• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Why an eternal hell? (2)

createdtoworship

In the grip of grace
Mar 13, 2004
18,941
1,758
West Coast USA
✟48,173.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
What's with the personal attacks, bro? Do you really think that your conduct on this thread has been honoring to our Lord? When I crossed the line, I sucked it up, apologized, and deleted the offending posts. And, I was still falsely accused by you of doing the very thing that you are brazenly doing here.

You've now openly admitted that your purpose in this thread is to collect "ammunition against" me. Is that what Jesus calls you to -- to collect ammunition against people who disagree with you? To twist and contort what they say until they point out how utterly dishonest your responses are, and then to turn around and act all surprised at being accused of behaving dishonestly? To falsely accuse other posters of mistreating others and then turn around and do to them the very thing that you falsely accused them of? If you believe that your Lord would tolerate such an approach, then you have bigger issues to deal with in your spiritual walk than the whole ET/Annihilation debate.

Like I said, when I was wrong, I admitted, I apologized, and I deleted the posts that caused the offense, including the parts of them that were not at all off base. Are you going to man up and do the same? Or is this conversation over?

Personally, I think that if you could stay civil, make an honest attempt to understand the positions of those who disagree with you, and abstain from personal attacks and false allegations, this could be a very interesting discussion. But, until then, it's really not a God honoring endeavor. :wave:

FTR, I am unsubscribing to this thread. If you're willing to man up and apologize for your last couple posts, PM me.
what attacks? If saying "ammunition" is an attack then you are way too sensitive. So why do you believe in two lakes of fire?
 
Upvote 0
B

Blessedj01

Guest
Why?

Does the bible actually say that?

In my opinion, yes.

And what he wants to spare us from is, in reality and effect, Himself... :/

In effect, yes. God is just and will not hold back our just reward for sin. Fortunately for us, God is also love and has provided an escape plan that satisfies both his wrath and his justice as well as his love.

God compares himself to a parent. I try to picture my daughter doing something bad, and me - for some reason - being forced to punish her for it. But, it's not too important that I punish the one who did something wrong, what really matters is that someone, somewhere, is punished. So I punish, say, the dog, in her stead. After having tortured the dog to death because my daugther stole a candy bar, I offer her to accept or reject my offer of grace. If she accepts, hooray. If she doesn't, I have no choice but torture her for ever and ever.

This is not at all what is described in the Bible. Very poor analogy. You've effectively compared the Son of God to a dog and the sin of man to stealing a candy bar. You're exposing a clear lack of theological solid-ground.

That should make her understand how much I love her.

You allow this to grow and I guarantee you it will consume your faith.
 
Upvote 0
B

Blessedj01

Guest
As I've stated, if we use the original greek words and how they were defined during that time, I don't see how anyone could believe in a non ending torture pit. As important were the greek words not used that would denote severe torture and endless time.

Even if Hell wasn't eternal, I wouldn't want to go there for five minutes.
 
Upvote 0

dollarsbill

Well-Known Member
Jan 17, 2012
6,676
147
✟7,746.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
As I've stated, if we use the original greek words and how they were defined during that time, I don't see how anyone could believe in a non ending torture pit. As important were the greek words not used that would denote severe torture and endless time.
All of our English Bibles CLEARLY teach eternal punishment in the fire.
 
Upvote 0

Armistead14

Newbie
Mar 18, 2006
1,430
61
✟24,449.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
All of our English Bibles CLEARLY teach eternal punishment in the fire.

All your English bibles may seem to promote such, the greek words do not as I have clearly shown numerous times in this thread. Not to mention we have numerous known mistranslated words used in the english versions.
 
Upvote 0

dollarsbill

Well-Known Member
Jan 17, 2012
6,676
147
✟7,746.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
All your English bibles may seem to promote such, the greek words do not as I have clearly shown numerous times in this thread. Not to mention we have numerous known mistranslated words used in the english versions.
So you're saying our English Bibles are wrong and you are right? Hmmm.

Matthew 25:41 (NASB)
41 "Then He will also say to those on His left, 'Depart from Me, accursed ones, into the eternal fire which has been prepared for the devil and his angels;
 
Upvote 0
B

Blessedj01

Guest
All your English bibles may seem to promote such, the greek words do not as I have clearly shown numerous times in this thread. Not to mention we have numerous known mistranslated words used in the english versions.

