• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Who really cares what the ECF's had to say?

Status
Not open for further replies.
B

bbbbbbb

Guest
Yes, and look where it got the Orthodox and Catholics ;)

Luke 5:37 "And no one is casting Young Wine into Old skins, if yet no surely shall be ruined the Wine, the Young, of the skins, and it shall be being poured-out and its skin shall be perishing.
38 but Young/neon <3501> Wine into New skins is to be cast and both are preserved together.
39 and no one driking Old immediately is willing Young, for he is saying, 'for the the Old is kind/mellow'".

Hebrews 8:13 in the to be saying `New,' He hath made Old the First. The yet being aged and being obsolete nigh of disappearance

I am still waiting for responses on this thread:

http://christianforums.com/showthread.php?t=7263327


Yes, indeed. Look where it got them. It got them in the very same position that any denomination claiming extrabiblical revelation has, such as the Mormons. Then ended up with "divine" traditions which do not reiterate biblical teaching, but add to it and frequently contradict it as in the semi-deification of Mary by the Marian dogmas pronounced infallible by the Pope in the twentieth century. Their claim to being the one and only True Church of Jesus Christ is just as spurious as any other such denomination. The foundation of these is not the Word of the God but the traditions and words of mere mortal men.

BTW, this debate would not be occuring at all if, in fact, all of the traditions of these churches were actually biblical.
 
Upvote 0

Yarddog

Senior Contributor
Site Supporter
Jun 25, 2008
16,902
4,250
Louisville, Ky
✟1,020,134.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Their theology was wrong in many areas, there were many different interpretations of the same scriptures and in many cases they had next to NO access to bounce their ideas off of other great theological minds...So what gives? why the heavy leanings for understanding? Essentially the scriptures they used and the ones we use have remained unchanged, less some poor translations. It does not seem plausible to hang ones salvation on an early 3rds or 4th century interpretation of the same scripture we have NOW.
Hello Simon,
I know that this comes far after this thread has started and much has been said, but, the ECF's are a great place to understand the early Church thinking. I tend to agree that by the 3rd and 4th century many of these men were at odds on certain items of faith. That doesn't mean that the Spirit of God was in them any less than in earlier years.

ECF's like Clement, Polycarp, Papias, and Ignatius were men who walked either with the Apostles or with men who learned directly from the Apostles. This makes what they say far greater than any present day preacher who uses their own interpretation to understand the scriptures.

When the Ecumenicakl Councils began, these men tried to ensure that what they confessed as canon was what the Church had passed down to them and had been consistantly taught since Christ.

Is all that the Church teaches today consistant, it doesn't appear to be since we can see the differences between Catholic and Orthodox teaching.

But if you want to understand how the Church developed, there is no better place than the ECF's.

God Bless,
Yarddog
 
Upvote 0

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,550
28,531
74
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,300.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
But if you want to understand how the Church developed, there is no better place than the ECF's.

God Bless,
Yarddog
Hi there. ONLY if you want to learn church History. But if you want to learn about YHWH and His Christ JESUS, then you go to the Scriptures. :)

http://christianforums.com/showthread.php?t=7255796
Matthew 24/Olivet Discourse and Partial Preterists question

Deuteronomy 4:26 I testify in the day the Heavens and the Land, to perish ye shall perish hastily from upon the land which ye ones crossing the Yarden there-ward to tenant of her not ye shall prolong days upon her that to be exterminated ye shall be exterminated.

Isaiah 65:17 That behold! Creating Heavens New-ones and-Land New and-not they-shall-be-remembered the-former-ones and-not they-shall-come-up on heart. [REVELATION 21:1]
 
  • Like
Reactions: joyshirley
Upvote 0

Yarddog

Senior Contributor
Site Supporter
Jun 25, 2008
16,902
4,250
Louisville, Ky
✟1,020,134.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Hi there. ONLY if you want to learn church History. But if you want to learn about YHWH and His Christ JESUS, then you go to the Scriptures. :)

Hello Lil Lamb,

There is no doubt that scripture is the best place to learn about God the Father and his Son Jesus, but the earliest of ECF's understood these scriptures far better than we do today. We must remember that Clement walked and talked with Paul. Polycarp walked and talked with John. Papias, though he didn't see the Apostles in person, did walk and talk with those in direct contact with the Aposltes, as did Ignatius.

