• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

What Is Evolution

Freedom777

Active Member
Oct 8, 2002
327
4
57
iowa,usa
Visit site
✟23,022.00
Faith
Non-Denom
It is vitally important that words such as" evolution" be used accurately and consistently.The theory of "evolution" that the evolutionists are really promoting,and which creationists oppose,is the idea that particles turned into people over time, without any need for an intelligent designer. The evolutionist Kerkut accurately defined this "general theory of evolution" (GTE) as "the theory that all living forms in the world have arisen from a single source which itself came from an inorganic form."He continued: "The evidence which supports this is NOT sufficiently strong to allow us to consider it as anything more than a WORKING HYPOTHESIS."

However, many evolutioniary propagandists are guilty of the deceitful practice of EQUIVOCATION, that is, switching the meaning of a single word(evolution) part way through an argument. A common tactic, "bait-and-switch," is simply to produce examples of change over time, call this "evolution," than imply that the GTE is thereby proven or even essential,and creation disproved.

The main scientific objection to GTE is NOT that changes occur through time,and neither is it about the size of the change. The key issue is the type of change required.
 

Cantuar

Forever England
Jul 15, 2002
1,085
4
71
Visit site
✟23,889.00
Faith
Agnostic
The theroy of evolution by variation and selection within populations does not cover the chemical processes occurring before populations of self-replicating individuals appeared. You can dredge around the definitions all you like until you find one that does, but abiogenesis isn't covered by the theory of evolution, and all the insisting in the world on your part isn't going to change that.
 
Upvote 0

lithium.

Well-Known Member
Sep 22, 2002
4,662
4
nowhere
✟30,036.00
Country
United States
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Today at 01:34 AM Freedom777 said this in Post #6

Arikay in not talking about your def of evolution ,I am talking about the scientific community at large.Now do you understand that.


I might be wrong here, but his def of ToE is the same one all in the science community uses (or most of everyone)..
 
Upvote 0

Arikay

HI
Jan 23, 2003
12,674
207
43
Visit site
✟43,817.00
Faith
Taoist
Yes, and the definition you are giving is not the one the scientific comunity uses.

From talkorigins article, http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-intro-to-biology.html, (also includes some common missconceptions of evolution.):

"What is Evolution?

Evolution is a change in the gene pool of a population over time. A gene is a hereditary unit that can be passed on unaltered for many generations. The gene pool is the set of all genes in a species or population.

The English moth, Biston betularia, is a frequently cited example of observed evolution. [evolution: a change in the gene pool] In this moth there are two color morphs, light and dark. H. B. D. Kettlewell found that dark moths constituted less than 2% of the population prior to 1848. The frequency of the dark morph increased in the years following. By 1898, the 95% of the moths in Manchester and other highly industrialized areas were of the dark type. Their frequency was less in rural areas. The moth population changed from mostly light colored moths to mostly dark colored moths. The moths' colorwas primarily determined by a single gene. [gene: a hereditary unit] So, the change in frequency of dark colored moths represented a change in the gene pool. [gene pool: the set all of genes in a population] This change was, by definition, evolution.

The increase in relative abundance of the dark type was due to natural selection. The late eighteen hundreds was the time of England's industrial revolution. Soot from factories darkened the birch trees the moths landed on. Against a sooty background, birds could see the lighter colored moths better and ate more of them. As a result, more dark moths survived until reproductive age and left offspring. The greater number of offspring left by dark moths is what caused their increase in frequency. This is an example of natural selection.

Populations evolve. [evolution: a change in the gene pool] In order to understand evolution, it is necessary to view populations as a collection of individuals, each harboring a different set of traits. A single organism is never typical of an entire population unless there is no variation within that population. Individual organisms do not evolve, they retain the same genes throughout their life. When a population is evolving, the ratio of different genetic types is changing -- each individual organism within a population does not change. For example, in the previous example, the frequency of black moths increased; the moths did not turn from light to gray to dark in concert. The process of evolution can be summarized in three sentences: Genes mutate. [gene: a hereditary unit] Individuals are selected. Populations evolve.

