• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Why discuss Calvinism vs Arminianism in Evangelism? Starts with Definitions

Charlie24

Newbie
Oct 17, 2014
2,306
963
✟111,231.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
Only the saved will call on his name.

Whosoever calls on His name in repentance is what I read in the bible.

You can't be saved before you see your need for a Saviour.

Oh I forgot, God's chosen don't have to that. They are already saved before they call on Him.
 
Upvote 0

Dave L

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 28, 2018
15,549
5,879
USA
✟580,230.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Whosoever calls on His name in repentance is what I read in the bible.

You can't be saved before you see your need for a Saviour.

Oh I forgot, God's chosen don't have to that. They are already saved before they call on Him.
Only believers will do this. Unbelievers certainly won't.
 
Upvote 0

bling

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Feb 27, 2008
16,812
1,921
✟989,101.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
With Calvinism you see your faith as proof God saved you. You could not believe otherwise. With Arminianism you see the gospel as a job offer. And believe God will owe you salvation when you accept the offer and go to work. = two different gospels.
Accepting pure charity is not work, but than you can do what you want, which out of gratitude will be pleasing to God activities.
 
Upvote 0

Dave L

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 28, 2018
15,549
5,879
USA
✟580,230.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Accepting pure charity is not work, but than you can do what you want, which out of gratitude will be pleasing to God activities.
You cannot accept anything unless you believe = are saved.
 
Upvote 0

Charlie24

Newbie
Oct 17, 2014
2,306
963
✟111,231.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
Only believers will do this. Unbelievers certainly won't.

Dave,I like you. I think if I were to meet you in person, you would be one of those who I couldn't help but like. Your composure in debate reminds me of someone I know here in my home town. Wish I had your qualities there.

But Dave, God does not pick some out of a bucket for salvation.

His Grace is far beyond that. He is a merciful and gracious God to all who will call on Him.

Peter said, that God's will is for no one to perish and that all will come to repentance.

Sorry I was so hard on you Brother.
 
Upvote 0

Maria Billingsley

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 7, 2018
11,171
9,214
65
Martinez
✟1,145,181.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Evangelism is the spreading of the Christian gospel by public preaching or personal witness. This is not the spreading of "theological systems". If you only had 60 seconds to witness to an unbeliever I would guess theology would not come into play, only the purity of the Good News. I also believe a Calvinist and Armenian would deliver that message in the same manner because the core truth of the Gospel can not be corrupted.
Blessings
 
Reactions: redleghunter
Upvote 0

Dave L

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 28, 2018
15,549
5,879
USA
✟580,230.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
His choice must be arbitrary or he is a respecter of persons.
 
Upvote 0

Emsmom1

Active Member
Nov 6, 2019
244
211
Los Angeles
✟56,441.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
3/4 of the seed washed out. Only the good soil brought endurance.
Okay, but I thought no one would even seek out God unless He drew them...does He draw some people, but only part way (i.e., enough to recognize their need for God but not enough to give them saving faith)?
 
Upvote 0

Josheb

Christian
Site Supporter
Jan 3, 2014
2,609
964
NoVa
✟267,765.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
This thread is not intended to be so much a round-and-round debate (though that could happen) but rather to "get the definitions on the table"...........................................................
First, this op is waaayyy too long to discuss all of its particulars in any structurally coherent manner.

Second, there are several flawed statements within the op. For example, the Revelation 3 text is written to the church, not to people in need of evangelization! This is shoddy exegesis.

Sadly, shoddy exegesis, or more accurately eisegetic interpretations are the second most frequently occurring error in discussions about monergism and synergism. The first most frequently occurring error being the failure to correctly understand the respective soteriologies.

The point here is you cannot use Rev. 3 to justify an Arm pov, and certainly not the premise of the openness, because it isn't written to or about those need ing evangelism and salvation. Big Fail.

Arminian free will does not exist because of God' act of drawing. Arminius did not believe the will was free in any definition that would have it autonomous or able to act soteriologically absent prevenient grace. Augustine, Luther, Calvin, Arminius, and Wesley ALL agreed with the principle we now call "total depravity. ALL of them. Without acting to free the sinner to have a point of liberated choice the sinner is wholly enslaved and unable to come to God.