It doesn't matter very much what you have personally shown, because thousands if not millions of people disagree with your analysis. You can't be the last word on this one.
 
Upvote 0

FredVB

Regular Member
Mar 11, 2010
4,982
1,009
America
Visit site
✟322,356.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
How is that? Why can't the offender pay the full consequences for his own actions? Is it impossible to punish you enough?

This may be for another thread, but I'm not so sure about the traditional view that the cross was merely a way for God to punish all the sin in the world. There are many records in the bible of God simply forgiving transgressors. But again, another topic.

On that we agree, and God's fair judgment is the point from which I read all other bible verses.

I think Armistead14 has provided some good insights into that, so I'll quote him. I'm not educated enough to determine exactly how correct he is, but it makes sense. The highlights are mine:



Maybe, but I don't see why eternal suffering for the sinner must be the only possible way to do it.

It is possible to be punished enough. That is separate, in eternity souls are not eliminated, and suffering does not pay for them to be clean from sin. Christ alone would do that, but still what is suffered is fair for each according to their sins.
 
Upvote 0

tankerG

Newbie
Jul 8, 2012
211
8
Tucson, AZ
✟22,908.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
As I've stated, if we use the original greek words and how they were defined during that time, I don't see how anyone could believe in a non ending torture pit. As important were the greek words not used that would denote severe torture and endless time.

True, we must look at the original Greek words and their meanings to correctly interpret what the Bible says to us.
Jesus said - "And these will go away into everlasting punishment, but the righteous into everlasting life." (Matt. 25:46) Both words everlasting are aionion in the Greek here. The only two ways to interpret this verse is:
#1) the punishment of the wicked is conscious and eternal
#2) the life of the righteous is not conscious and eternal

There's no wiggle room here - it's one or the other. Aionion is either eternal in both instances, or it's not eternal in both instances. Since so many verses of Scripture employ aionion in places that indicate eternal torment, I say it's #1.
If you say it's #2 then the redeemed will not fellowship with God forever. Simple as that.
 
Upvote 0

createdtoworship

In the grip of grace
Mar 13, 2004
18,941
1,758
West Coast USA
✟48,173.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
As I've stated, if we use the original greek words and how they were defined during that time, I don't see how anyone could believe in a non ending torture pit. As important were the greek words not used that would denote severe torture and endless time.

as I have stated before, the beast and the false prophet were in the lake of fire a thousand years before satan was thrown in. and anyone not found in the book will also be thrown in. Revelation 20:10-15
 
Upvote 0

createdtoworship

In the grip of grace
Mar 13, 2004
18,941
1,758
West Coast USA
✟48,173.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Without a doubt the human soul is immortal. This is clearly seen in many Scriptures in both the Old and New Testaments: Psalm 22:26; 23:6; 49:7-9; Ecclesiastes 12:7; Daniel 12:2-3; Matthew 25:46; and 1 Corinthians 15:12-19. Daniel 12:2 says, “Multitudes who sleep in the dust of the earth will awake: some to everlasting life, others to shame and everlasting contempt.” Similarly, Jesus Himself said that the wicked “will go away to eternal punishment, but the righteous to eternal life” (Matthew 25:46). With the same Greek word used to refer to both “punishment” and “life,” it is clear that both the wicked and the righteous have an eternal/immortal soul.

The unmistakable teaching of the Bible is that all people, whether they are saved or lost, will exist eternally, in either heaven or hell. True life or spiritual life does not cease when our fleshly bodies pass away in death. Our souls will live forever, either in the presence of God in heaven if we are saved, or in punishment in hell if we reject God’s gift of salvation. In fact, the promise of the Bible is that not only will our souls live forever, but also that our bodies will be resurrected. This hope of a bodily resurrection is at the very heart of the Christian faith (1 Corinthians 15:12-19).

