• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

What does “Free Will” mean?

Radagast

comes and goes
Site Supporter
Dec 10, 2003
23,896
9,864
✟344,531.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
God at the end of time can communicate to God at the beginning of time (Himself)

That's a strange theory. It seems to imply that God is in time.

and it is fixed, but again that does not mean humans did not make free will choices along the way.

Yes, but they must be compatibilist free will choices, not libertarian free will choices.
 
Upvote 0

Neogaia777

Old Soul
Site Supporter
Oct 10, 2011
24,717
5,558
46
Oregon
✟1,103,786.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Celibate
I've experienced dejavu several times in my life.
Ever experience any of the kinds of things i am talking about with it...? or any or all of this at all...?

If so, what does it mean...?

God Bless!
 
Upvote 0

Radagast

comes and goes
Site Supporter
Dec 10, 2003
23,896
9,864
✟344,531.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Please notice that asking what free will means

And I'm saying there are different kinds of free will.

Libertarian free will = I could have chosen something different.

Compatibilist free will = I choose the thing that I want to choose.
 
Upvote 0

childeye 2

Well-Known Member
Aug 18, 2018
5,897
3,323
67
Denver CO
✟240,703.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
No, if God foresees that I will eat scrambled eggs for breakfast next Friday, then it is fixed that I will eat scrambled eggs for breakfast next Friday -- I am unable to choose anything else. In other words, I do not have free will of the libertarian kind.

I still have compatibilist free will: I choose eggs because that's what I want to do.
I don't think wanting to do something constitutes a free will. it only shows we have a will. In this scenario, the will to eat could also be recognized as hunger.
 
Upvote 0

Neogaia777

Old Soul
Site Supporter
Oct 10, 2011
24,717
5,558
46
Oregon
✟1,103,786.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Celibate
And I'm saying there are different kinds of free will.

Libertarian free will = I could have chosen something different.

Compatibilist free will = I choose the thing that I want to choose.
Matrix: Your not here to make the choice, you've already made it... We cannot see past the choices we don't understand... Your here to understand why you made or make the choices that you do, or did... Do you see her die...? You have the sight now Neo... Were all here to do what were all here to do... Everything that has a beginning, has an end Neo...

God Bless!
 
Upvote 0

Radagast

comes and goes
Site Supporter
Dec 10, 2003
23,896
9,864
✟344,531.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I don't think wanting to do something constitutes a free will. it only shows we have a will. In this scenario, the will to eat could also be recognized as hunger.

You misread the sentence. Compatibilist free will means that you do the thing that you want to do.

Standard example: you wake up to find yourself in a cinema playing a fascinating movie, which you want to watch, so you sit in your chair and watch it. Unknown to you, the doors are all locked, trapping you inside.

Do you have free will about staying inside the cinema? On the compatibilist version, yes (you want to stay and watch the movie). On the libertarian version, no (you are unable to leave).
 
Upvote 0

childeye 2

Well-Known Member
Aug 18, 2018
5,897
3,323
67
Denver CO
✟240,703.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
And I'm saying there are different kinds of free will.

Libertarian free will = I could have chosen something different.

Compatibilist free will = I choose the thing that I want to choose.
Right. Well, that's just like saying that there are more than one interpretations or definitions of free will. I take compatibilism to be an attempt to make free will viable with predestination by changing the definition. To choose the thing I want to choose implies a predisposition or preference which is more consistent with determinism. I think it becomes a more focused discourse when contemplating the moral/immoral implications.
 
Upvote 0

Bible Highlighter

Law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul.
Site Supporter
Jul 22, 2014
41,685
7,908
...
✟1,321,706.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
As a spinoff from my last thread I found lots of differing ideas with “free will” and a need to ask some more questions:

Does God have both the power and knowledge to create a being with the ability to make one truly autonomous free will choice and if not why not?

Would God’s foreknowledge and/or knowing everything keep a being from making a truly autonomous free will choice?

Would giving a being the ability to make a truly autonomous free will choice reduce or even eliminate God’s Sovereignty?

God can certainly keep any being from making a choice, so does allowing the being to make the choice mean God is not “controlling” or “over” the universe?

With enough environmental and biological information, it can be determent which ice-cream you will chose, so is that really a free will choice?