Evolution can be divided into microevolution and macroevolution. The kind of evolution documented above is microevolution. Larger changes, such as when a new species is formed, are called macroevolution. Some biologists feel the mechanisms of macroevolution are different from those of microevolutionary change. Others think the distinction between the two is arbitrary -- macroevolution is cumulative microevolution.

The word evolution has a variety of meanings. The fact that all organisms are linked via descent to a common ancestor is often called evolution. The theory of how the first living organisms appeared is often called evolution. This should be called abiogenesis. And frequently, people use the word evolution when they really mean natural selection -- one of the many mechanisms of evolution. "

One thing to note, is that I believe since this has been written (in 1996) the line between Micro and macro evolution has been blured and both have been shown.
 
Upvote 0

Cantuar

Forever England
Jul 15, 2002
1,085
4
71
Visit site
✟23,889.00
Faith
Agnostic
Arikay in not talking about your def of evolution ,I am talking about the scientific community at large.

So am I. And I know a lot more of them than you do.

Wonder if Lucaspa (a bona fide member of the scientific community at large) will agree with your definition of his definition.
 
Upvote 0

wblastyn

Jedi Master
Jun 5, 2002
2,664
114
40
Northern Ireland
Visit site
✟26,265.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
Natural selection is evolution but it is not GTE, understand, I'm not going to bring it up any more.Didn't you read my thread when i speak of evolution thats what i am talking about. Natural selection is not GTE
Don't you think it's arrogant for you to try and TELL scientists what they should define evolution as, despite not actually knowing what it is? I also find it arrogant that you think you think you can knock over a theory that's existed for over 100 years by posting a few articles from AiG.

If evolution were so simple to knock over that even a layman could do it, do you seriously think scientists could still regard it as a valid theory, especially the Christian scientists (as in scientists who are Christians, not the cult).

Whatever.

IOW "Oh dear, it appears I have been proven wrong, but I'll try and hide it and pretend I don't care".
 
Upvote 0

Cantuar

Forever England
Jul 15, 2002
1,085
4
71
Visit site
✟23,889.00
Faith
Agnostic
Don't you think it's arrogant for you to try and TELL scientists what they should define evolution as, despite not actually knowing what it is?

It's worse than that, he's telling them what they are defining evolution as, and it bears precious little resemblance to the theory that's used in the scientific community (at large or otherwise).

Freedom777, nobody's saying that natural selection is the totality of evolution. The theory is the theory of evolution by variation and selection, and the latter includes a lot more than just natural selection. Darwin himself said that while he thought natural selection was the major mechanism, it wasn't the only one. What we are saying is that this creationist caricature that includes abiogenesis and dogmatic statements about lines of descent is not the same thing as the theory itself, however much you need to think otherwise.
 
Upvote 0

JohnR7

Well-Known Member
Feb 9, 2002
25,258
209
Ohio
✟29,532.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
Today at 01:01 AM Freedom777 said this in Post #1 The theory of "evolution" that the evolutionists are really promoting,and which creationists oppose,is the idea that particles turned into people over time, without any need for an intelligent designer.

That is this weeks flavor of the week. It will be proven wrong, so next week they will have to come up with something different. The "theory of evolution" does not appear to be evolving to much. They tend to lose more ground then they gain.
 
Upvote 0

JohnR7

Well-Known Member
Feb 9, 2002
25,258
209
Ohio
✟29,532.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
Today at 05:55 AM Arikay said this in Post #16

Why are you here?

I am doing a study to work out some general guidelines for a sunday school program for third world nations. Also an approach to help our students deal with some of the subject matter that they will find in the secular school systems.

You know, we want to show them when it is appropriate to laugh and when a polite smile would be sufficient.
 
Upvote 0

wblastyn

Jedi Master
Jun 5, 2002
2,664
114
40
Northern Ireland
Visit site
✟26,265.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
I am doing a study to work out some general guidelines for a sunday school program for third world nations. Also an approach to help our students deal with some of the subject matter that they will find in the secular school systems.
So you're trying to protect them from the evil "evolutionists"? Just tell them to stay in their homes, don't read any science journals, or just tell them the devil did it and to ignore any evidence because it's "of the devil" and to self-delude themselves into thinking there is no such thing as evolution. It seems to work for you.
 
Upvote 0