Which Kamala are we voting for?

[KCfromNC]

So sad!

Yeah, you'd think the GOP could do better, yet here we are.

 

[Postvieww]

Yeah, you'd think the GOP could do better, yet here we are.

The GOP will do better when in office 2025! There is nowhere to go but up.

 

[DavidTheGnome]

I'm not voting for Kamala at all. I'm voting for Donald.

 

[Postvieww]

I'm not voting for Kamala at all. I'm voting for Donald.

Smart move. Great!

 

[Postvieww]

The choice is not about liberal and conservative. The choice is between the American system that we've had for over 200 years and Trump.

How does one arrive at such an erroneous conclusion? Is the gaslighting really that effective? Trump is no threat to Democracy, he is actually the opposite.

 

[Tahoe Time]

Kamala Harris has faced criticism for some contradictions in her political career and policy positions. Here are a few notable examples:

1. Criminal Justice Reform: As a prosecutor and later as California’s Attorney General, Harris was known for her “tough on crime” stance, which included supporting the death penalty and opposing measures to reduce mass incarceration1. However, during her 2020 presidential campaign, she advocated for criminal justice reform and criticized the very policies she once enforced1.
2. Healthcare: Initially, Harris supported a single-payer healthcare system and co-sponsored Bernie Sanders’ Medicare for All bill. However, during her presidential campaign, she shifted her stance, proposing a more moderate plan that maintained a role for private insurance2.
3. Fracking: Harris has also changed her position on fracking. While she initially supported a ban on fracking, she later moderated her stance, aligning more closely with the Biden administration’s position2.
4. Abortion: Harris has been a strong advocate for abortion rights, but her position has evolved over time. She initially supported the Hyde Amendment, which restricts federal funding for abortions, but later opposed it during her presidential campaign2.

These shifts in positions have led to accusations of inconsistency and political opportunism.

She claims that from Day one she will tackle inflation - why has she not done that in the last 3 and a half years?

She claims she will control the border - why hasn't she controlled it in the last three and a half years?


She claims she will stop tips from being taxed - that is straight from Trump weeks ago.

This is why an indepth interview and more than one debate is needed -

Look it’s all very simple to decipher and understand. Liars lie. Especially when their lips are moving. Now if you want truth, stick to the Word of God.

 

[Pommer]

The GOP will do better when in office 2025! There is nowhere to go but up.

This implies the GOP is at the very bottom, at present, but you do you, I guess.

 

[Postvieww]

This implies the GOP is at the very bottom, at present, but you do you, I guess.

No actually it means better than the current disaster administration but I think you knew that.

 

[Pommer]

No actually it means better than the current disaster administration but I think you knew that.

Everything’s chugging along nicely, but you’ve convinced yourself it’s all “bad”, for some reason.

 

[Aldebaran]

Everything’s chugging along nicely, but you’ve convinced yourself it’s all “bad”, for some reason.

If it's so great, Biden wouldn't have been forced out in favor of someone who never got a single vote from the public.

 

[Postvieww]

Everything’s chugging along nicely, but you’ve convinced yourself it’s all “bad”, for some reason.

I am glad you are chugging nicely down the grocery isles.

 

[Pommer]

If it's so great, Biden wouldn't have been forced out in favor of someone who never got a single vote from the public.

Neither of which you’re likely to ever vote for, so, what difference does it make who that might be or how they were “selected”?

 

[Aldebaran]

Neither of which you’re likely to ever vote for, so, what difference does it make who that might be or how they were “selected”?

How did you go from discussing kamala to discussing me?

 

[mark46]

How does one arrive at such an erroneous conclusion? Is the gaslighting really that effective? Trump is no threat to Democracy, he is actually the opposite.

so says 40% of the voters

 

[Postvieww]

Neither of which you’re likely to ever vote for, so, what difference does it make who that might be or how they were “selected”?

It shows the hypocrisy of the party claiming to save democracy by violating it.

 

[Gene2memE]

How does one arrive at such an erroneous conclusion? Is the gaslighting really that effective? Trump is no threat to Democracy, he is actually the opposite.

The man that continually lied about his 2020 election defeat?
The man that called for vote counting to be halted when he had the initial lead?
The man that unilaterally declared himself the winner of the 2020 election, despite all evidence being to the contrary?
The man that fired the people who reported no widespread, systematic or results altering fraud in the result of the 2020 elections?
The man who called the Georgia SoS and asked him the "find" exactly the number of votes to win the state?
The man that refused to concede his election defeat even after 60 lost lawsuits?
The man who stopped the GSA from recognising the incoming Biden administration until late November?
The man that launched a multiple illegal attempt to overturn the result (including the 'false electors' scheme and getting his VP to change the certifications of the electoral college votes)?
The man that organised a rally that resulted in a crowd of his supporters attempting to stop/overturn the certification of the 2020 election results?
The man that oversaw the first non-peaceful transition of power in US electoral history?


That man is "no threat to [d]emocracy"?

 

[wing2000]

It shows the hypocrisy of the party claiming to save democracy by violating it.

If Trump dropped out of the race tomorrow, do you really believe the GOP would have primaries in all 50 states to determine the GOP nominee?

 

[Postvieww]

The man that continually lied about his 2020 election defeat?
The man that called for vote counting to be halted when he had the initial lead?
The man that unilaterally declared himself the winner of the 2020 election, despite all evidence being to the contrary?
The man that fired the people who reported no widespread, systematic or results altering fraud in the result of the 2020 elections?
The man who called the Georgia SoS and asked him the "find" exactly the number of votes to win the state?
The man that refused to concede his election defeat even after 60 lost lawsuits?
The man who stopped the GSA from recognising the incoming Biden administration until late November?
The man that launched a multiple illegal attempt to overturn the result (including the 'false electors' scheme and getting his VP to change the certifications of the electoral college votes)?
The man that organised a rally that resulted in a crowd of his supporters attempting to stop/overturn the certification of the 2020 election results?
The man that oversaw the first non-peaceful transition of power in US electoral history?


That man is "no threat to [d]emocracy"?

Let’s hear your explanation for this man you denigrate that has everything liberals could think of thrown at him and is still standing and by some measures stronger than ever?

 

[Postvieww]

If Trump dropped out of the race tomorrow, do you really believe the GOP would have primaries in all 50 states to determine the GOP nominee?

Joe was pushed out by Pelosi and the party.

 

[wing2000]

Joe was pushed out by Pelosi and the party.

...he was convinced to leave. The decision was still his to make.

Again, if Trump is convinced to leave the race tomorrow, would the GOP hold primaries in all 50 states?