• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Why do some Christians defend 2nd amend over lives?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Aldebaran

NCC-1701-A
Christian Forums Staff
Purple Team - Moderator
Site Supporter
Oct 17, 2009
42,838
13,602
Wisconsin, United States of America
✟872,247.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
So it can only blow people away 30 bullets at at a time? Oh, well then. These guns still have absolutely no purpose but to shoot and kill people. . .

Sometimes shooting and killing someone is necessary. Just ask any police agency in the country. You might also ask the military, along with every government agency. Do you think THEY want to use something less than the best for doing their job? Or do you think they should all be using bolt action rifles against the bad guys who threaten our freedom and our lives?
 
Upvote 0

Mudinyeri

Well-Known Member
May 4, 2016
953
630
60
Nebraska
✟19,443.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
Hi mudinyeri,

You're joking of course, right? Natural rights? What 'natural right' am I talking about taking away from you?

God bless you.
In Christ, Ted

You may have heard of it ... the natural right to defend one's self. Enumerated in our Bill of Rights as Amendment Two.

It seems, if I understand you correctly, that you believe that you are the only person who has researched our Constitution, its first ten amendments and the founding of our country. If my understanding is correct, you are sorely mistaken.
 
Upvote 0

miamited

Ted
Site Supporter
Oct 4, 2010
13,243
6,313
Seneca SC
✟705,807.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
You seem to think the founders of this country just had a bunch of lame ideas when they created the constitution, which the basic structure has allowed 315 million people (at the current count) to live in the country that enjoys the most freedom in history. Yeah, pretty lame, isn't it? You don't seem to realize what you have and what the cost was to achieve or defend it.

Hi aldebaran,

No, that's not at all what I think. I think the founders of our country were very brave and courageous mean and that their attempt was certainly a difficult and onerous one. I don't take lightly anything that they did and respect them greatly for their fine work and agree with you that the work they did has withstood the test of time and served our nation well.

However, I don't believe that their work was any more 'perfect' than a lot of other people who have founded nations. I'm sure that the people who established Canada were fine men who felt a great responsibility in the work that they did to establish Canada as a nation. I don't subscribe to this idea that Americans are somehow 'better' than other people.

We are all just people. Each and every one of us with the same legacy from Adam through Noah. Some nation governments are better than others. But, the people under those governments, for the most part, all have the same hopes and dreams. All wanting safety and security for their families and to be able to provide for them their daily needs.

We are actually, on the whole, a very spoiled people and sadly look down our noses at those in 'third world countries'. But you know what? That mother and father in that 'third world country' want the best for their children. Certainly what the two families might consider 'best' is likely very different. Here, we want our children to have fine college educations. There they want their children to have food to eat. And I think, here on the these supposed boards filled with Christians, that we need to remember that God provides for them and cares for them just as much as He does you or I.

But these ideas that our Constitution was somehow inspired by God or that it's a more than perfect document that should never need to be adjusted or changed, to me, is simply silly.

As I said before in an earlier post, when those men sat down and dipped their quill pen in the ink well and wrote out the words of the 2nd amendment, I'm absolutely positive that they never once intended that those words support what we are using them to support today.

I'm completely confident that if they had even had an inkling of an idea that their words would be used to defend someone owning a deadly weapon capable of firing off 50, 100 rounds in mere moments, the response would have been, "Ye gads, we need to reword this." I give them credit for being wise men and so I'm confident that in their wisdom they would have known the dangers that such a position would put us in.

But they didn't have God's omniscience. All they knew was that a man, if he was really good with a musket, could kill two or three people in 5 minutes and would have to stop and reload between every shot. They also put that passage in there for the purpose of making sure that our nation would be able to defend itself if needed. That's what they actually wrote was the purpose of personal firearms ownership. In order that a free state might have a 'well regulated' militia. Well regulated militia! We have gotten so far away from that being the purpose for us owning firearms that it honestly isn't even funny.

And now we listen to those who support the continuance of this murderous carnage try to tell us that this idea of infringing on the private ownership of firearms for just any purpose, is a 'natural right'? We listen to those who would try to convince us that we shouldn't attempt to correct this one error in our founding father's efforts to establish a more perfect union because the document was 'inspired by God'?

And the terribly sad thing to me, is that you guys honestly believe these things. Our constitution is nothing more than the work of a fine group of men to establish the United States as a self-standing nation. It is the document which was to lay out some of our beliefs and intentions. It isn't any different, in intent, than any other nations articles of governance and I'm quite sure that it wasn't inspired by God.

Over on the other side of the pond, we were just a bunch of traitorous hoodlums who had bitten the hand that fed us. Some group of men decided that our not having representation in the British government and, I imagine, the slow and ponderous rate at which things were able to get done because of the great separation of an ocean between us, that we should be our own nation. Steps were taken to do that.

