I think Peter was third in line:Some say Peter, but is that accurate?
The title of this thread isRead Isaiah Ch's 9, 11, 52 & 53. He is the first to know.
Mary. Because she knew Yeshua was conceived by the Holy Spirit.Some say Peter, but is that accurate?
Jesus said to her, “I am the resurrection and the life. The one who believes in me will live, even though they die; and whoever lives by believing in me will never die. Do you believe this?”
“Yes, Master,” she replied, “I believe that you are the Messiah, the Son of God, who is to come into the world.”
And when he was come to the other side into the country of the Gergesenes, there met him two possessed with devils, coming out of the tombs, exceeding fierce, so that no man might pass by that way.
And, behold, they cried out, saying, What have we to do with thee, Jesus, thou Son of God? art thou come hither to torment us before the time?
The title of this thread is
Who was the first to know that Yeshua was the Son of God?
Not, who was the first to know that G-d had a son?
I'm being picky here, but I'm always detail oriented. Since specifically Yeshua was named (and that wasn't one of the things he would be called in Is. 9) then it would have to be his mother.
30 So the angel told her, “Do not be afraid, Mary, for you have found favor with G-d.
31 Behold, you will conceive and give birth to a son, and you shall give Him the name Jesus (Yeshua).
32 He will be great and will be called the Son of the Most High.
The L-rd G-d will give Him the throne of His father David,…
It is odd that Mary and the brothers of Jesus forgot all about his calling and came to take him away because they thought that he was insane (beside himself).
The title of this thread is
Who was the first to know that Yeshua was the Son of God?
I'm being picky here, but I'm always detail oriented. Since specifically Yeshua was named (and that wasn't one of the things he would be called in Is. 9) then it would have to be his mother.
You are right, that is being really picky. You created a thread on here, recently, showing how his name (Yeshua) was to be found buried in the Tanach; that validates my response that Isaiah, inspired by G_d, knew who he was speaking of without actually naming him in print - he didn't need to, as John 7:42 also indicates.
Well that is arguable, remember that Daniel was told things and he didn't understand them? I don't think we can say that the prophets that were given words from G-d necessarily understood what they meant and I don't think Isaiah, who preceded Yeshua by many years 'knew' him.You are right, that is being really picky. You created a thread on here, recently, showing how his name (Yeshua) was to be found buried in the Tanach; that validates my response that Isaiah, inspired by G_d, knew who he was speaking of without actually naming him in print - he didn't need to, as John 7:42 also indicates.
The OP doesn't restrict your question to a written name in the Christian Testament; G_d only had one son, so no dispute as to 'which one'.
Well that is arguable, remember that Daniel was told things and he didn't understand them? I don't think we can say that the prophets that were given words from G-d necessarily understood what they meant and I don't think Isaiah, who preceded Yeshua by many years 'knew' him.
I guess we would have to then disect the word in the OP of what 'knew' is defined as.
So you think that he saw Him on the throne as in Revelation?Feel free to define 'knew'. 'Not necessarily' leaves open the fact that some did - I am sure Isaiah did as he described him so well. To say he didn't know G_d, makes Isaiah's claim that the son would be El Gibbor a nonsense; Isaiah knew G_d - they had spoken together (Is. 6)