No problem; I didn’t find it unclear or incoherent or anything like that.DesertScroll said:First I want to apologize for not being as clear in my previous post as I would have liked. Just off of work and getting the kids ready for church while typing it up left it less than desirable. Hopefully this post will be a little more clear.
This is true, but to be honest I’d rather not comment too much and give "my own” opinion. I'd rather let the scriptures speak for themselves, as much as possible. That may mean that others won’t see the same connections that I do and so have no clue what I am trying to say, but that is ok with me. I am happy to elaborate later if I can or answer whatever questions may pop up. I just don’t like to “go in” saying “this is what this means”. I much more prefer to show the “connections” and “patterns” themselves. Then others are free to take it or leave it based on what "they" see (or don't).About the blessed are the dead passage in Rev 14. This was in relation to 14:9-11 showing that it was in fact quite easy to show both the language of an end judgment here as well as maintain the phrase written after it saying blessed are the dead who from now on die in the Lord. They are not contrary to each other as I assumed was your argument in post #61. Btw thank you for fleshing out your post with your views. Just posting scriptures for the most part in #61 left me to try and follow your thoughts on my own the best I could. If you just give a verse four people can say amen, yet mean four different things.
Amen!! But “how” does he come quickly?About the shortly coming to pass. You wrote, "Those things were to shortly come to pass. Are those who read the book 2000(+/-) years ago still 'waiting' for those things to come to pass? How do they shortly come to pass for those of us who are reading the book now, 2000 (+/-) years later?". I would say in the same manner that our Lord promised he was coming quickly (Rev 3:11 22:7, 12, 20).
Amen again!! Why is it, do you think, that they “scoff”? How do you see “the day of the Lord”?Also look at Matt 24:22-28 2 Pet 3:3-13 (where it speaks of scoffers saying where is the promise of his coming) and Zeph 1:14-18 (where Zeph prophesized about the final judgment quickly coming as well).
I have not drawn the line to say “angels (as spirit being) do not exist”. But I do believe that at least some of the references in Bible to “angels” (which simply means “messenger”Now the angels and the harvest.
As I said before, we do sow and reap as we are sent out into the harvest of God (more on this later in the post). That is how disciples are made. So there are lots of harvests in relation to individual believers sharing the gospel. But all of these are part of the harvest of God (as I said more on this part of it later on, for now the focus is on method).
But what you responded with missed the point, but as I noted earlier it was my fault for not fleshing my view out. Your method is to note that in verse A angels are the harvesters. In verse B you point to the fact that ministers, such as Paul, are called angels. Now this gives you not an equivalence claim that angels doing the reaping are in fact ministers such as Paul, but gives you "it is not out of the realm of possibility" that ministers such as Paul are the ones described in the description of the harvest. Which I assume you agree with as you wrote "I have not drawn that line".
Psa 149:5-9 Let the saints be joyful in glory: let them sing aloud upon their beds. Let the high praises of God be in their mouth, and a twoedged sword in their hand; To execute vengeance upon the heathen, and punishments upon the people; To bind their kings with chains, and their nobles with fetters of iron; To execute upon them the judgment written: THIS HONOUR HAVE ALL HIS SAINTS. Praise ye the LORD.
And how do we know that? If judgment has begun (1 Pet 4:17) and in the resurrection of the dead we “are as the angels of God in heaven” (Matt 22:30, Mar 12:25)?Now, bring in Matt 25:31-34. Jesus is there. All the angels are with him. All the nations gathered before Jesus. And the people of the nations he separates into groups, the sheep and the goats. Now the question is "is it within the realm of possibility that ministers such as Paul are the angels that come with him?". Now because this is the judgment and we know all will stand before the judgment seat of God (Rom 14:10). We know ministers such as Paul are in the grouping of the sheep and so ministers such as Paul cannot be in the grouping of the angels.
