• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

What is wrong with Calvinism ?

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,038
7,497
North Carolina
✟342,614.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Calvinists have a not that different of a problem. Why God "accepts" Jimmy, but not Clark?

What I heard is it's because God chose Jimmy, but not Clark. It's just that it doesn't explain why it wasn't Clark He chose instead of Jimmy. Was Jimmy better than Clark? Chance?
Why, before they were even born, did God choose Jacob instead of Esau?
There was no basis in them for a choice.

And both were treacherous as adults.

Romans 9:18-24 explains why. . .in a nutsehll: the absolute sovereignty and right of God to do so, for his own purposes, and no other reason.

All we have to do is receive and believe it. . .and meditate on, and take to heart Isaiah 55:8-9.

Time to stop measuring God by ourselves. . .receive his revelation regarding himself. . .and start measuring ourselves by him.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

John Mullally

Well-Known Member
Aug 5, 2020
2,463
857
Califormia
✟146,819.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
I agree with AVB 2 on this one. These false prophets in 2 Peter 2 having at one time “escaped the pollutions of the world through the knowledge of the Lord and Savior Jesus Christ" means for that time they did not qualify as unsaved because they escaped “the influence of the prince of the power of the air” through the knowledge of the Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.
They were tares, not wheat. . .they were goats, not sheep. . .in the kingdom but not of the kingdom. . .in the visible church, but not in the invisible church (body of Christ).
The wheat and the tares parable is about why God does not judge immediately. Remember the field is the World, this is more about the teaching. God gives the truth and wisdom, the enemies create chaos and lies. This is why some are goats and tares, not because they were born with it. They were misled by deceit and lies.
 
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,038
7,497
North Carolina
✟342,614.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
God can use sin for His purpose, it just doesn't mean God decreed it.
There is nothing in the world of my sovereign God that he didn't ordain. (Daniel 4:35)
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

John Mullally

Well-Known Member
Aug 5, 2020
2,463
857
Califormia
✟146,819.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
I agree with AVB 2 on this one. These false prophets in 2 Peter 2 having at one time “escaped the pollutions of the world through the knowledge of the Lord and Savior Jesus Christ" means for that time they did not qualify as unsaved because they escaped “the influence of the prince of the power of the air” through the knowledge of the Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.
NOBODY escapes the influence of the evil one. Maybe you could rephrase that.
Here is my rephrase: “Escaping the pollutions of the world through the knowledge of the Lord and Savior Jesus Christ” implies “escaping the influence of the prince of the power of the air”. Both the "prince of the power of the air" and the “god of this world” are terms for satan.
 
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,038
7,497
North Carolina
✟342,614.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
The wheat and the tares parable is about why God does not judge immediately. Remember the field is the World, this is more about the teaching. God gives the truth and wisdom, the enemies create chaos and lies. This is why some are goats and tares, not because they were born with it. They were misled by deceit and lies.
In the only universe I know, wheat are not tares, and tares do not become wheat. . .
that is a given, and I won't be arguing with that reality.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

zoidar

loves Jesus the Christ! ✝️
Site Supporter
Sep 18, 2010
7,477
2,669
✟1,035,562.00
Country
Sweden
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Why, before they were even born, did God choose Jacob instead of Esau?
There was no basis in them for a choice.

Both were treacherous as adults.

Romans 9:18-24 explains why. . .in a nutsehll: the absolute sovereignty and right of God to do so, for his own purposes, and no other reason.

All we have to do is receive and believe it.

You say no basis? But it must be the basis of God's will right? So why did God have the will to save Jimmy, but not Clark? Couldn't God have His purposes through saving Clark instead of Jimmy? Why was His purposes to choose Jimmy instead of Clark?

Your answer is like why was that man shot by the burglar? Because the burglar fired a gun. And then we are to accept that as the reason. It's just not explaining anything.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Mark Quayle

Monergist; and by reputation, Reformed Calvinist
Site Supporter
May 28, 2018
14,282
6,364
69
Pennsylvania
✟943,943.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Widowed
What? Me sarcastic?!!

Well schoolboy I did suggest you make a anti-Armi thread and said I would carry the Armi torch. Feel Free to add a word or two from the Bible in support of the whateveritis you wrote above.

Kinda bogus to knock my Arminian presentations after you posted that junk :preach:

(I`m really a Paul guy. I just do the Armi for fun.)

Once again I invite you to share a word or two from the Bible in support of your points.

Which points —those to which these posts were in response? Or my points concerning regeneration? I will try to figure out what you mean by "that junk" that I "wrote above".

I should play the victim of your disrespect, in keeping with your pout concerning @Clare73 . If your attitude is necessary in defense of Arminianism, it doesn't speak well for Arminianism.