While all souls are immortal, it is important to remember that we are not eternal in the same way that God is. God is the only truly eternal being in that He alone is without a beginning or end. God has always existed and will always continue to exist. All other sentient creatures, whether they are human or angelic, are finite in that they had a beginning. While our souls will live forever once we come into being, the Bible does not support the concept that our souls have always existed. Our souls are immortal, as that is how God created them, but they did have a beginning; there was a time they did not exist.
 
Upvote 0

holo

former Christian
Dec 24, 2003
8,992
751
✟85,294.00
Country
Norway
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
Revelation 22:11 (NASB)
11 "Let the one who does wrong, still do wrong; and the one who is filthy, still be filthy;"
I'm not so sure that verse is about sinners who died and are facing judgment, especially since - as far as I know - that idea isn't found anywhere else in the bible, and the fact that it says many times that sinners will die as opposed to have eternal life (yes, I know you and I agree on what 'life' and 'death' means).

I think that to determine what the bible says about something we must look at the whole bible to get the whole picture. It seems to me that the really important stuff is said several times and in several ways. I don't see the idea of eternal torment for the sinner in general, or the idea that God forces them to keep sinning forever in particular, in the bible as a whole.
 
Upvote 0

holo

former Christian
Dec 24, 2003
8,992
751
✟85,294.00
Country
Norway
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
In effect, yes. God is just and will not hold back our just reward for sin. Fortunately for us, God is also love and has provided an escape plan that satisfies both his wrath and his justice as well as his love.
It makes me wonder: The belief I, and most other christians, have inherited from our christian families and cultures, is (basically) that God made evertything perfect. But for some reason He had to give man free will as well. Using his free will, Adam ruined everything for everyone, forever. He messed up God's perfect plan A, so God had to make a plan B, whereby He gets to save a few of us. But the vast majority He will create and then (have to?) torment forever and ever.

You know, that doesn't sound quite right, and the more I dare to question it (a fantastic byproduct of losing your traditional view of hell is that fear of hell will no longer dictate what questions you dare to ask) the more it seems to conflict with a lot of stuff in the bible, for example God's foreknowledge, His will, His might, man's abilities an purpose and so forth. I don't know what the truth is, but I'm pretty sure the truth isn't what I was brought up to believe.

This is not at all what is described in the Bible. Very poor analogy. You've effectively compared the Son of God to a dog and the sin of man to stealing a candy bar. You're exposing a clear lack of theological solid-ground.
But the sin of man may very well be stealing a candy bar. Your kid could steal something and die right after, and be sentenced to eternal suffering for that.

I worded it poorly, but my point wasn't to compare Christ to a dog, but to point out that the blame and punishment was laid somewhere other than on the offender. God apparently has to punish sin. Not all sin, because we know He has simply forgiven a lot of sin, but apparently some of the sin must be punished. It's not important who is punished for the sin, though, because God's wrath or some sort of cosmic law simply demands vengeance. So God does punish someone, first animals, then His own son, for EVERY SIN EVER COMMITTED. Then, if you're lucky enough to hear the gospel, you get the chance to accept or reject it. If you reject it, then you'll have to pay for your sin forever, even though Christ has already paid for it, once and for all according to the bible.

That's my rough and simplified understanding of typical christian theology.

You allow this to grow and I guarantee you it will consume your faith.
What do you mean?
 
Upvote 0

holo

former Christian
Dec 24, 2003
8,992
751
✟85,294.00
Country
Norway
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
It is possible to be punished enough. That is separate, in eternity souls are not eliminated, and suffering does not pay for them to be clean from sin. Christ alone would do that, but still what is suffered is fair for each according to their sins.
Does the bible say that suffering doesn't pay for them to be clean from sin? Like, God punishes you for sinning, but you're not actually paying for your crime?

Romans 6:7
because anyone who has died has been set free from sin.
 
Upvote 0
B

Blessedj01

Guest
It makes me wonder: The belief I, and most other christians, have inherited from our christian families and cultures, is (basically) that God made evertything perfect.

Why are we starting out with the assertion that most Christians "inherited" their beliefs?

But for some reason He had to give man free will as well.

Some reason? You wouldn't be a man without free will.

[Using his free will, Adam ruined everything for everyone, forever. He messed up God's perfect plan A, so God had to make a plan B, whereby He gets to save a few of us.