If God created a being with the very limited autonomous free will ability to make just one choice, yet that being never came close to reaching the age to ever making that autonomous free will choice, would God still know the exact without a doubt selection the being would have made had if it lived long enough?

Does Man Have Free Will?

Free will is defined in a few different ways. Here is one of it's definitions.

Free will (Noun) - The ability to act at one's own discretion.

http://oxforddictionaries.com/defini...sh/free%2Bwill

In fact, the origin of the word "will" is especially important to look at, too. It says this..

Will (Verb) - To wish, desire, want, to will, or to choose.

Online Etymology Dictionary

Now, how can you have the desire for anything or to choose differently if you did not have the free choice (i.e. free will) to choose or to not to choose in the first place?

Anyways, here is a list of the different types of Free Will that I hope you shall consider.

The Three different types of Free Will:

#1. Man's Limited Slave to Sin Type Free Will.
#2. Man's Limited Redemptive Type Free Will.
#3. God's Limited to Doing Only Good Type Free Will.​

And the hypothetical Free Will that does not exist for any being within our universe.
Which is...


#1. Ultimate or Absolute Free Will.​

A. Man's Limited Slave to Sin Free Will:
All non-believers or people who have not genuinely accepted Christ as their Savior are slaves to sin in some way. Now, this does not mean that unbelievers are not capable of making limited free will choices that are correct or good for their own well being (like choosing not to murder, steal, fornicate, or do drugs). However, on the other hand they are limited in their free will in the sense that they are slaves to sin and will have some type of sin within their life that separates them from God.

B. Man's Limited Redemptive Type Free Will:
All true believers in Christ or those who genuinely accept Jesus as their Savior are set free from being a slave to sin. This gives the believer a higher level of free will than that of a non-believer who is incapable of not sinning habitually. Now, does this mean that the believer does not have the free will to no longer sin anymore? No, most certainly not. It just means that they are no longer bound to sin anymore and are given a higher status of limited free will (or limited choices). They are also not forced against their free will to have a continued salvation or to still be a believer in Christ if they decide to change their minds, too. They still must choose each day to serve the Lord or to not serve the Lord. For a believer can forfeit his or her salvation if they do not live for Christ and become a new creature; Thus, showing that they were born again.

C. God's Limited to Doing Only Good Type Free Will:
God is limited to doing only that which is good and right. For God is light and in Him is no darkness at all. God is love and in Him is no evil. He is the very embodiment of all that is Holy, just, perfect, and good in this life. For there is none good but God. In other words, God is incapable of doing any type of evil or sin. He is perfect and good in every way. His limitation is that He can only do that which is good and right. Which of course is a good limitation to have. So praise be to our God for being all that is loving and good.

D. Ultimate or Absolute Free Will:
No being in the universe has absolute or ultimate free will. For if absolute free will existed, then there would have to be a being who could do whatever they wanted whether good or evil with no restrictions or consequences attached whatsoever. In other words, this concept of Free Will is purely imaginary because no being possesses this type of Free Will type characteristics.

In other words, It is not God's will or desire that you sin and reject Him. Yes, you are under His creation, sovereign rule, and divine plan (because the Lord can work both good and evil for His purposes), but God does not approve of someone doing evil as if it was His approved of will or desire for your life. God is good. Not evil.

For the moment you take away free will (not ultimate free will) is the moment you make God responsible for directly creating evil and sin. However, there is no darkness in God at all. God created free willed beings that made the decision to be evil and to sin. God did not force Adam and Eve to rebel. They had a choice to either choose life or to choose death. They chose death. Not because God wanted them to. It was because they wanted to choose death.
 
Upvote 0

Radagast

comes and goes
Site Supporter
Dec 10, 2003
23,896
9,864
✟344,531.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Right. Well, that's just like saying that there are more than one interpretations or definitions of free will.

Yes, and none of them is the "right definition."

I take compatibilism to be an attempt to make free will viable with predestination

Compatibilist free will is compatible with determinism, yes.
 
Upvote 0

childeye 2

Well-Known Member
Aug 18, 2018
5,897
3,323
67
Denver CO
✟240,703.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
You misread the sentence. Compatibilist free will means that you do the thing that you want to do.

