• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

What would happen to the creation/evolution debate...

Bungle_Bear

Whoot!
Mar 6, 2011
9,084
3,513
✟262,040.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
I'd like evidence in support of your claims:
1. "China is now the largest nation of Christians not the USA." Hint: "China on course to become world's most Christian nation within 15 years" indicates that your claim is incorrect. And that was your own "supporting" evidence.:doh:
2. "The most highly educated population of Hong Kong is made up of many Christians believing in a Creator God who made the heavens & the earth, as the recent demonstrations have shown." Hint: Hong Kong is about 12% Christian. Roughly 24% of recent university entrants are Christian.

Seriously, if you're going to complain about others making questionable claims about numbers you should be careful about your own claims. It makes you look hypocritical.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

pitabread

Well-Known Member
Jan 29, 2017
12,920
13,373
Frozen North
✟344,333.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
Ah yes, the good 'ole fallback on the margin of error sleight of hand denial. Nice. Same margin in 2017 yet in 2019 with the same margin, IT INCREASED. You said it was continually going down in stats. I showed otherwise.

I'm talking about long-term trends. Cherry picking two data points to claim a trend is a poor reading of statistical data. If you examine the long term trend (e.g. over the last few of decades), it's clearly going down. If I want, I can calculate a moving average based on the Gallup polls and show just that (I've done this before).

This is also supported by Pew Research data as well. I can pull their numbers if you'd like.

Even Dr. Dawkins admitted a spike upward of 30% IN BRITAIN for creationist beliefs, the stronghold of evolutionary theory & that from the younger 'educated' population. So you can rationalize away your denial of a legitimate increase rather than a decrease, whether USA or world. Cling to it however you wish.

There is no "clinging" to anything. The trend in the US is showing a decline; that's based on clear polling data.

If you believe there is an increase in the rate of creationist beliefs in Britain, show me the data.

Still clinging to it, it seems. You keep flip flopping. Which is it, decrease, increase, then decrease, this is where it stands, etc....

There is no flip-flopping. The long-term trend in the USA based on Gallup polling shows a decline.

They even show a chart with past polling results. You can look at it yourself: 40% of Americans Believe in Creationism. Every prior data point prior to 2017 ranged from 44 to 47% belief in creationism. In 2017 it was 38% and in 2019, 40%.

Tell me, are 38 and 40 bigger or smaller than numbers 44 through 47?

When you look at the demographics data it makes sense to expect to start seeing a decline. Older populations of creationists are passing on and rates of creationism among younger populations is lower.

China is now the largest nation of Christians not the USA. The most highly educated population of Hong Kong is made up of many Christians believing in a Creator God who made the heavens & the earth, as the recent demonstrations have shown.

This isn't a question of who is a Christian. Not all Christians are creationists. Not all creationists are Christians.

If you want to make claims about increasing rates of belief in creationism, then show me data to support that. The Gallup polls don't show that, not unless you ignore all polling data prior to 2017. But that would just be silly. :p
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: SLP
Upvote 0

DamianWarS

Follower of Isa Al Masih
Site Supporter
May 15, 2008
10,129
3,439
✟997,153.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
sounds like a strawman to me
How so?
the op is "your prediction" ergo your opinion but it is completely unsubstantiated and misleads those reading down a path of make-believe that you've imagined. It's also isn't actually a part of the creation/evolution debate and you know perfectly well that there are many well-educated creationists in the sciences but you presuppose this isn't the case suggesting a wide level of illiteracy on the subject. you then force those that participate to pick sides either affirming or rejecting your position when all the while it's not even a real argument. This is a textbook strawman.
 
