Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Oh...well...you are in the controversial section of this forum, you are free to leave this section if you do not like what you hear.
The whole world will not be saved. Salvation is only for those who believe.
Oh...well...
It's still venemous garbage.
Well I guess that leaves you out then as you do not believe what we are commanded to teach which is Jesus Christ is the saviour of ALL MEN, specially of those that believe.
That was the complete definition of of the Greek word "polus", i.e. "many" from one of, if not, the most highly accredited Greek lexicons available. And I posted the complete definition because the person I was responding to will not accept anything less. If he even accepts that because it disproves his UR interpretation of Romans 5:19 where he interprets the Greek word "polus"/many as all.Wouldn’t a simple definition from a Greek lexicon have been sufficient?
That was the complete definition of of the Greek word "polus", i.e. "many" from one of, if not, the most highly accredited Greek lexicons available. And I posted the complete definition because the person I was responding to will not accept anything less. If he even accepts that because it disproves his UR interpretation of Romans 5:19 where he interprets the Greek word "polus"/many as all.
Since you aren't answering my questions I'll do the same.Again, you are reasoning in earthly terms about what can and cannot be happening in the spiritual realm. As we saw in Isaiah, when a hot coal was put to his lips with no indication of a burn, that things probably operate differently there. A different or expanded set of physics, if you will. A "world" (for lack of a better term) not constrained by time or material.
I disagree, in my studies I'm very comfortable believing that aion is a noun meaning 'an age'. Indeed it's the very word from which we get the word EON out of, which is a period of time in eternity. And the adjective form of the noun aion is aionios. And an adjective can't have a definition that is greater than the noun it is derived from. The adjective form of any noun is merely descriptive of what is taking place in the limits of that noun. For example; An hour (noun) is 60 minutes long. 6 consecutive hourly (adj.) meetings don't mean an hour is also defined as 360 minutes. Those are simply the laws of grammar. And those laws were broken long ago after UR was practiced for 400 years. Another point which I've presented and NO ONE HERE HAS EVER REFUTED. So again, it's your turn to disprove my quote of;Perhaps this struggle to understand these things that we are engaged in here has something to do with the utter lack of the proper words to explain the unexplainable. At term that translates as eternal from an ancient term "ages to ages" may have been the best they could do with it.
Steven, believe me when I say this. There is nothing you can present that I, in my 40 years of studying and 30 years of believing this view of God and his plan, that I "may not have even considered." For 10 years I honestly just hoped it was true that God could be better than some eternal Hitler torturing people in some eternal DYING camp, as I had been taught to believe. A camp you can't even call as merciful as a death camp, that's for sure. Which reminds me you are still avoiding my direct questions AGAIN. WHERE IS THE VERSE ON ETERNAL 'PUNISHING' I asked you to find. Did you even look yet? I really want you to know that these are the 'heart' indicators I'm looking for, but not feeling bro. This is too time consuming for me, as evident by how it took all day at the office just on this one post.Here's the flip side of this. Which you guys may not have even considered. The same word used to define "eternal" death is also used to define "eternal" life. Would you be so quick to diminish our eternal life in Christ with your same arguments? Here are the scriptures in question. The exact same NT Greek word is used. Are you not forced to apply the same definition to the same word?
Thanks for the detailed (and edited) response. I appreciate it.Since you aren't answering my questions I'll do the same.
I think the very case you make concerning Isaiah and the fact that there was "no indication of a burn" speaks volumes as to what God wants you to see. It also aligns with the nature of the God I believe in and serve. It's the nature of a God who has commanded believers to always forgive. So I hope you see the dichotomy of an ETERNAL HELL which says HE is never going to forgive most!!!So, yes this may look like earthly reasoning in your eyes, but it's spiritual reasoning to my eyes. My God view does not hold me to a higher standard of forgiveness than God Himself will EVER live up to. I believe Jesus died for the forgiveness of EVERYBODY'S sins, or He didn't. So for me it's simply a matter of when His plan for ALL others to experience and be "predestined" to be "drawn", "called", and "ordained to believe". For ALL, it will be 'then' that they "hear his voice" for the first time, to receive "the gift of faith" to believe. Whether in this life/age or the "ages to come" is His to determine. All of this is from His initiating, not ours. So for me it just a question of WHEN their time comes. Back to your Isaiah revelation of FIRE that doesn't Burn...even though you can be a tortured soul as was Isaiah when he realized he was "a man with unclean lips". Your observation of God's fire does give you reason to seek a truth you've never seen.
