They were whatever we consider ourselves. Probably much shorter, though.
LOL. If you took away your tail bone.. you would not be able to control your bowels... It has nothing to do with us having tails in the past. It is a bone structure with a function..... But, nobody will believe that if they need it for their evolution hoax.We have tailbones because our distant ancestors had tails. God created various types of Apes/Monkeys and the last one was us, related to some of the others but altered through God's version of Evolution. Modern Evolutionists have merely misinterpreted the evidence God left behind that links us to animals he made before making modern humans.
View attachment 257749
Homo Perfectus?
Prior to the Fall, maybe.Homo Perfectus?
Errrrr, what? Not sure you understand what a lineage isIt is not logical.
Things with similar features has no causative relationship to each other.
e.g. private cars has head light ,the bus has bigger head light , the bus must be evolved from cars!
. Humans and other mammals are in clade Sarcopterygia . We ,meaning the land vertebrates , originally evolved from lobefinned fish about 400 million years ago. The real lineage isTaxonomists (biologists who classify all organisms) have rules for determining this stuff. For humans, this starts with animals, than later branches off in completely different categories from fish. It does not take a long time to see this separation. When it comes to determining what a human is based on their anatomy, start at the top: we are mammals and only mammals have hair.
that’s actually not true, some people don’t have a coccyx and they’re fine. You can see the tail form and disappear during fetal development in all of the great apes (including us)LOL. If you took away your tail bone.. you would not be able to control your bowels... It has nothing to do with us having tails in the past. It is a bone structure with a function..... But, nobody will believe that if they need it for their evolution hoax.
It doesn't "go away" the body just grows around it.that’s actually not true, some people don’t have a coccyx and they’re fine. You can see the tail form and disappear during fetal development in all of the great apes (including us)View attachment 257783
The circles in the left image are limb buds and the post anal tail is obvious
Errrrr, what? Not sure you understand what a lineage is
. Humans and other mammals are in clade Sarcopterygia . We ,meaning the land vertebrates , originally evolved from lobefinned fish about 400 million years ago. The real lineage is
lobefins —> amphibians—> reptilomorphs —> synapsids—> mammals —> Primates—> Hominids —> humans . I left out the side branches . The reptilomorphs are also the ancestors of reptiles including birds and dinosaurs
So its claimed by the unbeliever.That’s hard to say because there are about 25 proto Homo sapiens species that are not chimp ancestors . Neanderthals ( H neanderthalensis) were a different species of human but they were so closely related that they could produce fertile hybrids with H sapiens . There were at least 4 species of humans 50,000 years ago . H erectus, H neanderthalensis, H floresiensis, and the only survivor H sapiens
Errrrr, what? Not sure you understand what a lineage is
. Humans and other mammals are in clade Sarcopterygia . We ,meaning the land vertebrates , originally evolved from lobefinned fish about 400 million years ago. The real lineage is
lobefins —> amphibians—> reptilomorphs —> synapsids—> mammals —> Primates—> Hominids —> humans . I left out the side branches . The reptilomorphs are also the ancestors of reptiles including birds and dinosaurs
who said I was an unbeliever? I just happen to be a Christian with a biology degree . No one said that you had be ignorant to be a ChristianSo its claimed by the unbeliever.
False claim but.
DNA confirms the phylogenetic tree proposed by mainstream life scientists. The creationist version of “ kinds” is a pseudoscience fantasyThis is only artificial classification by human with no scientific basis.
Nearly all biological sciences are like that , this branch of science is actually pseudo-science when compares with physics and mathematics.
Because you can't define life in science.
DNA alone disprove evolution .
I hope all biological scientists can humble themselves and know that what is science , what is educated assumption.
This is only artificial classification by human with no scientific basis.
Nearly all biological sciences are like that , this branch of science is actually psedoosed-science when compares with physics and mathematics.
Because you can't define life in science.
DNA disprove evolution .
I hope all biological scientists can humble themselves and know that what is science , what is educated assumption.
mans carnal minded limited comprehension vs the word of the eternal GODwho said I was an unbeliever? I just happen to be a Christian with a biology degree . No one said that you had be ignorant to be a Christian
wrong.DNA confirms the phylogenetic tree proposed by mainstream life scientists. The creationist version of “ kinds” is a pseudoscience fantasy
yeah yeah I know , ignorance is blissmans carnal minded limited comprehension vs the word of the eternal GOD
I'll take Gods word.
When Jesus returns the dead in christ (dead thousands of years) rise... Do they re-evolve over milions of years to do so...
The heavens split open and roll up like a sroll to reveal JESUS... Does it take a billion years of the so called evolution of space and planets to do so ?
Resurrection from the dead cancels EVERY evolutionary theory ever.
Sticking " theistic" on the front of the word evolution means nothing.
It limits ,devalues and dishonours God
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?