What are your thoughts on this?

[RileyG]

We've gone from this:

'The whole song gave me chills. Nothing about it was cute or funny. I don't care if it was satire or not. A lot of those men were predators. Lord have mercy.'

To this:

'SOME of them were known predators'.

And when it was explained that the claim was a lie, you're now simply complaining about the song. Why not pick a position and stick with it so we know what you mean in each post. Are you suggesting that all of them are predators, some of them are or none, but hey - you don't see anything satirical in the song.

Which is it?

Don't like the song, don't like the message, don't like any of it.

 

[Bradskii]

What's been drilled into people's heads, is that if someone isn't in full support of LGBT, there's something wrong with them. Interacting with the community is anecdotal and subjective. I go by what LGBTQQIP2SAA+ publishes and their actions as a whole.

But we know that's not true. You go by what some low life says when he edits a video that can so easily be found to be false. This thread is based on that for heaven's sake.

 

[Bradskii]

Don't like the song, don't like the message, don't like any of it.

Well, looks like we have a decision. You're not claiming that any members of the choir were convicted child abusers. You just 'didn't like the song.' Which, seeing as it was a satirical message aimed at those who might sometimes accuse people of child abuse for no reason, seems to have done the job it set out to do. You weren't meant to like it.

 

[RileyG]

Well, looks like we have a decision. You're not claiming that any members of the choir were convicted child abusers. You just 'didn't like the song.' Which, seeing as it was a satirical message aimed at those who might sometimes accuse people of child abuse for no reason, seems to have done the job it set out to do. You weren't meant to like it.

Satire? When they go on and on about coming for our children and claim it's satire, how do you expect some people to react, with all due respect? It's beyond disgusting.

 

[ozso]

But we know that's not true. You go by what some low life says when he edits a video that can so easily be found to be false. This thread is based on that for heaven's sake.

Most of what I know about LGBTQQIP2SAA+ (including that acronym) comes from the source. Not only did you fail to prove the video false, you made posts that inadvertently corroborated it.

 

[RileyG]

I'm not going to bow down to the LGBTQUIAXYZ "community" despite their best efforts for so-called "respect" and "equality." That video gave me chills. Awful, awful, awful.

 

[Bradskii]

Satire? When they go on and on about coming for our children and claim it's satire, how do you expect some people to react, with all due respect? It's beyond disgusting.

I expect you to react just as you did.

 

[RileyG]

I expect you to react just as you did.

Ok. Agree to disagree and move on. No one is going to change my mind or yours.

God bless you

 

[ozso]

Well, looks like we have a decision. You're not claiming that any members of the choir were convicted child abusers. You just 'didn't like the song.' Which, seeing as it was a satirical message aimed at those who might sometimes accuse people of child abuse for no reason, seems to have done the job it set out to do. You weren't meant to like it.

The first one on the list, which you said was false, was an exact face match. You got thrown off by aliases.

 

[Pommer]

What's been drilled into people's heads, is that if someone isn't in full support of LGBT, there's something wrong with them. Interacting with the community is anecdotal and subjective. I go by what LGBTQQIP2SAA+ publishes and their actions as a whole.

You’re totally allowed to not support LGBTQQIP2SAA+ folk.
And we’re allowed to think less of you for your stance, why is that “unfair” to you?

 

[RileyG]

You’re totally allowed to not support LGBTQQIP2SAA+ folk.
And we’re allowed to think less of you for your stance, why is that “unfair” to you?

Not surprising.

A lot of LGBT folk demand approval for their lifestyle and see anything less as hate.

I've been there and seen it many times.

 

[Bradskii]

The first one on the list, which you said was false, was an exact face match. You got thrown off by aliases.

It's not the same person and it's not the same name. You think that if someone has a different middle name then it's an alias? Please don't treat me like an idiot. The second name doesn't appear in the court lists and the third name is also different. But of course, not using your middle name when looking to hide your identity is a brilliant ruse, bound to throw anyone off the track!

 

[Bradskii]

Ok. Agree to disagree and move on. No one is going to change my mind or yours.

God bless you

I think you should take that little gold star off my post. I wasn't being complimentary. Too subtle I guess...

 

[Pommer]

Not surprising.

A lot of LGBT folk demand approval for their lifestyle and see anything less as hate.

I've been there and seen it many times.

Christians claim that they go to heaven when they die…they’re all set!
But you’d like us to talk-nice about you when you won’t offer love and compassion to those whom you deem “lost”, and yet somehow people who try to get you to hold to a better standard are “the bad guys”.

Enjoy your privilege.

 

[Bradskii]

Not surprising.

A lot of LGBT folk demand approval for their lifestyle and see anything less as hate.

I've been there and seen it many times.

If I wanted, for example, to have sex outside marriage, then I wouldn't be looking for your approval. Just as if I was gay, I wouldn't be looking for a thumbs up from you. What you believe and why you believe it holds no interest to me. What you think of me or my friends or my family likewise has no interst to me whatsoever. I really could care less. But how you describe my friends and family and how you act towards them does.

 

[Diamond72]

Does that include being emotionally overwrought by seeing animals abused?

What abuse? Do you mean animals eating each other.
Those cute little kittens eating those cute little bunnies?

 

[ozso]

It's not the same person and it's not the same name. You think that if someone has a different middle name then it's an alias? Please don't treat me like an idiot. The second name doesn't appear in the court lists and the third name is also different. But of course, not using your middle name when looking to hide your identity is a brilliant ruse, bound to throw anyone off the track!

So the same exact face, but a different person. Sure.

 

[Bradskii]

So the same exact face, but a different person. Sure.

Your position is becoming desperate. It appears that you've painted yourself into a corner with your continued denial and now cannot back down. So be it.

 

[ozso]

You’re totally allowed to not support LGBTQQIP2SAA+ folk.
And we’re allowed to think less of you for your stance, why is that “unfair” to you?

And diagnose people with made up psychological conditions in the process?

 

[ozso]

Your position is becoming desperate. It appears that you've painted yourself into a corner with your continued denial and now cannot back down. So be it.

Same face, same person.