And if you still sin AT ALL then you too are going to endure the same 1Cor 3:15 'judgment of 'saving fire' for perfection, as will all Christians that fought the complete sanctification of their soul on this side of glory. A fire whose purpose is to purge and purify with it's burning. That's why there is a "baptism of the Holy Spirit AND FIRE" for us. That's why "every man shall be salted with FIRE". Were the disciples jumping around trying to put out the FIRE on each other's heads? And the purpose of His fire for us here and now is no different than the purpose of His fire in the hereafter. It is the consuming FIRE which He is, that is going "to make ALL things new". He will consume ALL that is still in you or me and He will do so for all His beloved. And NO His FIRE will not burn like the hot sermons of 'over pastor-ization' which has burned the sincere milk of the gospel. In our sides definition of GOSPEL anyway.
I disagree, in my studies I'm very comfortable believing that aion is a noun meaning 'an age'. Indeed it's the very word from which we get the word EON out of, which is a period of time in eternity. And the adjective form of the noun aion is aionios. And an adjective can't have a definition that is greater than the noun it is derived from. The adjective form of any noun is merely descriptive of what is taking place in the limits of that noun. For example; An hour (noun) is 60 minutes long. 6 consecutive hourly (adj.) meetings don't mean an hour is also defined as 360 minutes. Those are simply the laws of grammar. And those laws were broken long ago after UR was practiced for 400 years. Another point which I've presented and NO ONE HERE HAS EVER REFUTED. So again, it's your turn to disprove my quote of;
"The Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge" by Schaff-Herzog, which I presented to you WAAAAAAY back in post 873 now. But 'that' too is not your interest. Defending where you are is what's driving your heart here, not a quest for the Spirit to lead and guide you into a truth you have never known.
Steven, believe me when I say this. There is nothing you can present that I, in my 40 years of studying and 30 years of believing this view of God and his plan, that I "may not have even considered." For 10 years I honestly just hoped it was true that God could be better than some eternal Hitler torturing people in some eternal DYING camp, as I had been taught to believe. A camp you can't even call as merciful as a death camp, that's for sure. Which reminds me you are still avoiding my direct questions AGAIN. WHERE IS THE VERSE ON ETERNAL 'PUNISHING' I asked you to find. Did you even look yet? I really want you to know that these are the 'heart' indicators I'm looking for, but not feeling bro. This is too time consuming for me, as evident by how it took all day at the office just on this one post.
I actually wrote much more and then deleted to try to make this 'not overwhelming' amounts to read.
Oh my, I just now realized that everything I thought I’d deleted, I didn’t. Every thing past the smiley face was not supposed to be there. You know I hate long posts. I was trying to get out of the office and the edit part was below the screen when I hit send and walked out. Thanks for your much shorter reply. I think it’s a good place for us to leave things.Thanks for the detailed (and edited) response. I appreciate it.
Historically, we have always known (believed) that hell is sternal.
Here's the flip side of this. Which you guys may not have even considered. The same word used to define "eternal" death is also used to define "eternal" life. Would you be so quick to diminish our eternal life in Christ with your same arguments? Here are the scriptures in question. The exact same NT Greek word is used. Are you not forced to apply the same definition to the same word?
John 12:50
I know that his command leads to eternal life. So whatever I say is just what the Father has told me to say.”
John 17:3
Now this is eternal life: that they know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom you have sent.
Romans 6:23
For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.
1 John 5:20
We know also that the Son of God has come and has given us understanding, so that we may know him who is true. And we are in him who is true by being in his Son Jesus Christ. He is the true God and eternal life.
nikolai_42;5267833 said:2. The righteous go into eternal life. The cursed into everlasting punishment. The word for everlasting and eternal is the same here - so unless there is some specific construction leading us to believe that the comparison here is not direct, one would have to give the eternal life of the righteous the same weight as the everlasting punishment due the wicked. A similar argument is made by UR proponents about "all" in I Corinthians 15:22 (and may have been made in this thread - my apologies, I haven't read it in its entirety). So if the eternal life of the believer is never to cease, why should we think the punishment due the wicked will? And if the life of the believer is merely age-lasting, does that mean that at some point in the future, that salvation can be expended and come to an end?
