Mechanical Bliss
Secrecy and accountability cannot co-exist.
Clarity said:Another question is
Why do evolutionists not want creationism taught in schools?
Scientists do not want creationism taught in schools as valid science because it's not. Creationism was disproved in the 19th century. It would be like teaching geocentricity as a valid alternate to our modern understanding of the Solar System.
Additionally, it would surprise you to know that young earth creationism is taught in some schools--as false, of course. Students are often taught about the history of a particular science when they take a basic class in that subject. They learn that Bishop Ussher added Biblical genaeologies to date the earth at 6000 years, and they learn that early geologists thought that Noachian Deluge of the Bible was responsible for the sedimentary rock record. Of course, students then learn that those same Christian geologists were the very same ones to disprove young earth creationism. Science progresses. Creationism has already been left in the dust--that's why it's not taught as valid.
I think the reason is that if it was taught it would make people realise how flawed the theory of evolution is.
I have seen only very few creationists who even know what evolution is in the first place but none identify any flaws in evolutionary biology.
The problem is you act like it's some sort of conspiracy. You act as if scientists know there is zero evidence for evolution but accept it anyway and are out to get you. You act as if this is a part of science where scientists aren't actually trying to describe the evidence. Well, you're wrong.
Upvote
0