Our pastors, priest, ministers, etc. did not have the great priviledge of being the first to learn. These men also had the Spirit of God dwelling within them. The same Spirit that we have today.

When I read what these great men had to go through in order to serve God, I know that it is right to honor their memory. These men knew that serving God would lead them to torture and death. Try to put yourself in their shoes. Thousands upon thousands of these early christians died horrible deaths or survived many tortures, losing eyes or limbs, for the sake of Christ's word.

We should honor these men as we honor those men and women who have served God in the Churches today.

God Bless,
Yarddog
 
Upvote 0

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,550
28,531
74
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,300.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: joyshirley
Upvote 0

Yarddog

Senior Contributor
Site Supporter
Jun 25, 2008
16,902
4,250
Louisville, Ky
✟1,020,134.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,550
28,531
74
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,300.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
Hello again,
What makes anyone of the present day have an ability to understand scripture any better than a disciple of Paul?:angel:

Yarddog
Ya think his bro Peter understood him :)

2 Peter 3:16 As also/and in all the letters, speaking in them about these-things; in which are difficult to understand any which the un-learned and un-steadfast are wresting/twisting as also the rest of Writings, toward the own of them destruction/apwleian <684>. [# 684 used reve 17:8, 11]

Reve 17:8 The wild beast which you perceived was, and not is, and is being about to be ascending out of the abyss, and into destruction/apwleian <684> it is going away.
 
  • Like
Reactions: joyshirley
Upvote 0

Yarddog

Senior Contributor
Site Supporter
Jun 25, 2008
16,902
4,250
Louisville, Ky
✟1,020,134.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Ya think his bro Peter understood him :)

2 Peter 3:16 As also/and in all the letters, speaking in them about these-things; in which are difficult to understand any which the un-learned and un-steadfast are wresting/twisting as also the rest of Writings, toward the own of them destruction/apwleian <684>. [# 684 used reve 17:8, 11]

Reve 17:8 The wild beast which you perceived was, and not is, and is being about to be ascending out of the abyss, and into destruction/apwleian <684> it is going away.
I'm sure Peter understood everything Paul said as the other way around.
Peter warned christians not about the things that the Apostles taught and that Paul wrote, but about those that distort the message. Peter talked about these people in chapter 2 as well.

YD
 
Upvote 0

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,550
28,531
74
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,300.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
I'm sure Peter understood everything Paul said as the other way around.
Peter warned christians not about the things that the Apostles taught and that Paul wrote, but about those that distort the message. Peter talked about these people in chapter 2 as well.

YD
Ok thanks. Hope one day the Orthodox and RCC will mend the "fence" concerning their Schiszm. Peace. :wave:

http://christianforums.com/showthread.php?t=7260313
Questions to Catholics about theology and history

Where ever you got the idea that the Greek Orthodox Church is the only Church which can trace its roots all the way back to the first christians, they simply taught you an anti-Catholic myth that is popular in some anit-catholic circles found both in protestantism and eastern orthodoxy.

This tells me the source of your education in history is fairly well tainted with anti-catholic propaganda.

The statement you made above is simply not true. No reputable historian would make such a claim. All 5 ancient Sees can trace their beginnings back to the first Christians. The Roman See traces its originas back to Peter with the Roman Church being founded by Peter and Paul.
 