God's "plan" has always been perfect, from it's inception to it's response to sin.

You know, that doesn't sound quite right, and the more I dare to question it (a fantastic byproduct of losing your traditional view of hell is that fear of hell will no longer dictate what questions you dare to ask)...

You can't say it doesn't "sound right" and then propose that you came to your conclusions Biblically. You've just given an admission that it's purely your feelings you're judging upon.

What questions do we dare not ask? It seems to take more courage to accept the truth about God than it does to white-wash Him over with empty sentiment.

...the more it seems to conflict with a lot of stuff in the bible, for example God's foreknowledge, His will, His might, man's abilities an purpose and so forth. I don't know what the truth is, but I'm pretty sure the truth isn't what I was brought up to believe.

I know what your'e getting at, "it's God's fault". Your position simply isn't tenable.

But the sin of man may very well be stealing a candy bar. Your kid could steal something and die right after, and be sentenced to eternal suffering for that.

The sin of man is nothing like stealing a candy bar. It's rebellion against a Holy, righteous and perfect God.

I worded it poorly, but my point wasn't to compare Christ to a dog, but to point out that the blame and punishment was laid somewhere other than on the offender.

To say you worded it poorly is an understatement...

God apparently has to punish sin.

Well, yes, unless you want him to cease to be God.

Not all sin, because we know He has simply forgiven a lot of sin, but apparently some of the sin must be punished.

You haven't got a theological solid-ground. All sin is punished, either upon Jesus or the sinner whom rejects Him unto death.

It's not important who is punished for the sin, though, because God's wrath or some sort of cosmic law simply demands vengeance.

God's perfection demands justice.


So God does punish someone, first animals, then His own son, for EVERY SIN EVER COMMITTED. Then, if you're lucky enough to hear the gospel, you get the chance to accept or reject it.

There's no one who's ignorant of and innocent of sin. There's no one who's heart doesn't testify the existence of God. There's no one who God will forget to inform of the gospel. Just because there are big questions that require a higher perspective to understand (like why people die so suddenly,) doesn't mean those questions don't have an answer in the Bible.

If you reject it, then you'll have to pay for your sin forever, even though Christ has already paid for it, once and for all according to the bible.

You have to accept His payment in order for it to count. Rejecting Christ is a choice.

That's my rough and simplified understanding of typical christian theology.

No offense but I don't think you really understand Christian theology.

What do you mean?

You know what I mean.
 
Upvote 0

holo

former Christian
Dec 24, 2003
8,992
751
✟85,294.00
Country
Norway
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
Why are we starting out with the assertion that most Christians "inherited" their beliefs?
That's true for myself and everyone in my family, and the vast majority of the christians I know. It's also apparent that if you grow up in a catholic family or society, chances are you'll hold to catholic theology when you grow up. Or protestant, or muslim for that matter. We don't 'choose' our faith as freely as we like to think.

Some reason? You wouldn't be a man without free will.
I don't think the bible defines man as someone who has a free will.

At the very least our will isn't completely free, God has been known to "harden the heart of Saul," for example. And when Judas betrayed Jesus, was that his free will? Or part of God's plan? Paul also apparently states that people are the way they are because God decided to make them so. He then rethorically asks "then how can God judge me" and answers "who are you to question God" - which in my honest opinion is a totally cop-out answer. But of course, my opinion can't grasp God's character and will etc. But I can't understand how God can first decide that you are to, say, persecute the people of Israel, and then later judge you for doing it. Perhaps we'll get the answer to that beyond the grave.

God's "plan" has always been perfect, from it's inception to it's response to sin.
That's what I think too. And that's why I'm beginning to see the fall of Adam as God's plan as well. Because it's not like God, creator of the universe and all, couldn't make a world without this horrible potential for sin, or like He didn't know what Adam would do. So these days I'm trying to read the bible with that possibility in mind.

It's a dillemma, of course: either God couldn't stop the holocaust, or He didn't want to. What's worse? It may be that God has some reason, an ultimate purpose, for people to enudre all this happiness and torture strewn out in history seemingly at random.

