- Jul 22, 2014
- 41,685
- 7,908
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Not sure where you stand. Are you for water baptism still being applicable? Or are you for Spirit baptism being the new way of the New Covenant?
So the real reality in Romans 6:3-4 is Spirit baptism. It is the only kind that can help us to put to death the old man. It is the only kind of baptism whereby we can say we are dead and freed from sin. Water baptism cannot do such things. It is merely an outward picture and or ritual.
As for your statement that there is neither a water baptism or a Spirit baptism: Well, we cannot make the Bible say what we want it to say. Jesus says in Acts of the Apostles 11:16, “John indeed baptized with water; but ye shall be baptized with the Holy Ghost.” You say it is not a baptism in the Holy Ghost and it does not matter. I choose to believe my Bible and not you.
Peter’s first sermon goes way beyond the ability of a simple fisherman, even it he had been with Jesus for three years. God showed the group was inspired by the Holy Spirit, with the loud noise and them speaking in tongues they had not learned. It is miraculous how the people were all brought together to hear Peter’s message, but you are telling me the Holy Spirit was not keeping him from not saying the truth.Right, no doubt about it that Peter told them to repent and be baptized in water in Acts 2, and they were saved. But again, that does not mean God wanted Peter to tell others to be water baptized. It was not something that was highly offensive to God by any means because it was a picture or symbol pointing to the reality of Spirit baptism (When the Spirit comes into our life) when a person receives Jesus Christ. God allowed the church to be like a child and to act with imperfect knowledge. The church was still in it's infancy and it needed to grow and mature like all children do.
How did they: “dispense the Holy Spirit” God/Christ/Spirit dispenses the Spirit. The apostle could lay hands on people and they could receive a miraculous portion of the Spirit, but non-apostle Christians water baptize people.The Holy Spirit baptism did not happen until Pentecost for all believers. So when that happened, that is how they were able to dispense the Holy Spirit. It was not the water that got them into the Spirit because we know that Cornelius and his household received the Spirit without any water.
Either the scholars use a period between Acts 5 and 6 or they use a conjunction “and” between 5 and 6. If you study the use of conjunctions in many language including the Greek and do not tie yourself to modern American English you would know a conjunction separate two different actions and was not used to describe the same action two ways. We might say a person is “smart and intelligent” with smart and intelligent have the same meaning, but that was not done in the Greek and other languages. This is part of the reason modern day Greek scholars would use a period between two actions and drop the “and” since today we do not keep that rule in our writings.I am sure there are Greek scholars who would disagree with you. The 47 KJB translators wrote it in such a way in English that leads us to believe that verse 5 flows into verse 6 without any gap of time. Verse 5 is what action was taking place, and verse 6 is the details of that action. Surely you don't know more than the 47 translators of the KJB. Besides that, we have other verses that tell us that Spirit baptism is the new form of baptism for the New Covenant. It took the Jewish apostles time to come to this knowledge via by the apostle Paul.
Absolutely. Christ sent the Spirit to those who trust in him. I wouldn't be without him. Clearly this is a spiritual matter and part of the new life in Christ and part of the mechanism of salvation. But I will never take my eyes off the root of my faith which Jesus described as his baptism. I think I owe it to him to take the same view as he did of this central event of history.
You cannot conceive of how he descended to the dead for three days and three nights and preached to the prisoners in chains as Peter said and then rose again on the Third Day without realising that this salvation is a spiritual matter and that spiritual works and events will be required to see it through in individual lives and the whole earth. But never do I see the Holy Spirit pushing himself to the front of the queue in front of Jesus, always he promotes the Saviour.
So I say "he was baptized in his own blood for me". That's how he has taught me to see my salvation. When I was baptized into Christ it was his blood that washed me. When this life is over, it will be the washing of his blood that is the hope to which I cling. This of course also is a spiritual matter. Being made alive in the spirit is a spiritual matter.
But, please, Christ himself saw his death/resurrection as the central point of history, the culmination of his work on earth which would set him free to do greater things through the Spirit. Please, readers, please see his unique baptism as the One Baptism of all believers. Luke 12 v50.