The fact that I rarely add direct quotes from Scripture doesn't mean that my defenses of, or claims concerning, Reformed Theology are not Biblical. There are many reasons for not doing so, not the least of which is that it is not prudent to quote Scripture as, to all practical purposes, a blathering assault, on those who will not listen. But ironically, as I think I have mentioned before, every passage you have quoted serves equally well, if not more surely, as a defense for Calvinism, though you cannot see it, even though context makes it clear.

I hope you don't think the below is "junk".

Ephesians 2: "1 As for you, you were dead in your transgressions and sins, 2 in which you used to live when you followed the ways of this world and of the ruler of the kingdom of the air, the spirit who is now at work in those who are disobedient. 3 All of us also lived among them at one time, gratifying the cravings of our flesh and following its desires and thoughts. Like the rest, we were by nature deserving of wrath. 4 But because of his great love for us, God, who is rich in mercy, 5 made us alive with Christ even when we were dead in transgressions—it is by grace you have been saved. 6 And God raised us up with Christ and seated us with him in the heavenly realms in Christ Jesus, 7 in order that in the coming ages he might show the incomparable riches of his grace, expressed in his kindness to us in Christ Jesus. 8 For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith—and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God— 9 not by works, so that no one can boast. 10 For we are God’s handiwork, created in Christ Jesus to do good works, which God prepared in advance for us to do."
 
Upvote 0

Jesus is YHWH

my Lord and my God !
Site Supporter
Dec 15, 2011
3,496
1,727
✟389,997.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
When the word creation is used, it is always understood in reference to Genesis 1. If you wanted to add angles into the word creation, and to be clear in your comment as to what you were saying. Saying before the creation of the angels there was no sin, would have better been understood.
Angels were a creation . Colossians 1:16-17 attests to that fact
 
Upvote 0

John Mullally

Well-Known Member
Aug 5, 2020
2,463
857
Califormia
✟146,819.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
In the only universe I know, wheat are not tares, and tares do not become wheat. . .that is a given, and I won't be arguing against that reality.
Jesus describes a transition point from death (tare) into life (wheat). The parable was not about God assigning eternal destiny, it was about our difficulty discerning between the two, and about God delaying judgement for the sake of the wheat.

John 5:24 Truly, truly, I say to you, he who hears My word, and believes Him who sent Me, has eternal life, and does not come into judgment, but has passed out of death into life.​
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: iwbswiaihl
Upvote 0

d taylor

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2018
13,595
5,751
60
Mississippi
✟318,578.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Angels were a creation . Colossians 1:16-17 attests to that fact

Did i ever say they were not.
Again angles were created before the creation in Genesis 1. And as i stated before when the word creation is used, what comes to mind is the creation account in Genesis 1 and not the creation of angles.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iwbswiaihl
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,038
7,497
North Carolina
✟342,614.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
You say no basis? But it must be the basis of God's will right? So why did God have the will to save Jimmy, but not Clark? Couldn't God have His purposes through saving Clark instead of Jimmy? Why was His purposes to choose Jimmy instead of Clark?

To me your answer sounds like: "I don't know why."
Your answer is like why was that man shot by the burglar? Because the burglar fired a gun. And then we are to accept that as the reason.
And since my answer to which you are referring is Romans 9:18-24,
your issue is with authoritative NT apostolic teaching, not with me.

And that's above my paygrade.
My job is to receive and believe it.
Judging it is way above my paygrade.

But I'm certain of this:
We don't call God's word to the bar of our reason to answer our objections.
That's turning things upside down as if the potter were thought to be the clay (Isaiah 29:16).
We don't judge God's word, it judges us.

Romans 9:18-24 stands over you, you don't stand over it.

.
 
Upvote 0

zoidar

loves Jesus the Christ! ✝️
Site Supporter
Sep 18, 2010
7,477
2,669
✟1,035,562.00
Country
Sweden
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
And since my answer to which you are referring is Romans 9:18-24,
your issue is with authoritative NT apostolic teaching, not with me.

And that's above my paygrade.
My job is to receive and believe it.
Judging it is way above my paygrade.

But I'm certain of this:
We don't call God's word to the bar of our reason to answer our objections.
That's turning things upside down as if the potter were thought to be the clay (Isaiah 29:16).
We don't judge God's word, it judges us.

Romans 9:18-24 stands over you, you don't stand over it.

.

You are asuming Romans 9:18-24 was written to give an answer to my question. That's a misunderstanding on your part. I have no problem with Romans 9:18-24. It's not an answer to my question. It's answering other things.