Upvote 0

Speedwell

Well-Known Member
May 11, 2016
23,928
17,626
82
St Charles, IL
✟347,280.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
the op is "your prediction" ergo your opinion but it is completely unsubstantiated and misleads those reading down a path of make-believe that you've imagined. It's also isn't actually a part of the creation/evolution debate and you know perfectly well that there are many well-educated creationists in the sciences but you presuppose this isn't the case suggesting a wide level of illiteracy on the subject. you then force those that participate to pick sides from affriming or rejecting it when all the while it's not even a real argument. This is a textbook strawman.
No, the strawman is trying to conflate belief in God with belief in creationism. It's trying to turn the defense of a particular reading of Genesis into a struggle between theism and atheism.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Strathos
Upvote 0

DamianWarS

Follower of Isa Al Masih
Site Supporter
May 15, 2008
10,129
3,439
✟997,153.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
No, the strawman is trying to conflate belief in God with belief in creationism. It's trying to turn the defense of a particular reading of Genesis into a struggle between theism and atheism.
I'll rephrase "strawmen"
 
Upvote 0

FrumiousBandersnatch

Well-Known Member
Mar 20, 2009
15,405
8,144
✟349,292.00
Faith
Atheist
If you believe the existence of a supernatural being is irrelevant, why are you on here? When I was an get-in-your-face wannabe-agnostic/wannabe-Satanist, I didn't waste my time on these online forums. It seemed pretty pointless.
People have various reasons - some wish to change minds, some wish to broaden worldviews, some wish to correct errors & misrepresentations, some are curious about what others believe and why, some wish to promote their own interests, some wish to disrupt proceedings, etc.
 
Upvote 0

FrumiousBandersnatch

Well-Known Member
Mar 20, 2009
15,405
8,144
✟349,292.00
Faith
Atheist
Ah yes, the good 'ole fallback on the margin of error sleight of hand denial. Nice. Same margin in 2017 yet in 2019 with the same margin, IT INCREASED. You said it was continually going down in stats. I showed otherwise.

Even Dr. Dawkins admitted a spike upward of 30% IN BRITAIN for creationist beliefs, the stronghold of evolutionary theory & that from the younger 'educated' population. So you can rationalize away your denial of a legitimate increase rather than a decrease, whether USA or world. Cling to it however you wish.



Doesn't matter if you are a fan or not or your opinion. The LATEST STATS stand in 2019 of 73% believing a supernatural being, God, was the initiator of the creation of the heavens & the earth--whether ex nihilo or guided the evolutionary process vs. 22% believing no god was involved at all, which it appears you do. (only USA stats). Again I showed stats on the world view as well. You are in the minority & still are.



Thanks for admitting the newest stats IS an increase & in Britain for the educated youth a dramatic increase, as even Dr. Dawkins admits. You must be better informed than he is it seems, to keep insisting on a steady decline.
Creationists are a relatively small proportion of believers in Britain, so even a 30% increase is unlikely to be significant in the overall picture, which is of a significant increase in those professing no religion so that the proportion who say they are non-religious has increased to over 52%.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Astrophile
Upvote 0

pitabread

Well-Known Member
Jan 29, 2017
12,920
13,373
Frozen North
✟344,333.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
the op is "your prediction" ergo your opinion but it is completely unsubstantiated and misleads those reading down a path of make-believe that you've imagined. It's also isn't actually a part of the creation/evolution debate and you know perfectly well that there are many well-educated creationists in the sciences but you presuppose this isn't the case suggesting a wide level of illiteracy on the subject. you then force those that participate to pick sides either affirming or rejecting your position when all the while it's not even a real argument. This is a textbook strawman.

Allow me to explain why I posted what I posted in the OP then:

1) I never said that all creationists are scientifically illiterate. I said that the debate would "mostly disappear", not completely disappear. I suspect that some creationists would be able to pass a modern university-level Biology 101 course. I suspect that most wouldn't make the attempt though.

2) Yes there are creationists with scientific credentials. I never said otherwise. When you look at the stats**, however, creationist scientists represent a small fraction of those in scientific fields and especially so in the case of the relevant life sciences (e.g. biology).

3) The picture doesn't get any rosier when looking at broader education levels. Polling data from both Pew Research** and Gallup** continually show that creationists have lower average levels of educational attainment.