AMEN!! And we know that the kingdom of God is within, right? And the wheat and the tares are growing together until harvest, right? The tares are harvested FIRST (to be burned) and the wheat is gathered to the barn. As I see it, this applies to “the fiery trial” which is to try us. The hay wood and stubble must be burned up. We are “dead” (spiritually speaking) right? And it is not until we have been “judged” that we “learn righteousness”. (Isa 26:9) We must pass FROM DEATH (darkness/NIGHT) UNTO LIFE (light/DAY), right? And “in the resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but are as the angels of God in heaven”. The Sadducees (which say that there is no resurrection) tried to trap Christ by asking him about the resurrection after a carnal understanding and Christ told them “Ye do err, not knowing the scriptures, nor the power of God”.Now using this same method and turning to Matt 13. First, Christ's explanation in v. 37, 38. The one who sows the good seed is the Son of Man. The field is the world. The good seed are the children of the kingdom. The weeds are the children of the evil one. The enemy which sowed the weeds is the devil. The harvest is the end of the age. The reapers are angels. So now "is it within the realm of possibility that ministers such as Paul are the angels that are reaping?". Now ministers such as Paul are children of the kingdom, which in v. 30 it is told to us that Christ is allowing them to be grown together until harvest time when the reapers collect them. So no, because they are in the group of the good seed. They are not the reapers, but those that are reaped.
And perhaps they are both part of the same judgment/harvest which was begun at the cross but has yet to be “complete”.Now there is only one judgment and only one harvest which accomplishes this judgment.Well
Luke 10:2 we are sent out into this harvest.
John 4:36 some sow seeds of the gospel and others reap it. They make disciples, the great commission (Matt 28:19, 20) which is very different from Matt 13 which is not about making disciples, but separating those that are in Christ versus those that are not. There is only a problem if you try and equate the reaping in John 4:36 with the reaping of Matt 13. One is making disciples, the other is bringing them home.
But, of course, you know I disagree, right?So the separation and destruction takes place in what Matt 13 describes, not John 4:36.
Again, I do not see it the same way. Judgment has begun. The field is being harvested. The tares are being gathered to be burned and the wheat is being gathered to the barn. The sheep and the goats are already being separated. We have not yet seen the end result but these things, as I see it, are going on now. And they will continue to go on until such time as God decides to stop populating this world that we live in and He comes to gather all of those who remain, both the dead and the living.The prince of this world is judged already (John 16:11) just as those who do not believe in Jesus are condemned already (John 3:18). But the judgment, where everyone is judged based on their deeds, has not happened yet. But yes, judgment day is already decided based on whether or not one is in Christ, as seen in Revelation by the Lamb's book of life.
I thought I also quoted vs 28 and 29? They are not two different resurrections; there is ONLY ONE resurrection and HIS NAME is Jesus Christ.Now John 5:25, great passage, I love it! But read on to v. 28, 29. There are two different resurrections here. One is now and the other is the end, when Christ comes again. Amen! (I'll make use of this some more later).
Look carefully at the Martha said to Christ and how He responded to her at the resurrection of Lazarus:
John 11:23-26 Jesus saith unto her,Thy brother shall rise again. Martha saith unto him, I know that he shall rise again in the resurrection at the last day. Jesus said unto her,I AM the resurrection, and the life: he that believeth in me, though he were dead, yet shall he live: And whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die. Believest thou this?
Does it sound to you like Christ thought that Martha understood what “the resurrection at the last day” was? Jesus Christ IS the resurrection and the life. He IS eternal life; that life is IN THE SON. We wait for his “appearing” for his “coming”, YES!! Amen!!! Christ is formed IN US so that we might have LIFE and so that “as He is so are we IN THIS WORLD”. Amen? I know that most see two resurrections separated by the millennium. I see ONE resurrection (Jesus Christ):
1Co 15:22-23 For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive. But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ's at his coming.
He comes to each of us, unto those of us who look for Him, unto those who sleep (IN THE NIGHT) so that He might give them LIFE/LIGHT and make them children OF THE DAY. He comes “without sin unto salvation”.
