Why creationists can never convince me that evolution is false.

[BeyondET]

So you believe that amphibians evolved from fish and that reptiles evolved from amphibians and that mammals evolved from reptiles and that we evolved from said mammals? And you believe that this was a design process utilized by God?

Do you think God created the caterpillar and the butterfly at the same time in one day?

 

[Yttrium]

Actually there is some out there, Star dust theory and I believe in that.

Star dust seeding life on Earth? That's not a scientific theory.

 

[Hans Blaster]

Star dust seeding life on Earth? That's not a scientific theory.

Nope. It's more of a sci-fi solution to the problem created by incredulity.

 

[Job 33:6]

Do you think God created the caterpillar and the butterfly at the same time in one day?

Probably not. I would think that metamorphosis would be a process that would come about after caterpillars already exist. Or at least some sort of forerunner to the caterpillar.

If you believe that people came about through evolution of fish to amphibian to reptile to mammal, I imagine you wouldn't find much conflict here.

 

[Yttrium]

Nope. It's more of a sci-fi solution to the problem created by incredulity.

Well, it can be a fun idea to play with.

 

[BeyondET]

Like I said, I'm not going to get into it about whether OOL experiments are appropriate set ups for a pre-biotic Earth. That's not the point of my response, nor the overall thread.

Well the thread has a creation aspect as well so no it is not a appropriate set up for earth, you want the overall topic to be one sided I get it.

 

[BeyondET]

Probably not. I would think that metamorphosis would be a process that would come about after caterpillars already exist. Or at least some sort of forerunner to the caterpillar.

If you believe that people came about through evolution of fish to amphibian to reptile to mammal, I imagine you wouldn't find much conflict here.

The breathing the soul zinc spark came much after the flesh from dirt as well as your spark

 

[BeyondET]

If you believe that people came about through evolution of fish to amphibian to reptile to mammal, I imagine you wouldn't find much conflict here.

So how did it happen, man formed from a whirling dirt devil, wipped up a cup of flesh,

 

[renniks]

A more accurate description is that the evolutionary algorithms explored a search space of potential solutions for a particular optimal outcome.



A discussion of free will has absolutely nothing to do with the validity of the science of evolution nor my understanding thereof (the topic of the thread). Hence, why I don't want the thread devolving into a such a discussion.

Only you said the same thing about fish eyes...

 

[renniks]

And you know this how?

Reality exists because it couldn’t be otherwise.

 

[BeyondET]

[

 

[d taylor]

I'm dubious.

What, that there are actually people who believe that science is lying 100% about all of creation not just evolution.

So if science (or people of science) will not state truths about creation, starting several 1000's years back. Why should i all of the sudden say, hey this part now i believe.

 

[BeyondET]

Nope. It's more of a sci-fi solution to the problem created by incredulity.

Your humorous sci fi huh

Are we really made of stardust?

 

[BeyondET]

Even cooler about 9.5% of the elements in the human body came from the very first light.

 

[HitchSlap]

And you know this how?

Because

we’re

here...

 

[Hans Blaster]

Your humorous sci fi huh

Are we really made of stardust?

The "life came to Earth in stardust" is panspermia and it involves microscopic life forms arriving on Earth from other worlds in meteors.

That the Earth itself is condensed from dust made in prior generations of stars, especially exploding ones, is just fact.

 

[BeyondET]

The "life came to Earth in stardust" is panspermia and it involves microscopic life forms arriving on Earth from other worlds in meteors.

That the Earth itself is condensed from dust made in prior generations of stars, especially exploding ones, is just fact.

Everything physically is from the death of a star it’s not sci fi we are made up physically of star dirt.

 

[Shemjaza]

What, that there are actually people who believe that science is lying 100% about all of creation not just evolution.

So if science (or people of science) will not state truths about creation, starting several 1000's years back. Why should i all of the sudden say, hey this part now i believe.

Yeah, exactly.

You said that "Science convinced me that evolution is not true", but you don't have any understanding or awareness of the details of science. You have illogical conspiracy theories that are totally at odds with scientific evidence specifically and the reality of the world around you generally.

 

[Hans Blaster]

Everything physically is from the death of a star it’s not sci fi we are made up physically of star dirt.

Panspermia is a sci-fi solution.

Heavy element production in stars is science.

I've not said anything contrary to these two statements.

 

[renniks]

Because

we’re

here...

Are we? Maybe we just believe we are here.
But if we actually are, that doesn't mean this version of reality always existed.