You can't say it doesn't "sound right" and then propose that you came to your conclusions Biblically. You've just given an admission that it's purely your feelings you're judging upon.
It doesn't sound right because of what I read in the bible, I should probably have pointed that out. Stuff like "man devises his ways, but the Lord directs his steps." All the mentions of God controlling the forces of nature, animals, even sending evil spirits into people, it's all at best limiting to the idea of our famed "free will." And it doesn't seem to fit in with the idea of God being good and/or all-knowing, so my guess is that the understanding I grew up with is wrong.

Now, to find the right understanding...

What questions do we dare not ask? It seems to take more courage to accept the truth about God than it does to white-wash Him over with empty sentiment.
One of the questions I didn't even dare to ask before, was: "why do I believe in God?"
Or, "what if christianity isn't the right faith?"
I was so scared to ask some of the tough questions for fear of losing my faith. I was afraid to question the doctrine of hell because I was scared of hell. In short, fear kept me from seeking the truth (I may not have found it, but at least I'm searching). How many muslims would there be if they could feel comfortable questioning their own faith without repercussions from Allah and/or their fellow muslims?

Too often I'm met with the explicit "oh, we'll never find the answer to those questions," or the implicit and much more dangerous "you shouldn't be asking these questions, they might destroy your faith (and thus send you to HELL FOREVER)."

I know what your'e getting at, "it's God's fault". Your position simply isn't tenable.
I'm not saying it's His "fault," rather I'm suggesting that maybe it's His will.[/QUOTE]

The sin of man is nothing like stealing a candy bar. It's rebellion against a Holy, righteous and perfect God.
But the only sin a person may ever get to committ, is stealing that candy bar. A lot of people die young. If a person has spent eighty years cursing and/or denying God against better knowing, I could see the argument for severe and long lasting punishment. But an eternity in conscious suffering because you stole candy once?

Well, yes, unless you want him to cease to be God.

You haven't got a theological solid-ground. All sin is punished, either upon Jesus or the sinner whom rejects Him unto death.
Jesus said "forgive them, for they know not what they do." When the lambs were sacrificed, their blood covered the people's sin. On other occasions, God merely forgave or, like with Abraham "counted his faith as righteousness." I don't see "God's perfection demanding justice (revenge)" in those situations.

I don't think God is subject to anything, including His own perfection. People used to think God was "too perfect" to have anything to do with gentiles or sinners in general. But the perfect God, infinite and holy and all, washed people's feet and ate with prostitutes and tax collectors. Had it happened today it may have been child molesters and drug traffickers. People still talk about God as if He is somehow "too holy" to even come near sin, but God Himself became flesh and died naked on a cross, the bible even says "he became sin." If He hadn't dealt with sin before, He did it then, once and for all.

You have to accept His payment in order for it to count. Rejecting Christ is a choice.
It strikes me as strange that God would make that sacrifice knowing it would only "count" for a few of us. That He would punish ALL sin on the cross, but then punish AGAIN those who for some reason didn't get "saved" during their lifetime.

I think it's more likely that, just as none of us chose to be sinners but were born sinners since we are children of Adam, we all will be saints because of what Jesus did. In fact, the bible says "how much MORE" about Jesus' work compared to Adam's. And it figures that when God Himself recitifies something, it's ramifications are greater and more encompassing than when a human messed it up.

I'm not a universalist, just thinking about those things, trying to figure out what the bible acutally says.

You know what I mean.
No, I don't, and I'd rather have you tell me instead of speculating.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

holo

former Christian
Dec 24, 2003
8,992
751
✟85,294.00
Country
Norway
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
Without a doubt the human soul is immortal. This is clearly seen in many Scriptures in both the Old and New Testaments: Psalm 22:26; 23:6; 49:7-9; Ecclesiastes 12:7; Daniel 12:2-3; Matthew 25:46; and 1 Corinthians 15:12-19. Daniel 12:2 says, “Multitudes who sleep in the dust of the earth will awake: some to everlasting life, others to shame and everlasting contempt.” Similarly, Jesus Himself said that the wicked “will go away to eternal punishment, but the righteous to eternal life” (Matthew 25:46). With the same Greek word used to refer to both “punishment” and “life,” it is clear that both the wicked and the righteous have an eternal/immortal soul.
I don't know how you interpret those verses that way. I mean, "some to everlasting LIFE, others to shame and everlasting contempt." How does that NOT mean that one one side is life, and on the other is death, the absence of life?