(BTY, please don't tell me the next verses in Luke justify us all splitting up and falling out! )
And now I am tired and must go to bed. Have a nice day over there in the west!
Quintus
There is more to salvation than God's grace and or believing alone in Jesus for salvation. We need to work out our salvation with fear and trembling.
Quite. Was it not James (chapter 2) who stressed the importance of what you do in life as the working out of faith? I do agree, and now I have to do some works elsewhere. Bye
Wow! I fully agree that before Christ’s full replacement came to the 12 the indwelling Holy Spirit which was before Pentecost this group was almost clueless about the Kingdom and what it was really like. I am only referring to the Church Age, the Christian Dispensation. What those 12 said and did before the indwelling Holy Spirit we can take with a grain of salt.Why did Paul only baptize a few? Was it because Paul prophetically could see through the corridors of time and see in the future the situation that the Corinthian believers would be divisive?
In retrospect: While Paul was thankful to God that he only baptized a few in relation to the Corinthian situation of them being divisive is true, it does not undo what 1 Corinthians 1:14-17 says. Paul says that he was not sent to baptize and he only baptized two people, and one household. Again, Paul tells us to follow his example just as Christ is his example (1 Corinthians 11:1). This knowledge of Spirit baptism being the only one and true baptism that came to Paul must have came to him after he baptized two people and one household. Why? Well, Paul says Christ is his example in 1 Corinthians 11:1 and yet Christ did not water baptize anyone. However, our Lord did baptize believers into the Holy Ghost, though. This is something that happens when we preach the gospel. For when Peter preached the gospel to Cornelius and his household, the Holy Spirit fell upon them (i.e. They were baptized into the Spirit).
I am sure many have been water baptized in the beginning of the early church, but it was imposed upon them until the time of reformation (Hebrews 9:10) (Note: Again, the word “washings” in the Greek is “baptismos.”). The question is: When was the reformation? While the New Covenant officially began with Christ's death upon the cross, the disciples had no understanding of the cross fully and neither did they understand the resurrection yet. One could say the reformation was the cross, and from God's perspective, this may be true because God did end all of the Old Covenant ceremonial laws. But for man to catch up with God's understanding on that is another matter. Remember, the Gentiles were included in God's plan of salvation from even the Great Commission, but I don't believe the disciples fully understood that yet because of Cornelius and Peter explaining to the other Jewish believers in how the Gentiles are now included. So the disciples misunderstood Jesus in regards to the Great Commission when Jesus first gave those words to them to Go and teach all nations. They were most likely thinking to Go and teach all Jews in all nations. So if they misunderstood this aspect of the Great Commission in Matthew 28:19, then what else were they misunderstanding? I believe they misunderstood the new baptism that God was trying to tell them. Jesus said John baptized with water but you shall be baptized with the Holy Ghost. Peter still went back to that old water baptism that John did but he tried to Christianize it. Granted, I believe God is patient and he allows his people to learn and grow in their own timing on things. The church was still in it's infancy. I believe based on the context of Hebrews 9 (with Israel being the topic of conversation), that the time of reformation could also be the destruction of the temple in 70AD. By this time, Paul's teachings would have been made clear to many believers.
Again, they traveled two by two. Paul did not have an army of believers at his side to baptize many.
Then I am glad to God that I had been water baptized. Although back then I seen baptism in the same way you do (with a picture or symbol of dying to yourself and rising again), I was baptized in a church that believes in Eternal Security or Belief Alone-ism (Which is something I now find to be extremely unbiblical and immoral). Should I be water baptized again if they were not teaching a correct view on sin and salvation from the Bible? Surely not because water baptism is no longer necessary. For Jesus said, “John indeed baptized with water; but ye shall be baptized with the Holy Ghost.” (Acts of the Apostles 11:16). Jesus did not say, “John indeed baptized with water; but ye shall be baptized with the Holy Ghost and also be baptized in my name in water.”
This was still the time of the Old Covenant. The New Covenant did not even begin officially until Christ's death upon the cross. Yet, even after the New Covenant began, it took time for God's people to learn and grow in understanding the New Covenant ways.
