I know plenty of WOFers. In fact, I once wuz one, for a long (and what I now feel was a wasted) decade of my life that led me down several dead-end theological roads that did not profit me or anyone else I ministered to. In fact, today I consider myself a recovering WOFat least recovering from some of the extreme ear-pleasing (but impotent) doctrines I was taught.
But I will say that you are right: there are plenty of good Christian people who are WOF. Many of them live right here in my hometown and attend the local Rhema church, which, at the moment, is going through an identity crisis of its own.
I will also say, that some of the worst representatives of WOF I have yet to find (outside of religious TV), is right here on in this SFPC forum of CF, composed of Christians who seem to go to excessive lengths to defend the indefinable.
The WOFers I know personally are ...... moving (or have moved) away from the 19th-century doctrine of guaranteed PHIA (now preferring to say, as the AOG has, that healing is provided in the atonement rather than guaranteed");
are rejecting the little gods doctrine of KH as being more Mormonism than orthodox Christianity;
are coming to grips with the fact that there are other kinds of prosperity than just the kind you can put in the bank, and that true riches have nothing to do with money;
no longer adhere to the blab-it-grab-it method of exercising faith;
are coming to understand that faith is as much trusting God when things do not go as expected than in getting what you want from God when you want it,
and when they say God is good, it is God, not us, who gets to define what is good for us.
As long as this welcome trend continues, I see little wrong with WOF, but I will (and should) resist extremism no matter what form it takes or in what group it appears. I will "earnestly contend for the faith once delivered to the saints" (i.e., orthodoxy).
~Jim
If the first step in an argument is wrong everything that follows is wrong.
~C.S. Lewis, The Problem of Pain