  • Like
Reactions: joyshirley
Upvote 0

Yarddog

Senior Contributor
Site Supporter
Jun 25, 2008
16,902
4,250
Louisville, Ky
✟1,020,134.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Ok thanks. Hope one day the Orthodox and RCC will mend the "fence" concerning their Schiszm. Peace. :wave:
The Orthodox and Catholic Churches are working on that but let's hope it goes far beyond that.
[Quote}
Where ever you got the idea that the Greek Orthodox Church is the only Church which can trace its roots all the way back to the first christians, they simply taught you an anti-Catholic myth that is popular in some anit-catholic circles found both in protestantism and eastern orthodoxy.[/Quote]
May I ask what you are talking about? The Catholic doesn't teach whetever your referring to above.
This tells me the source of your education in history is fairly well tainted with anti-catholic propaganda.

The statement you made above is simply not true. No reputable historian would make such a claim. All 5 ancient Sees can trace their beginnings back to the first Christians. The Roman See traces its originas back to Peter with the Roman Church being founded by Peter and Paul.
Who are you referring this part of your post to?:confused: You begin this with a quote of mine and then start talking about a thread that I haven't responded to.

Yarddog
 
Upvote 0

Ramon96

Eastern Orthodox Christian
Nov 4, 2006
360
25
NY, NY
Visit site
✟23,086.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Which none of these tradtions can be found anywhere written from the Apostles. They are just heresay and mens opinions with a big name attached to them.

It does not have to be MamaZ because the Apostle Paul told the Early Christians to follow the Holy Traditions pass down by the Apostles either by word or written [2 Thes 2:15]. For you and other Protestants, it is opposite: Only follow what was written. But you and others can not give any solid Scriptures to justify your belief of Solo-Scriptural. Hence, it is a mad-made doctrines!

The Holy Spirit was sent down on the Apostles on Pentecost, and they were given the charisma to serve and lead the Church. This charisma they passed on to their successors, the Bishops, who in turn passed it on to their own successors, even to this present day [2 Tim 2:2]. The Holy Apostles and there Successors passed along the Holy Traditions [not written] to the Early Christians.

The fact that you have a Bible in your hands is because Christ' Church came together and decided which books belong where, under the guidance of the Holy Spirit in the 4th Century. These Same Church Fathers some try to put down were the one who canonized the Bible. Hello! The Church had the ultimate authority in this matter MamaZ, not the Holy Scriptures. You have yet to answer why this is so. This totally destroys your arguments that we should not follow the Church, and that the Holy Scriptures is ultimate authority. Furthermore, Scriptures declare that the Church [not the Bible] is the "pillar of truth" (2 Tim 3:15). Before any NT Scripture was written, it was the Church alone which passed the Apostolic Faith.

Scriptures never say to follow Scriptures alone, that was a myth promoted in the 1500s.

The bible is the truth and nothing but the truth. Scripture tells us this..
Psa 19:7 The law of the LORD is perfect, restoring the soul; The testimony of the LORD is sure, making wise the simple.
Psa 19:8 The precepts of the LORD are right, rejoicing the heart; The commandment of the LORD is pure, enlightening the eyes.
Psa 19:9 The fear of the LORD is clean, enduring forever; The judgments of the LORD are true; they are righteous altogether.
Psa 19:10 They are more desirable than gold, yes, than much fine gold; Sweeter also than honey and the drippings of the honeycomb.

Psalm 119, "Thy Word is very pure." "Thy law is truth." "All Thy commandments are truth." "The sum of Thy Word is truth." "Every one of Thy righteous ordinances endures forever for all Thy commandments are righteous." Psalm 111:7, "All his precepts are sure." Romans 7:12, "God's Word is holy, righteous and good." And you have in Deuteronomy 4:2, "Do not add to Scripture." You have in Revelation 22:18 and 19, "Do not add to Scripture, do not take away from Scripture." It is in total complete and infallible.

Nice Scriptures, but none teach Solo-Scriptural. No one argue that Scriptures are divinely inspired, and no one argue that Scriptures contains the utmost truth. But as Saint Paul said in 2 Thes 2:15, we Christians need to follow the Holy Traditions that was written down [Scriptures] and those which the Holy Apostles passed down through there Holy Successors, and the Early Christians, and not only what was written!