Here is one:
“And when his disciples James and John saw this, they said, Lord, wilt thou that we command fire to come down from heaven, and consume them, even as Elias did? But he turned, and rebuked them, and said, Ye know not what manner of spirit ye are of. For the Son of man is not come to destroy men's lives, but to save them. And they went to another village.” (Luke 9:54-56).
And here are a few more (if that is not convincing):
- When Jesus warned against “the yeast of the Pharisees and Sadducees” his disciples thought he was talking about literal bread, but he was talking about “the teaching of the Pharisees and Sadducees” (Matt. 16:5-12; cf. Mk. 8:14-21).
- After Jesus predicted that he must suffer many things and be killed, Peter rebuked him because he misunderstood what it meant for Jesus to be the Messiah (Mk. 8:31-33).
- Peter, James, and John didn’t understand what Jesus meant by “rising from the dead” (Mk. 9:9-10).
- Jesus said to his disciples, “‘The Son of Man is going to be delivered into the hands of men. They will kill him, and after three days he will rise.’ But they did not understand what he meant and were afraid to ask him about it” (Mk. 9:31-32; cf Lk. 9:43-45).
- Jesus told his disciples, “’We are going up to Jerusalem, and everything that is written by the prophets about the Son of Man will be fulfilled. He will be delivered over to the Gentiles. They will mock him, insult him and spit on him; they will flog him and kill him. On the third day he will rise again.’ The disciples did not understand any of this. Its meaning was hidden from them, and they did not know what he was talking about” (Lk. 18:31-34).
- Jesus told his disciples to buy a sword, they responded “Look, here are two swords.” Jesus replied, “That’s enough!” Then when one of them used his sword to cut off the servant’s ear, Jesus said, “No more of this!” then he healed the man’s ear (Lk. 22:36, 49-51). The context and Jesus’ entire life shows that he didn’t mean for his disciples to literally use their swords in defending him.
- After Jesus’ death, two of his followers said, “we had hoped that he was the one who was going to redeem Israel” (Lk. 24:21). They were thinking that he was going to free Israel from Roman domination. They misunderstood his mission.
- The disciples thought Jesus was talking about literal food, but he was talking about his Father’s work (Jn. 4:31-34).
- Martha thought Jesus’ statement “Your brother will rise again” referred to “the resurrection at the last day,” but Jesus raised Lazarus shortly afterwards (Jn. 11:23-44).
- None of the disciples understood why Jesus told Judas, “What you are about to do, do quickly.” They thought Judas needed to buy something for the festival or give something to the poor (Jn. 13:28-30).
- The disciples didn’t understand Jesus’ statement, “In a little while you will see me no more, and then after a little while you will see me.” They kept asking, “What does he mean by ‘a little while’? We don’t understand what he is saying” (Jn. 16:16-18).
- The book of John ends with a final misunderstanding. Responding to Peter’s question, “Lord, what about him?” Jesus says, “If I want him to remain alive until I return, what is that to you? You must follow me.” Then John states that Jesus’ words caused a rumor to spread among the believers. Think about this: Jesus has risen from the dead, John is at the end of his Gospel, and Jesus’ words are still being misunderstood. So John attempts to dispel the rumor with these words: “But Jesus did not say that he would not die; he only said, ‘If I want him to remain alive until I return, what is that to you?’” (Jn. 21:22-23).
Source used:
Misunderstanding Jesus - BibleBridge Bible Study Lessons
When men of God make mistakes, then they are to blame and not God (obviously). Even after the cross, there were misunderstandings going on.
Paul had to rebuke Peter for his trying to get the Gentiles to live as the Jews do (See: Galatians 2:11-14). Paul was later peer pressured by the Jewish Christian elders to go through with an OT ritual rite that involved an animal sacrifice within the Jewish temple (See: Acts of the Apostles 21:17-36).
I didn't decide to throw out water baptism based upon my own way of thinking. I actually was in support of water baptism at one time and I have even been water baptized before. The heart of the matter comes down to....
“What does God's Word say?”
I have given Scriptural support that the one baptism in Ephesians 4:5 is Spirit baptism in post #2.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?