? said:I read the book Hell on Trial: The Case for Eternal Punishment by Robert Peterson. He makes a solid argument. Would recommend it. He includes this quote from Augustine's City of God,
what a fond fancy is it to suppose that eternal punishment means long continued punishment, while eternal life means life without end, since Christ in the very same passage spoke of both in similar terms in one and the same sentence, "These shall go away into eternal punishment, but the righteous into life eternal!" Matthew 25:46 If both destinies are "eternal," then we must either understand both as long-continued but at last terminating, or both as endless. For they are correlative — on the one hand, punishment eternal, on the other hand, life eternal. And to say in one and the same sense, life eternal shall be endless, punishment eternal shall come to an end, is the height of absurdity. Wherefore, as the eternal life of the saints shall be endless, so too the eternal punishment of those who are doomed to it shall have no end.
In an effort to diminish "eternal" punishment, you are also diminishing "eternal" life. Because the exact same NT Greek word is used to describe both.
Matthew 25:46
“Then they will go away to eternal punishment, but the righteous to eternal life.”
??? said:"And these shall go away into eternal (aiōnios) punishment: but the righteous into life eternal (aiōnios)" (Mt.25:26).
??? said:Since the structure of this verse is best described as being a "parallelism" then the Greek word aiōnios must carry with it the same meaning in both instances where it is used.
Where do you draw the line?
If endless torment in hell is unthinkable, why not apply the same idea to momentary torment?
We have earthly rules (Geneva Convention) against human torture of any kind. We categorize these acts as war crimes. Ten minutes of earthly torture would qualify, would it not?
Is not hell the creation of God? Created for Satan and his angels. The unbelieving/disbelieving humans will join them. But only temporarily according to you.
2 Thessalonians 1:5-10
5 Which is a manifest token of the righteous judgment of God, that ye may be counted worthy of the kingdom of God, for which ye also suffer:
6 Seeing it is a righteous thing with God to recompense tribulation to them that trouble you;
7 And to you who are troubled rest with us, when the Lord Jesus shall be revealed from heaven with his mighty angels,
8 In flaming fire taking vengeance on them that know not God, and that obey not the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ:
9 Who shall be punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord, and from the glory of his power;
10 When he shall come to be glorified in his saints, and to be admired in all them that believe (because our testimony among you was believed) in that day.
So, what other commonly held doctrines of the church (or my toddler) are you guys standing against? I know you personally reject the doctrine of the indwelling Holy Spirit. (if I understood you correctly) What is the scope of doctrines under attack by this periphery translation club? The Trinity? Vicarious Atonement? The Deity of Christ? How deep does the rabbit hole go? Did you find Alice? lol --- Send me a PM if you don't want to post your reply here. ThnxOh my, I just now realized that everything I thought I’d deleted, I didn’t. Every thing past the smiley face was not supposed to be there. You know I hate long posts. I was trying to get out of the office and the edit part was below the screen when I hit send and walked out. Thanks for your much shorter reply. I think it’s a good place for us to leave things.
The Greek word aionios, erroneously translated above as "everlasting", is the same Greek word that is often deceptively translated as eternal or everlasting at Mt.25:46.
2 Thess.1:9 is not a difficult text to reconcile with the Scriptural teaching of universal reconciliation(UR). Simply put it speaks of an indefinite duration (=aionias,
often deceptively rendered eternal/everlasting) of destruction.
Therefore, whatever you understand by the word "destruction" - whether death, annihilation or ruin - the text is perfectly harmonious with UR passages of the Bible.
Problem solved. Now you can rejoice in the Good News!