Standard example: you wake up to find yourself in a cinema playing a fascinating movie, which you want to watch, so you sit in your chair and watch it. Unknown to you, the doors are all locked, trapping you inside.

Do you have free will about staying inside the cinema? On the compatibilist version, yes (you want to stay and watch the movie). On the libertarian version, no (you are unable to leave).
What about the impetus? If I pose the question in a moral/immoral context., where does the want to pet and hold a puppy come from as opposed to the want to strangle or torture it? Is it merely my random choice to want either one, or are their higher powers ,described spiritually as darkness and Light ,moving me and formulating my wants?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

childeye 2

Well-Known Member
Aug 18, 2018
5,897
3,323
67
Denver CO
✟240,703.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Ever experience any of the kinds of things i am talking about with it...? or any or all of this at all...?

If so, what does it mean...?

God Bless!
I'm not really sure I understand what you mean by "any of the kinds of things I am talking about". I only know that for a moment I experienced myself in a future time and place that I sensed was in the future, but I only became assured it was reality and not an illusion when that future became the present just exactly as I saw it in the past. It mainly left an imprint upon my disposition similar to when you first wake up from a dream and still have the feeling or flavor of the dream.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Radagast

comes and goes
Site Supporter
Dec 10, 2003
23,896
9,864
✟344,531.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
What about the impetus? If I pose the question in a moral/immoral context., where does the want come from to pet and hold a puppy come from as opposed to the want to strangle or torture it.?

In most cases, these wants are determined by our natures. If I have loved puppies from childhood, I will want to pet and hold the puppy.

or are their higher powers ,described spiritually as darkness and Light ,moving me and formulating my wants?

That can happen. God can make me want something.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

BNR32FAN

He’s a Way of life
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2017
25,854
8,380
Dallas
✟1,089,764.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
As a spinoff from my last thread I found lots of differing ideas with “free will” and a need to ask some more questions:

Does God have both the power and knowledge to create a being with the ability to make one truly autonomous free will choice and if not why not?

Would God’s foreknowledge and/or knowing everything keep a being from making a truly autonomous free will choice?

Would giving a being the ability to make a truly autonomous free will choice reduce or even eliminate God’s Sovereignty?

God can certainly keep any being from making a choice, so does allowing the being to make the choice mean God is not “controlling” or “over” the universe?

With enough environmental and biological information, it can be determent which ice-cream you will chose, so is that really a free will choice?

If God created a being with the very limited autonomous free will ability to make just one choice, yet that being never came close to reaching the age to ever making that autonomous free will choice, would God still know the exact without a doubt selection the being would have made had if it lived long enough?

I think 1 Timothy 2:3-4 and 2 Peter 3:9 are evidence that we are autonomous and God is not controlling our will. I these verses we see that God desires all men (and women of course) to repent and be saved but of course we know this will not happen. In many cases of the term “God’s will” they don’t always refer to something God has made to be true. In some cases this refers to God’s desire. The word “will” is often translated from the Greek word thélēma G2307 meaning

1) what one wishes or has determined shall be done a) of the purpose of God to bless mankind through Christ b) of what God wishes to be done by us

1) commands, precepts

2) will, choice, inclination, desire, pleasure

Some bible versions also translate will from the Greek word boúlomai G1014 meaning

1) to will deliberately, have a purpose, be minded

2) of willing as an affection, to desire

Both of these words can either mean made to be true or something someone desires. Personally I believe God designed us to be autonomous because He desires our love and fellowship. If God had designed us without the freedom to choose whether or not we would love Him would that love be of any value? Think of it like this. Let’s say you cast a spell on your wife and she has no choice but to love you. When she says I love you what would your first thought be? For me my first thought would be of course she loves me she has no other choice. To me it’s not even clear that this would truly be love. Love is a gift given freely. It’s not something you can take by force. It’s a genuine affection and emotion of someone towards another. Without free will there is no genuine affection or emotion because the love was not given by choice it was taken by force. When I think about which type of love would be of more value to me I believe it must be by free choice. Only then do you know that it is for real and genuine. Without free will love is just artificial. To me this explains why we are here on earth. If God wanted to create us without free will He could’ve created us to be obedient and to love Him then this world would be useless. He could’ve just created us this way in heaven. I believe this world is here to cultivate humans who will choose to love God of their own free will and to separate those who choose to love Him from those who don’t. This way God can have both true fellowship and love from us for all eternity.
 
