I will agree with you that World War 2 was a just war, but it had nothing to do with the Holocaust. That evil act was discovered after the war. America's main reason for declaring war on Germany was the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor although president Roosevelt would have eventually convinced congress to enter the war against Germany to protect democracy in Europe.
Nadine lets forget scripture for a second and debate this on the merits of what we believe to be right and wrong.
You said the military killing in the self-defense of its country was justified.
You also said military action to prevent genocide and other inhuman acts against society is justified. I agree on these two points. {From a non-biblical aspect of my sense of right and wrong}
Are there any other reasons that justify military action?
Have you seen the movie, “Hotel Rwanda"? It is a true story about the genocide that was committed 10 years ago in Rwanda. Close to a million people, men, woman, children, and babies were brutally hacked to death in the streets within a few months. No country in the world would help because Rwanda is a poor country and has no oil or other resources.
Recently some Christian groups are trying to pressure Washington to do something concerning the recent genocide in Darfur, Africa. But once again it has no economic benefit to the west so there is little hope of intervention. What is more important, protecting our economic interest in the world, or preventing inhumanity and genocide?
Unfortunately, my history knowledge is about as good as my math.

:o
As I remember the tv documentaries I saw on the war, that wasn't the sole reason - they did already catch wind of mistreatment of people & knew of them dissappearing over there. So it's possible it was a combined reason.
Either way, they used force & ENDED IT. Praise God.
As far as Rwanda, yes I remember that genocide - let's not forget aparthide too.
I say this, THE ENTIRE WORLD'S RESCUE ISN'T INCUMBANT SOLELY ON THE USA.
Where are OTHER countries? I hope you aren't blaming America?
We aren't the world police where when we see or hear of some attrocties, go & send our troops everywhere to the rescue.
The WORLD has an obligation (thru the UN) in this too.
Where is everyone else??
Since I'm not a mind reader, I cannot agree or disagree about the
motive you attach as to why Rwanda was ignored. I don't know all the details & issues for each countries failure to intervene.
It may or may not be the case.
But my issue wasn't to go into specific wars tho.
The truth is, the OT has some of the bloodiest battles archived. God TOLD THEM to wipe out the women & children (
for reasons I understand & accept - just that it's not all too pleasant) & led them from one campaign to another to get them into the Promise land.
Plus, He initiated capitol punishment. IF it were against God's principles & it was evil, He would have paved the way for Israel w/out leading them to mass slaughter of "innocent" people.
[all He had to do was send mass plagues, weather disasters fires, or wild animals in & wiped them out before them].
My point is, God isn't a passivist; He never was. Look at Jesus making a whip of cords & turning over tables of the moneychangers abusing the people coming to worship.
He is both loving, but He's also JUST and vengeful (Vengeance -revenge- is MINE, I will repay sayeth the Lord).
What I see happening is, people are REDEFINING what Love is rather than using God as the Model.
Love today in modern society is
removing anything that makes anyone feel "unpleasant, uncomfortable or inconvenienced" in any way.
This is why you see so many "pastors" neglecting to preach on "sin" or "hell", or anything else that's not uplifting or "
negative".
LOVE IS BEING WRONGLY DEFINED & distorted from it's true meaning.
Our purest example of Love comes FROM GOD who IS love, in all His attributes.
As for Darfur, Christians ARE doing what I want to see; trying to help & get aid to them, while at the same time trying to get world attn. to bring military
force to stop these muslims.
My problem is with those who don't CARE about their plight because they're "anti war/military". All war/military is sinful to them no matter what the cause.
Anyone who'd use force to get them liberated is "evil" in that person's mind.
(while comfortably enjoying the freedom & safety under the umbrella of that very force they deem wicked -
they'll sure accept all the BENEFITS it provides them).
But our Govt. has tried in the UN to get attn there to stop it. I've watched them speak about it on the news.
Just recently, George Clooney -of all people even spoke at the UN on this - I saw the film footage of him there; it's his cause as well -
what's the UN doing about it?
I'm not quick to attach *
motive* as to why each country isn't interceding there. We can't KNOW why - we can speculate but not judge.
The USA has brought this up repeatedly to the UN as a top priority issue.
As I see it, it's the UN (countries within it) TYING THE HANDS OF ANYONE TRYING TO STOP IT.
In the USA's defense, since we know Muslims don't fight "fair",
it's not so easy or cheap as to send a few troops in as if that's going to free them. It's not as simple as it might seem to go in there.
The POINT here tho, is that
it is our WILL to help them & use force to intervene.
Hope that clarifies things better

peace