Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Well... if you believe there is a god, then that god has some sort of influence over the physical world.Doesn't matter if He is "needed" or not! You can't change reality simply by changing your beliefs so you are completely barking up the wrong tree there.
It's been shown that the "what" or the "who" tends to become discarded when we finally find out the "why" and "how".By the way, do you always decide to discount the "what" on the basis that you can't comprehend the "why" and "how"?
Just observation of human nature and a LOT of extrapolation.
See what happened not very long ago with no unnatural causes:
Cargo cult - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
And of course they're my own views. Does anyone have any evidence of what really happened 2000 years ago?
You have to accept that it's possible the gospels are not accurate accounts of the events that really happened.
Only God knows the future, and He has told us what happens.Well... if you believe there is a god, then that god has some sort of influence over the physical world.
What I said is that nothing in the physical world requires the existence of god to work the way it works. Maybe we just don't know how that part of the physical world works, but that doesn't immediately mean that god is behind it.
500 years ago, lightning, earthquakes, etc were considered the work of god. Today... not so!
Isn't it possible to extrapolate into the future and realize that there's a good chance there is no god influencing anything.
I pointed the cargo cults as circumstantial evidence that human beings can easily distort things and, in a very short time span, spawn beliefs and evolve them.No, cargo cults are much different to Christianity. With Christianity you have a man who received all the necessary events in His life to believe He was the son of God, went up against the world powers of the time (Judaism and Rome), telling them that they were sinners and that God's kingdom would be taken from them. They saw the opportunity to claim God's kingdom for their own so they killed Him and hijacked the religious industries just like your friend is trying to entice you to do. There has always been a war over who dominates the religious industry, and there has always been a sliver of truth, due to those who love to live truthfully and to live in a manner that pleases God while the majority of the world lives in a manner to please themselves.
He has?Only God knows the future, and He has told us what happens.
I pointed the cargo cults as circumstantial evidence that human beings can easily distort things and, in a very short time span, spawn beliefs and evolve them.
Is it not possible that jesus never existed?
Is it not possible that, if jesus existed, he could have just advocated peace and love? everything else could have been the effect of such evolution of belief.
On the other hand, I hear god is perfect.... yet he send his only representative to Earth on the far end of some desert country and his message is not understood perfectly by the whole of humanity. why? Where's that perfection which can only make perfect things?
He has?
Or someone wrote something about it and you claim that it was god saying it?
Why BELIEVE, shouldn't we KNOW?
You claim that the book you call "bible" is completely trustworthy.No, it is you who does not understand it properly. The Bible shows that humanity did understand Jesus properly while He was alive, and it is only due to the necessity of Jesus to take His blood to the holy of holies that He was delivered over to the world's mockery and shamefully killed in exchange for a murderer. You sound less than qualified enough to hold your opinions on this matter, would you mind briefly explaining to me the nature of your exposure to Christianity?
Again, you refer to a book which has its merit, but you cannot say for certain that its contents are all that trustworthy.No, God has made the claim Himself:
The LORD, Not Idols
6 “This is what the LORD says—
Israel’s King and Redeemer, the LORD Almighty:
I am the first and I am the last;
apart from me there is no God.
7 Who then is like me? Let him proclaim it.
Let him declare and lay out before me
what has happened since I established my ancient people,
and what is yet to come—
yes, let them foretell what will come.
8 Do not tremble, do not be afraid.
Did I not proclaim this and foretell it long ago?
You are my witnesses. Is there any God besides me?
No, there is no other Rock; I know not one.”
It seems to me you have a lot of Déjà vu and daydreaming.Hi there, I thought I would start by answering your heading. I do know, you missunderstand what Christianity is about, it is about experiencing God. God never anywhere in the bible says you will never find me. He says seek and you will find.
My website is full of examples of God revealing himself to me. See Know God Personally It is a long read but at least read some of it. It will give you an idea of what a Christian life is like.
So why are some people specially tuned to this other world while others can't?
It seems to me you have a lot of Déjà vu and daydreaming
God is not needing anything.ah.. yes... I'm sorry, I had it wrong.
So we just have to be "humble", no believing required.
But bling also defined "humble" as "trusting god"... so there is a requirement for belief. why?
Why is an almighty being so needy of belief or trust from our side?
See the part i put in bold? I don't understand why should I desire such a creator.So the sequence is more sin (hurt others)> be aware of your sin (be burdened in conscience)> seek relieve from this burden> desire a benevolent creator to help relieve your burden > humble yourself to the point of accepting a benevolent creator> accept the benevolent creators charity> Love much as a result.
Red herring. People are either honest or dishonest. When people record their accounts and their thoughts, they can do so in an honest or dishonest manner. When people record honest accounts of Jesus Christ and their experience and thoughts with Him I do take it seriously. Therefore, those who claim in total honesty to have had experiences with God are more authority in my opinion than those who claim in all honesty to not have had experiences with God. Furthermore I speak honestly about my own experiences with God and I do not believe I am wrong in doing so. Do you see why I believe what the Bible says instead of what some atheist says against the Bible and my own testimony? If you can't see the truth for what it is, why do you think I should respect your opinion? This is exactly what you say about those who contribute to the knowledge of God, except it is vice-versa.You claim that the book you call "bible" is completely trustworthy.
I say it may not be so. After all, it was written by people. And people are fallible.