Why Christians should reject Partial Preterism

[sovereigngrace]

Post #584 Why Christians should reject Partial Preterism

It says:

"As a Trinitarian I see them both as distinct yet one. When Christ was in the grave, the Father began pouring out His wrath upon Jerusalem by first shaking the city of Jerusalem with a major earthquake, and then rendering their temple redundant by cutting their curtain in two."

 

[mkgal1]

It says:

"As a Trinitarian I see them both as distinct yet one. When Christ was in the grave, the Father began pouring out His wrath upon Jerusalem by first shaking the city of Jerusalem with a major earthquake, and then rendering their temple redundant by cutting their curtain in two."

Yes.....isn't that what you, as Sovereign Grace, posted? I quoted Sovereign Grace didn't I?

 

[sovereigngrace]

Yes.....isn't that what you, as Sovereign Grace, posted? I quoted Sovereign Grace didn't I?

No, this quote you keep attributing to me:

You already believe I am a "full preterist pretending to be a partial preterist"

Where is that quote on this forum? When did I make it? It is in quotes!!!

 

[mkgal1]

No, this quote you keep attributing to me:



Where is that quote on this forum? When did I make it? It is in quotes!!!

You've implied all throughout this thread that you "knew" I am really a full preterist (so, wouldn't that be me "pretending".....and you "caught me in the act"?). I'll look for that quote of yours - as Sovereign Grace - in this thread and give you the link. It IS pretty uncanny, though, don't you think that it's just like a banned member's posts?

Here is the list of your posts that imply that I am a full preterist pretending to be a partial preterist:

Search Results | Christian Forums

 

[sovereigngrace]

Yes.....isn't that what you, as Sovereign Grace, posted? I quoted Sovereign Grace didn't I?

It is not a difficult request, allowing for the fact that you keep repeating this quote, and attributing it to me, even though I keep questioning it.

 

[sovereigngrace]

You've implied all throughout this thread that you "knew" I am really a full preterist (so, wouldn't that be me "pretending".....and you "caught me in the act"?). I'll look for that quote of yours - as Sovereign Grace - in this thread and give you the link. It IS pretty uncanny, though, don't you think that it's just like a banned member's posts?

Here is the list of your posts that imply that I am a full preterist pretending to be a partial preterist:

Search Results | Christian Forums

What are you talking about?

 

[mkgal1]

It is not a difficult request, allowing for the fact that you keep repeating this quote, and attributing it to me, even though I keep questioning it.

This is the quote of Sovereign Grace's that this above quote was in response to......I think you're getting yourself confused:

It says:

"As a Trinitarian I see them both as distinct yet one. When Christ was in the grave, the Father began pouring out His wrath upon Jerusalem by first shaking the city of Jerusalem with a major earthquake, and then rendering their temple redundant by cutting their curtain in two."

 

[sovereigngrace]

You've implied all throughout this thread that you "knew" I am really a full preterist (so, wouldn't that be me "pretending".....and you "caught me in the act"?). I'll look for that quote of yours - as Sovereign Grace - in this thread and give you the link. It IS pretty uncanny, though, don't you think that it's just like a banned member's posts?

Here is the list of your posts that imply that I am a full preterist pretending to be a partial preterist:

Search Results | Christian Forums

Oh, so you are implying that I am banned and circumventing the rules under another alias? Wow! It is not enough for you to plagiarize, now you want to misrepresent me, put a question over my integrity? That is wicked!!!

 

[mkgal1]

What are you talking about?

Have you NOT posted in this thread - as Sovereign Grace - that "I knew you were really a full preterist" to me, Claninja, and Parousia70?

Post #594 - directed to Claninja - says:

I have known that you and mkgal were Full Preterist for a while.

.....even though both of us have been correcting that accusation repeatedly (myself, for months).

 

[mkgal1]

Oh, so you are implying that I am banned and circumventing the rules under another alias? Wow! It is not enough for you to plagiarize, now you want to misrepresent me, put a question over my integrity? That is wicked!!!

I only asked you if you found it as uncanny as I do. You are reading in the rest of that. You asked for a link for all the posts where you have made that implication (that I'm pretending to be a partial preterist). I provided you with the link.

 

[sovereigngrace]

Have you NOT posted in this thread - as Sovereign Grace - that "I knew you were really a full preterist" to me, Claninja, and Parousia70?

... when you have blatantly admitted to Full Preterist teaching.

 

[sovereigngrace]

I only asked you if you found it as uncanny as I do. You are reading in the rest of that.

That is not true! You have been throwing that false accusation throughout this thread!

 

[mkgal1]

That is not true! You have been throwing that false accusation throughout this thread!

I've been pointing out the similarities - and, to be honest, there were times I DID get your quotes mixed up due to the unusual comparisons. I posted, "we've had this discussion before" because it was a deja vu with both sides being represented exactly as before (so I provided a link - because I do believe it was a good discussion with many beneficial points made).

 

[mkgal1]

... when you have blatantly admitted to Full Preterist teaching.

No.....I've not. FP do not believe in any more fulfillment of prophecy left - but I believe in a future return of Christ (as I've posted many x already) ......and I believe in a future resurrection. I also believe God is reconciling ALL unto Himself....and, obviously, we are NOT there yet. Full = full.....nothing left to be fulfilled. That's not what I believe.

 

[sovereigngrace]

I've been pointing out the similarities - and, to be honest, there were times I DID get your quotes mixed up due to the unusual comparisons. I posted, "we've had this discussion before" because it was a deja vu with both sides being represented exactly as before.

Are you going to publicly apologize for your false accusations and misrepresentations?

 

[sovereigngrace]

No.....I've not. FP do not believe in any more fulfillment of prophecy left - but I believe in a future return of Christ (as I've posted many x already) ......and I believe in a future resurrection. I also believe God is reconciling ALL unto Himself....and, obviously, we are NOT there yet.

Then answer two simple questions:

1. Is the second coming of Christ an ongoing process or a literal future physical climactic event?
2. Is the resurrection of the dead an ongoing process or a literal future physical climactic event?

 

[mkgal1]

Then answer two simple questions:

1. Is the second coming of Christ an ongoing process or a literal future physical climactic event?
2. Is the resurrection of the dead an ongoing process or a literal future physical climactic event?

+1 for persistence.

I've said.....I'm not answering your loaded with bias and assumptions questions. A person cannot squeeze preterist views into a futurist paradigm.

 

[sovereigngrace]

+1 for persistence.

I've said.....I'm not answering your loaded with bias and assumptions questions. A person cannot squeeze to fit preterist views into a futurist paradigm.

Are you going to publicly apologize for your false accusations and misrepresentations?

 

[mkgal1]

Are you going to publicly apologize for your false accusations and misrepresentations?

You mean "accusing you" of having very similar posts to another member (one that happens to be banned)? That's not false - it's true. I used quotes because it's not an accusation, but an observation.

 

[sovereigngrace]

+1 for persistence.

I've said.....I'm not answering your loaded with bias and assumptions questions. A person cannot squeeze preterist views into a futurist paradigm.

Why would any Christian that has nothing to hide repeatedly ignore these simple questions?

1. Is the second coming of Christ an ongoing process or a literal future physical climactic event?
2. Is the resurrection of the dead an ongoing process or a literal future physical climactic event?