Randall McNally
Secrecy and accountability cannot coexist.
None of the above is true. Morphological, genetic and molecular evidence all overwhelmingly support evolution. Darwin's Origin contained numerous examples - he was a well-traveled naturalist, after all. The major difference between evolution ca. 1870 and evolution ca. 2005 is the Modern Synthesis - the fusion of Darwinian evolution and genetics.Clarity said:The fact is that Evolution is still a theory with no hard concrete evidence to prove it and yet people are being brainwashed to believe that evolution is an accepted scietific truth which it clearly isn't. Darwins original book on the origin of the species does not conatin a single piece of evidence to back it up that is still accepted as evidence today in fact what darwin taught and what evolutionists think today are completely different.
Do I count as "someone"? Do they: www.talkorigins.orgIf you ask someone who believes in evolution is it scientifically true they would usually say yes but if you ask them what is the scientific evidence then they are never able to provide any,
Most are scientists with little or no training in relevant fields.most people blindly believe in evolution despite and do not know of any actual proof. There are still many scientists who do not believe in evolution and to explain away all the gaps scientists rely on random chance mutations which aren't terribly scientific.
What does geology have to do with evolution? Don't give me the nonsense about how fossils are dated either.Darwin himself had no formal education in geology or paleontology, when he wrote his theory which was based on exactly these things
What relevance do you think that quote has to evolution as a whole? Do you even know what Huxley is talking about?"A proportion of favourable mutations of one in a thousand does not sound much but is generous, and a total of a million mutational steps sounds alot but is probably an understatement however let us take these figures as being reasonable estimates. With this proposition, but without any selection we would have to breed a million strains to get one containing two favourable mutations; up to a thousand to the millionth power to get one containing a million (1 with three million noughts after it)"
Julian Huxley evolution in action pg41
Upvote
0