To me your answer sounds like: "I don't know why." It's not that that is a bad answer. Sometimes we don't know how it works. That's what I also say about free will. I believe it. I don't know how it works. So there I think we are in a similar seat. Don't know if you will be willing to accept that or agree with that.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,038
7,497
North Carolina
✟342,614.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Jesus describes a transition point from death (tare) into life (wheat). The parable was not about God assigning eternal destiny, it was about our difficulty discerning between the two, and about God delaying judgement for the sake of the wheat.

John 5:24 Truly, truly, I say to you, he who hears My word, and believes Him who sent Me, has eternal life, and does not come into judgment, but has passed out of death into life.​
Nope. . .John 5:24 is not about Matthew 13:24-30.

Jesus never used analogies of nature that were not true to nature, for that would make the analogies no more true than they were in nature.
 
Upvote 0

John Mullally

Well-Known Member
Aug 5, 2020
2,463
857
Califormia
✟146,819.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
You seem to think that the warning to the Elect (and the presumably Elect) implies the ability to fail, i.e. to fall away and lose your salvation. No more so than the command to the lost implies the ability to obey.
I find it helpful to put away presuppositions when I read the Bible - otherwise, I don't learn anything. Hebrews 6:4-12 is a warning to believers as only believers qualify under verses 4 and 5. The warning would not be given if verse 6 was impossible. My opinion is that this happened to the 2 Peter 2 false prophets.

Hebrews 6:4 For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted of the heavenly gift, and were made partakers of the Holy Ghost, 5 And have tasted the good word of God, and the powers of the world to come, 6 If they shall fall away, to renew them again unto repentance; seeing they crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh, and put him to an open shame.

2 Peter 2:20 For if, after they have escaped the pollutions of the world through the knowledge of the Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, they are again entangled in them and overcome, the latter end is worse for them than the beginning​
 
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,038
7,497
North Carolina
✟342,614.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
You are asuming Romans 9:18-24 was written to a give an answer to my question. That's a misunderstanding on your part. I have no problem with Romans 9:18-24. It's not an answer to my question. It's answering other things.
To me your answer sounds like: "I don't know why."
Where do you get that idea?

The answer is clear in v. 21:
"Does not the potter have the right to make out of the same lump of clay some pottery for noble purposes and some for common purposes (human waste)?"

What is unclear about that?
Why this assertion of uncertainty? It makes no sense. . .the text is not uncertain here.
Why are we going there?
It's not that that is a bad answer. Sometimes we don't know how it works.
That's what I also say about free will. I believe it. I don't know how it works.
Well, it's certainly not hard to understand.
The will is governed by the disposition; i.e., what one prefers, likes.
God works in the disposition, giving one to prefer his will, which one then voluntarily and freely chooses because it is what he prefers.
What is so hard to understand about that?

Do you have something vested in spiritual things not being understandable?
So there I think we are in a similar seat. Don't know if you will be willing to accept that or agree with that.
Not when it is examined. . .nothing is unclear and uncertain there.

Sorry you don't see the clear correlation between "Why Jimmy and not Clark," and Romans 9:18-24
("God has mercy on whom he wants to have mercy, and he hardens whom he wants to harden.")
as it relates to "why Jacob and not Esau" of Romans 9:10-13.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: Mark Quayle
Upvote 0

iwbswiaihl

Active Member
May 17, 2022
398
118
82
BON AQUA
✟34,412.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Yes, it's a one-package deal. . .it is all a continuous process, the regenerated always believe, the regenerated are always saved, the regenerated's sins are always remitted, the regenerated are always justified, the regenerated are always adopted as sons. . .

Regeneration --> faith --> remission of sin (salvation) --> justification (declared righteous) --> sonship

are in reality close to simultaneous, but for order of effect, they are stated as occurring above,
it all beginning where Jesus says it does in John 3:3-8, with the rebirth by the sovereign will of God the Holy Spirit before the unregenerate can even see anything spiritual (Romans 8:7-8; 1 Corinthians 2:14), much less receive and believe.

""This is not scriptural (with the rebirth by the sovereign will of God the Holy Spirit before the unregenerate can even see anything spiritual (Romans 8:7-8; 1 Corinthians 2:14), """much less receive and believe.)"""