Upvote 0

Bible Highlighter

Law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul.
Site Supporter
Jul 22, 2014
41,685
7,908
...
✟1,321,706.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
As a spinoff from my last thread I found lots of differing ideas with “free will” and a need to ask some more questions:

Does God have both the power and knowledge to create a being with the ability to make one truly autonomous free will choice and if not why not?

Would God’s foreknowledge and/or knowing everything keep a being from making a truly autonomous free will choice?

Would giving a being the ability to make a truly autonomous free will choice reduce or even eliminate God’s Sovereignty?

God can certainly keep any being from making a choice, so does allowing the being to make the choice mean God is not “controlling” or “over” the universe?

With enough environmental and biological information, it can be determent which ice-cream you will chose, so is that really a free will choice?

If God created a being with the very limited autonomous free will ability to make just one choice, yet that being never came close to reaching the age to ever making that autonomous free will choice, would God still know the exact without a doubt selection the being would have made had if it lived long enough?

Free will is a choice that leads you down a path that determines which road you want to take.

Free Will in the Bible:

#1. Joshua 24:15 KJV -
"Choose for yourselves this day whom you will serve"

#2. Matthew 11:28 KJV -
"Come to Me, all you who labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest."

#3. John 7:17 KJV -
"If anyone wills to do His will, he shall know concerning the doctrine, whether it is from God."

#4. John 7:37 KJV -
"If anyone thirsts, let him come to Me and drink."

#5. Acts 2:38 KJV -
"Repent, and let everyone of you be baptized"

#6. Acts 3:19 KJV -
"Repent therefore and be converted"

#7. Acts 16:31 KJV -
"Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and you will be saved"

#8. Acts 17:30 KJV -
"but now commands all men everywhere to repent"

#9. Revelation 22:17 KJV -
"Whoever wills, let him take the water of life freely."

#10. Genesis 4:7 KJV -
"If thou doest well, shalt thou not be accepted? and if thou doest not well, sin lieth at the door. And unto thee shall be his desire, and thou shalt rule over him."

#11. Revelation 22:17 KJ2
"And the Spirit and the bride say, Come. And let him that hears say, Come. And let him that is thirsty come. And whosoever will, let him take the water of life freely."

#12. Luke 13:34 NLT -
"O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, the city that kills the prophets and stones God's messengers! How often I have wanted to gather your children together as a hen protects her chicks beneath her wings, but you wouldn't let me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: setst777
Upvote 0

Neogaia777

Old Soul
Site Supporter
Oct 10, 2011
24,717
5,558
46
Oregon
✟1,103,786.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Celibate
Matrix: Your not here to make the choice, you've already made it... We cannot see past the choices we don't understand... Your here to understand why you made or make the choices that you do, or did... Do you see her die...? You have the sight now Neo... Were all here to do what were all here to do... Everything that has a beginning, has an end Neo...

God Bless!
By the end of these movies as an outer example, in the first movie on it, it is all about man's free will and choice empowering them through Neo, but by the time the second starts, Morpheus even mentions that the reason why many of them were there or were supposedly free, was because of their shared affinity for rebelliousness or disobedience, ect, then there are characters like the Merovingian who talks all about "causality" (cause and effect, or supposed choice and consequence, ect) how they are all slaves to it, ect, no escaping it, ect, then by the end of the second movie after Neo's meeting with the Architect, ect (where maybe, or by the end of the movie it is revealed that only that one single choice, which was only one of two choices, made by Neo alone, and only right at that time with Architect, might have been the only true choice any of them ever made ever, throughout any of the entire three movies, by any of them... it is revealed that, by and at the end of the third that that might have been the one and only real true choice by anyone, but by the ending of the third movie of the series and the conclusion that was maybe never any of any or all of them, was any real true choice made anyone at all, Neo and Agent Smith, none of them maybe never, ever made any real true choice at all... and it is ultimately Neo's telling Agent Smith that (by or at the end of the final battle between them) that Neo beats Him (Agent Smith) at the end, by telling Agent Smith that he was right and was always right, then submits to Agent Smith and is how he (Neo) ultimately beats Smith, stops the attack on Zion and wins the biggest battle and war perhaps ever up to that point costing Neo (and Smith) their lives...along with many others, but then peace and a new and better world by that, by the end... And was it choice...? or was any of it really and real, true choice at all, truth is IDK..? if they ever truly figured it or that out for sure... maybe you should watch the series again...? And you tell me...?

