I've tried to watch her TV sermons a couple of times. I just don't feel it from her. In my opinion to put it simply enough she's not anointed. She's in it for the money.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Heretic hunters are on my least liked list.
That guys taking text out of context, how low can he get?
You think she's a bad person for having a private plane?
I guess I don't.
Because if I'm going to condemn her than I need
to condemn you and me too.
We have WAY more than we need...
Where do we draw the line? at our own possessions,
no higher or youre greedy? lol.
kwim?
Then there's the example of how God blessed a man who He was pleased with
King Solomon you greedy example of prosperity ...
Nah, I'm not jumping on that bandwagon yet.
Now the toilet seat, that's where I draw the line![]()
Heretic hunters are on my least liked list.
That guys taking text out of context, how low can he get?
You think she's a bad person for having a private plane?
I guess I don't.
Because if I'm going to condemn her than I need
to condemn you and me too.
We have WAY more than we need...
Where do we draw the line? at our own possessions,
no higher or youre greedy? lol.
kwim?
Then there's the example of how God blessed a man who He was pleased with
King Solomon you greedy example of prosperity ...
Nah, I'm not jumping on that bandwagon yet.
Now the toilet seat, that's where I draw the line![]()
It is certainly NOT illegal in this country currently to preach the Gospel(?????) and have people send in their $$$ to TAX EXEMPT Corporations where the recipients can spend MILLIONS on what many would consider to be 'personal' items such as HUGE SALARIES, PRIVATE JETS and MANSIONS.
Nothing illegal about that at all. They can even OFFSHORE those funds in TAX FREE situations by the likewise MILLIONS.
All perfectly LEGAL.
How 'christian' it is is debatable. For me that is a firm uh, no thank you as far as 'contributions' go.
And I suspect that at some point our idiotic government will see through this sham of democracy and shut it down, but unfortunately many of them have their own almost identical TAX DODGING SCAMS in place so none of them are prone to squealing on each others are they?
Oh well. I guess I must be a hater for seeing the obvious?
zzzzzzzz
s
I don't think you saw the obvious, however. By mixing in a lot of other issues and people, the point about Joyce Meyer using a private jet to crisscross the country all the time is confused. It is obvious to me that this is nothing special and certainly nothing shameful.
What do the complainers think she should do--take the bus?
You see, the problem is that EVERYONE can be made out to be a "money grubbing" hypocrite
so long as we contrast some normal action with the worst situation existing somewhere in the world. It goes like this--"Mother Teresa, you say you helped a lot of people, but you took in contributions. Why didn't you spend your time and that money helping to end AIDS or that quadraplegic in Bangladesh instead of making yourself look good?"
Yeah, that was not cool at all.That guy raving about Joyce Meyer can't even put together a coherent argument OR spell her name correctly, but we're supposed to consider HIM the authority on the subject and our model of Christian behavior??
Puhleeeeze!
Oh dang s, this is way out of my league.It is certainly NOT illegal in this country currently to preach the Gospel(?????) and have people send in their $$$ to TAX EXEMPT Corporations where the recipients can spend MILLIONS on what many would consider to be 'personal' items such as HUGE SALARIES, PRIVATE JETS and MANSIONS.
Nothing illegal about that at all. They can even OFFSHORE those funds in TAX FREE situations by the likewise MILLIONS.
All perfectly LEGAL.
How 'christian' it is is debatable. For me that is a firm uh, no thank you as far as 'contributions' go.
And I suspect that at some point our idiotic government will see through this sham of democracy and shut it down, but unfortunately many of them have their own almost identical TAX DODGING SCAMS in place so none of them are prone to squealing on each others are they?
I'm sure you're an equal opportunity hater.Oh well. I guess I must be a hater for seeing the obvious?
I'm not saying that the purchase of cars, jets, mansions and offshore tax free accounts are illegal, in the Name of God, of course.
As are dinners that cost $10000 a plate etc etc etc.
All tax free. Of course.
All in the Name of Jesus, of course!
I'm sure if you could buy your personal mansions, jets, cars and offshore accounts tax free you would as well, in the Name of Jesus too.
Indeed. Even in the Name of Jesus. It's all entirely quite legal.
For now. And maybe for a long time.
