Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Have you read any of Calvin's writings?
Is Romans 8:16-17 true or not?
You did. . .and Romans 8:16-17 is the simple answer to your simple question.I asked you a very simple question Clare and it's up to you whether you answer it or not.
Romans 8:16-17 is the only answer I have.This isn't an answer.
You did. . .and Romans 8:16-17 is the simple answer to your simple question.
Questions?
And you would not have asked how I knew "yes" or "no"?A Yes or a No, whatever you thought, would have been simpler.
And you would not have asked how I knew "yes" or "no"?
To which I would then have made the response to which you are not objecting.
Not seeing the problem here.
Exactly!I read this one, was good:
the arrangement of all things is in the hand of God, since to him belongs the disposal of life and death, he arranges all things by his sovereign counsel, in such a way that individuals are born, who are doomed from the womb to certain death, and are to glorify him by their destruction.Due to the logical consistency of babies being born already stained by sin, and having no innate justifying feature in themselves (think @Mark Quayle writing nothing is good in me save Christ,) many Calvinists argue that even infants populate hell. What’s wrong with Calvinism? Babies in hell.![]()
Another answer that would fit "Australian helicopter unit in Viet Nam" Also known as "Experimental Military Unit."Is that a Yes or a No?
Excuse me for a while. I'm just settling down with the Times crossword now. Two across. Large Australian bird, three letters beginning with 'E'. Hmm. This is obviously going to take some time so catch you later.
That’s nonsensical to me, you could explain again in more plain language. God knows which options are possible and so can we, for example, let’s say you have the choice between drinking a can of beer or a bottle of water. They’re both right in front of you. Would you argue that the mere possibility of having one or the other is unknown to you? You just inform yourself based upon weather, time of day, tastes, brand, and then you choose.
God knows who’s going to be saved, so to enlist you in order to make false offers of salvation to doomed reprobates created for destruction is peak insincerity.
Once again, the offer is valid, and the choice is real. In your example, if one chooses the beer, the beer would have been what is predestined; if the water, then the water. It is not so complicated as you wish to straighten up for your mind to handle. Perhaps the example I gave about Ninevah flew by you too quickly. If God offers something, and one accepts it, the offer was real, so why don't the ultimately lost accept it —because it was not a real offer to them? Is it not, rather, because they are reprobate?We don’t have to know who the elect are, God knows and has decided to commission Christians to share the gospel with the whole world. Under Calvinism Jesus didn’t die for the whole world, but God has told Christians to make an offer to the whole world. That sir is an insincere, false invitation for redemption.
Why can't it be a simple choice without it being something predestined?Yet, once you choose, let's say, the bottle of water, it has become obvious that it was the only actual thing to happen, as it the case with all choices. You have no basis but presumption upon which to claim that the beer could have happened. You had two options, but only one was predestined: precisely the one you chose. And what is predestined ALWAYS happens.
Peter had Christ's ransom being paid for the False Prophets & Teachers in 2 Peter 2.The "our" are all those who recite the creed. But Calvinism does not teach this. It says that Christ only died for the sins of the Elect and no-one knows who these are until the final judgement is revealed. So how can they say "For our sake" Jesus died when they don't know whether He did or not?
Peter had Christ's ransom being paid for the False Teachers in 2 Peter 2.
2 Peter 2:2 But there were also false prophets among the people, even as there will be false teachers among you, who will secretly bring in destructive heresies, even denying the Lord who bought them, and bring on themselves swift destruction.
Why can't it be a simple choice without it being something predestined?
Paul tells believers to pray for all men for a few reasons in 1 Timothy 2:1-6. Two of those reasons include that (a) God desires all men be saved and (b) that Christ gave himself a ransom for all. That is not congruent with a God who predestines some to eternal life and the rest to eternal flame.
