• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

What is wrong with Calvinism ?

QvQ

Member
Aug 18, 2019
2,381
1,076
AZ
✟147,890.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Do you think Jesus expects us to love our enemies if he isn't doing it himself?
Jesus may have loved the deniers however:
but whoever denies me before men, I also will deny before my Father who is in heaven. Matthew 10:33
For whoever is ashamed of Me and of My words in this adulterous and sinful generation, of him will the Son of Man also be ashamed when He comes in the glory of His Father with the holy angels. Mark 8:38

Those are strong words. Jesus may have loved His enemies however He said "
And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear Hm which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell. Matthew 10:28
 
Reactions: Mark Quayle
Upvote 0

Fervent

Well-Known Member
Sep 22, 2020
6,723
2,916
45
San jacinto
✟206,996.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
There's at least one glaring omission in your list of mentions of God's love from the gospels. John 3:16 didn't meet your agenda?
 
Reactions: Jesus is YHWH
Upvote 0

Mark Quayle

Monergist; and by reputation, Reformed Calvinist
Site Supporter
May 28, 2018
14,282
6,366
69
Pennsylvania
✟948,521.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Widowed
Hm, even if the apostles agree on it? I understand what you are saying and I agree.

Haha! Good point!

No, I'm not saying that. Why would God need to wait? God knows our free will decisions outside of time.

Maybe a better way I could have said it is, does God depend on us to make our decisions, so that he can make his?

And do you see how that makes chance a determiner —a cause?

Aha, I see! But if you see that determinism (that was the only word I could come up with to describe your view. Feel free to correct me.) isn't Biblically possible, then what?

Well, sure. If I could see that determinism (or anything else, for that matter) is Biblically impossible, then I could admit it is wrong. (Lol, good luck with that!)

I just believe Adam's sinful nature was inherited, not that Adam's guilt was imputed. Like I said, that sounds, and not only sounds but is from reason unjust to me.

I expect you mean to say, then, that wherever scripture obviously refers to imputation of Adam's sin, it is referring to the inherited fallen nature.

How is mere imputation any more unjust than to apply Adam's sinful nature to people (by 'inheritance' or whatever means he does so), so that they become actual sinners? Did they choose to inherit that sin? Neither is unjust. God has the right. But to claim that either is unjust, is to claim to understand God's level of justice. "Who are you, oh man, to talk back to God?" We are not his peers.

I don't remember if it was to you that I said this to, too, that God may see us corporately more than we want to admit to. One of the things humans tend to do in their self-interest is to separate themselves as individuals when it suits them, and to unite with humanity when it suits them. God doesn't do that to us when it suits us. Adam, as 'federal head' of corporate humanity, sinned, and so humanity corporately, and thus as individuals, are under condemnation.

While I don't claim to have worked out all the specifics of the "death" part of the condemnation, in which I've heard arguments of whether this death referred to is death of this body, or death of the spirit or both or what, I'm pretty sure that too will back up one view or the other between you and me, since, from how I understand things, the imputation of Adam's sin has everything to do with the command that Adam broke, that came with the statement that on the day he disobeys that command, he will surely die. And so, through the sin of one man, Adam, death came upon all.

He also chose from corporate fallen humanity, individuals who comprise the corporate church. And when we are in Heaven, he will absolutely love his Bride, even every individual part of her.
 
Upvote 0

Mark Quayle

Monergist; and by reputation, Reformed Calvinist
Site Supporter
May 28, 2018
14,282
6,366
69
Pennsylvania
✟948,521.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Widowed
Irrelevant and incomplete.
Not at all irrelevant. You want to make an issue of the question of condemnation and she showed your basis inapplicable. You don't know one way or the other, whether in the end Cain is condemned.
 
Upvote 0

Fervent

Well-Known Member
Sep 22, 2020
6,723
2,916
45
San jacinto
✟206,996.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
This statement is glaringly pompous, because it is not God's sense of justice that is being questioned it is yours.
 
Reactions: misput
Upvote 0

misput

JimD
Sep 5, 2018
1,026
384
86
Pacific, Mo.
✟173,825.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Not at all irrelevant. You want to make an issue of the question of condemnation and she showed your basis inapplicable. You don't know one way or the other, whether in the end Cain is condemned.
I know that God gave Cain two choices, "sin desires to have you which means you will be condemned if you let it in (continue in it) and "if you do well you will be accepted" means if you believe in me you will be saved. We do not know one way or the other if Cain is condemned because even God does not judge us until we die. The scripture says: Jesus did not come into the world to condemn but to save. John 3:17
John 8:11 She said, "No one, Lord." And Jesus said, "I do not condemn you, either. Go. From now on sin no more."
You are not understanding Romans nor Genesis.