4) This is further supported by studies** that correlate scientific literacy and specifically knowledge of evolution with acceptance thereof. Or to put it another way, knowledge of science and evolution can function a predictor how likely one is to be a creationist. Less scientific literacy/less knowledge of evolution, the greater chance one may be a creationist.

5) My own personal experience on this site promoting educational resources for creationists has been met with heavy resistance (see creationist responses in this thread as an example: Want to learn about evolution? Take a free course). I even started a thread gathering various free courses (Educational resources for learning about biology and evolution). To date, no creationists have responded to that thread.

That's my overall view and perspective based on external sources of data as well as my own personal experiences. Again, I'm not saying all creationists wouldn't pass a University-level Biology 101 course. There are certainly exceptions. In my own 20 years of debating C/E, I've found those exceptions to be quite rare. Which is why I suspect many creationists would not even be inclined to even take a modern university-level Biology 101 course.

Thus if the C/E debate were gated in that fashion, most creationists would no longer be participants.

(** I'll add polling and study references later when I have some more time. I have posted these at various times in the past on this forum. Just so you know I'm not completely making this stuff up. ;) )
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: SLP
Upvote 0

Kenny'sID

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 28, 2016
18,194
6,997
71
USA
✟585,424.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
...What would happen to the creation/evolution debate if everyone was required to pass an introductory Biology (university-level Biology 101) course first?

We would simply ask the all knowing to explain what little bit we don't understand, if anything. Or, educate us, explain what we don't know along the way because you already have the knowledge. You do have the knowledge, right? It's much much easier and makes so much more sense over your time consuming suggestion, or do you not want to make it easy for obvious reasons?

It's not like it's even close to rocket science and since there is no good reason whatsoever not too help us yet you continually claim "no, you need to take a class on it, there is just no other way".. In doing so you only prove once again you are copping out and you cannot prove evolution. Another reason for helping us through the rough spots, if any... Many are here constantly pushing evolution as a fact so it only makes sense you would do all you can to help us believe it...right? If you are in the know, you should be happy to share it all, I know I would be, and most people love to go on about what they know about any given thing. And lastly, didn't your teacher explain it to you? Or do you think you were more capable of understanding than we are? If not, then let's go.

All that said, we can easily see, a cop out here, riddled with excuses would only be an admission you cannot prove evolution.

Watch this...

The challenge

Show those of us who don't believe evolution as it is popularly known to be, that it is a fact....pretty straightforward request. .

I've already made this offer to the op so, though in all fairness I had to try again, I know he won't be accepting the very reasonable challenge offered and will only provide the usual excuses why not. However if there is anyone else here who would like to start from the beginning and explain how evolution is a fact, answer questions along the way, debate and so forth, all right here where all can join in, Then let's do that.

ExcuseOmometer engaged, :)
 
Upvote 0

yeshuaslavejeff

simple truth, martyr, disciple of Yahshua
Jan 6, 2005
39,946
11,096
okie
✟222,536.00
Faith
Anabaptist
You can't ignore scripture though
I don't. Every Word of Yahuweh is Truth.

Ignoring His warnings , and perhaps worse, not repenting of ignoring His Word, is akin to being on the wide road to destruction for everyone/ with everyone/ who practices abominations and does not repent.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Phil W
Upvote 0

Speedwell

Well-Known Member
May 11, 2016
23,928
17,626
82
St Charles, IL
✟347,280.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
It's not like it's even close to rocket science...
Yes, in fact it is. Evolutionary biology, molecular genetics, that math that backs it up, are all pretty much on a par with "rocket science" in terms of level of difficulty. The basic principles, however, are within the grasp of any intelligent layman who wants to study at the undergraduate level in biology, zoology, genetics and math.
 
Upvote 0

Phil W

Well-Known Member
Apr 15, 2019
3,187
676
71
Mesa, Az
✟82,350.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
What "evidence" was removed?
maybe they were just better educated.
An alternative to creation based on a loving God who gives us everything we require to love each other.
The "system" tries to remove any evidence of the real God, and the ways and means of life without corruption.
Any ideas as to why there is so much drug abuse, abortion, racism, and massacres at crowded places?
Having been taught by the "system" that there is no God, it is easy to live a life with our own scale of morality instead of a scale based on love.
 