I think you're mistaken about the words referring to punishment and life. Eternal punishment doesn't mean eternal life. When I say my dog is dead forever, it doesn't mean she's now been in a state of dying for the last five years and shall continue to be dying for all eternity. It means she's dead, and she'll be dead forever. She had to take the punishment for her actions, we had to put her to sleep, as they say. Eternal judgment, no way to escape, her death is never going to end.

And again, in the very beginning of the bible, God denies sinners eternal life. He blocks their access to the tree of life so they would NOT live forever. What would be the point if they were already immortal to begin with?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
B

Blessedj01

Guest
That's true for myself and everyone in my family, and the vast majority of the christians I know. It's also apparent that if you grow up in a catholic family or society, chances are you'll hold to catholic theology when you grow up. Or protestant, or muslim for that matter. We don't 'choose' our faith as freely as we like to think.

Well, it's not true for me. The Bible says if you don't choose Jesus freely of your own will and believe He is the Son of God who died for your sins then you don't know him. You can't "inherit" real faith.

I don't think the bible defines man as someone who has a free will.
How can you be a man if you don't have free will? Do you know what people without free will are called? They're called prisoners.

At the very least our will isn't completely free, God has been known to "harden the heart of Saul," for example. And when Judas betrayed Jesus, was that his free will? Or part of God's plan?
Don't misunderstand those passages. God works through the hearts of men and turns evil intentions into His good.

Paul also apparently states that people are the way they are because God decided to make them so.
So now your position is that God forced mankind to be evil?

But of course, my opinion can't grasp God's character and will etc. But I can't understand how God can first decide that you are to, say, persecute the people of Israel, and then later judge you for doing it.
God turns evil into good, he doesn't create the evil in the first place.

That's what I think too. And that's why I'm beginning to see the fall of Adam as God's plan as well.
It's not his plan but he knew it would happen and planned for our salvation before he made us, yes.

Because it's not like God, creator of the universe and all, couldn't make a world without this horrible potential for sin, or like He didn't know what Adam would do.
Do you have a better version of creation perhaps? There is no other version of reality other than the one God created. The potential for sin is a side effect of our spiritual imperfection alongside a holy and righteous God.

It's a dillemma, of course: either God couldn't stop the holocaust, or He didn't want to.
If God was to eliminate sin, he'd have to eliminate you and me. And everybody else.

What's worse? It may be that God has some reason, an ultimate purpose, for people to enudre all this happiness and torture strewn out in history seemingly at random.
It might seem at random to you, but it's not.

It doesn't sound right because of what I read in the bible, I should probably have pointed that out. Stuff like "man devises his ways, but the Lord directs his steps." All the mentions of God controlling the forces of nature, animals, even sending evil spirits into people, it's all at best limiting to the idea of our famed "free will." And it doesn't seem to fit in with the idea of God being good and/or all-knowing, so my guess is that the understanding I grew up with is wrong.
Your understanding of these concepts is incomplete. Do some reading instead of accepting the obviously most flawed interpretation of events.

One of the questions I didn't even dare to ask before, was: "why do I believe in God?"
Or, "what if christianity isn't the right faith?"
Those are common questions but faith in Jesus Christ should be your convincing factor.

I was so scared to ask some of the tough questions for fear of losing my faith.
You can ask those questions, but to entertain them as the truth is contradictory because Jesus Christ can't be the way and not the way at the same time. He's either the way, the truth and the life or He isn't.

I was afraid to question the doctrine of hell because I was scared of hell.
I think it works the other way around. You're no longer scared of hell (because you don't think it has eternal significance) and therefore you're free to question.

In short, fear kept me from seeking the truth (I may not have found it, but at least I'm searching).
Fear is the beginning of wisdom. If you don't fear God, you won't be wise. End of story.

How many muslims would there be if they could feel comfortable questioning their own faith without repercussions from Allah and/or their fellow muslims?
The last point hit the nail on the head. It's not fear of God that motivates the spread of Islam, but it's institutionalization on threat of death. Mankind is to blame for that.