John 9:39 says that He came “for judgment”, not “to judge”. But I am not saying that Christ does not judge as we all must stand before the judgment seat of Christ, as you know. But it is also true that judgment has been given unto His saints. So how can both Christ AND His saints judge? In my opinion, it is because as HIS BODY (He being the head) we are JESUS CHRIST. The second man IS “the Lord from heaven”. That is the ONE NEW MAN being created by God IN CHRIST. Now, I state that as my opinion as this is not something that I have studied out, but that I am just posting sort of impromptu at the moment as I respond to this post.With the vials they are not the final judgment. And yes, you are correct Christians shall judge (1 Cor 6:2). But Christ is also the judge John 9:39 (which says he came to judge) John 5:27 Acts 10:42 17:31. Christ came to save, but also in that process God has also established the criteria for judgment (John 3:16-21). Christ's second coming will be to fulfill that criteria, the judgment. (Don't confuse the two comings of Christ, the Jews still expect a messiah, but of the second coming variety. They missed the first coming which the scriptures are quite clear on).

Ok, I didn’t look up those verses. Sorry, I will try to do that later, but it is getting late. But as I said earlier, there in ONE resurrection, A resurrection of both the just and the unjust, JESUS CHRIST. No, not all will “see life”, many will “die in their sins”.Yes, the wrath of God abides in the wicked. But remember, he is being patient with them for the sake of the elect (Rom 9:22, 23). John 3:36 also shows that they will not see life, but must endure God's wrath. Now if you take "not see life" as referring to the second resurrection (remembering John 5) that would be for the future. We also have Rom 2:5-10 9:22 Col 3:6 1 Thess 1:10.
AMEN!! What shall be the end of those who obey not the gospel?Christians have been baptized with the Holy Spirit and with fire. Now Paul speaks about a future burning where works not on the foundation of Christ go poof (1 Cor 3:12-15) but I think you are referring to 1 Pet 4:12. This is a fire of persecution, to test them as they share in Christ's sufferings. Definitely a sense of refining. Also notice v. 17, if judgment is to begin with the household of God, then what will be the end for those who do not obey the gospel.
So it has to have the word “only” in it for it to mean that he “only” comes unto those who look for him when the verse say that he comes “unto those who look for him”? I could argue that it doesn’t say that He “also” comes unto those who “don’t” look for Him. It also doesn’t say that he comes “to all” (whether they look for Him or not), right? Let me ask you then, who do you think salvation comes to if salvation is coming unto those that Christ comes to “the second time”? When does salvation come? And who does it come to?Now a biggy. Those who look for him.
Here is the KJV of Heb 9:28
So Christ was once offered to bear the sins of many; and unto them that look for him shall he appear the second time without sin unto salvation.
Notice, if you read the whole verse he appears the second time to those that look for him unto salvation. It does not say only to those who look for him. Big difference.
The point being that with this “coming” comes “salvation” right? Does salvation also come to those who “don’t” look for Him? I do not see any difference in any of these translations, frankly. Except that I see “without sin” as “not in the flesh” (as sin dwells “in the flesh”Here are two other translations that may make it a little more clear.
So Christ, having been offered once to bear the sins of many, will appear a second time, not to deal with sin, but to save those who are eagerly waiting for him. NRSV
So Christ also, having been offered once to bear the sins of many, shall appear a second time for salvation without reference to sin, to those who eagerly await him. NASB
More verses to look up?And if that is not enough we have verses which clearly show the second coming is not just for those who wait for him: 1 Thess 5:1-11 Zech 12:10 Matt 24:23-31


Ok, I looked up 1 Thess 5:1-11. Beautiful!!! A chance to demonstrate to you how I see THE DAY of the Lord. Please notice that they KNOW PERFECTLY when THAT DAY shall come.