Upvote 0

Phil W

Well-Known Member
Apr 15, 2019
3,187
676
71
Mesa, Az
✟82,350.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Last edited:
Upvote 0

yeshuaslavejeff

simple truth, martyr, disciple of Yahshua
Jan 6, 2005
39,946
11,096
okie
✟222,536.00
Faith
Anabaptist
Careful. That's pretty close to a reportable statement.
Really? IN THE BIBLE, one translation anyways, it is written "SURPRISE!" , where people usually do not expect to see a surprise. It is very helpful to find out, as it is very revealing, and true, when understood in context (or rather, when understood as God Means it ) .....
 
Upvote 0

Mathetes66

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 24, 2019
1,030
862
Pacifc Northwest
✟90,277.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Skreeper: It's hard for people to let go of wishful thinking & fantasies if they bring them comfort. Life is cruel & hard. I can understand why people prefer to believe in some deity that loves them unconditionally &that they will see their loved ones in the afterlife.

Since you are so concerned about me, I would reverse what you say--is simply wishful thinking & fantasies--& let go of yours that God is not real but does exist & desires a right relationship with you. You sure seem to have missed a lot in my opinion.

One of the foremost scholars on the Bible & Christianity is Bart Erhman. Although he now claims to be agnostic, he states the Bible is one of the most attested ancient documents in history & has no problem believing in the evidence that Jesus existed & that He rose from the dead.

I would suggest you explore developing a relationship with the Lord Jesus Christ. Just as someone has offered free courses in biology, so Bibles can be obtained free as well as Bible courses. I have given away many Bibles to those who want one.

Life for me isn't cruel & hard. I am sorry you personally feel that way about life on this planet. My life is a wonderful adventure with some challenges here & there to overcome & a journey full of the joy & the life of Jesus Christ, just as He promised to give to those who repent & believe the gospel.

I have received malignment & ridicule for being a simple disciple & follower of the Savior of the world. But I rejoice in that because it comes with the territory of being a follower of the Lord. Billions around the world have found this to be their life & experience.


Our English word for martyr comes from the Greek word for 'preach' the gospel. From the days of Jesus Christ on this earth & since , to preach the gospel meant you preached it at the risk of martyrdom. The first three centuries of Christianity were paved with the blood of martyrs. So many became Christian that in the 4th century the Roman government made it the state religion under Constantine & it brought relative peace to the empire. This Christian bloodshed today is no different.

FrumiousBanders: Creationists are a relatively small proportion of believers in Britain, so even a 30% increase is unlikely to be significant in the overall picture

Dr Hawkins thought so. Apparently you don't.

Bunglebear: "China is now the largest nation of Christians not the USA." Hint: "China on course to become world's most Christian nation within 15 years" indicates that your claim is incorrect. And that was your own "supporting" evidence.:doh:

"The most highly educated population of Hong Kong is made up of many Christians believing in a Creator God who made the heavens & the earth, as the recent demonstrations have shown." Hint: Hong Kong is about 12% Christian. Roughly 24% of recent university entrants are Christian.

Seriously, if you're going to complain about others making questionable claims about numbers you should be careful about your own claims. It makes you look hypocritical.

Your false accusation that I am complaining is way off base. I never stated others were making questionable claims. You did. You obviously aren't reading ALL of my posts. I haven't denied most of what Pitabread is saying or saying what he is reporting is 'questionable.' YOU said that, I didn't. So if you are going to make accusations I am a hypocrite better not look in the mirror.


When I stated that China is now the largest Christian nation, I did that, because most of the reports I listed were quoting government statistics, not counting the large network of underground churches. I should have said it is fast becoming the largest Christian nation, if not already. I wrote that early in the morning. It apparently upset you so I apologize if it did.

And out of the 11 I posted you chose only one you decided to USE (most kept mentioning BY 2030 not by 2035) and make a condescending 'emoticon' to ADD. There is no opportunity for dialogue with you. I can dialogue with Pitabread. So have a great awesome day.