PS: Care to answer my questions in post 3612?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

zoidar

loves Jesus the Christ! ✝️
Site Supporter
Sep 18, 2010
7,502
2,678
✟1,043,743.00
Country
Sweden
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private

Of course! I don't see what that has to do with my post.
 
Upvote 0

zoidar

loves Jesus the Christ! ✝️
Site Supporter
Sep 18, 2010
7,502
2,678
✟1,043,743.00
Country
Sweden
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Maybe a better way I could have said it is, does God depend on us to make our decisions, so that he can make his?

And do you see how that makes chance a determiner —a cause?

Did God depend on my prayer for Him to answer it? Obviously yes! He couldn't have answered it without me praying. Did God know before time existed I would pray that prayer? Yes, I'm sure He did! Did God decide outside of time He would answer my prayer? I'm not sure. How can I fully know how God does what He does?

I don't see how that makes chance a determiner/cause.

Well, sure. If I could see that determinism (or anything else, for that matter) is Biblically impossible, then I could admit it is wrong. (Lol, good luck with that!)

I can't do that, but I know someone who can.

I expect you mean to say, then, that wherever scripture obviously refers to imputation of Adam's sin, it is referring to the inherited fallen nature.

You have to quote the many places where Scripture obviously refers to imputation of Adam's sin.

for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God,
— Romans 3:23


Why do we fall short of the glory of God? Because Adam's sin is imputed to us, or because we have actually sinned?

How is mere imputation any more unjust than to apply Adam's sinful nature to people (by 'inheritance' or whatever means he does so), so that they become actual sinners? Did they choose to inherit that sin? Neither is unjust.

God holding us responsible for a sin we have not committed is obviously (I think it's obvious) unjust by God. But if Adam's sin lead to a disease which is spread through inheritance, how is that making God unjust? Sure it's not just we inherit the disease, but it's not God's doing. It's not Him being unjust, but it's an "unjust" consequence of life. Some die young, some die old, is that God's fault?

God has the right. But to claim that either is unjust, is to claim to understand God's level of justice. "Who are you, oh man, to talk back to God?" We are not his peers.

Just by living a Christian life we can get a good sense of what is just. I'm of the belief we can know the basic things about God through life.


Neither can I say I know all the details. I don't feel I need to know, but the "how" is intriguing.
 
Upvote 0

Mark Quayle

Monergist; and by reputation, Reformed Calvinist
Site Supporter
May 28, 2018
14,282
6,366
69
Pennsylvania
✟948,521.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Widowed
You don't know that either one of those things God says to Cain means that. You are guessing.

Of course the word, 'condemned', is not always referring to hell. Yes, sometimes it has other meanings. When God had his discussion with Cain, no, he did not, as far as we know, condemn him to hell. Yes he said if he did well he would be accepted. Which I don't take to mean 'believe God', because I'm not sure what it refers to. Depends on what you mean by 'basic dealing' whether God has changed his ways of basic dealing with man.

I didn't answer before because to me these sound like rhetorical questions. They don't need answered. This is getting silly again.
 
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,324
7,564
North Carolina
✟346,237.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Does condemned always mean too hell?
Does it not have other meaning?
When God had His discussion with Cain,
did He condemn him too hell?
Did God tell Cain he was condemned (John 3:18; John 5:24; Romans 5:18)?
Irrelevant and incomplete.
The record shows otherwise.

Irrelevant?. . .goes to your question: "did God condemn Cain to hell?"

Incomplete?. . .answers the question: "does condemned mean to hell?" Answer: yes.
 
Reactions: Mark Quayle
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,324
7,564
North Carolina
✟346,237.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Just repeating the same 3 verses for the 100th time .
Perhaps you could produce three examples of John 3:18, John 5:24, Romans 5:18 presented together.
 
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,324
7,564
North Carolina
✟346,237.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
The pattern I see is that death came through Adam's sin and life comes from Christ's righteousness. And that sin reigned even over those that sinned without the Law before Moses.

Are you seeing something else?
That's a somewhat general, as well as somewhat mistaken notion of Romans 5:14.

