Which, as we have already discussed in this thread, God does not have. So... God is a robot.
But regardless that doesn't answer the question: why is that necessary?
The chain of argumentation from your side is always the same:
This is so, so there must be a good reason for it. And the reason is XYZ... (which is contradicted by other arguments used in the system).
If we were built properly we would choose not to mess up.
No, that is false.We are made perfect
No, that is false.
God is perfect
God never chooses evil
Perfect beings never choose evil
We choose evil
Perfect beings never choose evil
We are not perfect beings
Adam chose evil
Perfect beings never choose evil
Adam was not a perfect being
If we were created perfect, we would never choose evil.
We choose evil, therefore we were not created perfect.
We were built perfectly in the first place.Why not build us properly in the first place?
Wrong!If we were built properly we would choose not to mess up.
Normal, "common folk" meanings are not useful for precise theological/philosophical conversations, because they are too vague or even wrong.No, that's what people mean when they talk about "free will", that isn't wrong. I just cited the meaning of "free will". Whatever meaning you have for the term is not the norm. Let's stick to the normal usage of the term so that everyone understands the conversation.
The first sentence, already. God has free will.God doesn't have free will
God is perfect
If God was different, He wouldn't be perfect
If God had free will, then He would be different
If God had free will then God would be imperfect
Having free will is an imperfection
Anything wrong with any of that?
I do not understand what you mean. God creates worlds. What do you mean by a world without God?it means that a world without God would look pretty much the same as a world with God.
So what need is there of God?
By "world" I mean the whole creation, the universe of things. Not just this planet.Apart from when you are in Heaven of course. My understanding is that that place is perfect and without suffering.
Surely that means perfection can exist without suffering.
lol I didn't cite a "common folk" definition of free will. I cited the normal theological/philosophical definition of free will. If one is incapable of choosing to do evil, then one lacks free will.Normal, "common folk" meanings are not useful for precise theological/philosophical conversations, because they are too vague.
Nope. God is incapable of choosing to do evil, so He lacks free will. Until you offer a better source with a better definition of "free will" your objections are without merit or substance.The first sentence, already. God has free will.
What I mean is that as far as your explanation for suffering goes it doesn't seem to make any difference whether there's a God or not, because in either case the world will be full of suffering. So of what value is God if the world would be just as well off without Him?I do not understand what you mean. God creates worlds. What do you mean by a world without God?
The world is not full of suffering. There is the minimal necessary amount of suffering that God permits to happen, only.What I mean is that as far as your explanation for suffering goes it doesn't seem to make any difference whether there's a God or not, because in either case the world will be full of suffering. So of what value is God if the world would be just as well off without Him?
The world is not full of suffering. There is the minimal necessary amount of suffering that God permits to happen, only.
Our will is free, but predictable, based on causes and inclinations. There is no true randomness or unpredictability in our will.But we have free will...right?
So it's not a matter of what God permits to happen. God doesn't have any say in the matter. The world has the same amount of suffering whether there's a God or not. So what need do we have of God?
So my point still holds, God has no control over the amount of suffering. So what need do we have of Him?Our will is free, but predictable, based on causes and inclinations. There is no true randomness or unpredictability in our will.
The unpredictability of our choices is only from our human perspective, because we cannot see the future yet and we do not understand our past properly. Its too complex for us.
If A is better than BFree will is a will that is not forced.
I do not think your point holds. I do not even think your point or question are making sense.So my point still holds, God has no control over the amount of suffering. So what need do we have of Him?