This is like the statement you said before that is no where found in scripture and surely not in the ones who speak of here in John 3:5 Jesus answered, “Truly, truly, I tell you, no one can enter the kingdom of God unless he is born of water and the Spirit. The water is representative of the word of God; John 15:3 Now you are made clean through the word which I have spoken. Eph 5:26 that he might sanctify her, having cleansed her by the washing of water with the word 1 Peter 1:22 Having purified your souls by your obedience to the truth for a sincere brotherly love, love one another earnestly from a pure heart Ezekiel 36:25-27 I will sprinkle clean water on you, and you shall be clean from all your uncleanness, and from all your idols I will cleanse you. And I will give you a new heart, and a new spirit I will put within you. And I will remove the heart of stone from your flesh and give you a heart of flesh. And I will put my Spirit within you, and cause you to walk in my statutes and be careful to obey my rules. Once a person begins to hear the word of God, it will when heard enough spark an interest in the heart of the lost, and if responded to will cause the conscience of man to begin to see they need to change their ways, conviction begins, whether fast or slow would depend on each case, and they will come to faith or put in off, for a time or permanently. John 6:63 it is the Spirit that quickens the words I speak to you they are spirit and they are truth. Isa 55:8“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways My ways,” says the Lord. 9“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are My ways higher than your ways, And My thoughts than your thoughts. 10“For as the rain comes down, and the snow from heaven, And do not return there, but water the earth, And make it bring forth and bud, that it may give seed to the sower and bread to the eater, 11So shall My word be that goes forth from My mouth; It shall not return to Me void, but it shall accomplish what I please, and it shall prosper in the thing for which I sent it.

(Romans 8:7-8; 1 Corinthians 2:14) These are speaking as you imply to the carnal minded who are lost and desire to walk according to the flesh. Apart from the working of God which He demonstrates in His creation Romans 1:18 The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of men who suppress the truth by their wickedness. 19For what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. 20For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood from His workmanship, so that men are without excuse. And the word of God, which tells of the law of sin and death no one would know they needed a Savior. Although also, the conscience I believe is taught to be what Paul was meaning, when he said the Gentiles in
Romans2:14 Indeed, when Gentiles, who do not have the law, do by nature what the law requires, they are a law to themselves, even though they do not have the law. 15 So they show that the work of the law is written on their hearts, their consciences also bearing witness, and their thoughts either accusing or defending them 16 on the day when God will judge men’s secrets through Christ Jesus, as proclaimed by my gospel. Just as a side note, I had never heard a sermon mention the conscience of man, but was impressed in a bible study to look at all the references on the word, conscience, it was very informative and worth the time to do this, just put in your heading, if you haven't tried it, how many times in the bible is the word conscience mentioned and look them up, no charge for this valuable point. From birth the thoughts we have are the conscience often declaring the good thoughts and guilt without which while little babies, their parents tell them what not to do, when they do it, they look around to see who may be watching, just like Adam and Eve in the garden, when they ate of fruit, and heard the Lord in the garden, what did they do? they hid. Pardon me for getting off topic.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

zoidar

loves Jesus the Christ! ✝️
Site Supporter
Sep 18, 2010
7,477
2,669
✟1,035,562.00
Country
Sweden
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Sorry you don't see the correlation between "Why Jimmy and not Clark," and Romans 9:18-24 as it relates to "why Jacob and not Esau" of Romans 9:10-13.

Of course I do. But we have preconceived ideas about Jacob and Esau, which we don't have to Jimmy and Clark. That's why I choose two random guys.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,038
7,497
North Carolina
✟342,614.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
This is like the statement you said before that is no where found in scripture
Agreed. . .I said that was not in Scripture, but was a construct of effect regarding what is in Scripture.
 
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,038
7,497
North Carolina
✟342,614.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
You are asuming Romans 9:18-24 was written to give an answer to my question. That's a misunderstanding on your part. I have no problem with Romans 9:18-24. It's not an answer to my question. It's answering other things.

To me your answer sounds like: "I don't know why." It's not that that is a bad answer. Sometimes we don't know how it works. That's what I also say about free will. I believe it. I don't know how it works. So there I think we are in a similar seat. Don't know if you will be willing to accept that or agree with that.
Sorry you don't see the correlation between "Why Jimmy and not Clark," and Romans 9:18-24
("God has mercy on whom he wants to have mercy, and he hardens whom he wants to harden.")
as it relates to "why Jacob and not Esau" of Romans 9:10-13.
Of course I do. But we have preconceived ideas about Jacob and Esau, which we don't have to Jimmy and Clark. That's why I choose two random guys.
Irrelevant. . .and I have no ideas about Jacob and Esau that Scripture does not present.

All is clear in Scripture on the issue of God's sovereignty in choosing whom he chooses for his own purposes, and for no other reason.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

John Mullally

Well-Known Member
Aug 5, 2020
2,463
857
Califormia
✟146,819.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
God does not violate man's free will, God uses it to bring man freely and willingly to himself. (John 6:65)
According to Calvinist's, God channels man's supposed free will wherever He desires. They say man is born total depraved and must follow the dictates of satan. Except for the foreordained ones for whom at some point He changes their hearts out-of-the-blue, and suddenly they can freely and willingly cooperate with God. Calvinist's preach that God receives glory from the destruction of the ones He left in the state of Total Depravity (a state in which they are unable to cooperate with God).

No, God is not like that - per 1 Timothy 2:4 and 2 Peter 3:9 God desires all to be saved.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0