This is the point Mamaz, because what you and others do is read a Scripture that say "Thy Word is very pure" (Ps 119) and automatically assume the Scripture means "only" and thus you come to your conclusion that only Scriptures [what was written] is true and pure. This is where we divide Mamaz. I do not add the one "only" or "alone" to any Scripture text because I know what Saint Paul taught in 2 Thes 2:15. Scriptures is not total complete as you say. Some Holy Traditions were passed down "orally" and was not written down.

Deut 4:2 - This Scripture does not teach Solo-Scriptural, because If your interpretation of the Revelation verses were correct, then they would have to be applied here as well. In which case, the Old Testament after Deuteronomy and the entire New Testament would have to be discarded as false. The passages in the Old Testament that warn against such things (Deuteronomy 4:2; 12:32) are actually warning against adding to the books of Moses, the Pentateuch. God did not preclude Christians from accepting the Old Testament books after Deuteronomy or the New Testament. Where is the word "Scripture" in Deut 4:2? I have the KJV, NKJV, NIV, ASV, NASV, NLT, and others and none have the word "Scripture" in them. Did you add that word to prove your point MamaZ?

Rev 22:18; It is easy to misrepresent Scriptures MamaZ. Revelation 22:18 is talking about the Book of Revelation not the whole Bible. I do not see the word "Scripture" anyway in these verses!

"For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book: And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and [from] the things which are written in this book."
(Rev 22:18-19)

So the question that need to be ask is "Which Translation are you using MamaZ?" I am using the KJV. So are you adding words to the Bible Mamaz, because you add the word "Scripture" into these texts which none of my translations have?

Hence, Revelation 22:18 was talking about ONLY the Book of Revelation, and hence does not agree with Solo-Scriptural!
Saint John said "this book" three times. Saint John did not have a complied Bible with a black page in the back where he was writing on.

Thus, I have yet to see a Protestant give a Solid- Scripture proving Solo-Scriptural. I am still waiting.......

Blessings,
Ramon
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,550
28,531
74
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,300.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
Thus, I have yet to see a Protestant give a Solid- Scripture proving Solo-Scriptural. I am still waiting.......

Blessings,
Ramon
Guess you will just have to keep waiting, and enjoy your schism from the RCs [or is it the other way round]. :)

Matt 23:27 'Woe to ye Scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! that ye are likened to sepulchres whitewashed, who-any outwardly indeed appearing beautiful, within yet are being replete of bones of dead-ones, and of every uncleanness

Acts 23:2 The yet Chief-priest Ananias enjoins those standing beside him to be smiting of him the mouth. 3 Then the Paul said toward him, "to be smiting thee is being about the GOD. Wall! whitewashed, and thou thou dost sitting judging me according to the law, and being beside law, ordering me to be being smitten!'
 
  • Like
Reactions: joyshirley
Upvote 0

Montalban

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2004
35,424
1,509
58
Sydney, NSW
✟42,787.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
We are never told to keep our eyes upon the church. :) Nor the ECF. We are told to keep our eyes upon Jesus for He is the author and the finisher of our faith..

Actually that's just wrong. Paul continued to urge people to unity of fellowship, and of faith,

1 Corinthians 1:10
[ Divisions in the Church ] I appeal to you, brothers, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that all of you agree with one another so that there may be no divisions among you and that you may be perfectly united in mind and thought.

and to follow our elders!

1 Timothy 5:17
The elders who direct the affairs of the church well are worthy of double honor, especially those whose work is preaching and teaching.

You must have the expurgated version of the NT
 
Upvote 0

Montalban

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2004
35,424
1,509
58
Sydney, NSW
✟42,787.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Upvote 0

calluna

Regular Member
Apr 23, 2008
2,237
114
✟25,394.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Private
BTW, this debate would not be occuring at all if, in fact, all of the traditions of these churches were actually biblical.
The word 'tradition' itself is a vile one, because it is both admission of human teaching and threat that failure to comply will be met with violence. In fact, all traditions are novelties that were forced upon people at some time, and those of violent and fearful disposition would still prefer others to comply with them. They are, in reality, nothing more respectable than political interference. Although they are novel, they all have their roots in the paganism that often infested Israel and other states, including Rome. All RC distinctives remove initiative and control from Christians to the state, or to agents of the state, just as the pagn religions of Rome did of the plebeians.
 