1 Timothy 2:1 Therefore I exhort first of all that supplications, prayers, intercessions, and giving of thanks be made for all men, 2 for kings and all who are in authority, that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and reverence. 3 For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Savior, 4 who desires all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth. 5 For there is one God and one Mediator between God and men, the Man Christ Jesus, 6 who gave Himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time,
predestined [prēˈdestind] ADJECTIVE(of an outcome or course of events) determined in advance by divine will or fate:
I have never been in any church group other than Baptist, southern Baptist, and we do not have a creed of any kind other than what the scripture teaches. The only time that the word predestined would ever come up in teaching would maybe be in salvation uses as such, a sinner who comes to believe that Jesus is the Son of God and laid down His life to pay the sin debt of all who come to faith in Him will be saved and sealed with the Holy Spirit of promise unto the day of redemption. This could be expanded upon but on these grounds. Like using John 1:10-13 He was in the world, and the world was made through Him, and the world did not know Him. 11He came to His own, and His own did not receive Him. 12But as many as received Him, to them He gave the right to become children of God, to those who believe in His name: 13who were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God. Those who rejected Him (the unbelieving Jewish people, were predestined to eternal judgment because all who do not believe in Him are condemned by their own actions of unbelief, and those like in v12 are born again and filled with the Holy Spirit and pass from death into life because that is what the scripture declare. We have eternal security in Christ Jesus, thus we share in the predestined promises of our Lord such as in Romans 8:28 And we know that all things work together for good to those who love God, to those who are the called according to His purpose. 29 For whom He foreknew, He also predestined to be conformed to the image of His Son, that He might be the firstborn among many brethren. 30Moreover whom He predestined, these He also called; whom He called, these He also justified; and whom He justified, these He also glorified. The reason we know verses 28-30 to have been predestined before the foundation of the world that all who believe in Him have peace in our hearts knowing that what the Lord predestined to come to pass will come to pass just as He said, therefore like in those He called, are justified, and glorified which are in the past tense from His perspective and will indeed take place in the future. I have never heard as far as I remember the word predestined used in any other manner and this is my belief in the manner which I teach the word. I have a very close friend of over 45 years who is fully Calvinist but we have determined to let the other fine out who is right on this word, if it ever comes up when we are in glory. Every tub sets on its own bottom.
- "our predestined end"
synonyms:
preordained · ordained · foreordained · destined · predetermined · fated · predestinated
Why can't it be a simple choice without it being something predestined?
Paul tells believers to pray for all men for a few reasons in 1 Timothy 2:1-6. Two of those reasons include that (a) God desires all men be saved and (b) that Christ gave himself a ransom for all. That is not congruent with a God who predestines some to eternal life and the rest to eternal flame.
1 Timothy 2:1 Therefore I exhort first of all that supplications, prayers, intercessions, and giving of thanks be made for all men, 2 for kings and all who are in authority, that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and reverence. 3 For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Savior, 4 who desires all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth. 5 For there is one God and one Mediator between God and men, the Man Christ Jesus, 6 who gave Himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time,
Because God is in control, and, at the very least, the beginning of all fact. You seem to misapprehend what simple choice really is —a result, not just a cause.
I expect you've been in these discussions long enough to have heard that "all" doesn't always mean "absolutely everyone who ever lived." Beyond that, it can be true that God finds no pleasure in the death of the wicked; but to claim therefore, that free will trumps God's plans, is simply illogical.
Sorry, I view myself as a grateful co-heir with Jesus (Romans 8:17), not a pawn in a tightly controlled hardware or software simulation.Because God is in control, and, at the very least, the beginning of all fact. You seem to misapprehend what simple choice really is —a result, not just a cause.
It means "all without exception" here. To assert that Paul was referring to "all without distinction" makes no sense - as Paul was not contrasting different kinds of people.I expect you've been in these discussions long enough to have heard that "all" doesn't always mean "absolutely everyone who ever lived."
Yes, God finds no pleasure in the death of the wicked. But, I never mentioned anything like man's "free will trumps God's plans" - so no lecture on logic please.Beyond that, it can be true that God finds no pleasure in the death of the wicked; but to claim therefore, that free will trumps God's plans, is simply illogical.
Glad to help. These doctrinal category of forums will stretch you.That's an excellent proof verse. I`ve been looking for one like that recently.