2Thess.1:9 Who, indeed, a penalty, shall pay—age-abiding destruction from the face of the Lord and from the glory of his might— (Rotherham)
9 who shall incur the justice of eonian extermination from the face of the Lord, and from the glory of His strength" (CLNT)
who shall suffer justice -- destruction age-during -- from the face of the Lord, and from the glory of his strength, (2 Thess 1:9, YLT)
A recent new translation by EO scholar David Bentley Hart reads: "Who shall pay the just reparation of ruin in the Age, coming from the face of the Lord and the glory of his might" (A Translation: The New Testament, 2017, Yale University Press).
Regarding the mistranslation "everlasting" or "eternal" in 2 Thess.1:9: "166 aiṓnios (an adjective, derived from 165 /aiṓn ("an age, having a particular character and quality") –
properly, "age-like" ("like-an-age"), i.e. an "age-characteristic" (the quality describing a particular age);..." Strong's Greek: 166. ???????
(aiónios) -- agelong, eternal
A Greek lexicon at the following url states re the Greek word olethron ("destruction") at 2 Thess.1:9:
"...Hierocles 14, 451b has the thought that the soul of the sinner in Hades is purified by the tortures of hell, and is saved thereby..."
ὄλεθρος — с греческого на все языки
As does p.702 of "A Greek–English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature, 3rd ed. (BDAG)":
A Greek–English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature, 3rd ed. (BDAG)
https://www.amazon.ca/Greek-English-Lexicon-Testament-Christian-Literature/dp/0226039331
Compare that above statement to:
"In Ancient Greek mythology, Olethros was the personification of Havoc and probably one of the Makhai. Olethros translates roughly in ancient Greek to "destruction", but often with a positive connotation, as in the destruction required for and preceding renewal."
Here we see "destruction" is for the good of the person:
... deliver such a one to Satan for the destruction of the flesh, that his spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus. (1Cor 5:5)
He who is finding his soul will be destroying it, and he who destroys his soul on My account will be finding it. (Mt.10:39)
Here we see destruction was temporary:
Jesus answered them, "Destroy this temple, and I will raise it again in three days." (Jn.2:19)
"Does the eschatological destruction of 2 Thessalonians 1:9 exclude all redemptive possibilities? Nothing in the text requires such a reading." Continued at:
Thomas Talbott: The Inescapable Love of God (part 5)
II Thessalonians 1:8-9
Further re 2 Thess.1:9, Jason Pratt said:
"Which definitely refers to hopeful punishment (and expected salvation in the same day of the Lord to come), not annihilation, when Paul uses it to talk about handing the Stepmom-Sleeping Guy over to Satan for the whole-destruction of the flesh in 1 Cor 5:5.
"Paul compares it to a birth-pang, which is dangerous but hardly hopeless annihilation (and is generally regarded as very hopeful) at 1 Thess 5:3 (talking about the same day to come).
"Paul uses the term to describe people killed by God in the past at 1 Cor 10:10, which can hardly be annihilation unless the resurrection of the evil as well as the good is denied.
"2 Thess 1:9 uses phrases similar to those found in Isaiah 2, talking about the same coming event, which is part of a block of prophecy where those wholly ruined aren't annihilated, but eventually repent of their sins and go to the "survivors" of God's wrath to be reconciled to God, which God accepts washing them clean with spirit and with fire. (Isaiah 4.) Again, far from a result of hopeless annihilation.
"2 Thess 1 is actually one of my scriptural testimonies 'for' universal salvation."
Annihilation places huge doubt on Universalism
Lamentations 3:22 and 3:31-33, The steadfast love of the Lord NEVER ceases, his mercies NEVER come to an end. . . .
Lam.3:31 For the Lord will NOT cast off FOR EVER:
32 For if He causes grief, Then He will have compassion According to His abundant lovingkindness. 33 For He does not afflict willingly Or grieve the SONS OF MEN.…
Rom 5:18 Consequently, then, as it was through one offense for ALL MANKIND for condemnation, thus also it is through one just act for ALL MANKIND for life's justifying."
Rom 5:19 For even as, through the disobedience of the one man, THE MANY were constituted sinners, thus also, through the obedience of the One, THE MANY shall be constituted just."
Unique Proof For Christian, Biblical Universalism
75 UR verses + 100 proofs + 150 reasons etc:
Web Online Help
213 Questions Without Answers:
Questions Without Answers
Already addressed many times on the forum, including several in this topic.