Good point.I don't think you saw the obvious, however. By mixing in a lot of other issues and people, the point about Joyce Meyer using a private jet to crisscross the country all the time is confused. It is obvious to me that this is nothing special and certainly nothing shameful.
What do the complainers think she should do--take the bus? You see, the problem is that EVERYONE can be made out to be a "money grubbing" hypocrite so long as we contrast some normal action with the worst situation existing somewhere in the world. It goes like this---"Mother Teresa, you say you helped a lot of people, but you took in contributions. Why didn't you spend your time and that money helping to end AIDS or help that quadraplegic in Bangladesh instead of making yourself look good? Your sisters have some pretty nice saris, too, I noticed. Couldn't they have worn paper gowns instead?"
It's all in the Name of Haysues A.
Party on!
What she has does not concern me. How she came to get it does. Saying it would not bother you when someone takes the reward of giving away too literal or even as a reason for giving is what concerns me. Rich? Hey we are all rich in the US in comparison to others in third world countries. Being so self centered as to wear a suit of clothing only once isn't about being rich. It's about self centeredness. Not caring if someone gives you their rent money and gets put out on the street is also self centered. Thinking it's all about me getting blessed is the same. Our reward is not on this earth. Yes we can be blessed while here but if we rely on that as our spiritual awareness or spiritual worth in the eyes of God, we are not aware at all.Heretic hunters are on my least liked list.
That guys taking text out of context, how low can he get?
You think she's a bad person for having a private plane?
I guess I don't.
Because if I'm going to condemn her than I need
to condemn you and me too.
We have WAY more than we need...
Where do we draw the line? at our own possessions,
no higher or youre greedy? lol.
kwim?
Then there's the example of how God blessed a man who He was pleased with
King Solomon you greedy example of prosperity ...
Nah, I'm not jumping on that bandwagon yet.
Now the toilet seat, that's where I draw the line![]()
I don't begrudge anyone something like a private plane, for example, if their ministry requires them to travel very frequently. It may be a necessity in order to do God's work and spread the Gospel.When did envy become a Christian virtue? That's what most of this thread is about--tearing down someone whose life is the ministry. Could Joyce and Dave Meyer live more frugally? I suppose. But making her out to be the things that self-described Christians here have alleged (much of it without any real knowledge of the facts) is really shameful IMO. Or embarrassing.
Well, here's the point from my perspective (and then I'm done).
When did envy become a Christian virtue?
That's what most of this thread is about--tearing down someone whose life is the ministry.
Could Joyce and Dave Meyer live more frugally? I suppose.
But making her out to be the things that self-described Christians here have alleged (much of it without any real knowledge of the facts) is really shameful IMO. Or embarrassing.
Can't we do better than that? Like actually investigating a bit before shooting off our mouths?
Like not immediately thinking the worst? Like not engaging in character assassination by association (as was done)? Like not working so hard to find fault in matters of incidental importance (as was also done)?
I didn't think I needed to define envy.What does envy have to do with it? nice try though
I remain extremely suspicious of ALL political and priest class people by historical lessons superabundant, particularly when attached to a LOT of $$$ and POWER.
You may think my issue is with Joyce. You'd be wrong. It goes much deeper than her. She's simply an imperfect woman attempting to serve God in good conscience. It also has nothing to do with her being a woman as i think her ministry, being focused on teaching women is the proper manner.
I didn't think I needed to define envy.
If you sense my distrust of power mongers of any flavor you would be very correct. Especially so when encountering religious nitwits who think they sit in my eternal judgment seat of whom J. Meyer is certainly one. In the name of Tax Free Jesus of course!OK. I thought that was where you were coming from.
If you think me envious of J. Meyer uh, no. Very much the opposite.
I am as familiar as I ever care to be again with both $ and power.
If you sense my distrust of power mongers of any flavor you would be very correct. Especially so when encountering religious nitwits who think they sit in my eternal judgment seat of whom J. Meyer is certainly one.