I agree with the OP that this fight to retain the 2nd amendment doesn't seem like the kind of thing that a born again follower of the Lord, Jesus, would be fighting for. What I see here are several who are 'pound of flesh' folks. "Man, if someone tries to hurt me or my family, I want my pound of flesh." That isn't, for me, what the Scriptures teach. They don't even realize that the very reason they live in fear of someone doing such a thing as to attack them with a firearm is their own doing.

Then they tell us that if we try to make laws against private firearms ownership, that the criminals will just run amok and mow us all down at every opportunity. Folks, that isn't happening in the places where firearms are strictly regulated. Has a single one of you every described Canada to a friend as a place where all the criminals are running around with firearms having their way over the people? Japan? Australia? Great Britain?

Where do you guys come up with these excuses?

God bless you all.
In Christ, Ted
 
Upvote 0

civilwarbuff

Constitutionalist
Site Supporter
May 28, 2015
15,873
7,590
Columbus
✟756,257.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Constitution
Seriously. Automatic or semi-automatic guns are designed for active combat, and of course blowing crowds of innocent people away quickly in clubs and colleges, mass murdering people in theaters or killing lots of children in schools. What possible legitimate use would they have? Keeping them on hand to kill the government with seems a little premeditated, not to mention paranoid.
And of course you come to this conclusion because you have used a firearm before on multiple occasiions or because you were military and are familiar with weapons of war....or maybe because you are simply repeating the leftist mantra?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Darkhorse
Upvote 0

Mudinyeri

Well-Known Member
May 4, 2016
953
630
60
Nebraska
✟19,443.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
Since you've made this personal and are addressing members and not topics, I'll address you directly and respectfully.

You know what's great, Ted? Our fervent defense of the Second Amendment protects your right to the First. You're perfectly welcome to your own opinion and to publishing it - however misled it may be.
 
Upvote 0

Aldebaran

NCC-1701-A
Christian Forums Staff
Purple Team - Moderator
Site Supporter
Oct 17, 2009
42,838
13,602
Wisconsin, United States of America
✟872,247.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Then they tell us that if we try to make laws against private firearms ownership, that the criminals will just run amok and mow us all down at every opportunity. Folks, that isn't happening in the places where firearms are strictly regulated. Has a single one of you every described Canada to a friend as a place where all the criminals are running around with firearms having their way over the people? Japan? Australia? Great Britain?

Where do you guys come up with these excuses?

God bless you all.
In Christ, Ted

Just wanted to address this part of your post. It should be noted that criminals usually do pick the easiest targets when they do their mass shootings. Schools and other gun-free zones (where firearms are strictly regulated) are what those people like the most. That should be an indicator as to what happens when the criminals have the guns, but nobody else does (until the police--with their guns--finally show up.
 
Upvote 0

miamited

Ted
Site Supporter
Oct 4, 2010
13,243
6,313
Seneca SC
✟705,807.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Since you've made this personal and are addressing members and not topics, I'll address you directly and respectfully.

You know what's great, Ted? Our fervent defense of the Second Amendment protects your right to the First. You're perfectly welcome to your own opinion and to publishing it - however misled it may be.

Hi mudinyeri,

Thank you. However, the determination as to whether it is misled or not depends on whose doing the determining.

God bless you.
In Christ, Ted
 
Upvote 0

Circle Christ

TrueLuv: Jesus died-4-U Knowing you may not care
Feb 25, 2016
681
296
Missionary
✟2,411.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
There is not a single passage in God's word that tells the Christian they must be a victim to aggressors.

I would wonder at the judgment that is forthcoming in a caustic overlord manner and that presumes to argue their anti-gun opinion should be adopted by all people in America. Or else, those people are worthy of having aspersions cast upon them. And in the wake of that demonstration asking those being ridiculed what they believe our Lord would think of their holding to the natural right of self defense. In a world wherein the lord Satan walks and seeks souls to devour. And in the process of that causes those souls to terrorize the saints, the innocent babes just starting out their life, the weak, and without exception, the unarmed.
 
Upvote 0

yeshuaslavejeff

simple truth, martyr, disciple of Yahshua
Jan 6, 2005
39,946
11,096
okie
✟222,536.00
Faith
Anabaptist
Hi mudinyeri,

Thank you. However, the determination as to whether it is misled or not depends on whose doing the determining.

God bless you.
In Christ, Ted
Shalom Ted,
Did I miss something (again) ?

I didn't think you were counting on , nor depending on ,
the 1st, 2nd or any "Amendments" , nor any of man's laws.
I know at least I am not.