God Bless
 
Upvote 0

Neogaia777

Old Soul
Site Supporter
Oct 10, 2011
24,717
5,558
46
Oregon
✟1,103,786.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Celibate
By the end of these movies as an outer example, in the first movie on it, it is all about man's free will and choice empowering them through Neo, but by the time the second starts, Morpheus even mentions that the reason why many of them were there or were supposedly free, was because of their shared affinity for rebelliousness or disobedience, ect, then there are characters like the Merovingian who talks all about "causality" (cause and effect, or supposed choice and consequence, ect) how they are all slaves to it, ect, no escaping it, ect, then by the end of the second movie after Neo's meeting with the Architect, ect (where maybe, or by the end of the movie it is revealed that only that one single choice, which was only one of two choices, made by Neo alone, and only right at that time with Architect, might have been the only true choice any of them ever made ever, throughout any of the entire three movies, by any of them... it is revealed that, by and at the end of the third that that might have been the one and only real true choice by anyone, but by the ending of the third movie of the series and the conclusion that was maybe never any of any or all of them, was any real true choice made anyone at all, Neo and Agent Smith, none of them maybe never, ever made any real true choice at all... and it is ultimately Neo's telling Agent Smith that (by or at the end of the final battle between them) that Neo beats Him (Agent Smith) at the end, by telling Agent Smith that he was right and was always right, then submits to Agent Smith and is how he (Neo) ultimately beats Smith, stops the attack on Zion and wins the biggest battle and war perhaps ever up to that point costing Neo (and Smith) their lives...along with many others, but then peace and a new and better world by that, by the end... And was it choice...? or was any of it really and real, true choice at all, truth is IDK..? if they ever truly figured it or that out for sure... maybe you should watch the series again...? And you tell me...?

God Bless
Its just a movie series though, but man I really don't know of any other movie or series or whatever really tries hard to go into and answer that like the Matrix series does...

And that is one of things I like about it/them...

God Bless!
 
Upvote 0

Bible Highlighter

Law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul.
Site Supporter
Jul 22, 2014
41,685
7,908
...
✟1,321,706.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
As a spinoff from my last thread I found lots of differing ideas with “free will” and a need to ask some more questions:

Does God have both the power and knowledge to create a being with the ability to make one truly autonomous free will choice and if not why not?

Would God’s foreknowledge and/or knowing everything keep a being from making a truly autonomous free will choice?

Would giving a being the ability to make a truly autonomous free will choice reduce or even eliminate God’s Sovereignty?

God can certainly keep any being from making a choice, so does allowing the being to make the choice mean God is not “controlling” or “over” the universe?

With enough environmental and biological information, it can be determent which ice-cream you will chose, so is that really a free will choice?

If God created a being with the very limited autonomous free will ability to make just one choice, yet that being never came close to reaching the age to ever making that autonomous free will choice, would God still know the exact without a doubt selection the being would have made had if it lived long enough?

In reference to Salvation:

I believe “Prevenient Grace” is the best way to harmonize what Scripture says as whole in regards to God’s Sovereignty and Man’s Free Will. Prevenient Grace is the belief that God draws men at certain times to see and understand the gospel so as to choose it or reject it of their own free will. Without this illumination or drawing by God, a person cannot understand the gospel. For in the Parable in the Sower, we learn that the first seed did not even understand the gospel message. The devil stole the seed out of their heart before they could understand it. So there are times where a person can hear the gospel and not understand it because they have not been drawn by God yet. But God will draw all men unto Him in His timing, though.


Prevenient Grace Verses:

John 1:9 says,
“That was the true Light, which lighteth every man that cometh into the world.”

John 12:32 says,
“And I, if I be lifted up from the earth, will draw all men unto me.”