Mistaken: first, those without the law did not sin (Romans 5:14), because there was no law to sin against, yet they died anyway.
Why?
Adam's guilt was imputed to them.

Secondly, the emphasis of Romans 5:12-17 is not "life," it's justification.

General: specifically, justification is declared righteousness by faith with the imputed/reckoned righteousness of Jesus Christ (Romans 1:17, Romans 3:21, Romans 3:24-25), just as righteousness was imputed/reckoned to Abraham by faith (Romans 4:2-3; Genesis 15:6).

Sinful (first) Adam was the pattern of the righteous (second Adam) Jesus Christ (Romans 5:14) for imputation--of Adam's guilt to all the seed of Adam and of Christ's righteousness to all the seed of Christ (Romans 5:18-19).
 
Last edited:
Reactions: QvQ
Upvote 0

QvQ

Member
Aug 18, 2019
2,381
1,076
AZ
✟147,890.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Did He not tell him, if you do well , you will be accepted? Which I take to mean believe God.
I don't see any possibility of forgiveness or redemption in Cain's discussion with God.
Even if God allowed Cain to live, Cain was cast out, cursed and marked. And in the end, Cain would die.
What verse in Genesis says that God told Cain if he did well, he would be accepted?
 
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,324
7,564
North Carolina
✟346,237.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Why did you leave out all the Epistles?

Do you think Jesus expects us to love our enemies if he isn't doing it himself?
Yes, because while Jesus knows who are his enemies, we do not.

The one we think is an enemy may well be one that comes to faith and is God's elect, and in reality we would actually be hating our brother, not our enemy.
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,145
EST
✟1,123,523.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
What verse in Genesis says that God told Cain if he did well, he would be accepted?
Genesis 4:5-7
(5) But unto Cain and to his offering he had not respect. And Cain was very wroth, and his countenance fell.
(6) And the LORD said unto Cain, Why art thou wroth? and why is thy countenance fallen?
(7) If thou doest well, shalt thou not be accepted? and if thou doest not well, sin lieth at the door. And unto thee shall be his desire, and thou shalt rule over him.​
 
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,324
7,564
North Carolina
✟346,237.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I just believe Adam's sinful nature was inherited, not that Adam's guilt was imputed. Like I said, that sounds, and not only sounds but is from reason unjust to me.
It's not either/or. . .it's both/and.

You are not dealing with sinful Adam as a pattern for the righteous Christ (Romans 5:14).

Adam's sinful nature is inherited, and Adam's guilt is imputed (Romans 5:12-18) as the pattern (Romans 5:14) for Christ's righteousness likewise being imputed (Romans 1:17, Romans 3:21, Romans 3:24-25).
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

QvQ

Member
Aug 18, 2019
2,381
1,076
AZ
✟147,890.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
All right, God made clear the law before Cain slew Abel.
There wasn't any forgiveness or redemption after Cain slew Abel.
 
Upvote 0

misput

JimD
Sep 5, 2018
1,026
384
86
Pacific, Mo.
✟173,825.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
You don't know that either one of those things God says to Cain means that. You are guessing.
Do you have a bible search engine? Look up "do well and well done" what do they usually mean?
Mt 25:21 His lord said unto him, Well done, thou good and faithful servant: thou hast been faithful over a few things, I will make thee ruler over many things: enter thou into the joy of thy lord.
What does "sin is crouching at the door and desires to have you" mean to you"?
Lu 22:31 And the Lord said, Simon, Simon, behold, Satan hath desired to have you, that he may sift you as wheat:
What does the whole council of scripture teach about these things"? These are certainly not a guessing game to me.


What does God saying "be accepted" mean to u? The scripture says God is the same yesterday, today and forever. What does that mean to u?

I didn't answer before because to me these sound like rhetorical questions. They don't need answered. This is getting silly again.
The only thing silly is looking for black and white answers for Spiritual questions.
 
Upvote 0

QvQ

Member
Aug 18, 2019
2,381
1,076
AZ
✟147,890.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
What does God saying "be accepted" mean to u? The scripture says God is the same yesterday, today and forever. What does that mean to u?
To be accepted in the context seems to read that if Cain lived by the law, Cain was law abiding. When Cain transgressed the law, then Cain was outlaw.
Outlaw, the unaccepted, is an appalling state of existence.
The civil law is still the same in our time. If a person abides by the law, that person is accepted. If a person breaks the law, he becomes an outlaw. (until caught and punished according to the law)
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0