Peace IN CHRIST, living in God's Kingdom today - God Rules !,
jeff
 
Upvote 0

miamited

Ted
Site Supporter
Oct 4, 2010
13,243
6,313
Seneca SC
✟705,807.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Hi aldebaran,

You replied:
It should be noted that criminals usually do pick the easiest targets when they do their mass shootings. Schools and other gun-free zones (where firearms are strictly regulated) are what those people like the most.

I'm not sure that's true. Do you have some factual evidence to support your idea that mass killers 'choose' soft targets? From what I've seen with most mass shootings is that the perpetrator picks the people that he/she is most upset with. School kids/young adults and teachers, pick schools because that's who they're upset with. It might possibly just be that most places where people are gathered in masses such as malls, schools, office buildings, etc. are just the best places to kill a lot of people quickly. A place to 'show people what you're about' and that whether or not the particular place of choice 'allows' firearms or not doesn't even get factored into the equation.

Do you have evidence where an investigator spoke with 100 mass killers and they all said that they chose the place where they did their work because they knew that no one would have a firearm with which to defend themselves?

Generally, places in this country and many others where a lot of people are expected to be gathered together have restrictions on the carrying of firearms on the property. As I say, I'm not really convinced that the correlation you are trying to prove actually exists. Can you prove that it does? It really isn't proof, if mass shootings take place where there are masses of people that are, because of there being masses of people under firearms restrictions, chosen as targets because of the restrictions. They could just as easily have been chosen as targets because there is a mass of people for the mass killer to kill.

Here in South Carolina there was a guy that got mad about his firearm not being ready for pick up at a gun store. He started shooting and several people were killed and injured. He likely didn't pick his target audience(pun intended) because it was a soft target.

God bless you.
In Christ, Ted
 
Upvote 0

Mudinyeri

Well-Known Member
May 4, 2016
953
630
60
Nebraska
✟19,443.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
Hi mudinyeri,

Thank you. However, the determination as to whether it is misled or not depends on whose doing the determining.

God bless you.
In Christ, Ted

Here are a couple more indications:

1. The Second Amendment still stands after more than 200 years.
2. Four separate pieces of gun control legislation went down in flames in the Senate two days ago.

Other than a number of politicians who don't know the difference between semi-auto and full-auto and a small but well-funded vocal minority of civilians ... the law-abiding citizens of this country want to be able to defend themselves with at least as much force as those who would attack them.

There isn't a single peer-reviewed study that shows a causal relationship between firearms and violent crime. Even the ardently anti-gun CDC admitted, after much study and many tax payer dollars, that there simply was no evidence that gun control laws had any effect on violent crime.

The previous "assault weapons" ban had no effect on firearms murders. Less than 2% of all firearms murders are committed with these so-called "assault weapons" (a made up term that has no generally accepted meaning).

Anyone who truly cares about reducing murders - or violent crime as a whole - needs to approach the subject with both intellectual honesty and an absence of bias. Unfortunately, those who wish to disarm the law-abiding population seem unable to do so. Consequently, no one from the other side of the question has been able to successfully reach across the aisle to work on an actual solution.

Really care about lives? Ask why. Why do people kill one another (leave the mode out of the question)? Why do people harm one another? Once you've answered those questions, ask "why" again ... and again ... and again. This is a proven technique for identifying root causes - not symptoms, not hot button political topics, not biased and bigoted proposals for political gain ... real, honest-to-goodness root causes. Once we have identified root causes, we can begin to solve the problem. Of course that won't happen because people have to be right.
 
  • Like
Reactions: civilwarbuff
Upvote 0

miamited

Ted
Site Supporter
Oct 4, 2010
13,243
6,313
Seneca SC
✟705,807.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Shalom Ted,
Did I miss something (again) ?

I didn't think you were counting on , nor depending on ,
the 1st, 2nd or any "Amendments" , nor any of man's laws.
I know at least I am not.

Peace IN CHRIST, living in God's Kingdom today - God Rules !,
jeff

Hi jeff,

Ya gotta keep up.

God bless you.
In Christ, Ted
 
Upvote 0

Mudinyeri

Well-Known Member
May 4, 2016
953
630
60
Nebraska
✟19,443.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
Do you have evidence where an investigator spoke with 100 mass killers and they all said that they chose the place where they did their work because they knew that no one would have a firearm with which to defend themselves?

Actually, yes, a series of interviews were conducted with violent felons. To a person they said that they all looked for soft targets. I'll see if I can find a link.

Try this link: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/...chase_site_license=LICENSE_DENIED_NO_CUSTOMER

The study was conducted by Betty Grayson and Morris I. Stein and was titled Attracting Assault.
 