Too often I'm met with the explicit "oh, we'll never find the answer to those questions," or the implicit and much more dangerous "you shouldn't be asking these questions, they might destroy your faith (and thus send you to HELL FOREVER)."
You're struggling with those questions but a lot of people aren't. That's because they've accepted that fear is the beginning of wisdom - and their relationship with God and appreciation of his love is deeper for it.

I'm not saying it's His "fault," rather I'm suggesting that maybe it's His will.
It's his will to be unjust then? Why don't you just apply what we consistently know about God. Start with the fact that he's good and just and he is love and wrath and work backwards. Don't accept any position that you know is inconsistent with his unchanging character. But don't ignore any aspects of his character either. You can't have God's love without his wrath and his justice.

But the only sin a person may ever get to committ, is stealing that candy bar.
It's never about the object in question or about "stealing". God doesn't distinguish between sins for a clear reason: because all sins amount to rebellion against God. God set a "way" for man. To choose to sin is to choose your own "way". If you choose your own "way," you're making yourself God. However God only has room for himself being God, so what sin basically represents is waging war on God, becoming his enemy.

A lot of people die young. If a person has spent eighty years cursing and/or denying God against better knowing, I could see the argument for severe and long lasting punishment. But an eternity in conscious suffering because you stole candy once?
This analogy doesn't serve any purpose.

Jesus said "forgive them, for they know not what they do." When the lambs were sacrificed, their blood covered the people's sin. On other occasions, God merely forgave or, like with Abraham "counted his faith as righteousness." I don't see "God's perfection demanding justice (revenge)" in those situations.
That's right, Jesus asked for their forgiveness. What did God do? He forgave and gave a way for us to have salvation. God forgives every day, every second of our lives. If God were purely interested in his demand for justice, he'd have destroyed us already. However we are fortunate that God's primary attribute is love.

I don't think God is subject to anything, including His own perfection.
Actually, he is. He is consistent with himself and consistent in fellowship within the trinity. God does not do anything that is not "Godly". That is why we call Him "Holy". It's not a 'rule' though, it's just who He is.


People used to think God was "too perfect" to have anything to do with gentiles or sinners in general.
Not arguing with that, people's theology was poisoned with religion.

But the perfect God, infinite and holy and all, washed people's feet and ate with prostitutes and tax collectors. Had it happened today it may have been child molesters and drug traffickers.
That's exactly why He is perfect. He came amongst us to heal us, but he was not a sinner like us.

People still talk about God as if He is somehow "too holy" to even come near sin, but God Himself became flesh and died naked on a cross, the bible even says "he became sin." If He hadn't dealt with sin before, He did it then, once and for all.
God did all that voluntarily because he chose to, to save us. That has nothing to do with whether God's character accepts sin. God humbled himself to human form to achieve this.

It strikes me as strange that God would make that sacrifice knowing it would only "count" for a few of us.
Doesn't it just show you how desperate God is to give his children a chance?

That He would punish ALL sin on the cross, but then punish AGAIN those who for some reason didn't get "saved" during their lifetime.
I personally believe all the sin has the potential to be blotted out on the cross, but if you don't believe in it and you don't honor it - it will not be applied to you. It can't be - because you have to CHOOSE to respond to the Holy Spirit calling you to repentance. It is all a work of God but God does not force any one to accept His son.

I think it's more likely that, just as none of us chose to be sinners but were born sinners since we are children of Adam, we all will be saints because of what Jesus did.
You're welcome to believe that but I don't think you're right.

In fact, the bible says "how much MORE" about Jesus' work compared to Adam's. And it figures that when God Himself recitifies something, it's ramifications are greater and more encompassing than when a human messed it up.
Doesn't follow the scriptures though, unfortunately. The Bible is fraught with mention of people being unsaved.

I'm not a universalist, just thinking about those things, trying to figure out what the bible acutally says.
Alright, well I think it says the opposite.

No, I don't, and I'd rather have you tell me instead of speculating.
You should do as much of your own research as possible. But also be willing to swallow a bitter pill sometimes. Once the pill is down, it's actually not so bitter.
 
Upvote 0