So you've committed the first most frequently occurring error in these discussions, too.

The above comments are not intended to be hurtful to you. The op is simply incorrect on all these points. Scripture cannot be correctly "defined" by these errors. Neither can the matter of evangelism be meted out with these errors. There are others in this op but I haven't currently got the time to go through the whole op and correct all the many errors contained therein.

Go back and re-read your own op and look at how many times scriptures written by already regenerate believers to already regenerate believers about already regenerate believers was applied to the unregenerate still-sinfully-dead-and-enlsaved non-believer, and then realize how many errors were committed!

Because there are a lot of them.

Then go look at the prophetic nature of some of the scriptures cited. Understand once God stated X was gonna occur a certain determinism immediately accompanied those declarations. There was simply no chance the subjects of those prophesies were ever gonna be able to do other than that which God had prophetically stated would occur. This means there is another form of determinism beside that often incorrectly imagined to occur in Calvinist soteriology prior to creation. Those prophesies are a post-creation, post-sin occurrence.

Lastly, not how the entirety of the pre-epistolary scripture is uniformly about people who already believe a God exists. These are not atheists. Yes, they are people who need to hear the gospel of Christ, but they are not people who need to hear an apologetic for the existence of God. The Jew already has a theology for the Messiah; they simply didn't believe the Messiah is Jesus. So, if you're going to have an op on "definitions" you've got to correctly parse out the various influences and audiences because modern-day evangelism often entails people not often represented in scripture.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,117
34,056
Texas
✟199,236.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I see Him as no respecter of persons in that all have an opportunity to believe the Gospel.

Your view shows respect to some and not others.
What is the context of God not a respected of persons?
 
Upvote 0

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,117
34,056
Texas
✟199,236.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Okay, but I thought no one would even seek out God unless He drew them...does He draw some people, but only part way (i.e., enough to recognize their need for God but not enough to give them saving faith)?
John 10: NASB

27“My sheep hear My voice, and I know them, and they follow Me; 28and I give eternal life to them, and they will never perish; and no one will snatch them out of My hand. 29“My Father, who has given them to Me, is greater than all; and no one is able to snatch them out of the Father’s hand. 30“I and the Father are one.”
 
Upvote 0

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,117
34,056
Texas
✟199,236.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Peter is referring to the salvation of the Gentiles.

Up to this point he had only preached salvation to the Jews.

It means whosoever will can be saved.
Yes the context is that salvation through Jesus Christ was not only for the Jews. The “respecter” is related to ethnicity.
 
Upvote 0

Charlie24

Newbie
Oct 17, 2014
2,306
963
✟111,231.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
Yes the context is that salvation through Jesus Christ was not only for the Jews. The “respecter” is related to ethnicity.
Would you agree that Peter preached that whosoever will call upon the name of the Lord will be saved? Regardless of who they are?
 
Reactions: BobRyan
Upvote 0

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,117
34,056
Texas
✟199,236.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Would you agree that Peter preached that whosoever will call upon the name of the Lord will be saved? Regardless of who they are?
I do know this is what Peter said:

Acts 2: NASB

37Now when they heard this, they were pierced to the heart, and said to Peter and the rest of the apostles, “Brethren, what shall we do?” 38Peter said to them, “Repent, and each of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins; and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.39“For the promise is for you and your children and for all who are far off, as many as the Lord our God will call to Himself.” 40And with many other words he solemnly testified and kept on exhorting them, saying, “Be saved from this perverse generation!” 41So then, those who had received his word were baptized; and that day there were added about three thousand souls.
 
Upvote 0

Charlie24

Newbie
Oct 17, 2014
2,306
963
✟111,231.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single

What did Peter mean when he said, For the promise is for you and your children and for all who are far off?

Was he referring to the children of Israel and all the rest of the world, the Gentiles?
Or was he referring to a selected few from Israel and and the rest of the world?

Now remember, the condition is that they, "Repent."
 
Upvote 0