Much of the Christian population in China is actually underground, unreported, because of persecution & signing up for the government churches means constant surveillance & glorifying the patriotic state (so named the government 'Three Patriotic movement.'

So the stats shown are not representative of the actual number. Just last year they dynamited an unregistered house church with 50,000 members & a Catholic unregistered one without warning. This year one of China’s best-known underground churches, 'Latter Rain' in SW China was raided & closed. Pastor Wang & his wife, Jiang Rong, remain in detention, charged for 'inciting subversion', with a penalty up to 15 years in prison.

Early Rain is the latest victim of what Chinese Christians & rights activists say is the worst crackdown on religion since the country’s Cultural Revolution, when Mao Zedong’s communist, atheistic government vowed to eradicate religion. The USSR tried to do the same. Christians have a LONG history of overcoming persecution & martyrdom. We are still here, billions strong. And we will win in the end.

China has the largest number of cameras of any country & developing a 'gait' technology to identify people as well, as well as drone technology.

They are now developing a 'social credit system' that punishes bad Communist behavior & rewards good atheistic state party lines. The nightmare of George Orwell's book is a reality. It is not a good place to be identified as a Christian there or a minority group or someone opposing the atheistic party government, even on legal grounds.

China introduces surveillance system that recognises you just by the way you walk

In Xi we trust - Is China cracking down on Christianity? | DW | 19.01.2018


Pitabread: I'm talking about long-term trends. Cherry picking two data points to claim a trend is a poor reading of statistical data. If you examine the long term trend (e.g. over the last few of decades), it's clearly going down. If I want, I can calculate a moving average based on the Gallup polls and show just that (I've done this before).

I recognize you are talking about long-term trends, which for the most part I agree. However, I am not merely 'cherry picking' two data points. I already addressed the decrease of 7% in my past post over the almost 4 decades of polling data.

My point was to show that over those almost 4 decades, a 2% increase IS significant, not just cherry picking. You are correct in the 'details' of the trend generally declining.

However, I mentioned the second point to show that the increase in Britain was alarming enough to Dr. Hawkins, enough to mention a need for 'conversion.' That was all I was trying to show.

I mentioned the third point of 73% vs 22% to demonstrate also the latest stats on people believing God is involved in the universe we now live in.

I wasn't a Christian when I was 'indoctrinated' in high school evolutionary theory. I wasn't a Christian when I entered college.

Most colleges require a basic curriculum education for those wanting a degree & at least 2 credits in a natural science. Most I have observed over time choose biology. My intro class had between 300-400 in it.

I still remember the professor (class was in the school stage auditorium) starting the class, swinging on one of the ropes across the stage, yelling like Tarzan. Then he came to the mic & said, 'Good morning!' He definitely woke all of us up for that morning class!

I took another class in microbiology for my certification in another state to teach. It was also an enjoyable one as the professor told us that he was going to give us a history lesson on how microbiology changed the world while teaching the classs. Fascinating! We also made sauerkraut in lab as one project & he brought the sausages!

One person who had influence in my life concerning Christianity while I was attending college was the curator of the Science Museum on campus. He was a brilliant man, who got 2 degrees in the time it takes most to get one & then went on to more advanced degrees. He made science exciting. He was also a Christian who was a creationist & challenged much of my 'indoctrinated' evolutionary thinking. It changed the course of my life because I seriously began to investigate the claims of Jesus Christ. But enough of me.

People down through history have sought to eradicate Jews & Christians. As I said before we are billions strong & still here. And we will win in the end. And with that, thanks for the good discussion, Pitabread. Keep up the good work!
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
42,252
45,361
Los Angeles Area
✟1,009,463.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
One of the foremost scholars on the Bible & Christianity is Bart Erhman. Although he now claims to be agnostic, he states the Bible is one of the most attested ancient documents in history & has no problem believing in the evidence that Jesus existed

That is correct.

& that He rose from the dead.

That is not correct.
 
Upvote 0