Upvote 0
Actually that's just wrong. Paul continued to urge people to unity of fellowship, and of faith,

1 Corinthians 1:10
[ Divisions in the Church ] I appeal to you, brothers, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that all of you agree with one another so that there may be no divisions among you and that you may be perfectly united in mind and thought.

and to follow our elders!

1 Timothy 5:17
The elders who direct the affairs of the church well are worthy of double honor, especially those whose work is preaching and teaching.

You must have the expurgated version of the NT
^_^ The author and the finisher of our Faith is not the church. It is Christ. We are not to put our eyes upon any man for our faith. For our Faith does not come from Man but from Christ the Head..How does faith come? It cometh by hearing and hearing by the word of God. not the word of Man. Not tradtions but the word of God. This is why we see in scripture that we are not to live by bread alone but by Every word that proceeds out of the Mouth of God and that scripture is indeed breathed by God. Therefore the scriptures are what we are to live by. For it is the enterance of Gods word that brings light. Men are just men. Prone to error and delusions and being deceived. This is why the word has been written so that we have a sure testimony as to what is from God and what is not from God. His word is pure. Where mens word are just that mens word. The ECF never uttered scripture only their interpretation of the scripture already written. This is why we have a more sure promise.. Gods written word. For Gods word is sufficient to fully equip the man or woman of God.
 
Upvote 0

Yarddog

Senior Contributor
Site Supporter
Jun 25, 2008
16,902
4,250
Louisville, Ky
✟1,020,134.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
1Co 4:6 Now these things, brethren, I have figuratively applied to myself and Apollos for your sakes, so that in us you may learn not to exceed what is written, so that no one of you will become arrogant in behalf of one against the other.
Hi Mama,
Do you understand that Paul was talking about Old Testament when he says "what is written"? If you were to go by this then you would not be able to use what is now the New Testament.

Have you ever read the Epistle of Clement to the Corinthians? Clement is mentioned in Phillipians 4:3.
3 Yes, and I ask you also, my true yokemate, to help them, for they have struggled at my side in promoting the gospel, along with Clement and my other co-workers, whose names are in the book of life.

Why shouldn't we read the things that Clement wrote? Many people have a distrust of the Catholic Church but don't think of these people as the Roman Catholic Church, think of them as the men that walked and talked with the Apostles. They understood what was taught.

This letter was most likely written just after the deaths of Peter and Paul.

There are many other letters by wonderful men whose writings show their tremendous love for Jesus. Many people read the books of present day authors but why should we forsake those books written by the men who lived and died in the service of God in the early days?

Yarddog
 
Upvote 0
Hi Mama,
Do you understand that Paul was talking about Old Testament when he says "what is written"? If you were to go by this then you would not be able to use what is now the New Testament.

Have you ever read the Epistle of Clement to the Corinthians? Clement is mentioned in Phillipians 4:3.
3 Yes, and I ask you also, my true yokemate, to help them, for they have struggled at my side in promoting the gospel, along with Clement and my other co-workers, whose names are in the book of life.

Why shouldn't we read the things that Clement wrote? Many people have a distrust of the Catholic Church but don't think of these people as the Roman Catholic Church, think of them as the men that walked and talked with the Apostles. They understood what was taught.

This letter was most likely written just after the deaths of Peter and Paul.

There are many other letters by wonderful men whose writings show their tremendous love for Jesus. Many people read the books of present day authors but why should we forsake those books written by the men who lived and died in the service of God in the early days?

Yarddog
Yes He was but as the letters of the Apostles went out they were also scripture. We see Paul saying what Peter wrote was scripture and we see where Peter calling what Paul wrote scripture. :) Therefore they are scripture and they are written and we are not to exceed what is written. :) What Paul wrote was binding for it was scripture.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.