Upvote 0

Circle Christ

TrueLuv: Jesus died-4-U Knowing you may not care
Feb 25, 2016
681
296
Missionary
✟2,411.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
"I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them."
George Mason
Co-author of the Second Amendment
during Virginia's Convention to Ratify the Constitution, 1788


"And that the said Constitution be never construed to authorize Congress to infringe the just liberty of the Press, or the rights of Conscience; or to prevent the people of the United States, who are peaceable citizens, from keeping their own arms; …"
Samuel Adams
quoted in the Philadelphia Independent Gazetteer, August 20, 1789, "Propositions submitted to the Convention of this State"

Every firearm manufactured is expressly to serve as a means of lethal action. Be the handler a hunter, a member of the armed forces, or a citizen entitled to the right of self defense. And a patriot entitled to protect and defend against tyranny.

The media in years past and likely in recent times considering the headlines reporting domestic terrorism, report new weapons and methods of quelling public discord and pacifying domestic offenses. Weapons that can send pulses of heat, walls of high impact heat, against a crowd gathered in protest or otherwise. And this in order to disperse the threat.
They have tools that can see into a building, and pick out the heat signatures of all inside. They have weapons that can dispense many bullets at a time. Even piercing armor. And much much more.

A government in my view that is meant by the documents, the contracts, the covenants, that founded the free land of the United States of America, is to be in the control of the people, for the people, has no right to disarm a people in the face of those facts.

For certainly in my opinion it is the one inalienable right that we the people bear arms in order to remain a free people. In a country wherein our government demonstrates to us its desire to grow beyond what we believe we are able to control. And pacification by force is how Tyrants rise on the horizon. And freedom is a word whispered among the newly enslaved who hearken back to yesterday when it is too late to insure that freedom remain vested and alive today.

If someone is against firearm ownership it is a very simple matter to enforce one's own freedom not to purchase firearms.
That freedom of choice has no right to choose for anyone else.

Just because we do not live as our forefathers did over 200 years ago does not mean we are any less entitled to preserve our liberty. A people who take their liberty for granted stand to lose it to people who believe they should be granted the right to take it.


"To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them."
Richard Henry Lee
American Statesman, 1788
 
  • Like
Reactions: civilwarbuff
Upvote 0

civilwarbuff

Constitutionalist
Site Supporter
May 28, 2015
15,873
7,590
Columbus
✟756,257.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Constitution
I'm not sure that's true. Do you have some factual evidence to support your idea that mass killers 'choose' soft targets?
How many have attacked oh, armed military installations, police stations or any other such places where they know people will be armed and able to resist?
 
Upvote 0

yeshuaslavejeff

simple truth, martyr, disciple of Yahshua
Jan 6, 2005
39,946
11,096
okie
✟222,536.00
Faith
Anabaptist
Hi jeff,

Ya gotta keep up.

God bless you.
In Christ, Ted
That question before was just a 'reminder' to others that we don't count on the 1st nor the 2nd Amendments, nor on man's laws,
but on God.
Because someone had just suggested that you should think like they do because they 'protected' the 1st Amendment for you , or something like that.

OR, are you obligated to them, because they protected(if they did) your 1st Amendment Rights or anything at all, actually ?
(I don't think you nor we are obligated to them, as their values are totally different,
but I wanted to verify, with a positive expectation)
 
Upvote 0

Mudinyeri

Well-Known Member
May 4, 2016
953
630
60
Nebraska
✟19,443.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
That question before was just a 'reminder' to others that we don't count on the 1st nor the 2nd Amendments, nor on man's laws,
but on God.
Because someone had just suggested that you should think like they do because they 'protected' the 1st Amendment for you , or something like that.

OR, are you obligated to them, because they protected(if they did) your 1st Amendment Rights or anything at all, actually ?
(I don't think you nor we are obligated to them, as their values are totally different,
but I wanted to verify, with a positive expectation)

Ah, but the Bill of Rights is simply an enumeration of "God's laws" or natural laws for those who prefer to leave God out of it.

And, I will disagree with you on the "obligation" question. Every person who enjoys freedom owes a debt of obligation to those who have defended that freedom. Their values don't matter.
 
Upvote 0

civilwarbuff

Constitutionalist
Site Supporter
May 28, 2015
15,873
7,590
Columbus
✟756,257.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Constitution
That question before was just a 'reminder' to others that we don't count on the 1st nor the 2nd Amendments, nor on man's laws,
but on God.
Because someone had just suggested that you should think like they do because they 'protected' the 1st Amendment for you , or something like that.

OR, are you obligated to them, because they protected(if they did) your 1st Amendment Rights or anything at all, actually ?
(I don't think you nor we are obligated to them, as their values are totally different,
but I wanted to verify, with a positive expectation)
I will guess you have not served either......
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.