Why are SDA so paraoid of Jesuits?

[Rick Otto]

Oh boy.

 

[MoreCoffee]

on the off-chance MC is able to address the questions about his own video

By "short" do you mean 41 minutes??

Question 1. of the different John Paul Popes - which one is "John Paul the Great"???

Question 2. in the first five minutes - Fulton Sheen is quoted as if he knows something about both Catholics and non-Catholics. Is this where Catholics will admit that quoting Popes, Bishops, Catholic Digest etc when they say something that is "inconvenient" --- still matters??

Question 3 - at the 12 - 13 minute mark your video actually uses the Apostolic succession of Judas. which is the only one found in actual scripture -- even though James dies early on in the book of Acts - and there is no Apostolic succession for him.

But the video admits that the model they are following is the one for Judas.​

Answers:
Yes, 41 minutes is fairly short.

1. John Paul II
2. No idea what the question means
3. You mean the succession of Matthias into the office vacated by Judas? You know that James was not one of the twelve.

 

[Targaryen]

Answers:
Yes, 41 minutes is fairly short.

1. John Paul II
2. No idea what the question means
3. You mean the succession of Matthias into the office vacated by Judas? You know that James was not one of the twelve.

Yeah the Judas that, you know, killed himself after betraying Judas Kinda an amazing overlooking of Scripture there.

But I'm sure you'll have another conspiracy theory to spout off about that again too

If it's not Simon Magus whom Peter rebuked, and it's not Judas who was quite well dead during the times of the early days of the Church....then you're begininng to run out of names to toss out to support the conspiracy

 

[Rick Otto]

You're running out of excuses for your accident theory.
...But "somehow" I don't think you'll "understand" that.
lol

 

[Targaryen]

No accident theory is being discussed either. It's called studying ACTUAL history rather then a book from a dubious prophet that was wrong on far more then the Jesuits...unless the Millerite group,which white belonged to can be proven to have occured like the group of millerites that broke away and thus became the SDA said.

Which, wouldn't that be as much of a bit of secret knowledge as anything you are trying to accuse the RCC of?

 

[MoreCoffee]

Yeah the Judas that, you know, killed himself after betraying Judas Kinda an amazing overlooking of Scripture there.

But I'm sure you'll have another conspiracy theory to spout off about that again too

If it's not Simon Magus whom Peter rebuked, and it's not Judas who was quite well dead during the times of the early days of the Church....then you're begininng to run out of names to toss out to support the conspiracy

Everybody knows that no matter how many times the conspiracy is demonstrated to be wrong it will still be right!!!!



That's the nature of conspiracy theories

 

[Targaryen]

I just noticed a typo in my rebuttal

TO clarify, so I don't add to the conspiracy Judas killed himself after betraying Jesus.

 

[MoreCoffee]

I just noticed a typo in my rebuttal

TO clarify, so I don't add to the conspiracy Judas killed himself after betraying Jesus.

I bet somewhere in all this it will turn out that Judas was a Jesuit

 

[Targaryen]

I bet somewhere in all this it will turn out that Judas was a Jesuit

You just had to say it, didn't you?

 

[FreeinChrist]

MOD HAT

This thread has undergone a small clean up.

As a reminder, the site rules include:
​

Flaming and Harassment
● Please treat all members with respect and courtesy through civil dialogue. Refrain from insulting, inflammatory, or goading remarks. When you disagree, remember to address the content of the post and not the poster personally.
● If you are flamed, do not respond in-kind. Alert staff to the situation by utilizing the report button.
● Stating or implying that another member or group of members who have identified themselves as Christian are not Christian is not allowed.
● Be considerate and do not make another member's experience on this site miserable. This includes making false accusations or persistently attacking them in the open forums.
● Respect another member's request to cease personal contact.
​

And the General Theology Statement of Purpose includes:
​

Handling Disagreements

Members who participate in the General Theology forums are expected to treat one another with courtesy and respect at all times, ESPECIALLY when you disagree with each other. It is not a flame for a member to disagree with another member's argument or opinion on a specific topic.

• When you disagree, address the content of the post and not the poster.
• When you disagree with someone's position, you should post evidence and supporting statements for your position. This policy, sometimes referred to as "X means Y because of Z", must be followed especially when posting claims that are widely considered to be controversial.
• When you disagree and you find yourself becoming frustrated and angry, step away from the computer and give yourself time to cool down.
• Always proofread your post before hitting the "Reply" button to make sure you have responded with courtesy and respect.

Please keep it civil.

 

[LittleLambofJesus]

Originally Posted by MoreCoffee

I bet somewhere in all this it will turn out that Judas was a Jesuit
​

You just had to say it, didn't you?

Perhaps as an anti-type of him.
I doubt a Jesuit would do what Judas did to himself in Acts

Act 1:18
(With the reward he got for his wickedness, Judas bought a field; there he fell headlong, his body burst open and all his intestines spilled out.
19 Everyone in Jerusalem heard about this, so they called that field in their language Akeldama, that is, Field of Blood.)


.

 

[Rick Otto]

Perhaps as an anti-type of him.
I doubt a Jesuit would do what Judas did to himself in Acts

Act 1:18
(With the reward he got for his wickedness, Judas bought a field; there he fell headlong, his body burst open and all his intestines spilled out.
19 Everyone in Jerusalem heard about this, so they called that field in their language Akeldama, that is, Field of Blood.)


.

Entirely posiible I would imagine, if I gave it some serious thought, but serious thought isn't what motivates using these terms for mockery.

 

[Rick Otto]

No accident theory is being discussed either. It's called studying ACTUAL history rather then a book from a dubious prophet that was wrong on far more then the Jesuits...unless the Millerite group,which white belonged to can be proven to have occured like the group of millerites that broke away and thus became the SDA said.

Which, wouldn't that be as much of a bit of secret knowledge as anything you are trying to accuse the RCC of?

Your use of the term "ACTUAL" is hollow rhetoric.
I never read anything by Ms. White.

History is (in general) either the outcome of SOMEone's plans, or an unplanned (accidental) outcome. If it ain't one, by default is is the other.
You advocate accident by default, which is patently false in the face of the conspiracy for good, between the members of the Trinity.

 

[Mama Kidogo]

Repeat after me: The man in the below image is not a Jesuit. The man in the below image is not a Jesuit.

When you awaken, you will have no recollection of this post.

 

[Rick Otto]

Who is he?

 

[Mama Kidogo]

Who is he?

He's not a Jesuit spy. He's pure blood SDA. It's an "Amazing Fact".

 

[~Anastasia~]

LOL! I had no idea who he is either. I'm going to have to remember your hypnotic technique.

 

[Rick Otto]

He's not a Jesuit spy. He's pure blood SDA. It's an "Amazing Fact".

I imagined he's SDA, but now what do you mean, "pure blood"?

 

[Mama Kidogo]

I imagined he's SDA, but now what do you mean, "pure blood"?

Ellen G. White - Messenger for a Movement - YouTube

Minutes 38-40 should answer that question.

 

[BobRyan]

Ellen G. White - Messenger for a Movement - YouTube

Minutes 38-40 should answer that question.

You are pointing to section dealing with the degree to which Ellen White was a prolific writer, her writings translated into a large number of other languages, and the video then contains a focus on testing all doctrine against what the Bible says.

Did you mean to do that?

in Christ,

Bob