth, my position is that all claims about the past nature from science are beliefs only. I have my own beliefs, thanks. Your religion stands exposed.Yeah, that isn't proof for your position.
No, your position is that the laws of the universe were different in the past. You need to support this position with evidence. This is the fourteenth post in which you have failed to do so, and I doubt you ever will.
Actually, my osition is that science has little clue what the actual universe is like right NOW! Time for example, they do not know what it is like out there. As for earth, my position is that all claims about the past nature from science are beliefs only. I have my own beliefs, thanks. Your religion stands exposed.
Probably just one of hundreds you posted all of which have failed to support your beliefs or even support your off the cuff fly by so called science claims.And this is post 15.....
Probably just one of hundreds you posted all of which have failed to support your beliefs or even support your off the cuff fly by so called science claims.
...
No. You haven't. Jigs up.And I've supported my position. I don't do it anymore because you ignore it and I've got better things to do than waste my time.
A merry heart is like medicine.Please don't make me laugh while I'm drinking my lunchtime coffee...
Trust me, Kylie, he has far far more posts with nothing to support them.And this is post 15 in which you have made claims and failed to support them.
Were you created by God and also birthed by mortal humans? If you can believe that to be true, you can also believe you were created by God using the means of evolution.Some people's dad had a tail eh? Some people are also God's children and created by Him.
I was born of people who were born ...from Adam and Eve who were created.Were you created by God and also birthed by mortal humans?
If you can believe that to be true, you can also believe you were created by God using the means of evolution.
Trying to deflect the burden of proof for science claims on a science forum eh?I know. I've only recently started keeping count.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?