Yes, but this was addressed earlier. The idea that she is pushing some identifiable doctrine is ridiculous. You'd have to listen to a dozen TV hours, very intently, to even pick up what her theological slant or denominational orientation is. I''ve listened to quite a few, and it's overwhelmingly generic Christianity.I'm not a fan of the owner of this site, having engaged him in his drifts as well, but he does call it like it is for the most part on a lot of subjects. A nice synopsis of J. Meyer for anyone who is interested in some of the finer points from a DOCTRINAL PERSPECTIVE which points always are more concerning to me than whatever legal tax scams she has going on.
Hi RR.What she has does not concern me. How she came to get it does. Saying it would not bother you when someone takes the reward of giving away too literal or even as a reason for giving is what concerns me. Rich? Hey we are all rich in the US in comparison to others in third world countries. Being so self centered as to wear a suit of clothing only once isn't about being rich. It's about self centeredness. Not caring if someone gives you their rent money and gets put out on the street is also self centered. Thinking it's all about me getting blessed is the same. Our reward is not on this earth. Yes we can be blessed while here but if we rely on that as our spiritual awareness or spiritual worth in the eyes of God, we are not aware at all.
The Beatitudes seem relevant suddenly.
No problem!You may think my issue is with Joyce. You'd be wrong. It goes much deeper than her. She's simply an imperfect woman attempting to serve God in good conscience. It also has nothing to do with her being a woman as i think her ministry, being focused on teaching women is the proper manner. It's the impersonal manner of the ministry. As human beings we need the touch, the hug and the laying on of hands. If she was merely gathering people into the fold, I would not speak a single word against this. But she is actually shepherding.
Not at all! No worries at all.If I seem angry, your reading me wrong.
That's fine, and I'm not a fangirl of Joyces , so no worries.I'm passionate about this subject
Eck!. It's not from some theological standpoint either but from direct knowledge.
Between the time I was a baptist pastor and before coming to Orthodoxy, I learned about the liturgy from a very famous christian speaker who was also a bishop of a group. I'd already read quite a few of his books which i still consider good teachings. I attended their seminary (which was suspiciously short in duration and subject matter and was asked to walk with said bishop. He also did the mass gathering teachings in large arenas. He sold books tapes and the lot as well and collected a "love offering " to "support" the ministry ( in addition to the $35 cover-charge at the door before entering just like Joyce) of teaching. Me and another brother (now an anglo-catholic priest)were in charge of setting up the sound system and the lighting. All the while I listened intently to his teaching for which I am none the worse and maybe even better. The other brother went so far as to accept the bishops offer to invest in the speaking tour for a profit. That just didn't set right with me so I declined the same offer. After about a year, I went to the bishop as i was having an issue with accepting pay for ministry work(which was a fault I had).
He said something to me I'll never forget and it ended my walk with the bishop. He said, "What God has inspired me to say is mine to keep if I so desire and I am not about to simply give it away without being paid for it." About a month later he was defrocked for secretly getting a divorce and remarrying all within a month. About six months later the archbishop was found to be a thief (embezzling funds) and the whole shooting match fell to pieces. And that group is still in existence denying it all. Except most of the clergy moved on to something better. Guess what, the defrocked bishop still does the same dog and pony show and still calls himself a bishop but has been through another wife since then. Yep, still selling Jesus like a commodity and never for free. And my brother, the Anglo-catholic priest was left in debt to the tune of $75,000. Never made a dime and never shared in any of the profit as promised.
Right.Be I right or wrong on Joyce, that is my reason for the passion. Well, enough of that.
In truth, it was the tone of a number of posts that I had in mind, not something about you personally.
If you do not know my basic modus operandi when encountering any christian, particularly of the higher powers of authority, but even here it is this first and foremost:Well then, tell us why you think she fits that description.
Yes, but this was addressed earlier. The idea that she is pushing some identifiable doctrine is ridiculous. You'd have to listen to a dozen TV hours, very intently, to even pick up what her theological slant or denominational orientation is. I''ve listened to quite a few, and it's overwhelmingly generic Christianity.
There are a lot of what I call 'dynamic' and 'charismatic' personalities in the religious arena. I really am OK with it.Talking about Joyce Meyer in terms of her personal religious belief, other than for the standard beliefs of all normal Christians, is very hard to do. Her telecasts and lectures do not go that way but rather are about personal problems, women's issues, albeit with a Christian orientation. If we were talking about John Hagee or Doug Bachelder, well, that would be completely different.