John 16:8-11 says,
8 “And when he is come, he will reprove the world of sin, and of righteousness, and of judgment:
9 Of sin, because they believe not on me;
10 Of righteousness, because I go to my Father, and ye see me no more;
11 Of judgment, because the prince of this world is judged.”

Romans 2:4 says,
“Or despise you the riches of his goodness and forbearance and longsuffering; not knowing that the goodness of God leads you to repentance?”

Titus 2:11 says,
“For the grace of God that bringeth salvation hath appeared to all men,”

1 Timothy 2:3-4 says,
3 “For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Saviour;
4 Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth.

John 3:16 says,
“For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.”

2 Peter 3:9 which states that God “is not willing that any should perish, but for all to come to repentance.”

1 John 2:2 says,
“[Jesus] is the atoning sacrifice for our sins, and not only for ours but also for the sins of the whole world.” (Also see John 1:29 - the Lamb of God takes away the sins of the world).

Hebrews 2:9 essentially says,
"Jesus tasted death for everyone."

Matthew 13:15 says,
"For this people's heart is waxed gross, and their ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes they have closed; lest at any time they should see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and should understand with their heart, and should be converted, and I should heal them.”

Matthew 23:37 (NLT) says,
"O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, the city that kills the prophets and stones God's messengers! How often I have wanted to gather your children together as a hen protects her chicks beneath her wings, but you wouldn't let me.”

Deuteronomy 30:19 says,
“I call heaven and earth as witness this day against you, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing: therefore choose life, that both you and your descendants may live”.

Acts of the Apostles 17:27 says, “he be not far from every one of us”

Acts of the Apostles 16:14 says,
“And a certain woman named Lydia, a seller of purple, of the city of Thyatira, which worshipped God, heard us: whose heart the Lord opened, that she attended unto the things which were spoken of Paul.” (Note: This was an opening of the heart to listen and it was not a change of heart to be instantly saved and regenerated).


Good Article on this topic:
What Biblical Evidence Is There For Prevenient Grace?
 
Upvote 0

childeye 2

Well-Known Member
Aug 18, 2018
5,897
3,323
67
Denver CO
✟240,703.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
In most cases, these wants are determined by our natures. If I loved puppies from childhood, I will want to pet and hold the puppy.
I've studied linguistics most of my life. Therefore, asking where the impetus comes from is not much different than asking where our nature is derived from. In other words, I don't feel like you've answered where the impetus to do good or evil comes from when you say it's determined by our nature.

But to get to the point, I mean to imply that the nature or impetus is a spiritual issue wherein the term free will has no significance other than to provide a circular reasoning as an answer to why we do good or evil. Hence 'I did it because I could choose to do it", and "I could have not done it if I wanted to", or "He wanted to be bad because he could have wanted to be good". These are all examples of circular reasoning consistent with free will theology.



That can happen.
I believe it's the case and believing in free will simply obscures this reality.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

martymonster

Veteran
Dec 15, 2006
3,435
938
✟203,295.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Apparently, "Freewill" is something that God treasures so much, that he won't dare violate it, even to stop a very large portion of the human race, from entering into an eternity of extreme suffering.....but, he's violate it to stop people from starving to death.

Sounds totally legit!


Gen 50:18 And his brethren also went and fell down before his face; and they said, Behold, we be thy servants.
Gen 50:19 And Joseph said unto them, Fear not: for am I in the place of God?
Gen 50:20 But as for you, ye thought evil against me; but God meant it unto good, to bring to pass, as it is this day, to save much people alive.



P.S.

Meant, doesn't mean, knew what was going to happen in advance, because he can see into the future.
 
  • Friendly
Reactions: Neogaia777
Upvote 0

Radagast

comes and goes
Site Supporter
Dec 10, 2003
23,896
9,864
✟344,531.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
asking where the impetus comes from is not much different than asking where our nature is derived from. In other words, I don't feel like you've answered where the impetus to do good or evil comes from when you say it's determined by our nature.

Our nature is a combination of what we are born with and our experiences throughout life.

These are all examples of circular reasoning consistent with free will theology.

A great deal of theology relating to free will is poorly formulated, yes.
 
Upvote 0