1Th 5:1-11 But of the times and the seasons, brethren, ye have no need that I write unto you. For yourselves know perfectly that THE DAY of the Lord so cometh as a thief IN THE NIGHT. For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape. But ye, brethren, are not in darkness, that that day should overtake you as a thief. Ye are all the children OF LIGHT, and the children OF THE DAY: we are not OF THE NIGHT, nor OF DARKNESS. Therefore let us not sleep, as do others; but let us watch and be sober. For they that sleep sleep in the night; and they that be drunken are drunken in the night. But let us, who are of the day, be sober, putting on the breastplate of faith and love; and for an helmet, the hope of salvation. For God hath not appointed us to wrath, but to obtain salvation by our Lord Jesus Christ, Who died for us, that, whether we wake or sleep, we should live together with him. Wherefore comfort yourselves together, and edify one another, even as also ye do.
I can go into more detail if you like, but can you see the contrast between THE NIGHT and THE DAY? Between those who “watch” and those who “sleep”?
And we do not desire to be UNCLOTHED, but CLOTHED UPON. If this earthly tabernacle were dissolved we would see that we HAVE a house not made with hands eternal in the heavens. (2 Cor 5). That which is born of the flesh is flesh and that which is born of the spirit is spirit. (John 3:6)Now we are born again by having Christ in us, by the Spirit. Remember John 5 and the two resurrections? The promise of eternal life is with spiritual bodies, just like Christ was raised from the dead with (Rom 6:4,5).
I said that it had to do with Pentecost and the coming of the Holy Spirit, right? And Jesus Christ is THE resurrection, there is ONLY ONE, only THE FIRST. Blessed and holy is He that has part in THE FIRST RESURRECTION, it is by the power of HIS resurrection that we receive life and attain unto the resurrection of the dead.John 14:18-20 where the world doesn't see Christ anymore but believers will. This is about the promise of Pentecost. Go back up to v. 15 so it would be John 14:15-20 and you can relate that to the first resurrection in John 5.

AMEN!!Col 1:27 Christ in you. See above w/ John 14:15-20 as well as Php 2:12,13 where Christians work out there own salvation in fear and trembling for it is God who is at work in them, enabling both to will and to work.
The adoption of sons IS the redemption of the body, right? When do you think that you receive the adoption of sons?About being saved, I am saved now (remember John 5). His Spirit is the first fruits, while we wait for the second coming of Christ and the redemption of our bodies (Rom 8:23).
As I see it, we are sealed by the Holy Spirit of promise when we first believe, receiving “the earnest” (or firstfruits) of the spirit. But at that time we are “yet carnal” (1 Cor 3:3) and we must “go on unto perfection”. We must be “born again”; we must have Christ formed in us (this is how we are “delivered of the child”; remember the “woman in travail”?), we must receive the Spirit OF HIS SON whereby we cry Abba, Father. This is “the adoption of sons” and “salvation” and “the redemption of our body”.
yes it can be seen, it can be manifest in the flesh and appear in locked rooms, but a spiritual body is not a natural body. Christ appeared in a body of flesh to prove His resurrection. How else was He supposed to do that? He also appeared in a body of flesh to show us that he DOES have a body OF FLESH AND BONES. WE are His body, we are of his flesh and of his bones. And HE is THE BLOOD of that body, as the LIFE is IN THE BLOOD, right? Christ cannot come and dwell IN US and also maintain a body of flesh and bone somewhere else. God is SPIRIT. And if the Spirit of God dwells in us then we are “no longer in the flesh but in the spirit”.About the like manner of his second coming with the manner of his ascension (Acts 1:9-11) it is a natural truth to use your words. Because his body, the resurrected body, the same kind which we shall have (Rom 6:4,5) is spiritual (1 Cor 15:42-46) but it can also be seen. And it can even partake of the fruit of the vine (Luke 22:18). Its going to be a great wedding feast.
I never said that I am not accountable for my words. But I have not set myself in the position of being anyone’s “teacher” and if having a discussion about what one believes with other believers is going to bring upon us “a greater condemnation” then I suggest we ALL “shut up”.And you may not feel that you are teaching, but we will all be held accountable for every word we type on this forum. It isn't just idle chatter. We are espousing views, teaching.

I didn’t find either one incoherent, just long.I hope this post was a little more coherent, I still haven't slept, so I really can't tell.
Also couldn't repost what you wrote because of space limits.
Upvote
0