Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Ever made an explosive? How about a lethal gas?
Are you deliberately missing the point?We are talking about cites. Just because a STATE has lose gun laws in SOME states cities are permitted to have stricter gun laws.
That must be why every developed country has comparable numbers of gun violence. Oh wait, no they don't.
What is the point? You said that one of the reasons it may be an issue is because some states with lose gun laws are beside those with tight gun laws and I was saying that the state may or may not be the issue just because a STATE has fairly lose gun laws does not mean a particular city will.Are you deliberately missing the point?
no, nor do I have an interest in doing so.Ever made an explosive? How about a lethal gas?
Great. So if a CITY has strict gun laws, but the STATE it's in has lose gun laws, is it possible people might... go...out...of the city to do their gun shopping, do you think?What is the point? You said that one of the reasons it may be an issue is because some states with lose gun laws are beside those with tight gun laws and I was saying that the state may or may not be the issue just because a STATE has fairly lose gun laws does not mean a particular city will.
It's much harder to do than obtain a gun. Let alone to deploy.no, nor do I have an interest in doing so.
Yes, but then if they get caught in some of those cities with a gun they are breaking the law, and yet the gun does nothing by itself. Having a gun in and of itself means NOTHING.Great. So if a CITY has strict gun laws, but the STATE it's in has lose gun laws, is it possible people might... go...out...of the city to do their gun shopping, do you think?
Great. So if a CITY has strict gun laws, but the STATE it's in has lose gun laws, is it possible people might... go...out...of the city to do their gun shopping, do you think?
but if someone was deadset on causing much damage either of those options would be more effective than MOST guns.It's much harder to do than obtain a gun. Let alone to deploy.
but if someone was deadset on causing much damage either of those options would be more effective than MOST guns.
Only if they can obtain and deploy those options. Getting a gun is far simpler and more accessible.but if someone was deadset on causing much damage either of those options would be more effective than MOST guns.
You're now forgetting your own points.Yes, but then if they get caught in some of those cities with a gun they are breaking the law, and yet the gun does nothing by itself. Having a gun in and of itself means NOTHING.
Only if they can obtain and deploy those options. Getting a gun is far simpler and more accessible.
that was my point, but if someone was DEAD SET on doing it they WOULD find a way one way or another.Only if they can obtain and deploy those options. Getting a gun is far simpler and more accessible.
Which point am I forgetting in these 700+ posts?You're now forgetting your own points.
I think I'm done.
Which point am I forgetting in these 700+ posts?
or at least where everyone has the right to carry a firearm, even if for various reasons some do not.Crime is less in areas of the USA where EVERYONE is known to be carrying a firearm. Why do you suppose that is?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?