Rev Wayne
Simplicity + Sincerity = Serenity
Thaddeus,
I will ask you again, do you know any Hebrew at all? Do you have a Hebrew concordance to look this up and verify it for yourself, since you obviously refuse to take either my investigative results or the word of the ritualist himself? Do you at least have Strong's Concordance? If so, look up the numbers I provided, 202 and 203, you will find the truth of what I say. And I say nothing of my own volition, simply run down the word and its meaning by taking the ritualist at his word, looking up strength in the concordance and run down the numbers of the various words in Hebrew that translate into "strength" in English, and lo and behold, I find one used a dozen times which is transliterated as "on" in English. That being the case, when all is verified accordingly, why should I suddenly reject everything my eyes and my understanding reveal to me, and join you out on your limb?
The references containing this Hebrew word are:
Gen. 49:3, Deu. 21:17, Job 18:7 & 12, 20:10, 40:16, Psa. 78:51 & 105:36, Isa. 40:26 & 29, Hosea 12:3 & 8.
The battle for determining meaning was won for us from the outset by the author of the ritual himself. I do not know Egyptian and would not have a clue how to go about trying to determine the Egyptian origins of the name of the city On. But the fact is, I do not need to, you have made it clear what the meaning of the city's name is, "city of the sun." That contrasts sharply with the meaning the ritualist has offered, "father of all." Obviously he referred to a different word and meaning. I will leave that for someone skilled in Egyptian. All I need to know is, the author of the ritual stated himself, "it is also a Hebrew word," and the meaning he gives it is "strength." And I do know Hebrew, or at least know it well enough to know that the Scripture in the original Hebrew backs him up all the way. You seem to be in denial (not to be confused with "de Nile").
Wayne
Why should I even bother with that issue at all? It obviously has nothing to do with the word we're discussing. The ritualist made it abundantly obvious what he was speaking of.Did you even consider that it might be the pagan god since it's in the Bible?
I will ask you again, do you know any Hebrew at all? Do you have a Hebrew concordance to look this up and verify it for yourself, since you obviously refuse to take either my investigative results or the word of the ritualist himself? Do you at least have Strong's Concordance? If so, look up the numbers I provided, 202 and 203, you will find the truth of what I say. And I say nothing of my own volition, simply run down the word and its meaning by taking the ritualist at his word, looking up strength in the concordance and run down the numbers of the various words in Hebrew that translate into "strength" in English, and lo and behold, I find one used a dozen times which is transliterated as "on" in English. That being the case, when all is verified accordingly, why should I suddenly reject everything my eyes and my understanding reveal to me, and join you out on your limb?
The references containing this Hebrew word are:
Gen. 49:3, Deu. 21:17, Job 18:7 & 12, 20:10, 40:16, Psa. 78:51 & 105:36, Isa. 40:26 & 29, Hosea 12:3 & 8.
I don't see that we're in agreement at all. I have never denied that On refers to a city in Egypt. But my Hebrew concordance and my Strong's both deal with the two separately, and my sources say that in spite of the identical spelling in Hebrew, the two developed independently of each other--in other words, the little-letter "on" for "strength" and the capital-letter "On" for the city have absolutely no relation to one another by derivation or otherwise. When I spoke of the uncertainty of it having come from the Egyptian, I believe I was fairly clear in speaking only of "on" and not "On." And perhaps I was a bit unclear in the mention of Osiris--the uncertainty I expressed there was not uncertainty about the origin of the city's name, but uncertainty that Osiris was indeed that origin.We can agree on the Egyptian part.
So we can see that "On" is in fact a city. On in Egyptian means light or sun
The battle for determining meaning was won for us from the outset by the author of the ritual himself. I do not know Egyptian and would not have a clue how to go about trying to determine the Egyptian origins of the name of the city On. But the fact is, I do not need to, you have made it clear what the meaning of the city's name is, "city of the sun." That contrasts sharply with the meaning the ritualist has offered, "father of all." Obviously he referred to a different word and meaning. I will leave that for someone skilled in Egyptian. All I need to know is, the author of the ritual stated himself, "it is also a Hebrew word," and the meaning he gives it is "strength." And I do know Hebrew, or at least know it well enough to know that the Scripture in the original Hebrew backs him up all the way. You seem to be in denial (not to be confused with "de Nile").
So do I, especially the four-letter kind--which there seems to be an abundance of when it comes to this word and the ritual it appears in. I don't aim that comment at you in any way, just noting the nature of the false suppositions that have given rise to your arguments and those of many others.I still have issues with "bul,"
Wayne
Upvote
0