Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
who said that evolution is wrong because we cant falsify it? i just said that its unscientific. and so far you just proved my claim.
my claim is that human was designed.Is your claim that Humans designed humans?
Because that is the only claim you have proved with your own words.
why we cant push back primates evolution according to evolution?Nope, you are grasping at straws now by making false claims about scientists. One needs the forerunners to species. If the forerunners are found and a species is found to exist before them then the theory is in trouble. Nothing like that has happened.
so you cant make a prediction of that limit. why im not surprise?...OK. I will indulge this irrelevant fantasy yet again and give an equally irrelevant number of 13.8 billion years!
The point remains that fantasies about fossils are not real fossils and mean nothing. Making claims about what you imagines scientist would accept just makes things worse.
why we cant push back primates evolution according to evolution?
again- ad hominem. instead of dealing with me please deal with my claims kylie.You have not shown a single thing that shows that evolution is unscientific.
You don't understand science in general, and you don't understand evolution in particular.
Honestly, trying to talk to you about evolution is like trying to play a game of chess with someone who thinks he has won because he got three in a row.
By humans.
That is the ONLY conclusion that could be drawn from your arguments via analogy to human activity.
so you cant make a prediction of that limit. why im not surprise?...
Try actually reading the post, xianghua.so you cant make a prediction of that limit. why im not surprise?...
I answered an irrelevant fantasy about a limit with another irrelevant fantasy and emphasized that with aIf we are indulging in irrelevant fantasies, why not push back primate evolution to 4 billion years, xianghua?
The point remains that fantasies about fossils are not real fossils and mean nothing. Making claims about what you imagine scientists would accept just makes things worse.
again- ad hominem. instead of dealing with me please deal with my claims kylie.
so evolution has no such a limit too and therefore its unscientific.You're not surprised because you already know the answer. You admitted yourself that you can't provide an exact time of when you became an adult. What you're requesting is the same thing. We've already been through this. Why are you pushing it again?
As I stated, that would violate phylogeny.
so you cant deal with my claims. thanks for this clarification.Your claims show you have no understanding of evolution. You need to learn what you are talking about before you can expect to have a discussion about it.
Wow!! You have that one hundred percent wrong. Tiktaalik not only did not appear to early. It was found by using the theory of evolution. It it an example of a successful experiment.
No, the problem is that you are like a child that cannot add two plus two demanding that someone explain integral calculus to him.so you cant deal with my claims. thanks for this clarification.
Tiktaalik not only did not appear to early.
so evolution has no such a limit too and therefore its unscientific.
simply wrong. tiktaalik actually appeare to late, since it appeare after the first fossil evidence for a tetrapod.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?