Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Why did this moderate Libertarian vote Trump?
"Voting for Trump will be the biggest middle finger to the political establishment in the history of America, and it is going to feel gooooooooooood!" -Michael Moore
Yep, it was.
It's going to be even better voting for Trump again in 2020!
That's the hatred I've been referring to. The dems are really showing it now by going after 81 more people who aren't even Trump. The people who identify with the dems are going to vote in lockstep with what they see from their representatives.
Beats me! I voted for him because he was the Republican nominee.
Pelosi on the New Green Deal:That's probably true.
However, it is also true that the Democratic Party leaders, both inside and outside of Congress, have put her on some sort of pedestal in a way that is virtually unheard of for a newly-elected Congressperson still in her 20s.
They have welcomed her extremist political proposals and demands, never criticizing her "loose cannon" style, and also talking as though everything she is...is what the party needs for the future.
Isn't that why a lot of people voted for Trump?Agree.
or said another way, She's a young, charismatic idealist who's ideas need to be debated, scrutinized and evaluated.
and as an aside "loose cannon" would be a compliment to some of our elected leaders.
She hasn't been.That alpone doesn't answer the question of whether or not she has been promoted patronized, pushed forward, or put on a pedestal by party leaders in a way that is unusual considering her shortcomings.
She beat a 10-term incumbent by 15% points. That is huge.Oh, please, the only reason miss ex-bartender got voted in was cause her opponent didn't campaign and only the hardcore voted. She won the primary by like 9,000 votes. Not some overwhelmingly number. LOL
Are you seriously comparing the "leader" of the free world to a first-term congresswoman, 1 representative out of 435?It depends on what your definition of "obsessed" is. If someone is doing and saying things that create attention, then they will get attention. Take a look at what you said earlier:
Now, substitute OAC for Trump, and substitute the liberal media for the conservative media. See the pattern?
That certainly doesn't make it clean energy though, does it?I saw that part, but that's where they start inserting their own opinions into it. Even referring to what we use now as "dirty energy" shows their ignorance and bias on the subject. The energy we're using has been cleaned up immensely, and they fail to recognize that.
Nuclear energy may not produce much in the way of emissions (it isn't zero BTW) but it does have the little problem with disposing of those spent fuel rods.The original NGD proposed getting rid of natural gas and even nuclear energy, which produces no emissions at all aside from water vapor.
The common Dem / Media fears has found an outlet to their insane instability over impeaching or at least suppressing Trump, which I classify as political detoxification from what the Obama yrs wound up grooming them for, dreams which have turned into nightmares.Why is the news media making such a big deal over her? I don't get it.
Gimme a break! She beat him 15,897 to 11,761, a 4,000 vote win. Only the die-hards voted in a district with one million people. 127,000 voted in the general election, which was 100,000 more votes.She beat a 10-term incumbent by 15% points. That is huge.
Her fans don't see her, they see the fake version of her the media creates by covering up as many of the terrible things she's said and done as possible. Her fans aren't interested in reality or the disastrous consequences of leftist policies, they're interested in the Goodfeels they get when they continue to believe in the "Leftism good" lie.The news media loves and so do a lot of Democrats. But why? She recently cost NY $24.5 billion in tax revenue and 143,000 jobs over 10 years as her and others got Amazon to scuttle plans for HQ2 in Long Island City.
Her Green Deal is a joke that would cost $53-93 trillion over 10 years.
She's basically a 15 watt bulb in a socket that requires 100 watts.
Why is the news media making such a big deal over her? I don't get it.
That certainly doesn't make it clean energy though, does it?
Nuclear energy may not produce much in the way of emissions (it isn't zero BTW) but it does have the little problem with disposing of those spent fuel rods.
I'll say it again since you don't seem to get it:Gimme a break! She beat him 15,897 to 11,761, a 4,000 vote win. Only the die-hards voted in a district with one million people. 127,000 voted in the general election, which was 100,000 more votes.
Exactly.Which we don't know how to do yet.
And let's not delve into the fact that the US Navy doesn't know what to do with retired nuclear propulsion cores.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?