SolomonVII
Well-Known Member
- Sep 4, 2003
- 23,138
- 4,919
- Country
- Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- CA-Greens
We can do what we want.Why must we keep it within America only?
I think that comparing apples with apples is a good thing though. That is why nobody is bringing Honduras into the comparison, isn't it?
Americans are a self-reliant people. It is up to each and every one of them to chose what they need and what they want.So why do we need so many guns? If we are as safe as other places with fewer guns, why are we told non-stop that we need guns to protect ourselves?
Uh huh. Nevertheless, as the number of guns have risen, the number of homicides have fallen.More guns in circulation = higher probability of gun access (whether through theft or misuse, etc.)
That is not the argument. Criminals do have guns already,and illegally. That is where the problem of homicide is. It is just like illegal immigration. There is no need to scrap the constitution when enforcing the dam laws already on the books, and getting the bad guys off the street is the big first step that too many are queasy to take.Love that argument. Since bad people will always do bad things why have any laws at all?
Great. If you think it is practical, then by all means, scrap this one.We've gotten rid of other amendments, just an FYI.
Are the people without guns going to come knocking at their door in the middle of the night?If the gun owners of America don't get their stuff together sooner or later these mass shootings will result in much less pleasant outcomes for those who love their guns.
What exactly kind of threat are you intending to make here?
D
The NRA is a major boogey man and a minor player in funding of government officials.o something now or just wait. See what people sufficiently fed up with the mealy mouthed responses do after a couple hundred more mass-shootings. Sooner or later the NRA will lose its grip on government officials.
I see.At this point in the game those people who truly value their guns will have to agree to some things or it will be much worse for them in the future.
None of this requires a scrapping of the 2nd, and many of these things are already on the books.They have to agree to be on a registry so we know who has the guns. They need to agree to aggressive background checks. They need to agree to restrictions on their guns in many more invasive means.
Confiscation through taxation. Interesting idea.And they need to PAY for their guns. They need to pay surcharges on each gun and ammunition purchase to pay for mental healthcare improvements and first responders who deal with the aftermath of countless mass shootings.
Why do mass shooters shoot indiscriminately?Pay up one way or another. Americans may like their guns but I doubt they will put up with this stupidity forever. Think strategically or face much worse consequences later on.
Seems to me that one thing to do to solve the problem is to stop sending our the signal that most Americans are despicable, deplorable people for having the values they do.
There is the amending formula. If you think that is a practical idea in this particular instance, then that is up to you.Been done before.
The twentieth century showed the founding fathers prescient in their understanding of the tyranny of governments, and the inherent God given right of a self-reliant people to protect themselves, period.We don't NEED a Second Amendment interpreted as broadly as ours is interpreted and not everyone agrees that it applies to private ownership in the way we hold it.
Every day that goes by where the left in the West continue to play around with socialism, and not renounce that Marxism as vigorously as we all have Fasicsm -as if hundreds of millions of people have not died as a result of such governments being instituted- is another day that the sensibility of the second amendment makes itself known. 50 is not just a statistic, but neither is 100 million.
That such numbers do not figure into the thinking of so many people on the left who want to scrap the second is unsurprising, given that they have also supported the slaughter of 50 million unborn without blinking.
It is not that your heart is bigger. It is that it is selective of what it cares about.
Upvote
0